Search (171 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Sutton, S.A.; Golder, D.: Achievement Standards Network (ASN) : an application profile for mapping K-12 educational resources to achievement (2008) 0.07 
    0.06651693 = product of:
  0.23280925 = sum of:
    0.084592745 = weight(_text_:united in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084592745 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
    0.1482165 = sum of:
      0.115257055 = weight(_text_:states in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.115257055 = score(doc=2636,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04054466 = queryNorm
          0.5162411 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
      0.032959446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.032959446 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04054466 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    This paper describes metadata development of an application profile for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Achievement Standards Network (ASN) in the United States. The ASN is a national repository of machine-readable achievement standards modeled in RDF that shape teaching and learning in the various states. We describe the nature of the ASN metadata and the various uses to which that metadata is applied including the alignment of the standards of one state to those of another and the correlation of those standards to educational resources in support of resource discovery and retrieval.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Moulaison Sandy, H.L.; Dykas, F.: High-quality metadata and repository staffing : perceptions of United States-based OpenDOAR participants (2016) 0.04 
    0.041780755 = product of:
  0.14623263 = sum of:
    0.09869153 = weight(_text_:united in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09869153 = score(doc=2806,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.433885 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
    0.04754111 = product of:
      0.09508222 = sum of:
        0.09508222 = weight(_text_:states in 2806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09508222 = score(doc=2806,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 2806, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2806)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
  3. Park, J.-R.; Tosaka, Y.: Metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections : criteria, semantics, and mechanisms (2010) 0.04 
    0.035812076 = product of:
  0.12534226 = sum of:
    0.084592745 = weight(_text_:united in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084592745 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
    0.040749524 = product of:
      0.08149905 = sum of:
        0.08149905 = weight(_text_:states in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08149905 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    This article evaluates practices on metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections using an online survey of cataloging and metadata professionals in the United States. The study examines (1) the perceived importance of metadata quality, (2) metadata quality evaluation criteria and issues, and (3) mechanisms for building quality assurance into the metadata creation process. The survey finds wide recognition of the essential role of metadata quality assurance. Accuracy and consistency are prioritized as the main criteria for metadata quality evaluation. Metadata semantics greatly affects consistent and accurate metadata application. Strong awareness of metadata quality correlates with the widespread adoption of various quality control mechanisms, such as staff training, manual review, metadata guidelines, and metadata generation tools. And yet, metadata guidelines are used less frequently as a quality assurance mechanism in digital collections involving multiple institutions.
  4. Zavalina, O.L.: Complementarity in subject metadata in large-scale digital libraries : a comparative analysis (2014) 0.04 
    0.035812076 = product of:
  0.12534226 = sum of:
    0.084592745 = weight(_text_:united in 1972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084592745 = score(doc=1972,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 1972, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1972)
    0.040749524 = product of:
      0.08149905 = sum of:
        0.08149905 = weight(_text_:states in 1972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08149905 = score(doc=1972,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 1972, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1972)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Provision of high-quality subject metadata is crucial for organizing adequate subject access to rich content aggregated by digital libraries. A number of large-scale digital libraries worldwide are now generating subject metadata to describe not only individual objects but entire digital collections as an integral whole. However, little research to date has been conducted to empirically evaluate the quality of this collection-level subject metadata. The study presented in this article compares free-text and controlled-vocabulary collection-level subject metadata in three large-scale cultural heritage digital libraries in the United States and the European Union. As revealed by this study, the emerging best practices for creating rich collection-level subject metadata includes describing a collection's subject matter with mutually complementary data values in controlled-vocabulary and free-text subject metadata elements. Three kinds of complementarity were observed in this study: one-way complementarity, two-way complementarity, and multiple complementarity.
  5. Stevens, G.: New metadata recipes for old cookbooks : creating and analyzing a digital collection using the HathiTrust Research Center Portal (2017) 0.03 
    0.029843397 = product of:
  0.10445189 = sum of:
    0.07049395 = weight(_text_:united in 3897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07049395 = score(doc=3897,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 3897, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3897)
    0.033957936 = product of:
      0.06791587 = sum of:
        0.06791587 = weight(_text_:states in 3897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06791587 = score(doc=3897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.304198 = fieldWeight in 3897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3897)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The Early American Cookbooks digital project is a case study in analyzing collections as data using HathiTrust and the HathiTrust Research Center (HTRC) Portal. The purposes of the project are to create a freely available, searchable collection of full-text early American cookbooks within the HathiTrust Digital Library, to offer an overview of the scope and contents of the collection, and to analyze trends and patterns in the metadata and the full text of the collection. The digital project has two basic components: a collection of 1450 full-text cookbooks published in the United States between 1800 and 1920 and a website to present a guide to the collection and the results of the analysis. This article will focus on the workflow for analyzing the metadata and the full-text of the collection. The workflow will cover: 1) creating a searchable public collection of full-text titles within the HathiTrust Digital Library and uploading it to the HTRC Portal, 2) analyzing and visualizing legacy MARC data for the collection using MarcEdit, OpenRefine and Tableau, and 3) using the text analysis tools in the HTRC Portal to look for trends and patterns in the full text of the collection.
  6. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.02 
    0.02421702 = product of:
  0.08475957 = sum of:
    0.06827985 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06827985 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
    0.016479723 = product of:
      0.032959446 = sum of:
        0.032959446 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032959446 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  7. Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998) 0.02 
    0.019076416 = product of:
  0.13353491 = sum of:
    0.13353491 = sum of:
      0.09508222 = weight(_text_:states in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09508222 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04054466 = queryNorm
          0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
      0.03845269 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03845269 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04054466 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
    Date
    9. 9.2000 17:22:23
  8. Dublin Core and Web metadata standards converge in Helsinki (1997) 0.02 
    0.0150679685 = product of:
  0.105475776 = sum of:
    0.105475776 = weight(_text_:industry in 1767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105475776 = score(doc=1767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 1767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1767)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    A 5th metadata workshop was held in Helsinki in Oct 1997, cosponsored by the National Library of Finland and OCLC, and 75 experts continued work begun in 1995 to try and reach consensus on conventions for describing resources on the Internet. Representatives of the W3C Metadata Project presented the 1st draft of a new specification for extended Web metadata: the Resource Description Framework (RDF), and demonstrated how this meets the infrastructure and encoding arrangements identified at the series of international Dublin Core workshops. W3C is an industry consortium run jointly by institutions in the USA, France and Japan, and currently has 210 members
  9. Murphy, A.; Enser, P.: Accessing the visual heritage : metadata construction at the Science & Society Picture Library (1998) 0.02 
    0.0150679685 = product of:
  0.105475776 = sum of:
    0.105475776 = weight(_text_:industry in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105475776 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The Science & Society Picture Library (SSPL) has been established to market the images of 3 of Britain's museums: the Science Museum in London, the National Railway Museum in York, and the National Museum of Photography, Film and Television in Bradford - collectively called the National Museum of Science and Industry). The images are drawn from many different collections within these museums and, as a result, SSPL represents one of the widest varieties of photographs, paintings, prints, posters and objects in the world. Discusses issues surrounding the SSPL's current task of developing an integrated cataloguing and indexing strategy by which metadata construction can proceed, and which will provide potential users with effective and standardized subject access to the many components of its holding
  10. Stubley, P.: Cataloguing standards and metadata for e-commerce (1999) 0.01 
    0.014394656 = product of:
  0.10076258 = sum of:
    0.10076258 = weight(_text_:management in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10076258 = score(doc=1915,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.73732144 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Information management report. 1999, Dec., S.16-18
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  11. Hooland, S. van; Bontemps, Y.; Kaufman, S.: Answering the call for more accountability : applying data profiling to museum metadata (2008) 0.01 
    0.013432972 = product of:
  0.0470154 = sum of:
