Search (124 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Kirby, R.F.: Authority control in NOTIS (1989) 0.04
    0.04421734 = product of:
      0.13265201 = sum of:
        0.012177527 = weight(_text_:in in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012177527 = score(doc=434,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
        0.12047449 = weight(_text_:great in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12047449 = score(doc=434,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The NOTIS Authority Control Module is based on the MARC Format for Authorities. Because NOTIS is an integrated system, the functions of online create/edit, security, and indexing for authority records is very similar to that for bibliographic records. NOTIS also offers a great deal of flexibility in workflow for authority control.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Authority Control in the Online Environment: Considerations and Practices
  2. Borbinha, J.: Authority control in the world of metadata (2004) 0.03
    0.03363397 = product of:
      0.10090191 = sum of:
        0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010546046 = score(doc=5666,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
        0.090355866 = weight(_text_:great in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090355866 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the concept of "metadata" in the scope of the "digital library," two terms recently used in a great diversity of perspectives. It is not the intent to promote privilege of any particular view, but rather to help provide a better understanding of these multiple perspectives. The paper starts with a discussion of the concept of digital library, followed by an analysis of the concept of metadata. It continues with a discussion about the relationship of this concept with technology, services, and scenarios of application. The concluding remarks stress the three main arguments assumed for the relevance of the concept of metadata: the growing number of heterogeneous genres of information resources, the new emerging scenarios for interoperability, and issues related to the cost and complexity of current technology.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Authority control: definition and international experience. Part I"
  3. Hengel, C.: ¬The Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) : reflections upon internationalization and localization of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) (2008) 0.03
    0.031876296 = product of:
      0.09562889 = sum of:
        0.005273023 = weight(_text_:in in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005273023 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
        0.090355866 = weight(_text_:great in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090355866 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    «Current proposals for the future of the Web describe the use of ontologies for making the Web more intelligent for machine and automatic processing. The Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) could be one of the basic building blocks to a »semantic web« when combined with other controlled vocabularies and authority files from such sources as abstracting and indexing services, archives, museums, publishers, etc. Libraries now have an opportunity to make a great contribution to this future and should help make this vision a reality.« This article gives a status report on the VIAF, a cooperative project of the Library of Congress, the Bibliotheque nationale de France, OCLC and the German National Library.
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
  4. Petrucciani, A.: ¬The other half of cataloguing : new models and perspectives for the control of authors and works (2004) 0.03
    0.028374083 = product of:
      0.08512225 = sum of:
        0.0098257 = weight(_text_:in in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0098257 = score(doc=5669,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
        0.07529655 = weight(_text_:great in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07529655 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Today's electronic catalogue makes retrieval of specific records very simple and quick in most (not all) cases, but searches aimed at the reliable retrieval of all material answering a well-defined need (author, work, theme, form, etc.) are still long and tiring, and sometimes impossible, in crowded bibliographic databases. In spite of its great relevance, authority control has been and still is the "poor relative" of cataloguing, the often neglected or overlooked "other half" if we compare it to the creation of bibliographic records. The FRBR study and the new authority control standards (GARR and UNIMARC Authorities) are important steps towards future perspectives. Even today, cataloguing codes do not make clear the difference between the access points for bibliographic records and the relationships (work-to-work, author-to-work, etc.) that are independent from spoecific publications. With the development of richer authority records and relationships, the bibliographic record might be relieved of information related to entities different from publications and of all the functions more suitably worked out upstream or downstream in access systems or by links to the images and/or the texts of the publications themselves. A "light" bibliographic record would no longer be the paramount component of library information systems; it would keep its central role rather as nimble, swift turntable between access and content organization systems and systems for management and display of digital resources themselves.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Authority control: definition and international experience. Part I"
  5. Lucarelli, A.: Work in progress on the new Soggettario (2005) 0.02
    0.02203842 = product of:
      0.06611526 = sum of:
        0.01340767 = weight(_text_:in in 5042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01340767 = score(doc=5042,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.22928205 = fieldWeight in 5042, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5042)
        0.052707586 = weight(_text_:great in 5042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052707586 = score(doc=5042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.21774168 = fieldWeight in 5042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5042)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Work on a prototype of the new Soggettario (the main Italian subject heading list) has begun in October 2004 at the Central National Library of Florence (BNCF). BNCF is involving in the renewal of the most used subject indexing tool of Italian libraries. The project had already produced a Feasibility Study, representing a reference for the works which have started recently. An Italian abstract of the Feasibility Study, and more documentation, can be found in the BCNF website at the Web address <http://www bncf.firenze.sbn.it/progetti/>. Together with the project team and the BNCF staff, some young external consultants are working, who are focusing on the terminological component of the system, namely the prototype of the Thesaurus. At the same time, documents are produced which define procedures, establish criteria, and give guidelines. The list of items by which the prototype started consists of: - the terms included in the updates provided by the Italian National Bibliography (BNI) during the period 1986-1998 (already published in the form of lists); - the items introduced from 1999 to 2005 - other items introduced in the past years but never recorded; - some terms from the Soggettario (1956) or from BNI updates (1956-19S5), being especially outdated and needing revision. In building the semantic networks and the hierarchies, and in making the terminological control, of course, more terms have to be included, which come from the Soggettario, the BNI and other authoritative sources both catalographic (various indexing tools) and lexicographic (general and special directories). DDC numbers are also related to the terms in the Thesaurus. The prototype, to be completed in April 2006, will include a sample of terms for each disciplinary area. About 5000 terms will have a complete structure, but 6000 more will be included in the Thesaurus in order to fill the semantic networks, and marked with a different working status. For the prototype the AgroVoc software is used, which has been provided by FAO and adapted by the BNCF computing staff in order to match the specific requirements of the project. Thanks to the potential of this software, we intend to test in future on the multilingual side of terminology. Such work is likely to begin by testing links to the corresponding forms used by the Library of Congress. We are currently beginning to focus on this, and we wish that external parties be involved which are concerned with multilingual terminology in more or less specialistic contexts. We will follow the road of conventions with Italian universities, which could cooperate to this development through their students and graded students. We are also looking at the developments in the work of the British BSI working group on standards for thesauri convened by Stella Dextre Clarke.
    Testing on the syntactic component of the language is in progress, carried out by a team working on the basis of some terms of the Thesaurus which have been identified for possessing some special features. This will maybe lead to some changes and simplifications in the original structures coming from the GRIS model <http://wwwaib.it/aib/commiss/gris/ guida.htm> and the Feasibility Study. Within June 2006, two basic documents will be published: - a paper volume containing the Rules, concerning both terminology and syntax, explanations of the Thesaurus, criteria, choices made about the categories and the width of the semantic network, etc.; - a CD containing the Thesaurus. One side of great interest will be the c-learning process of the indexing language of the new Soggettario. This has to be undertaken only after the prototype stage is done. At that time, once the text of the Rules will have been published, it will be possible for the system to spread, to be learned, and to be tested by various indexers and partners.
  6. Gnoli, C.: Knowledge organization in Italy (2004) 0.02
    0.016768694 = product of:
      0.050306078 = sum of:
        0.01340767 = weight(_text_:in in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01340767 = score(doc=3750,freq=38.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.22928205 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
              6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                38.0 = termFreq=38.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
        0.036898408 = weight(_text_:education in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036898408 = score(doc=3750,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.1821834 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    As an Italian chapter of ISKO has recently been reorganized, I was kindly invited to Write a short report an current KO activities in our country. So, in the following, I will briefly illustrate the local situation of the various kinds of knowledge organization systems, as well as related developments and activities. I am grateful to Paola Capitani, Emanuela Casson, Michele Santoro, and Lorena Zuccolo for providing useful information to be included here.
    Content
    "Subject headings Many Italian libraries create subject headings for their catalogues, using as a reference guide the "Soggettario per i catalogui delle biblioteche italiane." This is basically a list of subject terms created by the Biblioteca nazionale centrale di Firenze (BNCF), first published in 1956 and later updated with various lists of new subject headings. Though the Soggettario is still the main available reference, librarians are generally aware that it is outdated in both vocabulary and structure, especially as it does not provide explicit principles and rules to create and combine subject headings. A research group, called the Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto (GRIS), was founded in 1990. It was devoted to improving the principles and consistency of subject indexing. Its members have performed in depth investigations of the structure of subject headings, starting with the principles of facet analysis used in PRECIS and including original developments. Results of their work are coded into the Guida all'indicizzazione per soggetto, published in 1996 and available also online <http:// wwwaib.it/aib/commiss/gris/gulda.htm>. The GRIS guide does not concern vocabulary, but morphological and syntactical rules for choosing and combining terms according to a sound citation order, based an a "role scheme." Unfortunately, GRIS principles have been applied only in a small number of libraries, mainly in Tuscany, rohere most GRIS members are located. A new project is now attempting to blend the traditional authority of the Soggettario with the more advanced principles of GRIS. A working group has been formed with people from BNCF, GRIS, and others, to study the feasibility of a renewal of the Soggettario. The group produced a report book in 2002, specifying the desirable features of the new system, and is at present searching for grants to implement it.
    Terminology and thesauri BNCF is also involved in a working group collecting information an online terminological resources <http://wwwindire.it/websemantico>. The group is headed by Paola Capitani, and has organized several roundtables an terminology in special domains, such as economy, fashion, law, and education. Thesauri are generally poorly known and used in Italy, although there are significant exceptions: among faceted systems we can mention the "Thesauro italiano di sociologia," published in 1999, and the "Thesaurus regionale toscano," as well as specialized an social sciences including a general outline, available both in print (1996) and online <http:// www regione.toscana.it/ius/ns-thesaurus/>. Classification systems The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is by far the most widespread classification scheme in Italian libraries. A working group, coordinated by Luigi Crocetti, regularly translates the new editions of DDC manuals, and gives refresher courses an it for librarians. BNCF makes DDC numbers for bibliographical records both of its own catalogue, and of the national bibliography (= Bibliografia nazionale italiana: BNI), which is available for other libraries in a CD-ROM edition. A very large number of public libraries use DDC for their shelfmarks, so that users are accustomed to it. This situation is different from other European countries, e.g., Spain where UDC is widespread."
  7. Leth, P.: Subject access - the Swedish approach (2007) 0.02
    0.015164334 = product of:
      0.045493003 = sum of:
        0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010546046 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
        0.034946956 = product of:
          0.06989391 = sum of:
            0.06989391 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06989391 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  8. Hengel, C.: Mapping name authorities : the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) (2007) 0.02
    0.015164334 = product of:
      0.045493003 = sum of:
        0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010546046 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
        0.034946956 = product of:
          0.06989391 = sum of:
            0.06989391 = weight(_text_:22 in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06989391 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  9. Goossens, P.: Authority control : trends and challenges (2007) 0.02
    0.015164334 = product of:
      0.045493003 = sum of:
        0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010546046 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
        0.034946956 = product of:
          0.06989391 = sum of:
            0.06989391 = weight(_text_:22 in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06989391 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  10. Horn, M.E.: "Garbage" in, "refuse and refuse disposal" out : making the most of the subject authority file in the OPAC (2002) 0.01
    0.011818215 = product of:
      0.035454646 = sum of:
        0.01506892 = weight(_text_:in in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01506892 = score(doc=156,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.2576908 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
        0.020385725 = product of:
          0.04077145 = sum of:
            0.04077145 = weight(_text_:22 in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077145 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access in the OPAC, as discussed in this article, is predicated on two different kinds of searching: subject (authority, alphabetic, or controlled vocabulary searching) or keyword (uncontrolled, free text, natural language vocabulary). The literature has focused on demonstrating that both approaches are needed, but very few authors address the need to integrate keyword into authority searching. The article discusses this difference and compares, with a query on the term garbage, search results in two online catalogs, one that performs keyword searches through the authority file and one where only bibliographic records are included in keyword searches.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Russell, B.M.; Spillane, J.L.: Using the Web for name authority work (2001) 0.01
    0.011380568 = product of:
      0.034141704 = sum of:
        0.01375598 = weight(_text_:in in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01375598 = score(doc=167,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
        0.020385725 = product of:
          0.04077145 = sum of:
            0.04077145 = weight(_text_:22 in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077145 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    While many catalogers are using the Web to find the information they need to perform authority work quickly and accurately, the full potential of the Web to assist catalogers in name authority work has yet to be realized. The ever-growing nature of the Web means that available information for creating personal name, corporate name, and other types of headings will increase. In this article, we examine ways in which simple and effective Web searching can save catalogers time and money in the process of authority work. In addition, questions involving evaluating authority information found on the Web are explored.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Vellucci, S.L.: Metadata and authority control (2000) 0.01
    0.011380568 = product of:
      0.034141704 = sum of:
        0.01375598 = weight(_text_:in in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01375598 = score(doc=180,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
        0.020385725 = product of:
          0.04077145 = sum of:
            0.04077145 = weight(_text_:22 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077145 = score(doc=180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    A variety of information communities have developed metadata schemes to meet the needs of their own users. The ability of libraries to incorporate and use multiple metadata schemes in current library systems will depend on the compatibility of imported data with existing catalog data. Authority control will play an important role in metadata interoperability. In this article, I discuss factors for successful authority control in current library catalogs, which include operation in a well-defined and bounded universe, application of principles and standard practices to access point creation, reference to authoritative lists, and bibliographic record creation by highly trained individuals. Metadata characteristics and environmental models are examined and the likelihood of successful authority control is explored for a variety of metadata environments.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01
    0.011080294 = product of:
      0.03324088 = sum of:
        0.009942909 = weight(_text_:in in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009942909 = score(doc=249,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.023297971 = product of:
          0.046595942 = sum of:
            0.046595942 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046595942 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.01
    0.010347021 = product of:
      0.031041062 = sum of:
        0.010655336 = weight(_text_:in in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010655336 = score(doc=5760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
        0.020385725 = product of:
          0.04077145 = sum of:
            0.04077145 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077145 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.01
    0.0101349 = product of:
      0.030404698 = sum of:
        0.015843466 = weight(_text_:in in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015843466 = score(doc=190,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.27093613 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.014561232 = product of:
          0.029122464 = sum of:
            0.029122464 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029122464 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
  16. Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006) 0.01
    0.009695257 = product of:
      0.02908577 = sum of:
        0.008700045 = weight(_text_:in in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008700045 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.14877784 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
        0.020385725 = product of:
          0.04077145 = sum of:
            0.04077145 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04077145 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Tillett, B.B.: Authority control at the international level (2000) 0.01
    0.008128977 = product of:
      0.024386931 = sum of:
        0.0098257 = weight(_text_:in in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0098257 = score(doc=191,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
        0.014561232 = product of:
          0.029122464 = sum of:
            0.029122464 = weight(_text_:22 in 191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029122464 = score(doc=191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    International efforts to provide authority control include the work of IFLA, the AUTHOR Project funded by the European Commission, and related work conducted under the auspices of the ICA/CDS. IFLA developed the guidelines Form and Structure of Corporate Headings, documented the formulation of names along the lines of national origin in its publication Names of Persons, and published Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries. Attention has shifted from a single authority record for each entity that would be shared internationally through the exchange of records to linking parallel authority records for the same entity. The access control of the future will account for difference in cataloging rules, transliteration standards, and cultural differences within the same language as well as for the need for different languages and scripts and will enable users to display the script and form of a heading that they expect. Project AUTHOR is a shared set of resource national authority files that used selections from the authority files of France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, and Belgium. The prototype tested an adaptation of Z39.50 server software for authority records and displays for user interface. An international standard for authority control records has been developed for corporate bodies, persons, and families. Through joint meetings efforts have been synchronized to develop authority control at the international level.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
  18. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.01
    0.007783202 = product of:
      0.023349606 = sum of:
        0.008788372 = weight(_text_:in in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008788372 = score(doc=1291,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
        0.014561232 = product of:
          0.029122464 = sum of:
            0.029122464 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029122464 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  19. Udoh, D.J.E.; Aderibigbe, M.R.: ¬The problems of development, maintenance, and automation of authority files in Nigeria (1987) 0.00
    0.003100247 = product of:
      0.01860148 = sum of:
        0.01860148 = weight(_text_:in in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01860148 = score(doc=400,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.31810042 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the problems of establishing and maintaining authority files in general and in Nigeria in particular. It spotlights the role that authority files can play not only in promoting uniformity of cataloging practice, but in allowing local concepts to be introduced. Also examined is the possibility of introducing automation into this aspect of library work in developing countries.
  20. Souza, R. de Mattos: ¬The representation of archival information in controlled vocabularies : the context of the archival institutions in Rio de Janeiro (2019) 0.00
    0.0030196158 = product of:
      0.018117694 = sum of:
        0.018117694 = weight(_text_:in in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018117694 = score(doc=5490,freq=34.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.3098273 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
              5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                34.0 = termFreq=34.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    We aim to trace the scenario of the use of controlled vocabularies as tools of research and work in the scope of representation and retrieval of information in institutions that have archival collections, in order to highlight the need for greater emphasis on the subject of representation of archival information in the academic field, increasing the visibility for the study and analysis of the collections in question and their contents, relevant to the information society. We investigate the current scenario of the use of controlled vocabularies in the archival collections of Rio de Janeiro, the theoretical-methodological changes arising from the impacts of information technologies on analysis, representation, such as classification and indexing, content retrieval, information needs in the contemporary world. The representation of information is associated with classification and retrieval of information to the organization of knowledge in information science. There is a gap in the archival area regarding the expression representation of information from the description of the nineteenth century. As for the theoretical-methodological aspect, there was a theoretical survey of the representation of information in publications in the interdisciplinary areas; as to the op-erational methodology, questionnaires were applied to information agencies on the use of controlled vocabularies, in relation to the treatment of information in archival collections. We conclude by demonstrating the importance of adopting the concept of information representation in archives, using controlled vocabularies associated with new information technologies and informational ecology, consolidating the area as a scientific and interdisciplinary field for information science.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue on Archival Knowledge Organization

Years

Types

  • a 118
  • el 10
  • b 2
  • m 1
  • More… Less…