Search (255 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.05
    0.05324313 = product of:
      0.10648626 = sum of:
        0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012303721 = score(doc=2509,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.073796816 = weight(_text_:education in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073796816 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
        0.020385725 = product of:
          0.04077145 = sum of:
            0.04077145 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077145 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
  2. Scott, D.S.: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases (1989) 0.04
    0.04421734 = product of:
      0.13265201 = sum of:
        0.012177527 = weight(_text_:in in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012177527 = score(doc=967,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
        0.12047449 = weight(_text_:great in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12047449 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    New forms of man-machine interaction are becoming available that have great power for the delivery of information. But the scales of speed and capacity on which the computing machines operate demand new thoughts as to how information can be stored and retrieved. The objective of the discussion in this paper is to argue for a combination of natural-language processing and subject classification to be able to meet the demands
    Source
    Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
  3. Vizine-Goetz, D.: OCLC investigates using classification tools to organize Internet data (1998) 0.04
    0.041933633 = product of:
      0.1258009 = sum of:
        0.10541517 = weight(_text_:great in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10541517 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
        0.020385725 = product of:
          0.04077145 = sum of:
            0.04077145 = weight(_text_:22 in 2342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077145 = score(doc=2342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The knowledge structures that form traditional library classification schemes hold great potential for improving resource description and discovery on the Internet and for organizing electronic document collections. The advantages of assigning subject tokens (classes) to documents from a scheme like the DDC system are well documented
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  4. Quick Guide to Publishing a Classification Scheme on the Semantic Web (2008) 0.04
    0.03923963 = product of:
      0.11771889 = sum of:
        0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012303721 = score(doc=3061,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
        0.10541517 = weight(_text_:great in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10541517 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This document describes in brief how to express the content and structure of a classification scheme, and metadata about a classification scheme, in RDF using the SKOS vocabulary. RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other RDF data by semantic web applications. The Semantic Web, which is based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF), provides a common framework that allows data to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community boundaries. Publishing classifications schemes in SKOS will unify the great many of existing classification efforts in the framework of the Semantic Web.
  5. Day, M.; Koch, T.: ¬The role of classification schemes in Internet resource description and discovery : DESIRE - Development of a European Service for Information on Research and Education. Specification for resource description methods, part 3 (1997) 0.04
    0.038070798 = product of:
      0.114212394 = sum of:
        0.008788372 = weight(_text_:in in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008788372 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
        0.105424024 = weight(_text_:education in 3067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105424024 = score(doc=3067,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.520524 = fieldWeight in 3067, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3067)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
  6. Wang, Z.; Khoo, C.S.G.; Chaudhry, A.S.: Evaluation of the navigation effectiveness of an organizational taxonomy built on a general classification scheme and domain thesauri (2014) 0.02
    0.024600152 = product of:
      0.07380045 = sum of:
        0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010546046 = score(doc=1251,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
        0.06325441 = weight(_text_:education in 1251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06325441 = score(doc=1251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.3123144 = fieldWeight in 1251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1251)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an evaluation study of the navigation effectiveness of a multifaceted organizational taxonomy that was built on the Dewey Decimal Classification and several domain thesauri in the area of library and information science education. The objective of the evaluation was to detect deficiencies in the taxonomy and to infer problems of applied construction steps from users' navigation difficulties. The evaluation approach included scenario-based navigation exercises and postexercise interviews. Navigation exercise errors and underlying reasons were analyzed in relation to specific components of the taxonomy and applied construction steps. Guidelines for the construction of the hierarchical structure and categories of an organizational taxonomy using existing general classification schemes and domain thesauri were derived from the evaluation results.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  7. Louie, A.J.; Maddox, E.L.; Washington, W.: Using faceted classification to provide structure for information architecture (2003) 0.02
    0.022842478 = product of:
      0.06852743 = sum of:
        0.005273023 = weight(_text_:in in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005273023 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
        0.06325441 = weight(_text_:education in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06325441 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.3123144 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This is a short, but very thorough and very interesting, report on how the writers built a faceted classification for some legal information and used it to structure a web site with navigation and searching. There is a good summary of why facets work well and how they fit into bibliographic control in general. The last section is about their implementation of a web site for the Washington State Bar Association's Council for Legal Public Education. Their classification uses three facets: Purpose (the general aim of the document, e.g. Resources for K-12 Teachers), Topic (the subject of the document), and Type (the legal format of the document). See Example Web Sites, below, for a discussion of the site and a problem with its design.
  8. Beagle, D.: Visualizing keyword distribution across multidisciplinary c-space (2003) 0.01
    0.014270993 = product of:
      0.042812977 = sum of:
        0.011185773 = weight(_text_:in in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011185773 = score(doc=1202,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.1912858 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
        0.031627204 = weight(_text_:education in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031627204 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.1561572 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of c-space is proposed as a visualization schema relating containers of content to cataloging surrogates and classification structures. Possible applications of keyword vector clusters within c-space could include improved retrieval rates through the use of captioning within visual hierarchies, tracings of semantic bleeding among subclasses, and access to buried knowledge within subject-neutral publication containers. The Scholastica Project is described as one example, following a tradition of research dating back to the 1980's. Preliminary focus group assessment indicates that this type of classification rendering may offer digital library searchers enriched entry strategies and an expanded range of re-entry vocabularies. Those of us who work in traditional libraries typically assume that our systems of classification: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), are descriptive rather than prescriptive. In other words, LCC classes and subclasses approximate natural groupings of texts that reflect an underlying order of knowledge, rather than arbitrary categories prescribed by librarians to facilitate efficient shelving. Philosophical support for this assumption has traditionally been found in a number of places, from the archetypal tree of knowledge, to Aristotelian categories, to the concept of discursive formations proposed by Michel Foucault. Gary P. Radford has elegantly described an encounter with Foucault's discursive formations in the traditional library setting: "Just by looking at the titles on the spines, you can see how the books cluster together...You can identify those books that seem to form the heart of the discursive formation and those books that reside on the margins. Moving along the shelves, you see those books that tend to bleed over into other classifications and that straddle multiple discursive formations. You can physically and sensually experience...those points that feel like state borders or national boundaries, those points where one subject ends and another begins, or those magical places where one subject has morphed into another..."
    But what happens to this awareness in a digital library? Can discursive formations be represented in cyberspace, perhaps through diagrams in a visualization interface? And would such a schema be helpful to a digital library user? To approach this question, it is worth taking a moment to reconsider what Radford is looking at. First, he looks at titles to see how the books cluster. To illustrate, I scanned one hundred books on the shelves of a college library under subclass HT 101-395, defined by the LCC subclass caption as Urban groups. The City. Urban sociology. Of the first 100 titles in this sequence, fifty included the word "urban" or variants (e.g. "urbanization"). Another thirty-five used the word "city" or variants. These keywords appear to mark their titles as the heart of this discursive formation. The scattering of titles not using "urban" or "city" used related terms such as "town," "community," or in one case "skyscrapers." So we immediately see some empirical correlation between keywords and classification. But we also see a problem with the commonly used search technique of title-keyword. A student interested in urban studies will want to know about this entire subclass, and may wish to browse every title available therein. A title-keyword search on "urban" will retrieve only half of the titles, while a search on "city" will retrieve just over a third. There will be no overlap, since no titles in this sample contain both words. The only place where both words appear in a common string is in the LCC subclass caption, but captions are not typically indexed in library Online Public Access Catalogs (OPACs). In a traditional library, this problem is mitigated when the student goes to the shelf looking for any one of the books and suddenly discovers a much wider selection than the keyword search had led him to expect. But in a digital library, the issue of non-retrieval can be more problematic, as studies have indicated. Micco and Popp reported that, in a study funded partly by the U.S. Department of Education, 65 of 73 unskilled users searching for material on U.S./Soviet foreign relations found some material but never realized they had missed a large percentage of what was in the database.
  9. Comaromi, C.L.: Summation of classification as an enhancement of intellectual access to information in an online environment (1990) 0.01
    0.013850367 = product of:
      0.0415511 = sum of:
        0.012428636 = weight(_text_:in in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012428636 = score(doc=3576,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
        0.029122464 = product of:
          0.05824493 = sum of:
            0.05824493 = weight(_text_:22 in 3576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05824493 = score(doc=3576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Classification structure and indexes to classifications need to be better understood before classification can be a major access point in online catalogs.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 12:22:40
  10. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.01
    0.0126369465 = product of:
      0.037910838 = sum of:
        0.008788372 = weight(_text_:in in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008788372 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
        0.029122464 = product of:
          0.05824493 = sum of:
            0.05824493 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05824493 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Präsentation zum Vortrag anlässlich des 98. Deutscher Bibliothekartag in Erfurt: Ein neuer Blick auf Bibliotheken; TK10: Information erschließen und recherchieren Inhalte erschließen - mit neuen Tools
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  11. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.01
    0.011825167 = product of:
      0.0354755 = sum of:
        0.012177527 = weight(_text_:in in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012177527 = score(doc=2474,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
        0.023297971 = product of:
          0.046595942 = sum of:
            0.046595942 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046595942 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Van Dijck builds up an example of actual XFML by showing how to organize tourist information about what restaurants in what cities feature which kind of music: <facet id="city">City</facet> and <topic id="ny" facetid="city"><name>New York</name></topic> combine to mean that New York is the name of a city internally represented as "ny". It is written in the usual clear and practical style of articles on xml.com. Highly recommended as an introduction for anyone interested in XFML.
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
  12. Lösse, M.; Svensson, L.: "Classification at a Crossroad" : Internationales UDC-Seminar 2009 in Den Haag, Niederlande (2010) 0.01
    0.011752427 = product of:
      0.03525728 = sum of:
        0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010546046 = score(doc=4379,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
        0.024711233 = product of:
          0.049422465 = sum of:
            0.049422465 = weight(_text_:22 in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049422465 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Am 29. und 30. Oktober 2009 fand in der Königlichen Bibliothek in Den Haag das zweite internationale UDC-Seminar zum Thema "Classification at a Crossroad" statt. Organisiert wurde diese Konferenz - wie auch die erste Konferenz dieser Art im Jahr 2007 - vom UDC-Konsortium (UDCC). Im Mittelpunkt der diesjährigen Veranstaltung stand die Erschließung des World Wide Web unter besserer Nutzung von Klassifikationen (im Besonderen natürlich der UDC), einschließlich benutzerfreundlicher Repräsentationen von Informationen und Wissen. Standards, neue Technologien und Dienste, semantische Suche und der multilinguale Zugriff spielten ebenfalls eine Rolle. 135 Teilnehmer aus 35 Ländern waren dazu nach Den Haag gekommen. Das Programm umfasste mit 22 Vorträgen aus 14 verschiedenen Ländern eine breite Palette, wobei Großbritannien mit fünf Beiträgen am stärksten vertreten war. Die Tagesschwerpunkte wurden an beiden Konferenztagen durch die Eröffnungsvorträge gesetzt, die dann in insgesamt sechs thematischen Sitzungen weiter vertieft wurden.
    Date
    22. 1.2010 15:06:54
  13. Doyle, B.: ¬The classification and evaluation of Content Management Systems (2003) 0.01
    0.011080294 = product of:
      0.03324088 = sum of:
        0.009942909 = weight(_text_:in in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009942909 = score(doc=2871,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
        0.023297971 = product of:
          0.046595942 = sum of:
            0.046595942 = weight(_text_:22 in 2871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046595942 = score(doc=2871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This is a report on how Doyle and others made a faceted classification scheme for content management systems and made it browsable on the web (see CMS Review in Example Web Sites, below). They discuss why they did it, how, their use of OPML and XFML, how they did research to find terms and categories, and they also include their taxonomy. It is interesting to see facets used in a business environment.
    Date
    30. 7.2004 12:22:52
  14. Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998) 0.01
    0.010896482 = product of:
      0.032689445 = sum of:
        0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012303721 = score(doc=57,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
        0.020385725 = product of:
          0.04077145 = sum of:
            0.04077145 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077145 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Conceptual Knowledge Markup Language (CKML), an application of XML, is a new standard being promoted for the specification of online conceptual knowledge (Kent and Shrivastava, 1998). CKML follows the philosophy of Conceptual Knowledge Processing (Wille, 1982), a principled approach to knowledge representation and data analysis, which advocates the development of methodologies and techniques to support people in their rational thinking, judgement and actions. CKML was developed and is being used in the WAVE networked information discovery and retrieval system (Kent and Neuss, 1994) as a standard for the specification of conceptual knowledge
    Date
    30.12.2001 16:22:41
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  15. Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010) 0.01
    0.010474863 = product of:
      0.03142459 = sum of:
        0.01395111 = weight(_text_:in in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01395111 = score(doc=3697,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
        0.017473478 = product of:
          0.034946956 = sum of:
            0.034946956 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034946956 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
    Date
    22. 7.2010 20:40:56
  16. Sandner, M.; Jahns, Y.: Kurzbericht zum DDC-Übersetzer- und Anwendertreffen bei der IFLA-Konferenz 2005 in Oslo, Norwegen (2005) 0.01
    0.009721211 = product of:
      0.029163633 = sum of:
        0.011509077 = weight(_text_:in in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011509077 = score(doc=4406,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.19681457 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
        0.017654555 = product of:
          0.03530911 = sum of:
            0.03530911 = weight(_text_:22 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03530911 = score(doc=4406,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.23454636 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    "Am 16. August 2005 fand in Oslo im Rahmen der heurigen IFLA-Konferenz das alljährliche Treffen der DDC-Übersetzer und der weltweiten DeweyAnwender-Institutionen (Nationalbibliotheken, Ersteller von Nationalbibliografien) statt. Die im Sommer 2005 bereits abgeschlossene deutsche Übersetzung wird in der Druckfassung Ende des Jahres in 4 Bänden vorliegen, beim K. G. Saur Verlag in München erscheinen (ISBN 3-598-11651-9) und 2006 vom ebenfalls erstmals ins Deutsche übersetzten DDC-Lehrbuch (ISBN 3-598-11748-5) begleitet. Pläne für neu startende Übersetzungen der DDC 22 gibt es für folgende Sprachen: Arabisch (mit der wachsenden Notwendigkeit, Klasse 200 Religion zu revidieren), Französisch (es erschien zuletzt eine neue Kurzausgabe 14, nun werden eine vierbändige Druckausgabe und eine frz. Webversion anvisiert), Schwedisch, Vietnamesisch (hierfür wird eine an die Sprache und Schrift angepasste Version des deutschen Übersetzungstools zum Einsatz kommen).
    Das Neueste zuerst Die Herausgeber der DDC präsentierten eine neue Informationsplattform "025.431: The Dewey blog"; seit Anfang Juli erreichbar unter http://ddc.typepad.com/. Neu ist auch der fünfsprachige, mit einem Farbleitsystem ausgestattete "DeweyBrowser" von OCLC; der Protoyp führt bereits in einen Katalog von 125.000 e-books und kann unter http://ddcresearch.oclc.org ,i ebooks/fileServer erprobt werden. OCLC bietet seit April 2005 eine neue Current Awareness-Schiene zur DDC mit unterschiedlichen Schwerpunkten an: Dewey Mappings, Dewey News, DeweyTips, Dewey Updates, Deweyjournal (letzteres fängt Themen aus allen 4 Teilbereichen auf); zu subskribieren unter http://www.oclc.org/dewey/syndicated/rss.htm. Wichtig für Freihandaufstellungen Die Segmentierung von Dewey-Notationen wurde reduziert! Ab September 2005 vergibt LoC nur noch ein einziges Segmentierungszeichen, und zwar an der Stelle, an der die jeweilige Notation in der englischen Kurzausgabe endet. Der Beginn einer Teilnotation aus Hilfstafel 1: Standardunterteilungen, wird also nun nicht mehr markiert. Für die Bildung von Standortsignaturen bietet sich das Dewey Cutter Programm an; Downloaden unter www.oclc.org/dewey/support/program.
    Allgemein DDC 22 ist im Gegensatz zu den früheren Neuauflagen der Standard Edition eine Ausgabe ohne generelle Überarbeitung einer gesamten Klasse. Sie enthält jedoch zahlreiche Änderungen und Expansionen in fast allen Disziplinen und in vielen Hilfstafeln. Es erschien auch eine Sonderausgabe der Klasse 200, Religion. In der aktuellen Kurzausgabe der DDC 22 (14, aus 2004) sind all diese Neuerungen berücksichtigt. Auch die elektronische Version exisitiert in einer vollständigen (WebDewey) und in einer KurzVariante (Abridged WebDewey) und ist immer auf dem jüngsten Stand der Klassifikation. Ein Tutorial für die Nutzung von WebDewey steht unter www.oclc.org /dewey/ resourcesitutorial zur Verfügung. Der Index enthält in dieser elektronischen Fassung weit mehr zusammengesetzte Notationen und verbale Sucheinstiege (resultierend aus den Titeldaten des "WorldCat") als die Druckausgabe, sowie Mappings zu den aktuellsten Normdatensätzen aus LCSH und McSH. Aktuell Die personelle Zusammensetzung des EPC (Editorial Policy Committee) hat sich im letzten Jahr verändert. Dieses oberste Gremium der DDC hat Prioritäten für den aktuellen Arbeitsplan festgelegt. Es wurde vereinbart, größere Änderungsvorhaben via Dewey-Website künftig wie in einem Stellungnahmeverfahren zur fachlichen Diskussion zu stellen. www.oclc.org/dewey/discussion/."
