Search (533 results, page 1 of 27)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Sutton, S.A.: Conceptual design and deployment of a metadata framework for educational resources on the Internet (1999) 0.09 
    0.09363414 = product of:
  0.18726829 = sum of:
    0.007457182 = weight(_text_:in in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007457182 = score(doc=4054,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
    0.08945525 = weight(_text_:education in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08945525 = score(doc=4054,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.44167927 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
    0.090355866 = weight(_text_:great in 4054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.090355866 = score(doc=4054,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 4054, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4054)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    The metadata framework described in this article stems from a growing concern of the U.S. Department of Education and its National Library of Education that teachers, students, and parents are encountering increasing difficulty in accessing educational resources on the Internet even as those resources are becoming more abundant. This concern is joined by the realization that as Internet matures as a publishing environment, the successful management of resource repositories will hinge to a great extent on the intelligent use of metadata. We first explicate the conceptual foundations for the Gateway to Educational Materials (GEM) framework including the adoption of the Dublin Core Element Set as its base referent, and the extension of that set to meet the needs of the domain. We then discuss the complex of decisions that must be made regarding selection of the units of description and the structuring of an information space. The article concludes with a discussion of metadata generation, the association of metadata to the objects described, and a general description of the GEM system architecture
  2. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metatdata education in North American LIS programs (2004) 0.06 
    0.060217485 = product of:
  0.12043497 = sum of:
    0.014573867 = weight(_text_:in in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014573867 = score(doc=138,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.24922498 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
    0.09129988 = weight(_text_:education in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09129988 = score(doc=138,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.450787 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
    0.014561232 = product of:
      0.029122464 = sum of:
        0.029122464 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029122464 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings of a survey an the state of cataloging and metadata education. in ALA-accredited library and information science progranis in North America. The survey was conducted in response to Action Item 5.1 of the "Bibliographic Control of Web Resources: A Library of Congress Action Plan," which focuses an providing metadata education to new LIS professionals. The study found LIS programs increased their reliance an introductory courses to cover cataloging and metadata, but fewer programs than before had a cataloging course requirement. The knowledge of cataloging delivered in introductory courses was basic, and the coverage of metadata was limited to an overview. Cataloging courses showed similarity in coverage and practice and focused an print mater!als. Few cataloging educators provided exercises in metadata record creation using non-AACR standards. Advanced cataloging courses provided in-depth coverage of subject cataloging and the cataloging of nonbook resources, but offered very limited coverage of metadata. Few programs offered full courses an metadata, and even fewer offered advanced metadata courses. Metadata topics were well integrated into LIS curricula, but coverage of metadata courses varied from program to program, depending an the interests of instructors. Educators were forward-looking and agreed an the inclusion of specific knowledge and skills in metadata instruction. A series of actions were proposed to assist educators in providing students with competencies in cataloging and metadata.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. DC-2013: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications : Online Proceedings (2013) 0.06 
    0.056761682 = product of:
  0.113523364 = sum of:
    0.01111651 = weight(_text_:in in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01111651 = score(doc=1076,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.19010136 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
    0.04216961 = weight(_text_:education in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04216961 = score(doc=1076,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.2082096 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
    0.060237244 = weight(_text_:great in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060237244 = score(doc=1076,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    The collocated conferences for DC-2013 and iPRES-2013 in Lisbon attracted 392 participants from over 37 countries. In addition to the Tuesday through Thursday conference days comprised of peer-reviewed paper and special sessions, 223 participants attended pre-conference tutorials and 246 participated in post-conference workshops for the collocated events. The peer-reviewed papers and presentations are available on the conference website Presentation page (URLs above). In sum, it was a great conference. In addition to links to PDFs of papers, project reports and posters (and their associated presentations), the published proceedings include presentation PDFs for the following: KEYNOTES Darling, we need to talk - Gildas Illien TUTORIALS -- Ivan Herman: "Introduction to Linked Open Data (LOD)" -- Steven Miller: "Introduction to Ontology Concepts and Terminology" -- Kai Eckert: "Metadata Provenance" -- Daniel Garjio: "The W3C Provenance Ontology" SPECIAL SESSIONS -- "Application Profiles as an Alternative to OWL Ontologies" -- "Long-term Preservation and Governance of RDF Vocabularies (W3C Sponsored)" -- "Data Enrichment and Transformation in the LOD Context: Poor & Popular vs Rich & Lonely--Can't we achieve both?" -- "Why Schema.org?"
    Content
    FULL PAPERS Provenance and Annotations for Linked Data - Kai Eckert How Portable Are the Metadata Standards for Scientific Data? A Proposal for a Metadata Infrastructure - Jian Qin, Kai Li Lessons Learned in Implementing the Extended Date/Time Format in a Large Digital Library - Hannah Tarver, Mark Phillips Towards the Representation of Chinese Traditional Music: A State of the Art Review of Music Metadata Standards - Mi Tian, György Fazekas, Dawn Black, Mark Sandler Maps and Gaps: Strategies for Vocabulary Design and Development - Diane Ileana Hillmann, Gordon Dunsire, Jon Phipps A Method for the Development of Dublin Core Application Profiles (Me4DCAP V0.1): Aescription - Mariana Curado Malta, Ana Alice Baptista Find and Combine Vocabularies to Design Metadata Application Profiles using Schema Registries and LOD Resources - Tsunagu Honma, Mitsuharu Nagamori, Shigeo Sugimoto Achieving Interoperability between the CARARE Schema for Monuments and Sites and the Europeana Data Model - Antoine Isaac, Valentine Charles, Kate Fernie, Costis Dallas, Dimitris Gavrilis, Stavros Angelis With a Focused Intent: Evolution of DCMI as a Research Community - Jihee Beak, Richard P. Smiraglia Metadata Capital in a Data Repository - Jane Greenberg, Shea Swauger, Elena Feinstein DC Metadata is Alive and Well - A New Standard for Education - Liddy Nevile Representation of the UNIMARC Bibliographic Data Format in Resource Description Framework - Gordon Dunsire, Mirna Willer, Predrag Perozic
  4. Jizba, L.; Hillmann, D.I.: Insights from Ithaca : an interview with Diane Hillmann on metadata, Dublin Core, the National Science Digital Library, and more (2004/05) 0.05 
    0.05324313 = product of:
  0.10648626 = sum of:
    0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012303721 = score(doc=637,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
    0.073796816 = weight(_text_:education in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073796816 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
    0.020385725 = product of:
      0.04077145 = sum of:
        0.04077145 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04077145 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    In an interview, Diane I. Hillmann, an expert in metadata for digital libraries and currently co-principal investigator for the National Science Digital Library Registry based at Cornell University, discusses her education and career, and provides overviews and insights on metadata initiatives, including standards and models such as the widely adopted Dublin Core schema. She shares her professional interests from the early part of her career with communications, cataloging, and database production services; highlights key issues; and provides ideas and resources for managing changes in metadata standards and digital projects.
