Search (2232 results, page 1 of 112)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.23 
    0.23485142 = product of:
  0.31313524 = sum of:
    0.0735765 = product of:
      0.2207295 = sum of:
        0.2207295 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2207295 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2207295 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2207295 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.018829225 = product of:
      0.03765845 = sum of:
        0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03765845 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.20 
    0.196204 = product of:
  0.392408 = sum of:
    0.098102 = product of:
      0.294306 = sum of:
        0.294306 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.294306 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.294306 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.294306 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  3. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.17 
    0.17167851 = product of:
  0.34335703 = sum of:
    0.08583926 = product of:
      0.25751776 = sum of:
        0.25751776 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25751776 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.25751776 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25751776 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  4. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.15 
    0.147153 = product of:
  0.294306 = sum of:
    0.0735765 = product of:
      0.2207295 = sum of:
        0.2207295 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2207295 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2207295 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2207295 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  5. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.12 
    0.12262751 = product of:
  0.24525502 = sum of:
    0.061313756 = product of:
      0.18394126 = sum of:
        0.18394126 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18394126 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18394126 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18394126 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  6. Berman, Y.; Phillips, D.: Information and social quality (2001) 0.10 
    0.10315709 = product of:
  0.20631418 = sum of:
    0.16195239 = weight(_text_:social in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16195239 = score(doc=703,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.87672204 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
    0.04436178 = product of:
      0.08872356 = sum of:
        0.08872356 = weight(_text_:aspects in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08872356 = score(doc=703,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.42373765 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper introduces the concept of 'social quality' as a measure of quality-of-life and it sets out a framework for identifying social indicators of the relationship between information and social quality. Social quality has four elements: socio - economic security, social inclusion, social cohesion and empowerment. Illustrative indicators are identified at both national (Demos) and community (Ethnos) level for four different aspects of each social quality element: input, process, outcome and impact. Then the distribution of information and social quality between Demos and Ethnos levels is investigated. It is concluded that usable indicators of all aspects of each element of social quality can be identified and that analysis of informational social quality at Demos and Ethnos level can add to knowledge about information provision and policy, particularly with reference to minority and marginal communities.
  7. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.10 
    0.098102 = product of:
  0.196204 = sum of:
    0.049051 = product of:
      0.147153 = sum of:
        0.147153 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.147153 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.147153 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.147153 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3927445 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  8. Standards and their stories : how quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life (2009) 0.09 
    0.09451543 = product of:
  0.18903086 = sum of:
    0.11509455 = weight(_text_:social in 3358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11509455 = score(doc=3358,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6230592 = fieldWeight in 3358, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3358)
    0.073936306 = product of:
      0.14787261 = sum of:
        0.14787261 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14787261 = score(doc=3358,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.70622945 = fieldWeight in 3358, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3358)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Standardization / Social aspects
    Measurement / Social aspects
    Classification / Social aspects
    Standards / Social aspects
    Subject
    Standardization / Social aspects
    Measurement / Social aspects
    Classification / Social aspects
    Standards / Social aspects
  9. Palfrey, J.; Gasser, U.: Generation Internet : die Digital Natives: Wie sie leben - Was sie denken - Wie sie arbeiten (2008) 0.09 
    0.09260583 = product of:
  0.18521166 = sum of:
    0.11276917 = weight(_text_:social in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11276917 = score(doc=6056,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.6104709 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
    0.072442494 = product of:
      0.14488499 = sum of:
        0.14488499 = weight(_text_:aspects in 6056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14488499 = score(doc=6056,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.69196075 = fieldWeight in 6056, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6056)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Information society / Social aspects
    Information technology / Social aspects
    Technological innovations / Social aspects
    Internet / Social aspects
    Technology / Social aspects
    Digital media / Social aspects
    Subject
    Information society / Social aspects
    Information technology / Social aspects
    Technological innovations / Social aspects
    Internet / Social aspects
    Technology / Social aspects
    Digital media / Social aspects
  10. Yetim, F.: Universal Actability : Towards an integral understanding of universal usability, (intercultural) action competence, and information systems actability (2004) 0.09 
    0.09248619 = product of:
  0.18497238 = sum of:
    0.08457688 = weight(_text_:social in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08457688 = score(doc=377,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.45785317 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
    0.100395486 = sum of:
      0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06273703 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
      0.03765845 = weight(_text_:22 in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03765845 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046325076 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The approach to information systems actability emphasizes the social action character of information systems and its social context. It aims at a pragmatically and social sensitive approach to information systems. This paper extends the scope and focus of this approach by suggesting a research framework called universal actability. The research framework advocates for an integral understanding of universal usability, human communication and action competence, and information systems actability. To pursue this research objective, this paper focuses on the following aspects: It provides a critical review of the concepts of the previous research on information systems actability and suggests some extensions and revisions towards universal actability. In addition, it discusses several maxims for (intercultural) communications and their implications for the actors and systems. Finally, it reflects on the applicability of user modeling technology for modeling diversity in order to enhance actor's and system's actability across diverse contexts.
    Date
    22. 6.2007 13:31:31
  11. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.09 
    0.09021294 = product of:
  0.18042588 = sum of:
    0.13021462 = weight(_text_:social in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13021462 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.704911 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
    0.050211266 = product of:
      0.10042253 = sum of:
        0.10042253 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10042253 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
  12. Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008) 0.09 
    0.08807066 = product of:
  0.17614132 = sum of:
    0.13954473 = weight(_text_:social in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13954473 = score(doc=2294,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.75541914 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
    0.036596604 = product of:
      0.07319321 = sum of:
        0.07319321 = weight(_text_:aspects in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07319321 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.3495657 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  13. Cronin, J.: Social influences on quantum mechanics? : I (2001) 0.09 
    0.08788595 = product of:
  0.1757719 = sum of:
    0.13811345 = weight(_text_:social in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13811345 = score(doc=1994,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.747671 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
    0.03765845 = product of:
      0.0753169 = sum of:
        0.0753169 = weight(_text_:22 in 1994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0753169 = score(doc=1994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Graham, L.R.: Do mathematical equations display social attributes? in: Mathematical intelligencer 22(2000) no.3, S.31-36
  14. Lipschütz-Yevick, M.: Social influences on quantum mechanics? : II (2001) 0.09 
    0.08788595 = product of:
  0.1757719 = sum of:
    0.13811345 = weight(_text_:social in 6886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13811345 = score(doc=6886,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.747671 = fieldWeight in 6886, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6886)
    0.03765845 = product of:
      0.0753169 = sum of:
        0.0753169 = weight(_text_:22 in 6886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0753169 = score(doc=6886,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6886, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6886)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Graham, L.R.: Do mathematical equations display social attributes? in: Mathematical intelligencer 22(2000) no.3, S.31-36
  15. Blumauer, A.; Pellegrini, T.: Semantic Web Revisited : Eine kurze Einführung in das Social Semantic Web (2009) 0.08 
    0.080756076 = product of:
  0.16151215 = sum of:
    0.13954473 = weight(_text_:social in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13954473 = score(doc=4855,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.75541914 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
    0.021967428 = product of:
      0.043934856 = sum of:
        0.043934856 = weight(_text_:22 in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043934856 = score(doc=4855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Während in den vergangenen Monaten Themen wie Web 2.0 und Social Software ein erstaunliches Konjunkturhoch erlebt haben, vollzieht sich weitgehend abseits der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung eine technologische Komplementärinnovation. Die wachsende Adaption semantischer Technologien zu Zwecken der strukturierten Erschließung von "Web 2.0 Content", aber auch der Einsatz von Social Software zur kollaborativen Anreicherung von Web Content mit maschinenlesbaren Metadaten sind Ausdruck eines Trends in Richtung "Social Semantic Web". Bezeichnendes Merkmal dieser Entwicklung ist die voranschreitende Konvergenz zwischen Social Software und Semantic Web Technologien. Dieser Beitrag hat das Ziel ein allgemeines Bewusstsein und Verständnis dieser Entwicklung zu schaffen und nähert sich dem Phänomen aus einer nichttechnischen Perspektive.
    Pages
    S.3-22
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  16. Andrew Keenan, A.; Shiri, A.: Sociability and social interaction on social networking websites (2009) 0.08 
    0.08055038 = product of:
  0.16110076 = sum of:
    0.13496032 = weight(_text_:social in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13496032 = score(doc=3630,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.73060167 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
    0.026140431 = product of:
      0.052280862 = sum of:
        0.052280862 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052280862 = score(doc=3630,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.2496898 = fieldWeight in 3630, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Social websites have become a major medium for social interaction. From Facebook to MySpace to emergent sites like Twitter, social websites are increasing exponentially in user numbers and unique visits every day. How do these websites encourage sociability? What features or design practices enable users to socialize with other users? The purpose of this paper is to explore sociability on the social web and details how different social websites encourage their users to interact. Design/methodology/approach - Four social websites (Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn and Twitter) were examined from a user study perspective. After thoroughly participating on the websites, a series of observations were recorded from each experience. These experiences were then compared to understand the different approaches of each website. Findings - Social websites use a number of different approaches to encourage sociability amongst their users. Facebook promotes privacy and representing "real world" networks in web environment, while MySpace promotes publicity and representing both real world and virtual networks in a web environment. Niche websites like LinkedIn and Twitter focus on more specific aspects of community and technology, respectively. Originality/value - A comparison of different models of sociability does not yet exist. This study focuses specifically on what makes social websites "social."
  17. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Zhang, Z.; Foo, S.; Yan, E.; George, N.L.; Guo, L.: Perspectives on social tagging (2009) 0.08 
    0.080280915 = product of:
  0.16056183 = sum of:
    0.1291933 = weight(_text_:social in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1291933 = score(doc=3290,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.69938225 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
    0.031368516 = product of:
      0.06273703 = sum of:
        0.06273703 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06273703 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Social tagging is one of the major phenomena transforming the World Wide Web from a static platform into an actively shared information space. This paper addresses various aspects of social tagging, including different views on the nature of social tagging, how to make use of social tags, and how to bridge social tagging with other Web functionalities; it discusses the use of facets to facilitate browsing and searching of tagging data; and it presents an analogy between bibliometrics and tagometrics, arguing that established bibliometric methodologies can be applied to analyze tagging behavior on the Web. Based on the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO), a Web crawler was built to harvest tag data from Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube in September 2007. In total, 1.8 million objects, including bookmarks, photos, and videos, 3.1 million taggers, and 12.1 million tags were collected and analyzed. Some tagging patterns and variations are identified and discussed.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  18. Song, F.W.: Virtual communities : bowling alone, online together (2009) 0.08 
    0.07997098 = product of:
  0.15994196 = sum of:
    0.10766109 = weight(_text_:social in 3287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10766109 = score(doc=3287,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.5828185 = fieldWeight in 3287, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3287)
    0.052280862 = product of:
      0.104561724 = sum of:
        0.104561724 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.104561724 = score(doc=3287,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20938325 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.4993796 = fieldWeight in 3287, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3287)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Does contemporary Internet technology strengthen civic engagement and democratic practice? The recent surge in online community participation has become a cultural phenomenon enmeshed in ongoing debates about the health of American civil society. But observations about online communities often concentrate on ascertaining the true nature of community and democracy, typically rehearsing familiar communitarian and liberal perspectives. This book seeks to understand the technology on its own terms, focusing on how the technological and organizational configurations of online communities frame our contemporary beliefs and assumptions about community and the individual. It analyzes key structural features of thirty award-winning online community websites to show that while the values of individual autonomy, egalitarianism, and freedom of speech dominate the discursive content of these communities, the practical realities of online life are clearly marked by exclusivity and the demands of commercialization and corporate surveillance. Promises of social empowerment are framed within consumer and therapeutic frameworks that undermine their democratic efficacy. As a result, online communities fail to revolutionize the civic landscape because they create cultures of membership that epitomize the commodification of community and public life altogether.
    COMPASS
    Online social networks
    Internet / Social aspects
    Information technology / Social aspects
    Subject
    Online social networks
    Internet / Social aspects
    Information technology / Social aspects
  19. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.08 
    0.07766013 = product of:
  0.15532026 = sum of:
    0.13021462 = weight(_text_:social in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13021462 = score(doc=2882,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.704911 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
    0.025105633 = product of:
      0.050211266 = sum of:
        0.050211266 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050211266 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Beitrag der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen.
    Pages
    S.15-22
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
    Theme
    Social tagging
  20. Harris, M.: Contexts of justification (2001) 0.08 
    0.075459026 = product of:
  0.15091805 = sum of:
    0.09766096 = weight(_text_:social in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09766096 = score(doc=5647,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1847249 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046325076 = queryNorm
        0.52868325 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
    0.053257093 = product of:
      0.106514186 = sum of:
        0.106514186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.106514186 = score(doc=5647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16222252 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046325076 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Erwiderung auf: Graham, L.R.: Do mathematical equations display social attributes? in: Mathematical intelligencer 22(2000) no.3, S.31-36
    Source
    Mathematical intelligencer. 23(2001) no.1, S.18-22

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1844
  • m 274
  • el 112
  • s 106
  • b 28
  • x 22
  • i 9
  • r 5
  • n 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications