Search (58 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Condron, L.: Management by action : how we're embracing new cataloging work at Tufts (2000) 0.06
    0.06365415 = product of:
      0.14852634 = sum of:
        0.04407445 = weight(_text_:management in 5390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04407445 = score(doc=5390,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 5390, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5390)
        0.07049395 = weight(_text_:united in 5390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07049395 = score(doc=5390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 5390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5390)
        0.033957936 = product of:
          0.06791587 = sum of:
            0.06791587 = weight(_text_:states in 5390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06791587 = score(doc=5390,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.304198 = fieldWeight in 5390, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5390)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Preparing for new cataloging such as metadata beyond MARC and thesauri beyond LCSH, is an exciting and daunting challenge for university libraries. Advancing technologies, as well as a growing demand for quality information with rapid access is fueling the need for technical services departments to restructure their work to accommodate the evolving world of information management. Catalogers who have been following the same procedures and practices for many years may find this change particularly difficult. Team leaders are often faced with breaking through skepticism and resistance to this new work in order to enable necessary progress. We found that discussions and gradual introduction of new directions is important to acceptance by team members. However, just as important is the implementation of an action plan to ensure that progress is ongoing. Reengineering Acquisitions and Cataloging into Current Processes and Information Management Initiatives, along with forming several focus groups to investigate and evaluate cataloging work, is proving successful for embracing new cataloging at Tufts University.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Managing cataloging and the organization of information: philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century. Part II: Specialized and academic libraries in the United States"
  2. Cooperative cataloging : past, present, and future (1993) 0.05
    0.050645925 = product of:
      0.17726073 = sum of:
        0.1196322 = weight(_text_:united in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1196322 = score(doc=375,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.52594805 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
        0.057628527 = product of:
          0.115257055 = sum of:
            0.115257055 = weight(_text_:states in 375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.115257055 = score(doc=375,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.5162411 = fieldWeight in 375, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=375)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Enthält die folgenden Beiträge: TILLETT, B.B.: Catalog it once for all: a history of cooperative cataloging in the United States prior to 1967 (before MARC); ANDERSON, G.: Symmetry and extrapolation: passion and precision - cooperative cataloging at the beginning of the 21st century; BARTLEY, L.K.: The CONSER model: a personal view; HARRIMAN, R.: The news in review: the United States newspaper program; JOACHIM, M.D.: Cooperative cataloging of microform sets; RIEMER, J.J. u. K. MORGENROTH: Hang together or hang separately: the cooperative authority work component of NACO; WIGGINS, B.: The national coordinated cataloging program; ROSENBLATT, S.: The national coordinated cataloging program from the participant's perspective; HOLLEY, R.P.: Cooperative cataloging outside North America: status report 1993; THOMAS, S.E. u. J.A. YOUNGER: Cooperative cataloging: a vision for the future
  3. Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007) 0.02
    0.017906038 = product of:
      0.06267113 = sum of:
        0.042296372 = weight(_text_:united in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042296372 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.18595073 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
        0.020374762 = product of:
          0.040749524 = sum of:
            0.040749524 = weight(_text_:states in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040749524 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.1825188 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The future of bibliographic control will be collaborative, decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based. Its realization will occur in cooperation with the private sector, and with the active collaboration of library users. Data will be gathered from multiple sources; change will happen quickly; and bibliographic control will be dynamic, not static. The underlying technology that makes this future possible and necessary-the World Wide Web-is now almost two decades old. Libraries must continue the transition to this future without delay in order to retain their relevance as information providers. The Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control encourages the library community to take a thoughtful and coordinated approach to effecting significant changes in bibliographic control. Such an approach will call for leadership that is neither unitary nor centralized. Nor will the responsibility to provide such leadership fall solely to the Library of Congress (LC). That said, the Working Group recognizes that LC plays a unique role in the library community of the United States, and the directions that LC takes have great impact on all libraries. We also recognize that there are many other institutions and organizations that have the expertise and the capacity to play significant roles in the bibliographic future. Wherever possible, those institutions must step forward and take responsibility for assisting with navigating the transition and for playing appropriate ongoing roles after that transition is complete. To achieve the goals set out in this document, we must look beyond individual libraries to a system wide deployment of resources. We must realize efficiencies in order to be able to reallocate resources from certain lower-value components of the bibliographic control ecosystem into other higher-value components of that same ecosystem. The recommendations in this report are directed at a number of parties, indicated either by their common initialism (e.g., "LC" for Library of Congress, "PCC" for Program for Cooperative Cataloging) or by their general category (e.g., "Publishers," "National Libraries"). When the recommendation is addressed to "All," it is intended for the library community as a whole and its close collaborators.
  4. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01
    0.014205642 = product of:
      0.049719743 = sum of:
        0.03598664 = weight(_text_:management in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03598664 = score(doc=420,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
        0.013733104 = product of:
          0.027466208 = sum of:
            0.027466208 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027466208 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  5. Bryant, P.: Making the most of our libraries (1997) 0.01
    0.0140987905 = product of:
      0.09869153 = sum of:
        0.09869153 = weight(_text_:united in 2439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09869153 = score(doc=2439,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.433885 = fieldWeight in 2439, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2439)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the 2 studies: "Retrospective conversion of library catalogues in institutions of higher education in the United Kingdom: a study of the justification for a national programme" and "Retrospective conversion for libraries in the UK other than those funded by the Higher Education Funding Councils". The latter study was on behalf of libraries other than national ones: public; learned and scientific society; professional; and religious. Covers: the scale of UK retrospective conversion issues, opportunities and need for a national strategy; retrospective conversion in an international context; conversion of library catalogues in UK higher education institutions; and catalogues in other UK libraries
  6. Condron, L.: Management by action : how we're embracing new cataloging work at Tufts (2001) 0.01
    0.0075556207 = product of:
      0.052889343 = sum of:
        0.052889343 = weight(_text_:management in 5430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052889343 = score(doc=5430,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 5430, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5430)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Preparing for new cataloging such as metadata beyond MARC and thesauri beyond LCSH, is an exciting and daunting challenge for university libraries. Advancing technologies, as well as a growing demand for quality information with rapid access is fueling the need for technical services departments to restructure their work to accommodate the evolving world of information management. Catalogers who have been following the same procedures and practices for many years may find this change particularly difficult. Team leaders are often faced with breaking through skepticism and resistance to this new work in order to enable necessary progress. We found that discussions and gradual introduction of new directions is important to acceptance by team members. However, just as important is the implementation of an action plan to ensure that progress is ongoing. Reengineering Acquisitions and Cataloging into Current Processes and Information Management Initiatives, along with forming several focus groups to investigate and evaluate cataloging work, is proving successful for embracing new cataloging at Tufts University.
  7. Goldman, H.; Havens, C.: Authority control efficiency increase : NOTIS online authority and merged headings (1990) 0.01
    0.007197328 = product of:
      0.05038129 = sum of:
        0.05038129 = weight(_text_:management in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05038129 = score(doc=501,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Auburn University name authority control has evolved from card revision to online control management. Since fall 1984, obsolete entries in the frozen public catalog have not been revised. All efforts now concern the building of an interactive online data and authority file system. Statistical information on the number of headings changed during the NOTIS period is presented as evidence in favor of electronic management of bibliographic files. Statistics presented concerning authority entries changed manually during the AACR2/pre-NOTIS age balance the picture. The statistics support the hypothesis that performing authority work online is quicker and more efficient than the manual performance of equivalent tasks. Online subject authority is also discussed, as is Auburn's implementation of the Merged Headings Index to date.
  8. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.01
    0.0062779905 = product of:
      0.04394593 = sum of:
        0.04394593 = product of:
          0.08789186 = sum of:
            0.08789186 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08789186 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  9. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.01
    0.0062779905 = product of:
      0.04394593 = sum of:
        0.04394593 = product of:
          0.08789186 = sum of:
            0.08789186 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08789186 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  10. Oddy, P.: Who dares, wins : libraries and catalogues for a postmodern world (1997) 0.01
    0.0058163195 = product of:
      0.040714234 = sum of:
        0.040714234 = weight(_text_:management in 603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040714234 = score(doc=603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=603)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Places present day UK culture and society in a postmodern context and considers their impact and cataloguing, concentrating specifically on the concepts of globalization and the death of tradition. Discusses how libraries can continue to provide high quality, structured access to their collections and the need for strategic management of this process. Emphasizes the importance of defining what the library want to achieve, setting objectives, and maintaining the capacity for flexible response to changing conditions, using as a case study the development and implementation of the British Library cataloguing strategy
  11. Bryant, P.: Making the most of our libraries : library catalogue access: the issues and the opportunities (1997) 0.01
    0.0058163195 = product of:
      0.040714234 = sum of:
        0.040714234 = weight(_text_:management in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040714234 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Indicates the benefits to be gained from a comprehensive programme of retrospective conversion of manual catalogue records into computerized form. Enumerates the scale of the task involved and the likely costs of the programme derived. Raises a range of issues arising from a relating to retrospective conversion and discusses the management implications. Lists a number of initiatives already undertaken and outlines the development of a possible national strategy
  12. Olson, H.A.: Thinking professionals : teaching critical cataloguing (1997) 0.01
    0.0050892793 = product of:
      0.035624955 = sum of:
        0.035624955 = weight(_text_:management in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035624955 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloguing education has been the focus of definition and ebate for over a century. Moving beyond cataloguing theory and the creation of records, to the management and process of producing catalogues, increases the complexity of demands placed on professionals and educators. Graduates need to understand their catalogues and integrated systems holistically. This requires a knowledge of each element, of standards governing the creation and maintenance of records, and of the relationship between the record and the catalogue and/or its constituent network. Moreover, the professional must know these things critically, and beyond mere acceptance of standards, so that the catalogue can effectively perform its mediating function between the collection and users
  13. Kevil, L.H.: ¬The paper library : beyond the automated card catalog (1998) 0.01
    0.0050892793 = product of:
      0.035624955 = sum of:
        0.035624955 = weight(_text_:management in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035624955 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Without reform and adaptation to contemporary technology, existing paper libraries may become increasingly marginalized and eventually little more than book museums. Proposes a new method to organize access to paper resources by using relational database management systems technology to change libraries' existing data structures and concepts of organization of materials in order to create an open, shared, easy-to-use and cooperatively maintained system. Without substantial proactive change, users familiar with accessing and manipulating digital materials will become very intolerant of the anomalies and archaisms of libraries' card-based automated catalogues. Outlines the benefits of such a system and lists considerations which should be taken into account in its design
  14. Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011) 0.01
    0.0050892793 = product of:
      0.035624955 = sum of:
        0.035624955 = weight(_text_:management in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035624955 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  15. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.00
    0.0047084927 = product of:
      0.032959446 = sum of:
        0.032959446 = product of:
          0.06591889 = sum of:
            0.06591889 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06591889 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  16. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.00
    0.0047084927 = product of:
      0.032959446 = sum of:
        0.032959446 = product of:
          0.06591889 = sum of:
            0.06591889 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06591889 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  17. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.00
    0.0047084927 = product of:
      0.032959446 = sum of:
        0.032959446 = product of:
          0.06591889 = sum of:
            0.06591889 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06591889 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  18. Joint, N.: URLs in the OPAC : comparative reflections on US vs UK practice (2007) 0.00
    0.0043622395 = product of:
      0.030535674 = sum of:
        0.030535674 = weight(_text_:management in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030535674 = score(doc=857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To examine whether placing URLs into library OPACs has been an effective way of enhancing the role of the catalogue for the contemporary library user. Design/methodology/approach - A brief review of the literature combined with an analysis of publicly available statistics for library use in the USA and the UK. Findings - That certain ways of placing URLs into the OPAC are loosely associated with a successful library environment, i.e. with constant or increasing levels of stock circulation and OPAC use, while other forms of hyper-linking OPAC records are loosely associated with declining levels of library use. Research limitations/implications - The loose association between different OPAC management practices and apparent statistical trends of library use could be investigated in greater depth by further subsequent research, but along the lines and methodology suggested herein. Practical implications - Firm suggestions on how to place and manage URLs in the online catalogue are made. Originality/value - This paper takes certain catalogue enhancement practices which are identified with the US library environment and investigates them in a UK, and specifically Scottish context, to shed light on the original US ideas behind these practices.
  19. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.00
    0.003923744 = product of:
      0.027466208 = sum of:
        0.027466208 = product of:
          0.054932415 = sum of:
            0.054932415 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054932415 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  20. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.00
    0.003923744 = product of:
      0.027466208 = sum of:
        0.027466208 = product of:
          0.054932415 = sum of:
            0.054932415 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054932415 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Years

Languages

  • e 42
  • d 14
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 49
  • m 4
  • s 4
  • b 3
  • el 2
  • r 2
  • More… Less…