-
Shewale, N.G.: Information delivery of full-text databases in academic and research libraries using hypermedia (1998)
0.06
0.0552224 = product of:
0.082833596 = sum of:
0.020713769 = weight(_text_:in in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020713769 = score(doc=3566,freq=16.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
0.062119827 = product of:
0.12423965 = sum of:
0.12423965 = weight(_text_:education in 3566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12423965 = score(doc=3566,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.51529247 = fieldWeight in 3566, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3566)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the introduction of hypermedia in information delivery and its advantages. Describes the special features in the design of full text databases and steps in developing in-house hypermedia databases. It may not be the job of the library professionals to design and develop the hypermedia system for information retrieval, but their ideas and experience will play an important role
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 5th National Convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), at Bhubaneswar, 4-5 March 1998
- Source
- Information management in academic and research libraries: Proceedings of the 5th National convention for Automation of Libraries in Education and Research (CALIBER-98), Bhubaneswar, India, 4-5 March 1998. Ed. by M. Mahapatra et al
-
Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2017)
0.03
0.033068217 = product of:
0.049602322 = sum of:
0.0052310163 = weight(_text_:in in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052310163 = score(doc=3868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
0.044371307 = product of:
0.088742614 = sum of:
0.088742614 = weight(_text_:education in 3868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088742614 = score(doc=3868,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.36806607 = fieldWeight in 3868, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3868)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This paper reports on an analysis of the loss levels that would result if a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI), were missing the subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by its professional indexers, employing the methodology developed by Gross and Taylor (2005), and later by Gross et al. (2015). The results indicate that AEI users would lose a similar proportion of hits per query to that experienced by library catalog users: on average, 27% of the resources found by a sample of keyword queries on the AEI database would not have been found without the subject indexing, based on the Australian Thesaurus of Education Descriptors (ATED). The paper also discusses the methodological limitations of these studies, pointing out that real-life users might still find some of the resources missed by a particular query through follow-up searches, while additional resources might also be found through iterative searching on the subject vocabulary. The paper goes on to describe a new research design, based on a before - and - after experiment, which addresses some of these limitations. It is argued that this alternative design will provide a more realistic picture of the value that professionally assigned subject indexing and controlled subject vocabularies can add to literature searching of a more scholarly and thorough kind.
- Content
- Beitrag bei: NASKO 2017: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities. The sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2017), June 15-16, 2017, in Champaign, IL, USA.
-
Zillmann, H.: OSIRIS und eLib : Information Retrieval und Search Engines in Full-text Databases (2001)
0.03
0.02815431 = product of:
0.042231463 = sum of:
0.014496619 = weight(_text_:in in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014496619 = score(doc=5937,freq=6.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.027734846 = product of:
0.05546969 = sum of:
0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 5937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05546969 = score(doc=5937,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5937, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5937)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- OSIRIS und ELIB sind von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) und dem Niedersächsischen Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur (MWK) geförderte Projekte an der Universität Osnabrück. Sie beschäftigen sich mit intuitiv-natürlichsprachlichen Retrievalsystemen und mit Fragen der Indexierung großer Volltexdatenbanken in dieser Technik. Die Entwicklungen haben dazu geführt, daß an sich aufwendige und komplexe Verfahren der syntaktisch-semantischen Analyse und Bewertung von textuellen Phrasen in relationale Datenbanken für Massendaten eingebettet werden konnten und nun im Produktionsbetrieb eingesetzt werden können
- Date
- 14. 6.2001 12:22:31
-
Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993)
0.03
0.026380857 = product of:
0.039571285 = sum of:
0.011836439 = weight(_text_:in in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011836439 = score(doc=7701,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.027734846 = product of:
0.05546969 = sum of:
0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05546969 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
- Date
- 23. 1.1999 19:22:09
-
Reinisch, F.: Wer suchet - der findet? : oder Die Überwindung der sprachlichen Grenzen bei der Suche in Volltextdatenbanken (2000)
0.03
0.026380857 = product of:
0.039571285 = sum of:
0.011836439 = weight(_text_:in in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011836439 = score(doc=4919,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.027734846 = product of:
0.05546969 = sum of:
0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05546969 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 17:48:06
- Source
- Dokumente und Datenbanken in elektronischen Netzen: Tagungsberichte vom 6. und 7. Österreichischen Online-Informationstreffen bzw. vom 7. und 8. Österreichischen Dokumentartag, Schloß Seggau, Seggauberg bei Leibnitz, 26.-29. September 1995, Congresszentrum Igls bei Innsbruck, 21.-24. Oktober 1997. Hrsg.: E. Pipp
-
Hider, P.: ¬The search value added by professional indexing to a bibliographic database (2018)
0.03
0.025848685 = product of:
0.038773026 = sum of:
0.007397774 = weight(_text_:in in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007397774 = score(doc=4300,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.03137525 = product of:
0.0627505 = sum of:
0.0627505 = weight(_text_:education in 4300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0627505 = score(doc=4300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.260262 = fieldWeight in 4300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4300)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Gross et al. (2015) have demonstrated that about a quarter of hits would typically be lost to keyword searchers if contemporary academic library catalogs dropped their controlled subject headings. This article reports on an investigation of the search value that subject descriptors and identifiers assigned by professional indexers add to a bibliographic database, namely the Australian Education Index (AEI). First, a similar methodology to that developed by Gross et al. (2015) was applied, with keyword searches representing a range of educational topics run on the AEI database with and without its subject indexing. The results indicated that AEI users would also lose, on average, about a quarter of hits per query. Second, an alternative research design was applied in which an experienced literature searcher was asked to find resources on a set of educational topics on an AEI database stripped of its subject indexing and then asked to search for additional resources on the same topics after the subject indexing had been reinserted. In this study, the proportion of additional resources that would have been lost had it not been for the subject indexing was again found to be about a quarter of the total resources found for each topic, on average.
-
Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989)
0.02
0.019785643 = product of:
0.029678462 = sum of:
0.0088773295 = weight(_text_:in in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0088773295 = score(doc=3564,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.020801133 = product of:
0.041602265 = sum of:
0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041602265 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
- Date
- 9. 1.1996 10:22:31
-
Dambeck, H.; Engler, T.: Gesucht und gefunden : Neun Volltext-Suchprogramme für den Desktop (2002)
0.01
0.009244949 = product of:
0.027734846 = sum of:
0.027734846 = product of:
0.05546969 = sum of:
0.05546969 = weight(_text_:22 in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05546969 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- c't. 2002, H.22, S.190-197
-
Ashford, J.H.; Matkin, D.I.: Studies in the application of free text package systems for information storage and retrieval in libraries and related information centres (1982)
0.01
0.008456361 = product of:
0.025369082 = sum of:
0.025369082 = weight(_text_:in in 1351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025369082 = score(doc=1351,freq=6.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.3644298 = fieldWeight in 1351, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1351)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- Case studies in library automation; no.1
-
Free text in information systems: capabilities and limitations (1985)
0.01
0.0083696265 = product of:
0.025108878 = sum of:
0.025108878 = weight(_text_:in in 2045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025108878 = score(doc=2045,freq=8.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.36069193 = fieldWeight in 2045, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2045)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Diese Empfehlungen liegen auch in deutscher Übersetzung vor (abgedruckt ebenfalls in International classification), leider ist die Übersetzung nicht in allen Aussagen recht gelungen, so daß das Original vorzuziehen ist
-
Kristensen, J.; Järvelin, K.: ¬The effectiveness of a searching thesaurus in free-text searching in a full-text database (1990)
0.01
0.00789096 = product of:
0.023672879 = sum of:
0.023672879 = weight(_text_:in in 2043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023672879 = score(doc=2043,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.34006363 = fieldWeight in 2043, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2043)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Mallinson, P.: Developments in free text retrieval systems (1993)
0.01
0.0077979392 = product of:
0.023393817 = sum of:
0.023393817 = weight(_text_:in in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023393817 = score(doc=4931,freq=10.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes a typical traditional 1989 free text system and discusses developments in data storage, in search strategy and in the storage and retrieval of real time data. Outlines the following areas in which free text systems are likely to develop: standards; integration; dynamic data exchange; improved user interfaces; and better retrieval methods
-
Freitext in Informationssystemen (1985)
0.01
0.0072483094 = product of:
0.021744927 = sum of:
0.021744927 = weight(_text_:in in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021744927 = score(doc=2036,freq=6.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.3123684 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Deutsche Fassung von 'Free text in information systems' in: International classification 12(1985) H.2, S.95-98. Wegen einiger Ungereimtheiten sollte die englische Fassung benutzt werden
-
Tenopir, C.; Ro, J.S.: Full text databases (1990)
0.01
0.00690459 = product of:
0.020713769 = sum of:
0.020713769 = weight(_text_:in in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020713769 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Information technology and libraries. 10(1991) S.156-157 (E. Kanter)
- Series
- New directions in information management; 21
-
Warner, A.J.: ¬The role of linguistic analysis in full-text retrieval (1994)
0.01
0.00690459 = product of:
0.020713769 = sum of:
0.020713769 = weight(_text_:in in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020713769 = score(doc=2992,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Challenges in indexing electronic text and images. Ed.: R. Fidel et al
-
Poler, E.M.: Overcoming limitations in database searches (1992)
0.01
0.0060402583 = product of:
0.018120775 = sum of:
0.018120775 = weight(_text_:in in 2329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018120775 = score(doc=2329,freq=6.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.260307 = fieldWeight in 2329, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2329)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the advantages of full text databases and full text searching, particularly in the context of law databases, the drawbacks to such searching in terms of recall, precision and errors, and methods of overcoming some of these problems
-
Marcus, J.: ¬The full text ideal (1995)
0.01
0.0060402583 = product of:
0.018120775 = sum of:
0.018120775 = weight(_text_:in in 4086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018120775 = score(doc=4086,freq=6.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.260307 = fieldWeight in 4086, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4086)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews developments in full text databases in 1995. Numbers of full text databases have increased by 12%. Consumer services are offering more full text databases, as is the Internet. News feeds are increasingly being offered to corporate users. Contemplates the ideal information service and how full text databases could evolve in this environment
-
Tauchert, W.; Hospodarsky, J.; Krause, J.; Schneider, C.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Effects of linguistic functions on information retrieval in a German language full-text database : comparison between retrieval in abstract and full text (1991)
0.01
0.0059182197 = product of:
0.017754659 = sum of:
0.017754659 = weight(_text_:in in 465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017754659 = score(doc=465,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 465, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=465)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
McDonald, J.; Ghaphery, J.: Do we have this in full-text? : providing access to content in full-text aggregated databases (2000)
0.01
0.0059182197 = product of:
0.017754659 = sum of:
0.017754659 = weight(_text_:in in 8287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017754659 = score(doc=8287,freq=4.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 8287, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8287)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Sieverts, E.G.; Hofstede, M.; Groeniger, B.O.: Software for information storage and retrieval tested, evaluated and compared : pt.4: indexing and full-text retrieval programs (1992)
0.01
0.0059182197 = product of:
0.017754659 = sum of:
0.017754659 = weight(_text_:in in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017754659 = score(doc=2051,freq=16.0), product of:
0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.051176514 = queryNorm
0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this article, the fourth in a series on microcomputer software for information storage and retrieval, test results of six indexing and full-text retrieval programs are presented and various properties and qualities of these programs are discussed. The common faeture of programs in these categories is that they are primarily meant to retrieve words (or combination of them) in large text files. To do this they either simply index existing text files in one or more formats (indexing programs), or they store and index them in their own database format (full-text retrieval programs). The programs reviewed in this issue are the indexing programs Ask-it, Texplore and ZYindex and the full-text retrieval programs KAware, textMaster and WordCruncher. All programs run under MS-DOS. In addition ZYindex has a Windows and a Unix version and TextMaster is also available for for Unix. For each of the six programs almost 100 facts and test results are tabulated. The programs are also discussed individually