    0.030535674 = weight(_text_:management in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030535674 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
    0.016479723 = product of:
      0.032959446 = sum of:
        0.032959446 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032959446 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Although the issue of metadata quality is recognized as an important topic within the metadata research community, the cultural heritage sector has been slow to develop methodologies, guidelines and tools for addressing this topic in practice. This paper concentrates on metadata quality specifically within the museum sector and describes the potential of data-profiling techniques for metadata quality evaluation. A case study illustrates the application of a generalpurpose data-profiling tool on a large collection of metadata records from an ethnographic collection. After an analysis of the results of the case-study the paper reviews further steps in our research and presents the implementation of a metadata quality tool within an open-source collection management software.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  12. Philips, J.T.: Metadata - information about electronic records (1995) 0.01 
    0.011632639 = product of:
  0.08142847 = sum of:
    0.08142847 = weight(_text_:management in 4556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08142847 = score(doc=4556,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 4556, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4556)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Metadata is a term to describe the information required to documents the characteristics of information contained within databases. Describes the elements that make up metadata. A number of software tools exist to help apply document management principles to electronic records but they have, so far, been inadequately applied. Describes 2 initiative currently under way to develop software to automate many records management functions. Understanding document management principles as applied to electronic records are vital to records managers
    Source
    Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.53-55
  13. Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008) 0.01 
    0.011194143 = product of:
  0.0391795 = sum of:
    0.025446396 = weight(_text_:management in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025446396 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
    0.013733104 = product of:
      0.027466208 = sum of:
        0.027466208 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027466208 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  14. a cataloger's primer : Metadata (2005) 0.01 
    0.011147485 = product of:
  0.039016195 = sum of:
    0.022037225 = weight(_text_:management in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022037225 = score(doc=133,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.16125548 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
    0.016978968 = product of:
      0.033957936 = sum of:
        0.033957936 = weight(_text_:states in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033957936 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.152099 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 33(2006) no.1, S.58-60 (S.J. Miller): "Metadata: A Cataloger's Primer is a welcome addition to the field of introductory books about metadata intended for librarians and students. The book consists of a collection of papers co-published simultaneously as Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, Volume 40, Numbers 3/4 2005. In the Introduction, the book's editor, Richard P Smiraglia, states that "The purpose of this volume is to provide a learning resource about metadata for catalog librarians and students ... The point of the volume, overall, is that in library and information science there is an ongoing convergence of cataloging and metadata, such that the community will benefit from instructional material that demonstrates this convergence" (p. 1). The collection is divided into two major sections. Part I, "Intellectual Foundations," includes papers with an introductory and theoretical focus, while Part II, "How to Create, Apply, and Use Metadata," contains material with a relatively more practical, instructive focus. In "Understanding Metadata and Metadata Schemes," Jane Greenberg defines metadata and its functions and provides a useful framework for analyzing and comparing diverse metadata schemes based on their objectives and principles, domains, and architectural layout. In her paper "Metadata and Bibliographic Control: Soul-mates or Two Solitudes?" Lynne Howarth directly addresses the central theme of this collection by examining the historical development of, and growing convergence between, the two fields, and concludes that they are more soulmates than solitudes. In "Metadata, Metaphor, and Metonymy," D. Grant Campbell outlines the development of metadata among different stakeholder communities and employs structuralist literary theory to illuminate a perspective on metadata and information representation as special uses of human language in the form of metaphor and metonymy. Part I continues with three papers that present the results of original applied research. Leatrice Ferraioli explores the ways in which individual workers use their own personal metadata for organizing documents in the workplace in "An Exploratory Study of Metadata Creation in a Health Care Agency." In her paper "The Defining Element-A Discussion of the Creator Element within Metadata Schemas," Jennifer Cwiok analyses divergent uses of the "Creator" or equivalent elements in seven different metadata schemes and compares those with the AACR2 approach to representing authorship and intellectual responsibility. The relevance of the bibliographic concept of "the work" to metadata creation for museum artifacts is the focus of "Content Metadata-An Analysis of Etruscan Artifacts in a Museum of Archeology" by Richard P Smiraglia.
    - Caplan, Priscilla. 2003. Metadata fundamentals for all librarians. Chicago: ALA Editions. - Gorman, G.E. and Daniel G. Dorner, eds. 2004. Metadata applications and management. International yearbook of library and information management 2003/2004. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press. - Intner, Sheila S., Susan S. Lazinger and Jean Weihs. 2006. Metadata and its impact on libraries. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. - Haynes, David. 2004. Metadata for information management and retrieval. London: Facet. - Hillmann, Diane I. and Elaine L. Westbrooks, eds. 2004. Metadata in practice. Chicago: American Library Association. Metadata: A Cataloger's Primer compares favorably with these texts, and like them has its own special focus and contribution to make to the introductorylevel literature on metadata. Although the focus, purpose, and nature of the contents are different, this volume bears a similarity to the Hillmann and Westbrooks text insofar as it consists of a collection of papers written by various authors tied together by a general, common theme. In conclusion, this volume makes a significant contribution to the handful of books that attempt to present introductory level information about metadata to catalog librarians and students. Although it does not serve fully satisfactorily as a stand-alone textbook for an LIS course nor as a single unified and comprehensive introduction for catalogers, it, like the others mentioned above, could serve as an excellent supplementary LIS course text, and it is highly worthwhile reading for working catalogers who want to learn more about metadata, as well as librarians and instructors already well-versed in metadata topics."
  15. Janssen, U.: ONIX - Metadaten in Verlagen und Buchhandel (2003) 0.01 
    0.010762835 = product of:
  0.07533984 = sum of:
    0.07533984 = weight(_text_:industry in 1764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07533984 = score(doc=1764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.320393 = fieldWeight in 1764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1764)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    ONIX (das Akronym steht für Online information exchange) ist der erste weltweit akzeptierte Standard für angereicherte Metadaten über Bücher, Fortsetzungswerke und andere Produkte des Buchhandels. Er wurde ursprünglich in den USA entwickelt, zunächst mit dem Ziel, dem Internetbuchhandel in einem einheitlichen Format Katalogdaten und zusätzlich Marketingmaterial zur Verfügung stellen zu können. Von Anfang an waren Barsortimente, bibliographische Agenturen und Verlage in den USA und bald auch aus dem Vereinigten Königreich an der Entwicklung von ONIX beteiligt und haben diese finanziell sowie personell gefördert. Die Pflege und Weiterentwicklung dieses neuen Standards wurde dann in die Hände von EDItEUR gelegt, der internationalen Dachorganisation für Standardisierung im Buchhandel, gegründet und gefördert von Verbänden aus Buchhandel, Verlagen und Bibliothekswesen, darunter dem Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels und der European Booksellers Federation. Büro und Sekretariat von EDItEUR werden in London von Book Industry Communication (BIC), einer Gemeinschaftsorganisation der britischen Verleger- und Buchhändlerverbände, gestellt. EDIMUR wurde vor zehn Jahren gegründet, um EDIStandards (EDI = electronic data interchange, elektronischer Datenaustausch) für die Kommunikation zwischen Buchhandel und Verlagen einerseits und Bibliotheken und ihren Lieferanten andererseits zu entwickeln. Dafür wurden Richtlinien für eine Reihe von EANCOM-Nachrichten verabschiedet, darunter für Bestellungen, Auftragsbestätigungen, Rechnungen und Angebote. Ein Richtlinienentwurf für die Nachricht PRICAT (Price and sales catalogue), die für die Übermittlung von Katalogdaten bestimmt ist, wurde zwar vor einigen Jahren entwickelt, aber bisher noch nirgendwo in der Praxis getestet oder gar produktiv eingesetzt. Hingegen sind die transaktionsbezogenen EDI-Nachrichten sowohl im Bibliothekswesen als auch im Buchhandel in Europa vielfach im Einsatz.
  16. Chivers, A.; Feather, J.: ¬The management of digital data : a metadata approach (1998) 0.01 
    0.010281897 = product of:
  0.07197328 = sum of:
    0.07197328 = weight(_text_:management in 2363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07197328 = score(doc=2363,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2363, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2363)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Reports on a research study, conducted at the Department of Information and Library Studies, Loughborough University, to investigate the potential of metadata for universal data management and explore the attitudes of UK information professionals to these issues
  17. Poulter, A.: Metaviews: metadata research and teaching in the United Kingdom and Ireland (2003) 0.01 
    0.010070565 = product of:
  0.07049395 = sum of:
    0.07049395 = weight(_text_:united in 1996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07049395 = score(doc=1996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 1996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1996)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  18. Büttner, G.: Integration audiovisueller Aufzeichnungen in das Records Management einer Organisation : ein konzeptionelles Metadatenmodell (2017) 0.01 
    0.008814892 = product of:
  0.061704237 = sum of:
    0.061704237 = weight(_text_:management in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061704237 = score(doc=4202,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Dieser Artikel stellt ein konzeptionelles Metadatenmodell vor, das auf Records verschiedener Medientypen anwendbar ist. Organisationen, die im Zuge ihrer Tätigkeit regelmäßig sowohl textbasierte als auch audiovisuelle Records erstellen, haben beide Medien im Sinne des Records Management zu verwalten. Dazu sind Metadaten, einschließlich der des zentralen Ordnungssystems für Records, ein Hauptwerkzeug. Inspiriert durch medienübergreifende, auf gemeinsamen Zugriff ausgerichtete Metadatenmodelle, wird ein neues Modell vorgeschlagen. Es kombiniert die hierarchische Abstraktion der existierenden Modelle mit den Prinzipien des Records Management. Das Modell kann Organisationen dabei helfen, Entscheidungen über Metadaten für ihre Records zu treffen.
  19. Chen, C.C.; Chen, H.H.; Chen, K.H.: ¬The design of the XML/Metadata management system (2000) 0.01 
    0.008724479 = product of:
  0.061071347 = sum of:
    0.061071347 = weight(_text_:management in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061071347 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  20. Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008) 0.01 
    0.0078359 = product of:
  0.02742565 = sum of:
    0.017812477 = weight(_text_:management in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017812477 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.13034125 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
    0.009613172 = product of:
      0.019226344 = sum of:
        0.019226344 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019226344 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Metadata is a key aspect of our evolving infrastructure for information management, social computing, and scientific collaboration. DC-2008 will focus on metadata challenges, solutions, and innovation in initiatives and activities underlying semantic and social applications. Metadata is part of the fabric of social computing, which includes the use of wikis, blogs, and tagging for collaboration and participation. Metadata also underlies the development of semantic applications, and the Semantic Web - the representation and integration of multimedia knowledge structures on the basis of semantic models. These two trends flow together in applications such as Wikipedia, where authors collectively create structured information that can be extracted and used to enhance access to and use of information sources. Recent discussion has focused on how existing bibliographic standards can be expressed as Semantic Web vocabularies to facilitate the ingration of library and cultural heritage data with other types of data. Harnessing the efforts of content providers and end-users to link, tag, edit, and describe their information in interoperable ways ("participatory metadata") is a key step towards providing knowledge environments that are scalable, self-correcting, and evolvable. DC-2008 will explore conceptual and practical issues in the development and deployment of semantic and social applications to meet the needs of specific communities of practice.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 150
  • el 15
  • m 11
  • s 11
  • b 2
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications