-
Sweeney, R.: Dewey in Great Britain and Northern Ireland (1985)
0.23
0.23331586 = product of:
0.4666317 = sum of:
0.014061396 = weight(_text_:in in 2568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014061396 = score(doc=2568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 2568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2568)
0.24094898 = weight(_text_:great in 2568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24094898 = score(doc=2568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.99539053 = fieldWeight in 2568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2568)
0.21162134 = product of:
0.4232427 = sum of:
0.4232427 = weight(_text_:britain in 2568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.4232427 = score(doc=2568,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32082173 = queryWeight, product of:
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
1.3192457 = fieldWeight in 2568, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2568)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.20
0.19724123 = product of:
0.29586184 = sum of:
0.068278834 = product of:
0.20483649 = sum of:
0.20483649 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483649 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.005273023 = weight(_text_:in in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005273023 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.20483649 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483649 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.017473478 = product of:
0.034946956 = sum of:
0.034946956 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034946956 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
- Abstract
- Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Bell, H.K.: History of indexing societies : Pt.6: 1988-91 (2000)
0.19
0.1893459 = product of:
0.5680377 = sum of:
0.18071173 = weight(_text_:great in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18071173 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.74654293 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
0.38732594 = sum of:
0.31743202 = weight(_text_:britain in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.31743202 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32082173 = queryWeight, product of:
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.98943424 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
0.06989391 = weight(_text_:22 in 506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06989391 = score(doc=506,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 506, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=506)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- History of the Society of Indexers (Great Britain) and other societies of indexers
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.35-38
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.19
0.18559223 = product of:
0.37118447 = sum of:
0.09103845 = product of:
0.27311534 = sum of:
0.27311534 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27311534 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.007030698 = weight(_text_:in in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007030698 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.27311534 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27311534 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019)
0.19
0.1854388 = product of:
0.3708776 = sum of:
0.068278834 = product of:
0.20483649 = sum of:
0.20483649 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483649 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.012916218 = weight(_text_:in in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012916218 = score(doc=484,freq=12.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.28968254 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28968254 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Eine der wesentlichen Aufgaben als Fachreferent*in ist die inhaltliche Erschließung der neuerworbenen Literatur, sowie die Begutachtung und Auswahl der neu erschienenen Werke in den jeweiligen Fachgebieten hinsichtlich der Relevanz für die eigenen Sammlungen gemäß dem Sammlungsprofil der TU Wien Bibliothek. Im Zuge der Corona-Krise wurde die herkömmliche Arbeitsweise in der Sacherschließung beeinträchtigt, und es haben sich neue Herausforderungen, aber auch Möglichkeiten ergeben. Neben der fehlenden Autopsie der Literatur leidet auch die Sichtung und Erwerbung neuer Literatur unter der physischen Abwesenheit vom Arbeitsplatz bzw. der entsprechenden technischen Infrastruktur. Auch der persönliche Austausch mit den Kolleg*innen wurde deutlich erschwert. Neben den Schwierigkeiten wurden aber auch die neuen Handlungsoptionen auf beruflicher und individueller Ebene positiv gesehen. In dem Artikel werden unsere individuellen Erfahrungen an der TU Wien Bibliothek sowie Ausblicke in die Zukunft wiedergegeben.
- Footnote
- https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.18
0.18270928 = product of:
0.36541855 = sum of:
0.068278834 = product of:
0.20483649 = sum of:
0.20483649 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483649 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.007457182 = weight(_text_:in in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007457182 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.28968254 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28968254 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.17
0.16619527 = product of:
0.33239055 = sum of:
0.07965864 = product of:
0.23897591 = sum of:
0.23897591 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23897591 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.01375598 = weight(_text_:in in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01375598 = score(doc=306,freq=10.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.23897591 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23897591 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Wakeling, S.; Spezi, V.; Fry, J.; Creaser, C.; Pinfield, S.; Willett, P.: Academic communities : the role of journals and open-access mega-journals in scholarly communication (2019)
0.15
0.15226862 = product of:
0.22840291 = sum of:
0.012428636 = weight(_text_:in in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012428636 = score(doc=4627,freq=16.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
0.07454605 = weight(_text_:education in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07454605 = score(doc=4627,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.36806607 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
0.07529655 = weight(_text_:great in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07529655 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
0.066131674 = product of:
0.13226335 = sum of:
0.13226335 = weight(_text_:britain in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13226335 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32082173 = queryWeight, product of:
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.4122643 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into publication practices from the perspective of academics working within four disciplinary communities: biosciences, astronomy/physics, education and history. The paper explores the ways in which these multiple overlapping communities intersect with the journal landscape and the implications for the adoption and use of new players in the scholarly communication system, particularly open-access mega-journals (OAMJs). OAMJs (e.g. PLOS ONE and Scientific Reports) are large, broad scope, open-access journals that base editorial decisions solely on the technical/scientific soundness of the article. Design/methodology/approach Focus groups with active researchers in these fields were held in five UK Higher Education Institutions across Great Britain, and were complemented by interviews with pro-vice-chancellors for research at each institution. Findings A strong finding to emerge from the data is the notion of researchers belonging to multiple overlapping communities, with some inherent tensions in meeting the requirements for these different audiences. Researcher perceptions of evaluation mechanisms were found to play a major role in attitudes towards OAMJs, and interviews with the pro-vice-chancellors for research indicate that there is a difference between researchers' perceptions and the values embedded in institutional frameworks. Originality/value This is the first purely qualitative study relating to researcher perspectives on OAMJs. The findings of the paper will be of interest to publishers, policy-makers, research managers and academics.
-
Hallonsten, O.; Holmberg, D.: Analyzing structural stratification in the Swedish higher education system : data contextualization with policy-history analysis (2013)
0.15
0.15184247 = product of:
0.2277637 = sum of:
0.008788372 = weight(_text_:in in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008788372 = score(doc=668,freq=8.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.12911753 = weight(_text_:education in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12911753 = score(doc=668,freq=12.0), product of:
0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.6375091 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.07529655 = weight(_text_:great in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07529655 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.014561232 = product of:
0.029122464 = sum of:
0.029122464 = weight(_text_:22 in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029122464 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
- Abstract
- 20th century massification of higher education and research in academia is said to have produced structurally stratified higher education systems in many countries. Most manifestly, the research mission of universities appears to be divisive. Authors have claimed that the Swedish system, while formally unified, has developed into a binary state, and statistics seem to support this conclusion. This article makes use of a comprehensive statistical data source on Swedish higher education institutions to illustrate stratification, and uses literature on Swedish research policy history to contextualize the statistics. Highlighting the opportunities as well as constraints of the data, the article argues that there is great merit in combining statistics with a qualitative analysis when studying the structural characteristics of national higher education systems. Not least the article shows that it is an over-simplification to describe the Swedish system as binary; the stratification is more complex. On basis of the analysis, the article also argues that while global trends certainly influence national developments, higher education systems have country-specific features that may enrich the understanding of how systems evolve and therefore should be analyzed as part of a broader study of the increasingly globalized academic system.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:43:01
-
Slack, F.: Subject searching in OPACs : a general survey of facilities available on OPACs in academic libraries in the UK (1988)
0.15
0.15125392 = product of:
0.30250785 = sum of:
0.0196514 = weight(_text_:in in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0196514 = score(doc=4241,freq=10.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.3360549 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
0.1505931 = weight(_text_:great in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1505931 = score(doc=4241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.62211907 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
0.13226335 = product of:
0.2645267 = sum of:
0.2645267 = weight(_text_:britain in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2645267 = score(doc=4241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32082173 = queryWeight, product of:
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.8245286 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch die neuere Studie: Crawford, J.C. et al.: A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain in: Journal of librarianship and information science 25(1993) no.2, S.85-93)
-
Hufford, J.R.: Use studies and OPACs (1991)
0.15
0.14764255 = product of:
0.2952851 = sum of:
0.012428636 = weight(_text_:in in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012428636 = score(doc=1589,freq=4.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.1505931 = weight(_text_:great in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1505931 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.62211907 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.13226335 = product of:
0.2645267 = sum of:
0.2645267 = weight(_text_:britain in 1589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2645267 = score(doc=1589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32082173 = queryWeight, product of:
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.8245286 = fieldWeight in 1589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- This article discusses the major catalog use studies that have been conducted in the United States and Great Britain. The potential to influence the construction of new online public access catalogs is emphasized. The cumulative findings could serve as an information base which designers of OPAC systems could refer to in the course of their work
-
Gilbert, J.: AACR2 headings for local churches and parishes in Great Britain (1997)
0.15
0.1458224 = product of:
0.2916448 = sum of:
0.008788372 = weight(_text_:in in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008788372 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
0.1505931 = weight(_text_:great in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1505931 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.62211907 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
0.13226335 = product of:
0.2645267 = sum of:
0.2645267 = weight(_text_:britain in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2645267 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32082173 = queryWeight, product of:
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.8245286 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.14
0.14112423 = product of:
0.28224847 = sum of:
0.068278834 = product of:
0.20483649 = sum of:
0.20483649 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483649 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.009133145 = weight(_text_:in in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009133145 = score(doc=862,freq=6.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.1561842 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.20483649 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483649 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.14
0.13919418 = product of:
0.27838835 = sum of:
0.068278834 = product of:
0.20483649 = sum of:
0.20483649 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483649 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.005273023 = weight(_text_:in in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005273023 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.20483649 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483649 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.14
0.13919418 = product of:
0.27838835 = sum of:
0.068278834 = product of:
0.20483649 = sum of:
0.20483649 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483649 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.005273023 = weight(_text_:in in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005273023 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.09017298 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.20483649 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20483649 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Bell, H.K.: History of indexing societies : Pt.4: 1978-82 (1998)
0.13
0.13199967 = product of:
0.395999 = sum of:
0.21083035 = weight(_text_:great in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21083035 = score(doc=504,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.87096673 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
0.18516868 = product of:
0.37033737 = sum of:
0.37033737 = weight(_text_:britain in 504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.37033737 = score(doc=504,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32082173 = queryWeight, product of:
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
1.15434 = fieldWeight in 504, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=504)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- History of the Society of Indexers (Great Britain)
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.12
0.121384606 = product of:
0.3641538 = sum of:
0.09103845 = product of:
0.27311534 = sum of:
0.27311534 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27311534 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.27311534 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27311534 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Piggott, M.: Some post-war developments in indexing in Great Britain (1996)
0.12
0.120173275 = product of:
0.24034655 = sum of:
0.014061396 = weight(_text_:in in 4449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014061396 = score(doc=4449,freq=8.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 4449, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4449)
0.12047449 = weight(_text_:great in 4449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12047449 = score(doc=4449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 4449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4449)
0.10581067 = product of:
0.21162134 = sum of:
0.21162134 = weight(_text_:britain in 4449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.21162134 = score(doc=4449,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32082173 = queryWeight, product of:
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.65962285 = fieldWeight in 4449, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4449)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Focuses on some specific post war developments in indexing in the UK, including notes on thesauri; online indexing services; Brtish standards; automatic inxeding; and the role of the Society of Indexers
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.12
0.118710905 = product of:
0.23742181 = sum of:
0.056899026 = product of:
0.17069708 = sum of:
0.17069708 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17069708 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0098257 = weight(_text_:in in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0098257 = score(doc=5895,freq=10.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.16802745 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.17069708 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17069708 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- Das Problem der Wahrnehmung und Darstellung von Wahrheit durch die Medien führt zu vier zentralen Fragen: Wie viel Wahrheit gibt es in der Welt, über die Journalisten berichten müssen? Wie ermittelt oder recherchiert man diese Wahrheit? Wie trennt man die Spreu vom Weizen? Und wie geht man als Journalist mit dem um, was man als Wahrheit erkannt hat oder erkannt zu haben glaubt? Hier gibt es ganz offensichtlich eine Parallele zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern. Journalisten und Wissenschaftler brauchen erstens Hypothesen, zweitens geeignete Hypothesentests, drittens ein gutes Abgrenzungs-Kriterium und viertens Verfahren, um die erkannten Sachverhalte auf angemessene Weise für eine Kommunikation mit anderen zu repräsentieren, das heißt sie darzustellen. Es gibt zwei große Unterschiede zwischen Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern: Journalisten sind in der Regel auf raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen aus, Wissenschaftler in der Regel auf raumzeitlich unbegrenzte Gesetze. Aber diese Unterschiede sind fließend, weil Wissenschaftler raum-zeitlich begrenzte Aussagen brauchen, um ihre All-Aussagen zu überprüfen, und Journalisten sich immer häufiger auf das Feld der allgemeinen Gesetzes-Aussagen wagen oder doch zumindest Kausalinterpretationen für soziale Phänomene anbieten. Der zweite Unterschied besteht darin, dass die Wissenschaft weitgehend professionalisiert ist (zumindest gilt dies uneingeschränkt für die Naturwissenschaften und die Medizin), was ihr relativ klare Abgrenzungs- und Güte-Kriterien beschert hat. Diese fehlen weitgehend im Journalismus.
- Content
- Der Beitrag basiert auf einem Vortrag beim 9. Ethiktag "Wissenschaft und Medien" am Zentrum für Ethik und Recht in der Medizin des Universitätsklinikums Freiburg im Februar 2001.
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.12
0.11819224 = product of:
0.23638448 = sum of:
0.056899026 = product of:
0.17069708 = sum of:
0.17069708 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17069708 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.008788372 = weight(_text_:in in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008788372 = score(doc=76,freq=8.0), product of:
0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.15028831 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.17069708 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17069708 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042989567 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
