-
Lai, K.-K.; Wu, S.-J.: Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system (2005)
0.04
0.043034595 = product of:
0.15062107 = sum of:
0.106546625 = weight(_text_:industry in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.106546625 = score(doc=1013,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.04407445 = weight(_text_:management in 1013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04407445 = score(doc=1013,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 1013, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1013)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The paper proposes a new approach to create a patent classification system to replace the IPC or UPC system for conducting patent analysis and management. The new approach is based on co-citation analysis of bibliometrics. The traditional approach for management of patents, which is based on either the IPC or UPC, is too general to meet the needs of specific industries. In addition, some patents are placed in incorrect categories, making it difficult for enterprises to carry out R&D planning, technology positioning, patent strategy-making and technology forecasting. Therefore, it is essential to develop a patent classification system that is adaptive to the characteristics of a specific industry. The analysis of this approach is divided into three phases. Phase I selects appropriate databases to conduct patent searches according to the subject and objective of this study and then select basic patents. Phase II uses the co-cited frequency of the basic patent pairs to assess their similarity. Phase III uses factor analysis to establish a classification system and assess the efficiency of the proposed approach. The main contribution of this approach is to develop a patent classification system based on patent similarities to assist patent manager in understanding the basic patents for a specific industry, the relationships among categories of technologies and the evolution of a technology category.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.313-330
-
Vaughan, L.; Shaw, D.: Web citation data for impact assessment : a comparison of four science disciplines (2005)
0.04
0.038186125 = product of:
0.13365144 = sum of:
0.0996935 = weight(_text_:united in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0996935 = score(doc=3880,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.43829006 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.033957936 = product of:
0.06791587 = sum of:
0.06791587 = weight(_text_:states in 3880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06791587 = score(doc=3880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.304198 = fieldWeight in 3880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- The number and type of Web citations to journal articles in four areas of science are examined: biology, genetics, medicine, and multidisciplinary sciences. For a sample of 5,972 articles published in 114 journals, the median Web citation counts per journal article range from 6.2 in medicine to 10.4 in genetics. About 30% of Web citations in each area indicate intellectual impact (citations from articles or class readings, in contrast to citations from bibliographic services or the author's or journal's home page). Journals receiving more Web citations also have higher percentages of citations indicating intellectual impact. There is significant correlation between the number of citations reported in the databases from the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, now Thomson Scientific) and the number of citations retrieved using the Google search engine (Web citations). The correlation is much weaker for journals published outside the United Kingdom or United States and for multidisciplinary journals. Web citation numbers are higher than ISI citation counts, suggesting that Web searches might be conducted for an earlier or a more fine-grained assessment of an article's impact. The Web-evident impact of non-UK/USA publications might provide a balance to the geographic or cultural biases observed in ISI's data, although the stability of Web citation counts is debatable.
-
Ardanuy, J.: Sixty years of citation analysis studies in the humanities (1951-2010) (2013)
0.04
0.035812076 = product of:
0.12534226 = sum of:
0.084592745 = weight(_text_:united in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084592745 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
0.040749524 = product of:
0.08149905 = sum of:
0.08149905 = weight(_text_:states in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08149905 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This article provides an overview of studies that have used citation analysis in the field of humanities in the period 1951 to 2010. The work is based on an exhaustive search in databases-particularly those in library and information science-and on citation chaining from papers on citation analysis. The results confirm that use of this technique in the humanities is limited, and although there was some growth in the 1970s and 1980s, it has stagnated in the past 2 decades. Most of the work has been done by research staff, but almost one third involves library staff, and 15% has been done by students. The study also showed that less than one fourth of the works used a citation database such as the Arts & Humanities Citation Index and that 21% of the works were in publications other than library and information science journals. The United States has the greatest output, and English is by far the most frequently used language, and 13.9% of the studies are in other languages.
-
Heneberg, P.: Lifting the fog of scientometric research artifacts : on the scientometric analysis of environmental tobacco smoke research (2013)
0.03
0.029843397 = product of:
0.10445189 = sum of:
0.07049395 = weight(_text_:united in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07049395 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.033957936 = product of:
0.06791587 = sum of:
0.06791587 = weight(_text_:states in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06791587 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.304198 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Previous analyses identified research on environmental tobacco smoke to be subject to strong fluctuations as measured by both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The evolution of search algorithms (based on the Web of Science and Web of Knowledge database platforms) was used to show the impact of errors of omission and commission in the outcomes of scientometric research. Optimization of the search algorithm led to the complete reassessment of previously published findings on the performance of environmental tobacco smoke research. Instead of strong continuous growth, the field of environmental tobacco smoke research was shown to experience stagnation or slow growth since mid-1990s when evaluated quantitatively. Qualitative analysis revealed steady but slow increase in the citation rate and decrease in uncitedness. Country analysis revealed the North-European countries as leaders in environmental tobacco smoke research (when the normalized results were evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively), whereas the United States ranked first only when assessing the total number of papers produced. Scientometric research artifacts, including both errors of omission and commission, were shown to be capable of completely obscuring the real output of the chosen research field.
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.02
0.02215745 = product of:
0.07755107 = sum of:
0.061071347 = weight(_text_:management in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061071347 = score(doc=994,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.016479723 = product of:
0.032959446 = sum of:
0.032959446 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032959446 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.01
0.013432972 = product of:
0.0470154 = sum of:
0.030535674 = weight(_text_:management in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030535674 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.016479723 = product of:
0.032959446 = sum of:
0.032959446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032959446 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
-
Trivison, D.: Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity (1987)
0.01
0.011632639 = product of:
0.08142847 = sum of:
0.08142847 = weight(_text_:management in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08142847 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 23(1987), S.183-194
-
Kwok, K.L.: ¬The use of titles and cited titles as document representations for automatic classification (1975)
0.01
0.0101785585 = product of:
0.07124991 = sum of:
0.07124991 = weight(_text_:management in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07124991 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 11(1975), S.201-206
-
He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002)
0.01
0.0101785585 = product of:
0.07124991 = sum of:
0.07124991 = weight(_text_:management in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07124991 = score(doc=2584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.521365 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.4, S.491-508
-
Fujigaki, Y.: ¬The citation system : citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation (1998)
0.01
0.0077618146 = product of:
0.0543327 = sum of:
0.0543327 = product of:
0.1086654 = sum of:
0.1086654 = weight(_text_:states in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1086654 = score(doc=5129,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- States that it can be shown that claims of a lack of theories of citation are also indicative of a great need for a theory which links science dynamics and measurement. There is a wide gap between qualitative (science dynamics) and quantitative (measurement) approaches. To link them, proposes the use of the citation system, that potentially bridges a gap between measurement and epistemology, by applying system theory to the publication system
-
Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001)
0.01
0.00629635 = product of:
0.04407445 = sum of:
0.04407445 = weight(_text_:management in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04407445 = score(doc=5767,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.0062779905 = product of:
0.04394593 = sum of:
0.04394593 = product of:
0.08789186 = sum of:
0.08789186 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08789186 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.01
0.0062779905 = product of:
0.04394593 = sum of:
0.04394593 = product of:
0.08789186 = sum of:
0.08789186 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08789186 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993)
0.01
0.0058163195 = product of:
0.040714234 = sum of:
0.040714234 = weight(_text_:management in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040714234 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.01
0.0058163195 = product of:
0.040714234 = sum of:
0.040714234 = weight(_text_:management in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040714234 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1395-1402
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.0055490118 = product of:
0.03884308 = sum of:
0.03884308 = product of:
0.07768616 = sum of:
0.07768616 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07768616 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005)
0.01
0.0050892793 = product of:
0.035624955 = sum of:
0.035624955 = weight(_text_:management in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035624955 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1403-1418
-
Tho, Q.T.; Hui, S.C.; Fong, A.C.M.: ¬A citation-based document retrieval system for finding research expertise (2007)
0.00
0.0043622395 = product of:
0.030535674 = sum of:
0.030535674 = weight(_text_:management in 956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030535674 = score(doc=956,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 956, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=956)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.1, S.248-264
-
Sidiropoulos, A.; Manolopoulos, Y.: ¬A new perspective to automatically rank scientific conferences using digital libraries (2005)
0.00
0.0043622395 = product of:
0.030535674 = sum of:
0.030535674 = weight(_text_:management in 1011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030535674 = score(doc=1011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1011)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.289-312
-
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I.: Bibliometric maps of field of science (2005)
0.00
0.0043622395 = product of:
0.030535674 = sum of:
0.030535674 = weight(_text_:management in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030535674 = score(doc=1069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1534-1547