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:35:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Profiles in digital information"
  5. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Cataloging and metadata education : asserting a central role in information organization (2002) 0.05 
    0.045684956 = product of:
  0.13705486 = sum of:
    0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010546046 = score(doc=5457,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
    0.12650882 = weight(_text_:education in 5457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12650882 = score(doc=5457,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.6246288 = fieldWeight in 5457, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5457)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This paper describes challenges in organizing digital resources, the role of cataloging in such an effort, forces that threaten the future of cataloging, and responses from the field. It identifies ten issues for consideration when one designs a future cataloging education program. A model program providing four levels of expertise is presented to illustrate that future cataloging education will have a broader scope, incorporating metadata and various aspects of information organization. The program shows that LIS programs can meet different market demands to cover cataloging and metadata topics adequately to help students and ensure the central role of the profession in future information organization.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part I
  6. Weibel, S.; Miller, E.: Cataloging syntax and public policy meet in PICS (1997) 0.04 
    0.043472465 = product of:
  0.13041739 = sum of:
    0.009942909 = weight(_text_:in in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009942909 = score(doc=1561,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
    0.12047449 = weight(_text_:great in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12047449 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    The PICS, an initiative of W3C, is a technology that supports the association of descriptive labels with Web resources. By providing a single common transport syntax for metadata, PICS will support the growth of metadata systems (including library cataloguing) that are interoperable and widely supported in Web information systems. Within the PICS framework, a great diversity of resource description models can be implemented, from simple rating schemes to complex data content standards
  7. White, M.: ¬The value of taxonomies, thesauri and metadata in enterprise search (2016) 0.04 
    0.040127017 = product of:
  0.12038105 = sum of:
    0.013895638 = weight(_text_:in in 2964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013895638 = score(doc=2964,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 2964, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2964)
    0.10648541 = weight(_text_:great in 2964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10648541 = score(doc=2964,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.43990463 = fieldWeight in 2964, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2964)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Although the technical, mathematical and linguistic principles of search date back to the early 1960s and enterprise search applications have been commercially available since the 1980s; it is only since the launch of Microsoft SharePoint 2010 and the integration of the Apache Lucene and Solr projects in 2010 that there has been a wider adoption of enterprise search applications. Surveys carried out over the last five years indicate that although enterprises accept that search applications are essential in locating information, there has not been any significant investment in search teams to support these applications. Where taxonomies, thesauri and metadata have been used to improve the search user interface and enhance the search experience, the indications are that levels of search satisfaction are significantly higher. The challenges faced by search managers in developing and maintaining these tools include a lack of published research on the use of these tools and difficulty in recruiting search team members with the requisite skills and experience. There would seem to be an important and immediate opportunity to bring together the research, knowledge organization and enterprise search communities to explore how good practice in the use of taxonomies, thesauri and metadata in enterprise search can be established, enhanced and promoted.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
  8. Lam, V.-T.: Cataloging Internet resources : Why, what, how (2000) 0.04 
    0.038690172 = product of:
  0.11607051 = sum of:
    0.010655336 = weight(_text_:in in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010655336 = score(doc=967,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
    0.10541517 = weight(_text_:great in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10541517 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Internet resources have brought great excitement but also grave concerns to the library world, especially to the cataloging community. In spite of the various problematic aspects presented by Internet resources (poorly organized, lack of stability, variable quality), catalogers have decided that they are worth cataloging, in particular those meeting library selection criteria. This paper tries to trace the decade-long history of the library comrnunity's efforts in providing an effective way to catalog Internet resources. Basically, its olbjective is to answer the following questions: Why catalog? What to catalog? and, How to catalog. Some issues of cataloging electronic journals and developments of the Dublin Core Metadata system are also discussed.
  9. Integrating multiple overlapping metadata standards (1999) 0.04 
    0.038070798 = product of:
  0.114212394 = sum of:
    0.008788372 = weight(_text_:in in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008788372 = score(doc=4052,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
    0.105424024 = weight(_text_:education in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105424024 = score(doc=4052,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.520524 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This special issue of JASIS addresses different applications of metadata standards in geospatial collections, education, historical costume collection, data management, and information retrieval, end explores the future thinking of metadata standards for digital libraries
  10. Tennis, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability : Dublin core audience element (2003) 0.03 
    0.0343086 = product of:
  0.1029258 = sum of:
    0.011625925 = weight(_text_:in in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011625925 = score(doc=1253,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.19881277 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
    0.09129988 = weight(_text_:education in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09129988 = score(doc=1253,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.450787 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the assumptions, process and results of a pilot study of issues of interoperability among a set of seven existing controlled vocabulary schemes that make statements about the audience of an educational resource. The notion of audience for the study was defined in terms of the semantics of the Dublin Core metadata element of the same name: "A category of user for whom the resource is intended." The study used a data collection technique, card sorting, to see how nonexpert users sorted terms in the seven vocabularies into relationships and what their thought processes were in sorting these terms. The need for controlled vocabulary interoperability is a pressing concern for the education community as well as many others. In particular, the current study was informed by the need of the Dublin Core Education Working Group (www.dublin core.org/groups/education/) to explore the possibility of a high-level switching language in an application profile for the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) audience element. An abundance of educational resources exists, many of which are available in the networked environment. Yet, theie are various conceptualizations of the domain in the form of different controlled vocabularies that limit access. Controlled vocabulary interoperability would allow these different conceptualizations to remain intact, thereby serving local needs while allowing users to navigate across collections and exploiting the intellectual network of resources available.
