-
Read, S.: ¬The new guide to working from home (1995)
0.18
0.18476105 = product of:
0.55428314 = sum of:
0.29510102 = weight(_text_:great in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.29510102 = score(doc=780,freq=12.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
1.2190994 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.25918216 = product of:
0.5183643 = sum of:
0.5183643 = weight(_text_:britain in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.5183643 = score(doc=780,freq=12.0), product of:
0.32082173 = queryWeight, product of:
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
1.6157395 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- LCSH
- Home / based businesses / Great Britain
Small business / Great Britain
New business enterprises / Great Britain
- Subject
- Home / based businesses / Great Britain
Small business / Great Britain
New business enterprises / Great Britain
-
Anderson, J.D.: Education for indexing in North America : course content, emphasis and approach (1982)
0.06
0.060913276 = product of:
0.18273982 = sum of:
0.014061396 = weight(_text_:in in 6173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014061396 = score(doc=6173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 6173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6173)
0.16867843 = weight(_text_:education in 6173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16867843 = score(doc=6173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.8328384 = fieldWeight in 6173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6173)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
-
Hedden, H.: Creating an index for your Web site to make info easier to see (2006)
0.04
0.04250173 = product of:
0.12750518 = sum of:
0.007030698 = weight(_text_:in in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007030698 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.12047449 = weight(_text_:great in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12047449 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Most libraries have long had their own Web sites. The longer a library has had a Web site the more likely it is that the number of pages, and the amount of information within those pages, has grown beyond what users can find simply with the navigation menu. Building a site index is a great way to help seekers find all those bits of data they might otherwise miss.
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 26(2006) no.9, S.16-
-
Connolly, D.A.: ¬The many uses of Email discussion lists (2000)
0.03
0.03442403 = product of:
0.10327208 = sum of:
0.012916218 = weight(_text_:in in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012916218 = score(doc=216,freq=12.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
0.090355866 = weight(_text_:great in 216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.090355866 = score(doc=216,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 216, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=216)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- If you want to let other indexers know about a great new medical dictionary, discuss the pros and cons of using prepositions in subentries, find an indexer in Phoenix, or maybe share some marketing tips, then consider joining an email discussion list. Email discussion lists provide numerous tools and opportunities for indexers, especially for freelancers. Despite the rapid growth of Web- and graphical-based communication, email remains the linchpin of electronic communication. While the World Wide Web has become ubiquitous in our society, email remains the most reliable form of electronic communication. Email access is more prevalent than Web access, less cumbersome, and some would say, more egalitarian. Despite improvements over time, Web access is not available in equal quality or proportion to email access, especially in poorer or developing areas. Indeed, many users who have access to both restrict their use of the Web for important research efforts, and maintain nearconstant connection with their email servers for daily business
- Issue
- Beyond book indexing: how to get started in Web indexing, embedded indexing and other computer-based media. Ed. by D. Brenner u. M. Rowland.
-
Bakewell, K.G.B.; Rowland, G.: Indexing and abstracting (1993)
0.03
0.030456638 = product of:
0.09136991 = sum of:
0.007030698 = weight(_text_:in in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007030698 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
0.08433922 = weight(_text_:education in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08433922 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.4164192 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- State of the art review of UK developments in indexing and abstracting druing the period 1986-1990 covering: bibliographies of indexing and abstracting; British standards (including the revised British Standard on indexing, BS 3700); Wheatley Medal and Carey Award; a list of indexes published during this period; the role of the computer and automatic indexing; hypermedia; PRECIS; POPSI, relational indexing; thesauri; education and training; the indexing process, newspaper indexing; fiction indexes; the indexing profession; and a review of abstracting and indexing services
-
Software for Indexing (2003)
0.02
0.02085473 = product of:
0.06256419 = sum of:
0.009321478 = weight(_text_:in in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009321478 = score(doc=2294,freq=36.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.15940484 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.053242706 = weight(_text_:great in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053242706 = score(doc=2294,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.21995232 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 30(2003) no.2, S.115-116 (C. Jacobs): "This collection of articles by indexing practitioners, software designers and vendors is divided into five sections: Dedicated Software, Embedded Software, Online and Web Indexing Software, Database and Image Software, and Voice-activated, Automatic, and Machine-aided Software. This diversity is its strength. Part 1 is introduced by two chapters an choosing dedicated software, highlighting the issues involved and providing tips an evaluating requirements. The second chapter includes a fourteen page chart that analyzes the attributes of Authex Plus, three versions of CINDEX 1.5, MACREX 7, two versions of SKY Index (5.1 and 6.0) and wINDEX. The lasting value in this chart is its utility in making the prospective user aware of the various attributes/capabilities that are possible and that should be considered. The following chapters consist of 16 testimonials for these software packages, completed by a final chapter an specialized/customized software. The point is made that if a particular software function could increase your efficiency, it can probably be created. The chapters in Part 2, Embedded Software, go into a great deal more detail about how the programs work, and are less reviews than illustrations of functionality. Perhaps this is because they are not really stand-alones, but are functions within, or add-ons used with larger word processing or publishing programs. The software considered are Microsoft Word, FrameMaker, PageMaker, IndexTension 3.1.5 that is used with QuarkXPress, and Index Tools Professional and IXgen that are used with FrameMaker. The advantages and disadvantages of embedded indexing are made very clear, but the actual illustrations are difficult to follow if one has not worked at all with embedded software. Nonetheless, the section is valuable as it highlights issues and provides pointers an solutions to embedded indexing problems.
Part 3, Online and Web Indexing Software, opens with a chapter in which the functionalities of HTML/Prep, HTML Indexer, and RoboHELP HTML Edition are compared. The following three chapters look at them individually. This section helps clarify the basic types of non-database web indexing - that used for back-of-the-book style indexes, and that used for online help indexes. The first chapter of Part 4, Database and image software, begins with a good discussion of what database indexing is, but falls to carry through with any listing of general characteristics, problems and attributes that should be considered when choosing database indexing software. It does include the results of an informal survey an the Yahoogroups database indexing site, as well as three short Gase studies an database indexing projects. The survey provides interesting information about freelancing, but it is not very useful if you are trying to gather information about different software. For example, the most common type of software used by those surveyed turns out to be word-processing software. This seems an odd/awkward choice, and it would have been helpful to know how and why the non-specialized software is being used. The survey serves as a snapshot of a particular segment of database indexing practice, but is not helpful if you are thinking about purchasing, adapting, or commissioning software. The three case studies give an idea of the complexity of database indexing and there is a helpful bibliography.
A chapter an image indexing starts with a useful discussion of the elements of bibliographic description needed for visual materials and of the variations in the functioning and naming of functions in different software packaltes. Sample features are discussed in light of four different software systems: MAVIS, Convera Screening Room, CONTENTdm, and Virage speech and pattern recognition programs. The chapter concludes with an overview of what one has to consider when choosing a system. The last chapter in this section is an oddball one an creating a back-ofthe-book index using Microsoft Excel. The author warns: "It is not pretty, and it is not recommended" (p.209). A curiosity, but it should have been included as a counterpoint in the first part, not as part of the database indexing section. The final section begins with an excellent article an voice recognition software (Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred), followed by a look at "automatic indexing" through a critique of Sonar Bookends Automatic Indexing Generator. The final two chapters deal with Data Harmony's Machine Aided Indexer; one of them refers specifically to a news content indexing system. In terms of scope, this reviewer would have liked to see thesaurus management software included since thesaurus management and the integration of thesauri with database indexing software are common and time-consuming concerns. There are also a few editorial glitches, such as the placement of the oddball article and inconsistent uses of fonts and caps (eg: VIRAGE and Virage), but achieving consistency with this many authors is, indeed, a difficult task. More serious is the fact that the index is inconsistent. It reads as if authors submitted their own keywords which were then harmonized, so that the level of indexing varies by chapter. For example, there is an entry for "controlled vocabulary" (p.265) (singular) with one locator, no cross-references. There is an entry for "thesaurus software" (p.274) with two locators, plus a separate one for "Thesaurus Master" (p.274) with three locators. There are also references to thesauri/ controlled vocabularies/taxonomies that are not mentioned in the index (e.g., the section Thesaurus management an p.204). This is sad. All too often indexing texts have poor indexes, I suppose because we are as prone to having to work under time pressures as the rest of the authors and editors in the world. But a good index that meets basic criteria should be a highlight in any book related to indexing. Overall this is a useful, if uneven, collection of articles written over the past few years. Because of the great variation between articles both in subject and in approach, there is something for everyone. The collection will be interesting to anyone who wants to be aware of how indexing software works and what it can do. I also definitely recommend it for information science teaching collections since the explanations of the software carry implicit in them descriptions of how the indexing process itself is approached. However, the book's utility as a guide to purchasing choices is limited because of the unevenness; the vendor-written articles and testimonials are interesting and can certainly be helpful, but there are not nearly enough objective reviews. This is not a straight listing and comparison of software packaltes, but it deserves wide circulation since it presents an overall picture of the state of indexing software used by freelancers."
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Information Today, in association with the American Society of Indexers
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.02
0.017691724 = product of:
0.053075172 = sum of:
0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012303721 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.04077145 = product of:
0.0815429 = sum of:
0.0815429 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0815429 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.02
0.017691724 = product of:
0.053075172 = sum of:
0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012303721 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.04077145 = product of:
0.0815429 = sum of:
0.0815429 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0815429 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.02
0.017691724 = product of:
0.053075172 = sum of:
0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012303721 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.04077145 = product of:
0.0815429 = sum of:
0.0815429 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0815429 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.02
0.017691724 = product of:
0.053075172 = sum of:
0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012303721 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.04077145 = product of:
0.0815429 = sum of:
0.0815429 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0815429 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001)
0.02
0.017691724 = product of:
0.053075172 = sum of:
0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012303721 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.04077145 = product of:
0.0815429 = sum of:
0.0815429 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0815429 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004)
0.02
0.017691724 = product of:
0.053075172 = sum of:
0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012303721 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.04077145 = product of:
0.0815429 = sum of:
0.0815429 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0815429 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 17.10.2005 13:54:22
-
Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992)
0.02
0.015164334 = product of:
0.045493003 = sum of:
0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010546046 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.034946956 = product of:
0.06989391 = sum of:
0.06989391 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06989391 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.015164334 = product of:
0.045493003 = sum of:
0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010546046 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.034946956 = product of:
0.06989391 = sum of:
0.06989391 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06989391 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.01
0.014297072 = product of:
0.042891216 = sum of:
0.009942909 = weight(_text_:in in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009942909 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.032948308 = product of:
0.065896615 = sum of:
0.065896615 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065896615 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Bell, H.K.: History of societies of indexing : part VII: 1992-95 (2000)
0.01
0.013850367 = product of:
0.0415511 = sum of:
0.012428636 = weight(_text_:in in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012428636 = score(doc=113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.029122464 = product of:
0.05824493 = sum of:
0.05824493 = weight(_text_:22 in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05824493 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The development of international relations and technology predominated in indexing through these four years, 1992-95, as reflected in the four societies' international journal, The Indexer.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.81-83
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.01
0.012453123 = product of:
0.037359368 = sum of:
0.014061396 = weight(_text_:in in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014061396 = score(doc=1427,freq=8.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.023297971 = product of:
0.046595942 = sum of:
0.046595942 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595942 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Shuttleworth, C.: Marot, Hofstadter, index (1998)
0.01
0.011080294 = product of:
0.03324088 = sum of:
0.009942909 = weight(_text_:in in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009942909 = score(doc=4642,freq=4.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.023297971 = product of:
0.046595942 = sum of:
0.046595942 = weight(_text_:22 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595942 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Comments on Douglas Hofstadter's index to his book 'Le ton beau de Marot: in praise of the music of language'. Hofstadter took charge of the book design, typography, typesetting and copy-editing, and also compiled the index which covers 23 pages of 3 columnes and is set in a practically illegible 4-point. Although the index breaks all the rules of indexing, it is a masterly creation showing the author's industry, exhuberance and wit. Summarizes Hofstadter's own remarks on how creating the index gave hin new insights into what his book was essentially about
- Source
- Indexer. 21(1998) no.1, S.22-23
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.010109557 = product of:
0.030328669 = sum of:
0.007030698 = weight(_text_:in in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007030698 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.023297971 = product of:
0.046595942 = sum of:
0.046595942 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046595942 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
-
Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006)
0.01
0.0097117005 = product of:
0.0291351 = sum of:
0.014573867 = weight(_text_:in in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014573867 = score(doc=5775,freq=22.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.24922498 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.014561232 = product of:
0.029122464 = sum of:
0.029122464 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029122464 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Moving beyond the presentation layer: content and context in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System"