  17. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01
    0.009695257 = product of:
      0.02908577 = sum of:
        0.008700045 = weight(_text_:in in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008700045 = score(doc=1673,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
        0.020385725 = product of:
          0.04077145 = sum of:
            0.04077145 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077145 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The Wolverhampton Web Library (WWLib) is a WWW search engine that provides access to UK based information. The experimental version developed in 1995, was a success but highlighted the need for a much higher degree of automation. An interesting feature of the experimental WWLib was that it organised information according to DDC. Discusses the advantages of classification and describes the automatic classifier that is being developed in Java as part of the new, fully automated WWLib
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  18. Lardera, M.; Gnoli, C.; Rolandi, C.; Trzmielewski, M.: Developing SciGator, a DDC-based library browsing tool (2017) 0.01
    0.009339842 = product of:
      0.028019525 = sum of:
        0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010546046 = score(doc=4144,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
        0.017473478 = product of:
          0.034946956 = sum of:
            0.034946956 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034946956 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Exploring collections by their subject matter is an important functionality for library users. We developed an online tool called SciGator in order to allow users to browse the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) classes used in different libraries at the University of Pavia and to perform different types of search in the OPAC. Besides navigation of DDC hierarchies, SciGator suggests "see-also" relationships with related classes and maps equivalent classes in local shelving schemes, thus allowing the expansion of search queries to include subjects contiguous to the initial one. We are developing new features, including the possibility to expand searches even more to national and international catalogues.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.
  19. Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999) 0.01
    0.008868875 = product of:
      0.026606623 = sum of:
        0.009133145 = weight(_text_:in in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009133145 = score(doc=4189,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
        0.017473478 = product of:
          0.034946956 = sum of:
            0.034946956 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034946956 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Anzahl von Bibliotheken in Europa befaßt sich mit der Entwicklung von Internet Subject Gateways - einer Serviceleistung, die den Nutzern helfen soll, qualitativ hochwertige Internetquellen zu finden. Subject Gateways wie SOSIG (The Social Science Information Gateway) sind bereits seit einigen Jahren im Internet verfügbar und stellen eine Alternative zu Internet-Suchmaschinen wie AltaVista und Verzeichnissen wie Yahoo dar. Bezeichnenderweise stützen sich Subject Gateways auf die Fertigkeiten, Verfahrensweisen und Standards der internationalen Bibliothekswelt und wenden diese auf Informationen aus dem Internet an. Dieses Referat will daher betonen, daß Bibliothekare/innen idealerweise eine vorherrschende Rolle im Aufbau von Suchservices für Internetquellen spielen und daß Information Gateways eine Möglichkeit dafür darstellen. Es wird einige der Subject Gateway-Initiativen in Europa umreißen und die Werkzeuge und Technologien beschreiben, die vom Projekt DESIRE entwickelt wurden, um die Entwicklung neuer Gateways in anderen Ländern zu unterstützen. Es wird auch erörtert, wie IMesh, eine Gruppe für Gateways aus der ganzen Welt eine internationale Strategie für Gateways anstrebt und versucht, Standards zur Umsetzung dieses Projekts zu entwickeln
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:35:09
  20. Chandler, A.; LeBlanc, J.: Exploring the potential of a virtual undergraduate library collection based on the hierarchical interface to LC Classification (2006) 0.01
    0.008868875 = product of:
      0.026606623 = sum of:
        0.009133145 = weight(_text_:in in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009133145 = score(doc=769,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
        0.017473478 = product of:
          0.034946956 = sum of:
            0.034946956 = weight(_text_:22 in 769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034946956 = score(doc=769,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 769, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=769)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification (HILCC) is a system developed by the Columbia University Library to leverage call number data from the MARC holdings records in Columbia's online catalog to create a structured, hierarchical menuing system that provides subject access to the library's electronic resources. In this paper, the authors describe a research initiative at the Cornell University Library to discover if the Columbia HILCC scheme can be used as developed or in modified form to create a virtual undergraduate print collection outside the context of the traditional online catalog. Their results indicate that, with certain adjustments, an HILCC model can indeed, be used to represent the holdings of a large research library's undergraduate collection of approximately 150,000 titles, but that such a model is not infinitely scalable and may require a new approach to browsing such a large information space.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 214
  • el 32
  • m 11
  • s 9
  • x 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…