  11. Borbinha, J.: Authority control in the world of metadata (2004) 0.03 
    0.03363397 = product of:
  0.10090191 = sum of:
    0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010546046 = score(doc=5666,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
    0.090355866 = weight(_text_:great in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.090355866 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the concept of "metadata" in the scope of the "digital library," two terms recently used in a great diversity of perspectives. It is not the intent to promote privilege of any particular view, but rather to help provide a better understanding of these multiple perspectives. The paper starts with a discussion of the concept of digital library, followed by an analysis of the concept of metadata. It continues with a discussion about the relationship of this concept with technology, services, and scenarios of application. The concluding remarks stress the three main arguments assumed for the relevance of the concept of metadata: the growing number of heterogeneous genres of information resources, the new emerging scenarios for interoperability, and issues related to the cost and complexity of current technology.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Authority control: definition and international experience. Part I"
  12. Aulik, J.L.; Burt, H.A.; Gruby, E.; Morgan, A.; O'Halloran, C.: Online mentoring : a student experience at Dominican University (2002) 0.03 
    0.028150719 = product of:
  0.08445215 = sum of:
    0.010655336 = weight(_text_:in in 5465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010655336 = score(doc=5465,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5465, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5465)
    0.073796816 = weight(_text_:education in 5465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073796816 = score(doc=5465,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 5465, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5465)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This paper explores the online learning experience of seven students in the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at Dominican University. In a class entitled Metadata for Internet Resources, the students developed a distance learning relationship with professional catalogers. Student assignments included posting bibliographic records on the WebBoardTM for mentor input. In an online exchange, the mentors responded by posting their suggestions for improving student records. The interaction between students and mentors is discussed, as is the educational value of distance learning.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part II
  13. Niininen, S.; Nykyri, S.; Suominen, O.: ¬The future of metadata : open, linked, and multilingual - the YSO case (2017) 0.03 
    0.028028307 = product of:
  0.08408492 = sum of:
    0.008788372 = weight(_text_:in in 3707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008788372 = score(doc=3707,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 3707, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3707)
    0.07529655 = weight(_text_:great in 3707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07529655 = score(doc=3707,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 3707, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3707)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is threefold: to focus on the process of multilingual concept scheme construction and the challenges involved; to addresses concrete challenges faced in the construction process and especially those related to equivalence between terms and concepts; and to briefly outlines the translation strategies developed during the process of concept scheme construction. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is based on experience acquired during the establishment of the Finnish thesaurus and ontology service Finto as well as the trilingual General Finnish Ontology YSO, both of which are being maintained and further developed at the National Library of Finland. Findings Although uniform resource identifiers can be considered language-independent, they do not render concept schemes and their construction free of language-related challenges. The fundamental issue with all the challenges faced is how to maintain consistency and predictability when the nature of language requires each concept to be treated individually. The key to such challenges is to recognise the function of the vocabulary and the needs of its intended users. Social implications Open science increases the transparency of not only research products, but also metadata tools. Gaining a deeper understanding of the challenges involved in their construction is important for a great variety of users - e.g. indexers, vocabulary builders and information seekers. Today, multilingualism is an essential aspect at both the national and international information society level. Originality/value This paper draws on the practical challenges faced in concept scheme construction in a trilingual environment, with a focus on "concept scheme" as a translation and mapping unit.
  14. Tallerås, C.; Dahl, J.H.B.; Pharo, N.: User conceptualizations of derivative relationships in the bibliographic universe (2018) 0.03 
    0.028028307 = product of:
  0.08408492 = sum of:
    0.008788372 = weight(_text_:in in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008788372 = score(doc=4247,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
    0.07529655 = weight(_text_:great in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07529655 = score(doc=4247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose Considerable effort is devoted to developing new models for organizing bibliographic metadata. However, such models have been repeatedly criticized for their lack of proper user testing. The purpose of this paper is to present a study on how non-experts in bibliographic systems map the bibliographic universe and, in particular, how they conceptualize relationships between independent but strongly related entities. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on an open concept-mapping task performed to externalize the conceptualizations of 98 novice students. The conceptualizations of the resulting concept maps are identified and analyzed statistically. Findings The study shows that the participants' conceptualizations have great variety, differing in detail and granularity. These conceptualizations can be categorized into two main groups according to derivative relationships: those that apply a single-entity model directly relating document entities and those (the majority) that apply a multi-entity model relating documents through a high-level collocating node. These high-level nodes seem to be most adequately interpreted either as superwork devices collocating documents belonging to the same bibliographic family or as devices collocating documents belonging to a shared fictional world. Originality/value The findings can guide the work to develop bibliographic standards. Based on the diversity of the conceptualizations, the findings also emphasize the need for more user testing of both conceptual models and the bibliographic end-user systems implementing those models.
  15. Cortez, E.M.: Use of metadata vocabularies in data retrieval (1999) 0.03 
    0.027498953 = product of:
  0.08249686 = sum of:
    0.008700045 = weight(_text_:in in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008700045 = score(doc=4057,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
    0.073796816 = weight(_text_:education in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073796816 = score(doc=4057,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Researchers have developed a prototype of a system that uses metadata to guide their user in selecting document databases of interest. A standardized vocabulary is used to index the document sets and is also used to locate databases. Once a database is located, then freeform searches are aided by the metadata vocabulary to locate specific documents. This system, the Research, Education, Economic Information System (REEIS), is being developed fot the USDA to provide a way to locate programs, projects, and research that focus on food, agriculture, natural resources and rural development
  16. Chou, C.: Purpose-driven assessment of cataloging and metadata services : transforming broken links into linked data (2019) 0.03 
    0.027498953 = product of:
  0.08249686 = sum of:
    0.008700045 = weight(_text_:in in 5280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008700045 = score(doc=5280,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 5280, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5280)
    0.073796816 = weight(_text_:education in 5280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.073796816 = score(doc=5280,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.3643668 = fieldWeight in 5280, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5280)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Many primary school classrooms have book collections. Most teachers organize and maintain these collections by themselves, although some involve students in the processes. This qualitative study considers a third approach, parent-involved categorization, to understand how people without library or education training categorize books. We observed and interviewed parents and a teacher who worked together to categorize books in a kindergarten classroom. They employed multiple orthogonal organizing principles, felt that working collaboratively made the task less overwhelming, solved difficult problems pragmatically, organized books primarily to facilitate retrieval by the teacher, and left lumping and splitting decisions to the teacher.
  17. Slavic, A.: General library classification in learning material metadata : the application in IMS/LOM and CDMES metadata schemas (2003) 0.03 
    0.025735173 = product of:
  0.07720552 = sum of:
    0.01395111 = weight(_text_:in in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01395111 = score(doc=3961,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
    0.06325441 = weight(_text_:education in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06325441 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.3123144 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This paper analyses the approach to resource discovery in the educational domain and stresses this community's need for a subject approach to information. The use of both general (Dublin Core) and domain specific (IEEE Learning Object Metadata/IMS Metadata) metadata schemas for learning resource discovery suggests that library classification could be used for subject description. There are several reasons why this indexing language might be suitable for the indexing of education resources. The paper will explain the reasoning behind the application of Universal Decimal Classification in the EASEL (Educator's Access to Services in the Electronic Landscape - http://www.fdgroup.com/easel) project. EASEL deploys two Dublin Core and several different application profiles of LOM i.e. IMS Metadata and this paper will explain how these two types of metadata support the use of classification.
