-
Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971)
0.04
0.039571285 = product of:
0.059356924 = sum of:
0.017754659 = weight(_text_:in in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017754659 = score(doc=3904,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.041602265 = product of:
0.08320453 = sum of:
0.08320453 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08320453 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.03
0.029649397 = product of:
0.044474095 = sum of:
0.016739251 = weight(_text_:in in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016739251 = score(doc=3726,freq=8.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.027734846 = product of:
0.05546969 = sum of:
0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05546969 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Ausgehend von der Notwendigkeit, das Wissen der Wissensorganisation in ihren Wissenseinheiten (Begriffen) zu erfassen, wird auf Vorgängerarbeiten (E.Wüster, F.Riggs) hingewiesen. Für die notwendigen Arbeiten wird der noematische Wissensbegriff herangezogen und es wird gezeigt, wie begriffsanalytisch (merkmalsbezogen und durch Merkmale auch systembildend) an eine mögliche Begriffsarbeit herangegangen werden sollte. Die sieben notwendigen Schritte hierzu werden erläutert.
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.11
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.02
0.024118079 = product of:
0.036177117 = sum of:
0.015375986 = weight(_text_:in in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015375986 = score(doc=3060,freq=12.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.020801133 = product of:
0.041602265 = sum of:
0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041602265 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Alon Friedman und Richard P. Smiraglia kündigen in ihrem aktuellen Artikel "Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization" an, eine "empirical demonstration of how the domain [of knowledge organisation] itself understands the meaning of a concept" durchzuführen. Die Klärung des Konzeptbegriffs ist ein begrüßenswertes Vorhaben, das die Autoren in einer empirischen Untersuchung von concept maps (also Konzeptdiagrammen) aus dem Bereich der Wissensorganisation nachvollziehen wollen. Beschränkte sich Friedman 2011 in seinem Artikel "Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization" [Fn 01] noch ausschließlich auf Sprache als Medium im Zeichenprozess, bezieht er sich nun auf Visualisierungen als Repräsentationsform und scheint somit seinen Ansatz um den Aspekt der Bildlichkeit zu erweitern. Zumindest erwartet man dies nach der Lektüre der Beschreibung des aktuellen Vorhabens von Friedman und Smiraglia, das - wie die Autoren verkünden - auf einer semiotischen Grundlage durchgeführt worden sei.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.libreas.eu/09treude.htm. Bezug zu: Alon Friedman, Richard P. Smiraglia, (2013): Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization. In: Journal of Documentation, Vol. 69/1, S.27-48.
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.02
0.02201822 = product of:
0.03302733 = sum of:
0.015693048 = weight(_text_:in in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015693048 = score(doc=5588,freq=18.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.017334279 = product of:
0.034668557 = sum of:
0.034668557 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034668557 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'Gender Issues in Information Needs and Services'.
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
-
Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006)
0.02
0.021060942 = product of:
0.03159141 = sum of:
0.0073234225 = weight(_text_:in in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0073234225 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.10520181 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
0.02426799 = product of:
0.04853598 = sum of:
0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04853598 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Pages
- S.22-33
- Series
- Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.9
-
Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012)
0.02
0.020782834 = product of:
0.03117425 = sum of:
0.01383997 = weight(_text_:in in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01383997 = score(doc=33,freq=14.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.017334279 = product of:
0.034668557 = sum of:
0.034668557 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034668557 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The concept of concept has seldom been examined in its entirety, and the term very seldom defined. The rigidity, or lack thereof, and the homogeneity, or lack thereof, of concepts, are only two of their characteristics that have been debated. These issues are reviewed in this paper, namely: 1) does a concept represent its referent(s), or is it a free creation of the mind?; 2) can a concept be analyzed in parts or elements?; 3) must a concept be general, i.e., refer to a category or a type, or can it refer to a single object, physical or mental?; 4) are concepts as clearly delimited as terms are? Are concepts voiceless terms?; and, 5) what do terms contribute to an individual's and a community's conceptual richness? As regards the relationship of concepts with their referents in the stage of formation, it seems reasonable to conclude that said relationship may be close in some concepts, less close in others, and lacking altogether in some cases. The set of elements of a concept, which varies from individual to individual and across time inside the same individual, is called the intension of a concept. The set of referents of a concept is called the extension of that concept. Most concepts don't have a clearly delimited extension: their referents form a fuzzy set. The aspects of a concept's intension form a scale of generality. A concept is not equal to the term that describes it; rather, many terms are joined to concepts. Language, therefore, renders a gamut of services to the development, consolidation, and communication of conceptual richness.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:11:25
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.02
0.020782834 = product of:
0.03117425 = sum of:
0.01383997 = weight(_text_:in in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01383997 = score(doc=1440,freq=14.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.017334279 = product of:
0.034668557 = sum of:
0.034668557 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034668557 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The aim of this paper is to analyze the Gottlob Frege's (1848-1925) theory of definition as a tool for knowledge organization. The objective was achieved by discussing the theory of definition including: the aims of definition, kinds of definition, condition of correct definition, what is undefinable. Frege indicated the following aims of a defining: (1) to introduce a new word, which has had no precise meaning until then (2) to explain the meaning of a word; (3) to catch a thought. We would like to present three kinds of definitions used by Frege: a contextual definition, a stipulative definition and a piecemeal definition. In the history of theory of definition Frege was the first to have formulated the condition of a correct definition. According to Frege not everything can be defined, what is logically simple cannot have a proper definition Usability of Frege's theory of definition is referred in the case study. Definitions that serve as an example are definitions of 'context'. The term 'context' is used in different situations and meanings in the field of knowledge organization. The paper is rounded by a discussion of how Frege's theory of definition can be useful for knowledge organization. To present G. Frege's theory of definition in view of the need for knowledge organization we shall start with different ranges of knowledge organization.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002)
0.02
0.019354125 = product of:
0.029031187 = sum of:
0.011696909 = weight(_text_:in in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011696909 = score(doc=1204,freq=10.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.017334279 = product of:
0.034668557 = sum of:
0.034668557 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034668557 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A main goal of recent studies in semantics is to integrate into conceptual structures the models of representation used in linguistics, logic, and/or artificial intelligence. A fundamental problem resides in the need to structure knowledge and then to check the validity of constructed representations. We propose associating logical properties with relationships by introducing the relationships into a typed and functional system of specifcations. This makes it possible to compare conceptual representations against the relationships established between the concepts. The mandatory condition to validate such a conceptual representation is consistency. The semantic system proposed is based an a structured set of semantic primitives-types, relations, and properties-based an a global model of language processing, Applicative and Cognitive Grammar (ACG) (Desc16s, 1990), and an extension of this model to terminology (Jouis & Mustafa 1995, 1996, 1997). The ACG postulates three levels of representation of languages, including a cognitive level. At this level, the meanings of lexical predicates are represented by semantic cognitive schemes. From this perspective, we propose a set of semantic concepts, which defines an organized system of meanings. Relations are part of a specification network based an a general terminological scheure (i.e., a coherent system of meanings of relations). In such a system, a specific relation may be characterized as to its: (1) functional type (the semantic type of arguments of the relation); (2) algebraic properties (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, etc.); and (3) combinatorial relations with other entities in the same context (for instance, the part of the text where a concept is defined).
- Date
- 1.12.2002 11:12:22
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.02
0.01617866 = product of:
0.04853598 = sum of:
0.04853598 = product of:
0.09707196 = sum of:
0.09707196 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09707196 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Mental images in human cognition (1991)
0.01
0.008456361 = product of:
0.025369082 = sum of:
0.025369082 = weight(_text_:in in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025369082 = score(doc=4085,freq=6.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.3644298 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Library quarterly 63(1993) no.1, S.108-110.
- Series
- Advances in psychology; no.80
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.01
0.00808933 = product of:
0.02426799 = sum of:
0.02426799 = product of:
0.04853598 = sum of:
0.04853598 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04853598 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
-
Wilbert, R.: Assoziative Begriffsrepräsentation in neuronalen Netzwerken : Zur Problematik eines assoziativen Zugriffs in Information Retrieval Systemen (1991)
0.01
0.00789096 = product of:
0.023672879 = sum of:
0.023672879 = weight(_text_:in in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023672879 = score(doc=479,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.34006363 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Kageura, K.: Terminological semantics : an examination of 'concept' and 'meaning' in the study of terms (1995)
0.01
0.00789096 = product of:
0.023672879 = sum of:
0.023672879 = weight(_text_:in in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023672879 = score(doc=4561,freq=16.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.34006363 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The importance of 'concept' in the study of terms is recognized by most researchers in the field of terminological research. However, the theoretical status of 'concept' in the study of terms has not been clarified so far. Against this background, the status of 'concept' in the study of terms is theoretically examined in comparison with the status of 'meaning' in the semantic study of general languages. Sketches a possible scheme by which 'concept' and 'meaning' are properly plyced in the theoretical study of terms
-
Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967)
0.01
0.0077979392 = product of:
0.023393817 = sum of:
0.023393817 = weight(_text_:in in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023393817 = score(doc=1194,freq=10.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
- Source
- Studies in southwestern ethnolinguistics. Eds.: D. Hymes u. W.E. Bittle
-
¬The role of formal ontology in the information technology (1995)
0.01
0.0069746887 = product of:
0.020924065 = sum of:
0.020924065 = weight(_text_:in in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020924065 = score(doc=4746,freq=8.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.30057663 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A special issue devoted to the role of formal ontology in information technology. Papers were given at the International Workshop on Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation, held in Padova, Iatly, Mar 95
-
Principles of semantic networks : explorations in the representation of knowledge (1991)
0.01
0.0069746887 = product of:
0.020924065 = sum of:
0.020924065 = weight(_text_:in in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020924065 = score(doc=1677,freq=8.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.30057663 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Enthält 3 thematische Sektionen: (1) Issues in knowledge representation; (2) formal analyses; (3) systems for knowledge representation
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization. 20(1993) no.1, S.60-61 (O. Sechser)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Jorna, R.J.: Knowledge representation and symbols in the mind : an analysis in cognitive psychology (1990)
0.01
0.00690459 = product of:
0.020713769 = sum of:
0.020713769 = weight(_text_:in in 7305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020713769 = score(doc=7305,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 7305, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7305)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Suchanek, A.: Zur Problemkultur in den Sozialwissenschaften (1996)
0.01
0.00690459 = product of:
0.020713769 = sum of:
0.020713769 = weight(_text_:in in 3938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020713769 = score(doc=3938,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 3938, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3938)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen?
-
Thiel, C.: ¬Der klassische und der moderne Begriff des Begriffs : Gedanken zur Geschichte der Begriffsbildung in den exakten Wissenschaften (1994)
0.01
0.0062869 = product of:
0.0188607 = sum of:
0.0188607 = weight(_text_:in in 7868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0188607 = score(doc=7868,freq=26.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.27093613 = fieldWeight in 7868, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7868)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Up to the present day, difficulties have confronted all attempts at establishing a theory of concepts that would comprise the various kinds of concept-formation in the disciplines of the spectrum of sciences. Not a few philosophical dictionaries, under the entry 'concept', still offer doctrinies which were current far back in the history of philosophy and have little in coomon with concept-formations in the sciences today. The paper aims at an improvement in this situation. After a sketch of the 'classical' notion of concept, already developed in antiquity (essentially a logic of 'classification', although 'class-formation' in tis present understanding had not yet been conceived), the canonical modern doctrine of concepts is outlined. With an eye to application in the exact sciences, it is shown how in the nineteenth century the view of concept as an additive complex of characteristics yields to a functional approach systematized, in the last quarter of the century, by classical quantificational logic. Almost simultaneously, Mach, Frege, Peano, Weyl and others set out to shape the modern theory of abstraction. It is these two theories that today permit philosophers of science not only to deal with functional processes of concept-formation but also to represent in a formally coorect manner metalinguistic propositions about concepts and their properties. Thus it seems that the fundamental tasks of a modern theory of concept have finally been taken care of
- Series
- Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization
-
Fellbaum, C.: On the semantics of troponymy (2002)
0.01
0.0059795505 = product of:
0.017938651 = sum of:
0.017938651 = weight(_text_:in in 1191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017938651 = score(doc=1191,freq=12.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 1191, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1191)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The principal relation linking verbs in a semantic network is the manner relation (or "troponymy"). We examine the nature of troponymy across different semantic domains and verb classes in an attempt to arrive at a more subtle understanding of this intuitive relation. Troponymy is not a semantically homogeneous relation; rather, it is polysemous and encompasses distinct sub-relations. We identify and discuss Manner, Function, and Result. Furthermore, different kinds of troponyms differ from their semantically less elaborated superordinates in their syntactic behavior. In some cases, troponyms exhibit a wider range of syntactic altemations; in other cases, the troponyms are more restricted in their argument-projecting properties.
