-
Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004)
0.03
0.029282015 = product of:
0.11712806 = sum of:
0.11712806 = sum of:
0.07319321 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07319321 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.3495657 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043934856 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
-
Avram, H.D.: Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC): 1961-1974 (2009)
0.03
0.029282015 = product of:
0.11712806 = sum of:
0.11712806 = sum of:
0.07319321 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07319321 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.3495657 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 3844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043934856 = score(doc=3844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3844)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The MARC Program of the Library of Congress, led during its formative years by the author of this entry, was a landmark in the history of automation. Technical procedures, standards, and formatting for the catalog record were experimented with and developed in modern form in this project. The project began when computers were mainframe, slow, and limited in storage. So little was known then about many aspects of automation of library information resources that the MARC project can be seen as a pioneering effort with immeasurable impact.
- Date
- 27. 8.2011 14:22:53
-
Studwell, W.E.: Format integration : the most invisible new major change in cataloging (1995)
0.02
0.020346032 = product of:
0.08138413 = sum of:
0.08138413 = weight(_text_:social in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08138413 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.44056937 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Behavioral and social sciences librarian. 14(1995) no.1, S.63-65
-
Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992)
0.02
0.016276827 = product of:
0.06510731 = sum of:
0.06510731 = weight(_text_:social in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06510731 = score(doc=8865,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards. It provides a summary of the fields in the format and considers the prospects for its implementation. The papaer describes an experiment currently being conducted at the Library of Congress to create USMARC classification records and use a classification database in classifying materials in the social sciences
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.01
0.013314273 = product of:
0.053257093 = sum of:
0.053257093 = product of:
0.106514186 = sum of:
0.106514186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106514186 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Tillett, B.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : theoretical and practical foundations (1995)
0.01
0.0130702155 = product of:
0.052280862 = sum of:
0.052280862 = product of:
0.104561724 = sum of:
0.104561724 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104561724 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.4993796 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The study covers the full range of functions for the bibliographic record in its widest sense. Discusses theoretical and practical aspects, methodology and the future
-
Miller, K.; Matthews, B.: Having the right connections : the LIMBER project (2001)
0.01
0.01220762 = product of:
0.04883048 = sum of:
0.04883048 = weight(_text_:social in 5933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04883048 = score(doc=5933,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 5933, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5933)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- As with any journey, you have to make the right connections if you want to reach your desired destination. The goal in the LIMBER project is to facilitate cross-European data analysis independent of domain, resource, language and vocabulary. The paper describes the expertise, associations, standards and architecture underlying the project deliverables designed to achieve the project's ambitious aims. - Limber (Language Independent Metadata Browsing of European Resources) is an EU (European Union) IST (Information Societies Technology) funded project that seeks to address the problems of linguistic and discipline boundaries, which, within a more integrated European environment, are becoming increasingly important. Decision-makers, researchers and journalists need to be provided with a broader, comparative picture of society across the continent; with the social science information often required to be correlated with information from domains such as environmental science, geography and health. This cross-discipline interoperability will be provided via a uniform metadata description. In addition, the provision of multilingual user interfaces and the controlled vocabulary of a multi-lingual thesaurus will make these datasets globally accessible in a range of end-user natural languages
-
Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000)
0.01
0.010983714 = product of:
0.043934856 = sum of:
0.043934856 = product of:
0.08786971 = sum of:
0.08786971 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08786971 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26. 8.2000 19:22:35
-
Weber, R.: "Functional requirements for bibliographic records" und Regelwerksentwicklung (2001)
0.01
0.010983714 = product of:
0.043934856 = sum of:
0.043934856 = product of:
0.08786971 = sum of:
0.08786971 = weight(_text_:22 in 6838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08786971 = score(doc=6838,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6838, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6838)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Dialog mit Bibliotheken. 13(2001) H.3, S.20-22
-
Parent, I.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : an Anglo-American perspective (1995)
0.01
0.010456172 = product of:
0.041824687 = sum of:
0.041824687 = product of:
0.083649375 = sum of:
0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083649375 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Presents a view on the work of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Study Group on behalf of the Anglo-American cataloguing tradition. The study is examining the fundamental aspects of record design using the entity-attribute-relationship model to link data elements to the function that a user can perform while accessing a bibliographic record. The data and functions are being linked by UNIMARC fields
-
Merwe, H.C.J. van der: SAMARC versus USMARC and UNIMARC : a position paper (1997)
0.01
0.010456172 = product of:
0.041824687 = sum of:
0.041824687 = product of:
0.083649375 = sum of:
0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083649375 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The original purpose of the MARC format was to specify the formatting of data to be exchanged electronically. Compares the SAMARC format with USMARC and UNIMARC, both well established and widely used in the International community, in terms of scope, updating mechanisms, completeness and the current status of the formats. Recommends conversion to USMARC given the fact that SAMARC is hampered by an inadequate infrastructure which makes it unresponsive to immediate needs and the UNIMARC is still being developed. Discusses the benefits and the negative aspects of converting to USMARC
-
Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996)
0.01
0.008876181 = product of:
0.035504725 = sum of:
0.035504725 = product of:
0.07100945 = sum of:
0.07100945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07100945 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 13. 1.2007 18:31:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
-
Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004)
0.01
0.008876181 = product of:
0.035504725 = sum of:
0.035504725 = product of:
0.07100945 = sum of:
0.07100945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07100945 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9.12.2005 19:22:38
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
-
Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996)
0.01
0.007845511 = product of:
0.031382043 = sum of:
0.031382043 = product of:
0.062764086 = sum of:
0.062764086 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062764086 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 9.1996 18:58:22
-
Hoffmann, L.: ¬Die Globalisierung macht vor der Katalogisierung nicht Halt : Mit AACR2 zum Global Player? (2003)
0.01
0.007845511 = product of:
0.031382043 = sum of:
0.031382043 = product of:
0.062764086 = sum of:
0.062764086 = weight(_text_:22 in 1544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062764086 = score(doc=1544,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1544, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1544)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 3.2016 12:15:46
-
McBride, J.L.: Faceted subject access for music through USMARC : a case for linked fields (2000)
0.01
0.007842129 = product of:
0.031368516 = sum of:
0.031368516 = product of:
0.06273703 = sum of:
0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06273703 = score(doc=5403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The USMARC Format for Bibliographic Description contains three fields (045, 047, and 048) designed to facilitate subject access to music materials. The fields cover three of the main aspects of subject description for music: date of composition, form or genre, and number of instruments or voices, respectively. The codes are rarely used for subject access, because of the difficulty of coding them and because false drops would result in retrieval of bibliographic records where more than one musical work is present, a situation that occurs frequently with sound recordings. It is proposed that the values of the fields be converted to natural language and that subfield 8 be used to link all access fields in a bibliographic record for greater precision in retrieval. This proposal has implications beyond music cataloging, especially for metadata and any bibliographic records describing materials containing many works and subjects.
-
Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995)
0.01
0.007766659 = product of:
0.031066636 = sum of:
0.031066636 = product of:
0.06213327 = sum of:
0.06213327 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06213327 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 11. 9.1996 19:22:20
- Source
- Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
-
Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 4.12.1995 22:40:20
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.01
0.006276408 = product of:
0.025105633 = sum of:
0.025105633 = product of:
0.050211266 = sum of:
0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050211266 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046325076 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