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  18. Bueno-de-la-Fuente, G.; Hernández-Pérez, T.; Rodríguez-Mateos, D.; Méndez-Rodríguez, E.M.; Martín-Galán, B.: Study on the use of metadata for digital learning objects in University Institutional Repositories (MODERI) (2009) 0.02 
    0.024600152 = product of:
  0.07380045 = sum of:
    0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 2981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010546046 = score(doc=2981,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2981, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2981)
    0.06325441 = weight(_text_:education in 2981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06325441 = score(doc=2981,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.3123144 = fieldWeight in 2981, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2981)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Metadata is a core issue for the creation of repositories. Different institutional repositories have chosen and use different metadata models, elements and values for describing the range of digital objects they store. Thus, this paper analyzes the current use of metadata describing those Learning Objects that some open higher educational institutions' repositories include in their collections. The goal of this work is to identify and analyze the different metadata models being used to describe educational features of those specific digital educational objects (such as audience, type of educational material, learning objectives, etc.). Also discussed is the concept and typology of Learning Objects (LO) through their use in University Repositories. We will also examine the usefulness of specifically describing those learning objects, setting them apart from other kind of documents included in the repository, mainly scholarly publications and research results of the Higher Education institution.
  19. Poulter, A.: Metaviews: metadata research and teaching in the United Kingdom and Ireland (2003) 0.02 
    0.02196486 = product of:
  0.065894574 = sum of:
    0.013182558 = weight(_text_:in in 1996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013182558 = score(doc=1996,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.22543246 = fieldWeight in 1996, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1996)
    0.052712012 = weight(_text_:education in 1996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052712012 = score(doc=1996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.260262 = fieldWeight in 1996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1996)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Although research and teaching can (and should) be seen as international, there must also be an underlying national focus, based on the structure of higher education in a particular country and a corresponding unique pattern of teaching and research. This column therefore looks at research and teaching in metadata in the UK and Ireland, since I work at Strathclyde University in the UK that teaches and researches metadata. This column illustrates that, indeed, the current state of research and teaching in metadata is currently healthy in the UK and Ireland. There are a variety or research activities related to metadata taking place. These range from metadata for digital preservation through 'mainstream' metadata applications in library and information work to contributing to work an the semantic web itself. Among the leading organisational foci of metadata research in the UK are: - the Metadata Group at UKOLN (formerly the UK Office of Library and Information Networking) at the University of Bath (http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/) - the Semantic Web Research Group at the Institute for Learning and Research Technology (ILRT) at the University of Bristol (http://www.ilrt.bristol.ac.uk/discovery/) - the Centre for Digital Library Research (CDLR) at the University of Strathclyde (http://cdlr.strath.ac.uk/).
  20. Roszkowski, M.; Lukas, C.: ¬A distributed architecture for resource discovery using metadata (1998) 0.02 
    0.021536095 = product of:
  0.06460828 = sum of:
    0.0049714544 = weight(_text_:in in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0049714544 = score(doc=1256,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.08501591 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
    0.05963683 = weight(_text_:education in 1256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05963683 = score(doc=1256,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042989567 = queryNorm
        0.29445285 = fieldWeight in 1256, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1256)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This article describes an approach for linking geographically distributed collections of metadata so that they are searchable as a single collection. We describe the infrastructure, which uses standard Internet protocols such as the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) and the Common Indexing Protocol (CIP), to distribute queries, return results, and exchange index information. We discuss the advantages of using linked collections of authoritative metadata as an alternative to using a keyword indexing search-engine for resource discovery. We examine other architectures that use metadata for resource discovery, such as Dienst/NCSTRL, the AHDS HTTP/Z39.50 Gateway, and the ROADS initiative. Finally, we discuss research issues and future directions of the project. The Internet Scout Project, which is funded by the National Science Foundation and is located in the Computer Sciences Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, is charged with assisting the higher education community in resource discovery on the Internet. To that end, the Scout Report and subsequent subject-specific Scout Reports were developed to guide the U.S. higher education community to research-quality resources. The Scout Report Signpost utilizes the content from the Scout Reports as the basis of a metadata collection. Signpost consists of more than 2000 cataloged Internet sites using established standards such as Library of Congress subject headings and abbreviated call letters, and emerging standards such as the Dublin Core (DC). This searchable and browseable collection is free and freely accessible, as are all of the Internet Scout Project's services.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 469
  • el 76
  • m 25
  • s 17
  • n 4
  • x 3
  • b 2
  • r 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications