Search (1722 results, page 1 of 87)

0.10017689 = product of:
  0.15026534 = sum of:
    0.1354698 = product of:
      0.40640935 = sum of:
        0.40640935 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40640935 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43387505 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.014795548 = weight(_text_:in in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014795548 = score(doc=1826,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Präsentation anlässlich: European Conference on Data Analysis (ECDA 2014) in Bremen, Germany, July 2nd to 4th 2014, LIS-Workshop.

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.09677942 = product of:
  0.14516912 = sum of:
    0.007397774 = weight(_text_:in in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007397774 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
    0.13777135 = sum of:
      0.088742614 = weight(_text_:education in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.088742614 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051176514 = queryNorm
          0.36806607 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.049028743 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049028743 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051176514 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.

0.087292776 = product of:
  0.13093916 = sum of:
    0.014036291 = weight(_text_:in in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014036291 = score(doc=2248,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.20163295 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
    0.11690286 = sum of:
      0.0753006 = weight(_text_:education in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0753006 = score(doc=2248,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051176514 = queryNorm
          0.3123144 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
      0.041602265 = weight(_text_:22 in 2248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041602265 = score(doc=2248,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051176514 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2248, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2248)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Das Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education wurde im Januar 2016 vom Vorstand der Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) beschlossen. Es beruht auf der Idee von "Threshold Concepts" und sieht Informationskompetenz in einem engen Zusammenhang mit Wissenschaft und Forschung. Dadurch legt es bei der Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz eine starke Betonung auf das "Warum", nicht nur auf das "Was". Der Ansatz des Framework wird vielfach kontrovers diskutiert. Bietet er tatsächlich eine neue Sichtweise auf die Förderung von Informationskompetenz oder ist er überwiegend alter Wein in neuen Schläuchen? Kann das Framework neue Impulse für die Aktivitäten an den Bibliotheken in Deutschland setzen oder beschreibt es etwas, was wir längst machen? Der Beitrag versucht, Anregungen zu geben, welche Konsequenzen das Framework für unsere Kurse haben kann und welche veränderten Lernziele mit ihm verbunden sein können. Dabei plädiert er für ein umfassendes Verständnis von Informationskompetenz, das sich nicht auf Einzelaspekte wie Recherchekompetenz beschränkt.

Footnote

Vortrag anlässlich des Bibliothekartages 2017 in Frankfurt.

Source

o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.4, S.22-29

0.07783031 = product of:
  0.11674546 = sum of:
    0.10837583 = product of:
      0.32512748 = sum of:
        0.32512748 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32512748 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43387505 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.008369626 = weight(_text_:in in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008369626 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

0.06337407 = product of:
  0.0950611 = sum of:
    0.010872464 = weight(_text_:in in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010872464 = score(doc=1158,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
    0.08418864 = product of:
      0.16837728 = sum of:
        0.16837728 = weight(_text_:education in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16837728 = score(doc=1158,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.6983563 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This article builds on work in the past few years, triggered by Ticer course and consulting activities, notably for the Dutch Open University and the Amsterdam University for Professional Education. It attempts to identify strategic issues for libraries wishing to pursue a more active policy with regard to the changes affecting higher education due to the increased use of information and communication technologies (ICT). The article starts out by sketching the changes currently occurring in education. A study of the literature, carried out while preparing a new strategic plan for the libraries of Amsterdam University for Professional Education, identified five major areas in which libraries can develop strategies to enhance services for their patrons. The following domains are discussed: digital libraries and digital learning environments; digital portfolios; information literacy; collaborative course design; and the relation between physical and virtual learning environments. Next, possible implications for library staff regarding the changes are discussed. The article concludes with thoughts on alignment between library strategy and the strategy of the library's parent institution.

0.06203684 = product of:
  0.093055256 = sum of:
    0.017754659 = weight(_text_:in in 545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017754659 = score(doc=545,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 545, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=545)
    0.0753006 = product of:
      0.1506012 = sum of:
        0.1506012 = weight(_text_:education in 545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1506012 = score(doc=545,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.6246288 = fieldWeight in 545, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=545)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the theory and practice of education in schools and the further education as two levels of the Information Society in Hungary . The LIS education is considered the third level over previous levels. I attempt to survey the curriculum and content of different subjects in school; and the division of the programme for librarians. There is a great and long history of UDC usage in Hungary. The lecture sketches stairs of tradition from the beginning to the situation nowadays. Szab ó Ervin began to train the UDC at the Municipal Library in Budapest from 1910. He not only used, but taught the UDC for librarians in his courses, too. As a consequence of Szab ó Ervin's activity the librarians knew and used the UDC very early, and all libraries would use it. The article gives a short overview of recent developments and duties, the situation after the new Hungarian edition, the UDC usage in Hungarian OPAC and the possibility of UDC visualization.

0.060326457 = product of:
  0.090489686 = sum of:
    0.012554439 = weight(_text_:in in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012554439 = score(doc=3608,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
    0.07793525 = sum of:
      0.050200403 = weight(_text_:education in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050200403 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051176514 = queryNorm
          0.2082096 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.027734846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027734846 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051176514 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.

0.053698815 = product of:
  0.08054822 = sum of:
    0.0677349 = product of:
      0.20320468 = sum of:
        0.20320468 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20320468 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43387505 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.012813321 = weight(_text_:in in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012813321 = score(doc=4388,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.18406484 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Werden Maschinen mit Begriffen beschrieben, die ursprünglich der Beschreibung des Menschen dienen, so liegt zunächst der Verdacht nahe, dass jene Maschinen spezifischmenschliche Fähigkeiten oder Eigenschaften besitzen. Für körperliche Fähigkeiten, die mechanisch nachgeahmt werden, hat sich in der Alltagssprache eine anthropomorphisierende Sprechweise bereits etabliert. So wird kaum in Frage gestellt, dass bestimmte Maschinen weben, backen, sich bewegen oder arbeiten können. Bei nichtkörperlichen Eigenschaften, etwa kognitiver, sozialer oder moralischer Art sieht dies jedoch anders aus. Dass mittlerweile intelligente und rechnende Maschinen im alltäglichen Sprachgebrauch Eingang gefunden haben, wäre jedoch undenkbar ohne den langjährigen Diskurs über Künstliche Intelligenz, welcher insbesondere die zweite Hälfte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts geprägt hat. In jüngster Zeit ist es der Autonomiebegriff, welcher zunehmend Verwendung zur Beschreibung neuer Technologien findet, wie etwa "autonome mobile Roboter" oder "autonome Systeme". Dem Begriff nach rekurriert die "Autonomie" jener Technologien auf eine bestimmte Art technologischen Fortschritts, die von der Fähigkeit zur Selbstgesetzgebung herrührt. Dies wirft aus philosophischer Sicht jedoch die Frage auf, wie die Selbstgesetzgebung in diesem Fall definiert ist, zumal sich der Autonomiebegriff in der Philosophie auf die politische oder moralische Selbstgesetzgebung von Menschen oder Menschengruppen beziehungsweise ihre Handlungen bezieht. Im Handbuch Robotik hingegen führt der Autor geradezu beiläufig die Bezeichnung "autonom" ein, indem er prognostiziert, dass "[.] autonome Roboter in Zukunft sogar einen Großteil der Altenbetreuung übernehmen werden."

Footnote

Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.

0.052954536 = product of:
  0.0794318 = sum of:
    0.0677349 = product of:
      0.20320468 = sum of:
        0.20320468 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20320468 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43387505 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.011696909 = weight(_text_:in in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011696909 = score(doc=5669,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

"Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."

0.050258808 = product of:
  0.07538821 = sum of:
    0.0052310163 = weight(_text_:in in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052310163 = score(doc=849,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.07514416 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
    0.07015719 = product of:
      0.14031439 = sum of:
        0.14031439 = weight(_text_:education in 849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14031439 = score(doc=849,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.58196354 = fieldWeight in 849, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=849)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

ChatGPT, a general-purpose conversation chatbot released on November 30, 2022, by OpenAI, is expected to impact every aspect of society. However, the potential impacts of this NLP tool on education remain unknown. Such impact can be enormous as the capacity of ChatGPT may drive changes to educational learning goals, learning activities, and assessment and evaluation practices. This study was conducted by piloting ChatGPT to write an academic paper, titled Artificial Intelligence for Education (see Appendix A). The piloting result suggests that ChatGPT is able to help researchers write a paper that is coherent, (partially) accurate, informative, and systematic. The writing is extremely efficient (2-3 hours) and involves very limited professional knowledge from the author. Drawing upon the user experience, I reflect on the potential impacts of ChatGPT, as well as similar AI tools, on education. The paper concludes by suggesting adjusting learning goals-students should be able to use AI tools to conduct subject-domain tasks and education should focus on improving students' creativity and critical thinking rather than general skills. To accomplish the learning goals, researchers should design AI-involved learning tasks to engage students in solving real-world problems. ChatGPT also raises concerns that students may outsource assessment tasks. This paper concludes that new formats of assessments are needed to focus on creativity and critical thinking that AI cannot substitute.

0.04939305 = product of:
  0.07408957 = sum of:
    0.0088773295 = weight(_text_:in in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0088773295 = score(doc=297,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
    0.06521224 = product of:
      0.13042448 = sum of:
        0.13042448 = weight(_text_:education in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13042448 = score(doc=297,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.54094446 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Im Mittelpunkt dieses Beitrags steht das 2016 von der Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) veröffentlichte Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, dessen Kernideen und Entwicklung aus Vorläufern wie den 2000 von der ACRL publizierten Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education heraus skizziert werden. Die Rezeptionsgeschichte dieser Standards im deutschen Sprachraum wird vor dem Hintergrund der Geschichte ihrer (partiellen) Übersetzung nachgezeichnet und hieraus das Potenzial abgeleitet, das die nun vorliegende vollständige Übersetzung des Framework ins Deutsche für eine zeitgemäße Förderung von Informationskompetenz bietet. Die vielfältigen Herausforderungen einer solchen Übersetzung werden durch Einblicke in die Übersetzungswerkstatt exemplarisch reflektiert.

0.04880836 = product of:
  0.073212534 = sum of:
    0.010462033 = weight(_text_:in in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010462033 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
    0.0627505 = product of:
      0.125501 = sum of:
        0.125501 = weight(_text_:education in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.125501 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.520524 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

0.048369773 = product of:
  0.072554655 = sum of:
    0.011071975 = weight(_text_:in in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011071975 = score(doc=705,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.15905021 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
    0.061482683 = product of:
      0.122965366 = sum of:
        0.122965366 = weight(_text_:education in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.122965366 = score(doc=705,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.51000726 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

What is the role of controlled vocabulary in a Web 2.0 world? Can we have the best of both worlds: balancing folksonomies and controlled vocabularies to help communities of users find and share information and resources most relevant to them? education.au develops and manages Australian online services for education and training. Its goal is to bring people, learning and technology together. education.au projects are increasingly involved in exploring the use of Web 2.0 developments building on user ideas, knowledge and experience, and how these might be integrated with existing information management systems. This paper presents work being undertaken in this area, particularly in relation to controlled vocabularies, and discusses the challenges faced. Education Network Australia (edna) is a leading online resource collection and collaborative network for education, with an extensive repository of selected educational resources with metadata created by educators and information specialists. It uses controlled vocabularies for metadata creation and searching, where users receive suggested related terms from an education thesaurus, with their results. We recognise that no formal thesaurus can keep pace with user needs so are interested in exploiting the power of folksonomies. We describe a proof of concept project to develop community contributions to managing information and resources, using Taxonomy-Directed Folksonomy. An established taxonomy from the Australian education sector suggests terms for tagging and users can suggest terms. Importantly, the folksonomy will feed back into the taxonomy showing gaps in coverage and helping us to monitor new terms and usage to improve and develop our formal taxonomies. This model would initially sit alongside the current edna repositories, tools and services but will give us valuable user contributed resources as well as information about how users manage resources. Observing terms suggested, chosen and used in folksonomies is a rich source of information for developing our formal systems so that we can indeed get the best of both worlds.

0.048317812 = product of:
  0.072476715 = sum of:
    0.010356884 = weight(_text_:in in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010356884 = score(doc=298,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
    0.062119827 = product of:
      0.12423965 = sum of:
        0.12423965 = weight(_text_:education in 298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12423965 = score(doc=298,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.51529247 = fieldWeight in 298, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=298)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Im Mittelpunkt dieses Beitrags steht das 2016 von der Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) veröffentlichte Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, dessen Kernideen und Entwicklung aus Vorläufern wie den 2000 von der ACRL publizierten Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education heraus skizziert werden. Die Rezeptionsgeschichte dieser Standards im deutschen Sprachraum wird vor dem Hintergrund der Geschichte ihrer (partiellen) Übersetzung nachgezeichnet und hieraus das Potenzial abgeleitet, das die nun vorliegende vollständige Übersetzung des Framework ins Deutsche für eine zeitgemäße Förderung von Informationskompetenz bietet. Die vielfältigen Herausforderungen einer solchen Übersetzung werden durch Einblicke in die Übersetzungswerkstatt exemplarisch reflektiert.

0.04813569 = product of:
  0.07220353 = sum of:
    0.017938651 = weight(_text_:in in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017938651 = score(doc=1936,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
    0.054264877 = product of:
      0.108529754 = sum of:
        0.108529754 = weight(_text_:22 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.108529754 = score(doc=1936,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17921144 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.6055961 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Dewey Decimal Classification and Relative Index, Edition 22 (DDC 22) will be issued simultaneously in print and web versions in July 2003. The new edition is the first full print update to the Dewey Decimal Classification system in seven years-it includes several significant updates and many new numbers and topics. DDC 22 also features some fundamental structural changes that have been introduced with the goals of promoting classifier efficiency and improving the DDC for use in a variety of applications in the web environment. Most importantly, the content of the new edition has been shaped by the needs and recommendations of Dewey users around the world. The worldwide user community has an important role in shaping the future of the DDC.

Object

DDC-22

0.046239533 = product of:
  0.069359295 = sum of:
    0.0132335415 = weight(_text_:in in 1217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0132335415 = score(doc=1217,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.19010136 = fieldWeight in 1217, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1217)
    0.056125756 = product of:
      0.11225151 = sum of:
        0.11225151 = weight(_text_:education in 1217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11225151 = score(doc=1217,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.46557084 = fieldWeight in 1217, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The National Science Foundation's (NSF) National Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education Digital Library (NSDL) program seeks to create, develop, and sustain a national digital library supporting science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET) education at all levels -- preK-12, undergraduate, graduate, and life-long learning. The resulting virtual institution is expected to catalyze and support continual improvements in the quality of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET) education in both formal and informal settings. The vision for this program has been explored through a series of workshops over the past several years and documented in accompanying reports and monographs. (See [1-7, 10, 12, and 13].) These efforts have led to a characterization of the digital library as a learning environments and resources network for science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education, that is: * designed to meet the needs of learners, in both individual and collaborative settings; * constructed to enable dynamic use of a broad array of materials for learning primarily in digital format; and * managed actively to promote reliable anytime, anywhere access to quality collections and services, available both within and without the network. Underlying the NSDL program are several working assumptions. First, while there is currently no lack of "great piles of content" on the Web, there is an urgent need for "piles of great content". The difficulties in discovering and verifying the authority of appropriate Web-based material are certainly well known, yet there are many examples of learning resources of great promise available (particularly those exploiting the power of multiple media), with more added every day. The breadth and interconnectedness of the Web are simultaneously a great strength and shortcoming. Second, the "unit" or granularity of educational content can and will shrink, affording the opportunity for users to become creators and vice versa, as learning objects are reused, repackaged, and repurposed. To be sure, this scenario cannot take place without serious attention to intellectual property and digital rights management concerns. But new models and technologies are being explored (see a number of recent articles in the January issue of D-Lib Magazine). Third, there is a need for an "organizational infrastructure" that facilitates connections between distributed users and distributed content, as alluded to in the third bullet above. Finally, while much of the ongoing use of the library is envisioned to be "free" in the sense of the public good, there is an opportunity and a need to consider multiple alternative models of sustainability, particularly in the area of services offered by the digital library. More details about the NSDL program including information about proposal deadlines and current awards may be found at <http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/due/programs/nsdl>.

0.043380715 = product of:
  0.06507107 = sum of:
    0.01596103 = weight(_text_:in in 1227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01596103 = score(doc=1227,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.22928205 = fieldWeight in 1227, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1227)
    0.049110036 = product of:
      0.09822007 = sum of:
        0.09822007 = weight(_text_:education in 1227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09822007 = score(doc=1227,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.40737447 = fieldWeight in 1227, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1227)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The National Science Foundation's (NSF) National Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education Digital Library (NSDL) program comprises a set of projects engaged in a collective effort to build a national digital library of high quality science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) educational materials for students and teachers at all levels, in both formal and informal settings. By providing broad access to a rich, reliable, and authoritative collection of interactive learning and teaching resources and associated services in a digital environment, the NSDL will encourage and sustain continual improvements in the quality of STEM education for all students, and serve as a resource for lifelong learning. Though the program is relatively new, its vision and operational framework have been developed over a number of years through various workshops and planning meetings. The NSDL program held its first formal funding cycle during fiscal year 2000 (FY00), accepting proposals in four tracks: Core Integration System, Collections, Services, and Targeted Research. Twenty-nine awards were made across these tracks in September 2000. Brief descriptions of each FY00 project appeared in an October 2000 D-Lib Magazine article; full abstracts are available from the Awards Section at <http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/due/programs/nsdl/>. In FY01 the program received one hundred-nine proposals across its four tracks with the number of proposals in the collections, services, and targeted research tracks increasing to one hundred-one from the eighty received in FY00. In September 2001 grants were awarded to support 35 new projects: 1 project in the core integration track, 18 projects in the collections track, 13 in the services track, and 3 in targeted research. Two NSF directorates, the Directorate for Geosciences (GEO) and the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) are both providing significant co-funding on several projects, illustrating the NSDL program's facilitation of the integration of research and education, an important strategic objective of the NSF. Thus far across both fiscal years of the program fifteen projects have enjoyed this joint support. Following is a list of the FY01 awards indicating the official NSF award number (each beginning with DUE), the project title, the grantee institution, and the name of the Principal Investigator (PI). A condensed description of the project is also included. Full abstracts are available from the Awards Section at the NSDL program site at <http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/due/programs/nsdl/>. (Grants with shared titles are formal collaborations and are grouped together.) The projects are displayed by track and are listed by award number. In addition, six of these projects have explicit relevance and application to K-12 education. Six others clearly have potential for application to the K-12 arena. The NSDL program will have another funding cycle in fiscal year 2002 with the next program solicitation expected to be available in January 2002, and an anticipated deadline for proposals in mid-April 2002.

0.041574072 = product of:
  0.062361106 = sum of:
    0.012554439 = weight(_text_:in in 1221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012554439 = score(doc=1221,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1221, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1221)
    0.049806666 = product of:
      0.09961333 = sum of:
        0.09961333 = weight(_text_:education in 1221) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09961333 = score(doc=1221,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.4131531 = fieldWeight in 1221, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1221)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

In fall 2004, the National Science Foundation's (NSF) National Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education Digital Library (NSDL) program made new grants in three tracks: Pathways, Services, and Targeted Research. Together with projects started in fiscal years (FY) 2000-03 these new grants continue the development of a national digital library of high quality educational resources to support learning at all levels in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). By enabling broad access to reliable and authoritative learning and teaching materials and associated services in a digital environment, the National Science Digital Library expects to promote continual improvements in the quality of formal STEM education, and also to serve as a resource for informal and lifelong learning. Proposals for the FY05 funding cycle are due April 11, 2005, and the full solicitation is available at <http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf05545>. Two NSF directorates, the Directorate for Geosciences (GEO) and the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) have both provided significant co-funding for over twenty projects in the first four years of the program, illustrating the NSDL program's facilitation of the integration of research and education, an important strategic objective of the NSF. In FY2004, the NSDL program introduced a new Pathways track, replacing the earlier Collections track. The Services track strongly encouraged two particular types of projects: (1) selection services and (2) usage development workshops. * Pathways projects provide stewardship for educational content and services needed by a broad community of learners; * Selection services projects identify and increase the high-quality STEM educational content known to NSDL; and * Usage development workshops engage new communities of learners in the use of NSDL and its resources.
These three elements reflect a refinement of NSDL's initial emphasis on collecting educational resources, materials, and other digital learning objects, towards enabling learners to "connect" or otherwise find pathways to resources appropriate to their needs. Projects are also developing both the capacities of individual users and the capacity of larger communities of learners to use and contribute to NSDL. For the FY2004 funding cycle, one hundred forty-four proposals sought approximately $126.5 million in total funding. Twenty-four new awards were made with a cumulative budget of approximately $10.2 million. These include four in the Pathways track, twelve in the Services track, and eight in the Targeted Research track. As in the earlier years of the program, sister directorates to the NSF Directorate for Education and Human Resources (EHR) are providing significant co-funding of projects. Participating directorates for FY2004 are GEO and MPS. Within EHR, the Advanced Technological Education program and the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research are also co-funding projects. Complete information on the technical and organizational progress of NSDL including links to current Standing Committees and community workspaces may be found at <http://nsdl.org/community/nsdlgroups.php>. All workspaces are open to the public, and interested organizations and individuals are encouraged to learn more about NSDL and join in its development. Following is a list of the new FY04 awards displaying the official NSF award number, the project title, the grantee institution, and the name of the Principal Investigator (PI). A condensed description of the project is also included. Full abstracts are available from the NSDL program site (under Related URLs see the link to NSDL program site (under Related URLs see the link to Abstracts of Recent Awards Made Through This Program.) The projects are displayed by track and are listed by award number. In addition, seven of these projects have explicit relevance to applications to pre-K to 12 education (indicated with a * below). Four others have clear potential for application to the pre-K to 12 arena (indicated with a ** below).

0.040200684 = product of:
  0.060301024 = sum of:
    0.016375672 = weight(_text_:in in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016375672 = score(doc=2973,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
    0.043925352 = product of:
      0.087850705 = sum of:
        0.087850705 = weight(_text_:education in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087850705 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

In spring 2002 I started teaching Knowledge Organization (KO) at the new master education at The Royal School of Library and Information Science in Copenhagen (MS RSLIS). I began collecting information about KO as support for my own teaching and research. In the beginning I made the information available to the student through a password protected system "SiteScape". This site was a great success, but I encountered problems in transferring the system for new classes the following years. Therefore I have now decided to make it public on the www and to protect only information that should not be made public. References freely available in electronic form are given an URL (if known).

0.040200684 = product of:
  0.060301024 = sum of:
    0.016375672 = weight(_text_:in in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016375672 = score(doc=3413,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.069613084 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.051176514 = queryNorm
        0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
    0.043925352 = product of:
      0.087850705 = sum of:
        0.087850705 = weight(_text_:education in 3413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087850705 = score(doc=3413,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24110512 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051176514 = queryNorm
            0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 3413, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3413)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

A survey is given, how modifications in the field of the information processing and technology have influenced the concepts for teaching and studying the subjects of knowledge organization and information retrieval in German universities for library and information science. The discussion will distinguish between fields of modifications and fields of stability. The fields of the modifications are characterised by procedures and applications in libraries. The fields of stability are characterised by theory and methods