Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Studwell, W.E.: Format integration : the most invisible new major change in cataloging (1995) 0.02
    0.020346032 = product of:
      0.08138413 = sum of:
        0.08138413 = weight(_text_:social in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08138413 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.44056937 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Behavioral and social sciences librarian. 14(1995) no.1, S.63-65
  2. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992) 0.02
    0.016276827 = product of:
      0.06510731 = sum of:
        0.06510731 = weight(_text_:social in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06510731 = score(doc=8865,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards. It provides a summary of the fields in the format and considers the prospects for its implementation. The papaer describes an experiment currently being conducted at the Library of Congress to create USMARC classification records and use a classification database in classifying materials in the social sciences
  3. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01
    0.013314273 = product of:
      0.053257093 = sum of:
        0.053257093 = product of:
          0.106514186 = sum of:
            0.106514186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.106514186 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  4. Tillett, B.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : theoretical and practical foundations (1995) 0.01
    0.0130702155 = product of:
      0.052280862 = sum of:
        0.052280862 = product of:
          0.104561724 = sum of:
            0.104561724 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.104561724 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.4993796 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The study covers the full range of functions for the bibliographic record in its widest sense. Discusses theoretical and practical aspects, methodology and the future
  5. Parent, I.: IFLA study on functional requirements for bibliographic records : an Anglo-American perspective (1995) 0.01
    0.010456172 = product of:
      0.041824687 = sum of:
        0.041824687 = product of:
          0.083649375 = sum of:
            0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083649375 = score(doc=3080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 3080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a view on the work of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records Study Group on behalf of the Anglo-American cataloguing tradition. The study is examining the fundamental aspects of record design using the entity-attribute-relationship model to link data elements to the function that a user can perform while accessing a bibliographic record. The data and functions are being linked by UNIMARC fields
  6. Merwe, H.C.J. van der: SAMARC versus USMARC and UNIMARC : a position paper (1997) 0.01
    0.010456172 = product of:
      0.041824687 = sum of:
        0.041824687 = product of:
          0.083649375 = sum of:
            0.083649375 = weight(_text_:aspects in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083649375 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The original purpose of the MARC format was to specify the formatting of data to be exchanged electronically. Compares the SAMARC format with USMARC and UNIMARC, both well established and widely used in the International community, in terms of scope, updating mechanisms, completeness and the current status of the formats. Recommends conversion to USMARC given the fact that SAMARC is hampered by an inadequate infrastructure which makes it unresponsive to immediate needs and the UNIMARC is still being developed. Discusses the benefits and the negative aspects of converting to USMARC
  7. Byrne, D.J.: MARC manual : understanding and using MARC records (1998) 0.01
    0.009414612 = product of:
      0.03765845 = sum of:
        0.03765845 = product of:
          0.0753169 = sum of:
            0.0753169 = weight(_text_:22 in 6077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0753169 = score(doc=6077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    2. 8.2001 16:22:33
  8. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01
    0.008876181 = product of:
      0.035504725 = sum of:
        0.035504725 = product of:
          0.07100945 = sum of:
            0.07100945 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07100945 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  9. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01
    0.007845511 = product of:
      0.031382043 = sum of:
        0.031382043 = product of:
          0.062764086 = sum of:
            0.062764086 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062764086 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  10. Murphy, C.: Curriculum-enhanced MARC (CEMARC) : a new cataloging format for school librarians (1995) 0.01
    0.007766659 = product of:
      0.031066636 = sum of:
        0.031066636 = product of:
          0.06213327 = sum of:
            0.06213327 = weight(_text_:22 in 5100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06213327 = score(doc=5100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    11. 9.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Literacy: traditional, cultural, technological. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the International Association of School Librarianship (selected papers), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh University, School of Library and Information Science, 17-22 Jul 94
  11. Gopinath, M.A.: Standardization for resource sharing databases (1995) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=4414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    It is helpful and essential to adopt standards for bibliographic information, project description and institutional information which are shareable for access to information resources within a country. Describes a strategy for adopting international standards of bibliographic information exchange for developing a resource sharing facilitation database in India. A list of 22 ISO standards for information processing is included
  12. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  13. Mishra, K.S.: Bibliographic databases and exchange formats (1997) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    DESIDOC bulletin of information technology. 17(1997) no.5, S.17-22
  14. Radwanski, A.: Rozwoj formatu MARC (1996) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 3052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=3052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:34:37
  15. Weber, L.B.: Reading formatting MARC AMC (1990) 0.01
    0.006276408 = product of:
      0.025105633 = sum of:
        0.025105633 = product of:
          0.050211266 = sum of:
            0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050211266 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    8. 1.2007 14:22:51
  16. UNIMARC and CDS/ISIS : Proceedings of the Workshops held in Budapest, 21.-22. June 1993 and Barcelona, 26. August 1993 (1994) 0.01
    0.005491857 = product of:
      0.021967428 = sum of:
        0.021967428 = product of:
          0.043934856 = sum of:
            0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 8779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043934856 = score(doc=8779,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 8779, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8779)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Ranta, J.A.: Queens Borough Public Library's Guidelines for cataloging community information (1996) 0.01
    0.005491857 = product of:
      0.021967428 = sum of:
        0.021967428 = product of:
          0.043934856 = sum of:
            0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 6523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043934856 = score(doc=6523,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6523, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6523)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.51-69
  18. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.01
    0.005491857 = product of:
      0.021967428 = sum of:
        0.021967428 = product of:
          0.043934856 = sum of:
            0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043934856 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046325076 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22