Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

0.053466 = product of:
  0.106932 = sum of:
    0.06510731 = weight(_text_:social in 4075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06510731 = score(doc=4075,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 4075, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4075)
    0.041824687 = product of:
      0.083649375 = sum of:
        0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 4075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083649375 = score(doc=4075,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 4075, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4075)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Mass media / Social aspects
Telecommunication / Social aspects

Subject

Mass media / Social aspects
Telecommunication / Social aspects

0.020912344 = product of:
  0.083649375 = sum of:
    0.083649375 = product of:
      0.16729875 = sum of:
        0.16729875 = weight(_text_:aspects in 253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16729875 = score(doc=253,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.79900736 = fieldWeight in 253, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=253)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.014386819 = product of:
  0.057547275 = sum of:
    0.057547275 = weight(_text_:social in 1312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057547275 = score(doc=1312,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.3115296 = fieldWeight in 1312, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1312)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: VICKERY, B.C.: An approach to information science; HENRIKSEN, T.: Information science: towards consensus; HOEL, I.A.L.: On the concept of knowledge and its relation to information science; PRATT, A.D. Information and emmorphosis: an attempt at definition; BRITTAIN, J.M.: What are the distinctive characteristics of information science? MEY, M. de: The relevance of the cognitive paradigm for information science; BIVINS, K.T. Concept formation: the evidence from experimental psychology and linguistics and its relationship to information science; DEBONS, A.: Foundations of information science; WELLISCH, H.H.: The cybernetics of bibliographic control: toward a theory of document retrieval systems; FAIRTHORNE, R.A. Bradford's law and perspective; BROOKES, B.C.: People versus particles; GRIFFITHS, J.-M.: Alternative approaches to information retrieval system simulation; GOFFMAN, W.: On the effectiveness problem in communication; ROBERTSON, S.E.: Some recent theories and models in information retrieval; HEINE, M.H.: The 'question' as a fundamental variable in information science; PEJTERSEN, A.M.: Sesign of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication; and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies; INGWERSEN, P., T. JOHANSEN u. P. TIMMERMANN: User-librarian negotiations and search procedures: a progress report; KOCHEN, M.: Control of attention in raising consciousness about community issues; BELKIN, N.J.: The problem of 'matching' in information retrieval; WILSON, T.D.: Information system design implications of research into the information behavoiur of social workers and social administrators; NEVELING, U. u. G. WERSIG: The information scientist of the 1980s in Europe

0.013314273 = product of:
  0.053257093 = sum of:
    0.053257093 = product of:
      0.106514186 = sum of:
        0.106514186 = weight(_text_:22 in 670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106514186 = score(doc=670,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 670, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 7.2000 18:22:27

0.012552816 = product of:
  0.050211266 = sum of:
    0.050211266 = product of:
      0.10042253 = sum of:
        0.10042253 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10042253 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Reference librarian; no.22

0.006276408 = product of:
  0.025105633 = sum of:
    0.025105633 = product of:
      0.050211266 = sum of:
        0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050211266 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

7. 1.1996 22:47:52

0.005228086 = product of:
  0.020912344 = sum of:
    0.020912344 = product of:
      0.041824687 = sum of:
        0.041824687 = weight(_text_:aspects in 333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041824687 = score(doc=333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.19975184 = fieldWeight in 333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=333)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: ARNHEIM, R.: Stillstand in der Tätigkeit; MOTTE-HABER, H. de la: "Sie bildet regelnd jegliche Gestalt / und selbst im Großen ist es nicht Gewalt": Regelmaß und Einmaligkeit als ästhetische Prinzipien; PEITGEN. H.-O.: Symmetrie im Chaos: Selbstähnlichkeit in komplexen Systemen; HAKEN, H.: Die Rolle der Symmetrie in der Synergetik: spontane Entstehung von Strukturen in der Natur; THOM, R.: On the origin and stability of symmetries; GAZZANIGA, M.S.: Aspects of brain asymmetry; GOMBRICH, E.H.: Symmetrie, Wahrnehmung und künstlerische Gestaltung; OTTO, F.: Symmetrie zwischen Biologie und Architektur; HARGITTAI, I.: Real turned ideal through symmetry; VOGT, A.M.: Rotunde und Panorama: Steigerung der Symmetrie-Ansprüche seit Palladio; MICHEL, L.: Symmetry in physics; HOLENSTEIN, E.: Symmetrie und Symmetriebruch in der Sprache;

0.004707306 = product of:
  0.018829225 = sum of:
    0.018829225 = product of:
      0.03765845 = sum of:
        0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03765845 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

9. 1.1996 10:22:31

0.0032675539 = product of:
  0.0130702155 = sum of:
    0.0130702155 = product of:
      0.026140431 = sum of:
        0.026140431 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026140431 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.1248449 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Criteria for Selection In selecting the writings to be included in this reader, we have followed the criteria listed below: 1. Theoretical emphasis. Our focus is an theoretical and philosophical aspects rather than practical or technical considerations. In a number of cases, where several authors have written an the same subject or idea or expressed similar thoughts, the originator of the idea, if this could be determined, was selected. 2. Significance and impact. Our most important criterion is the significance of a particular piece or the contribution that it has made in the field of subject analysis. The impact of the ideas or concepts an subsequent practice in subject analysis has also been considered. 3. Perspicuity. Where multiple choices were available an a particular topic or area, our tendency was to exclude the writings that are obscure or highly technical and would require a high degree of tech nical sophistication an the part of the reader. Comprehensibility and clarity of style were often our guide. Based an the criteria stated above, the following types of writings have generally been excluded: review articles, the how-to-do-it type of writings, and textbook materials. In a way, it would probably be easier to defend the writings that have been included than to justify the exclusions. In a small volume containing writings chosen from a vast amount of available material, it is virtually impossible to arrive at a collection that will satisfy every reader. Each person has his or her own preferences or criteria. Inevitably, personal bias comes into play in assembling such a reader. At least, we hope that in this case the collective bias of three individuals rather than one has helped to provide a certain degree of balance. A number of writings originally selected for inclusion were omitted because of space limitation or failure to secure permission to reprint.