Search (77 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.23
    0.22538485 = product of:
      0.525898 = sum of:
        0.07512829 = product of:
          0.22538485 = sum of:
            0.22538485 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22538485 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22538485 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22538485 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.22538485 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22538485 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.16
    0.16098918 = product of:
      0.3756414 = sum of:
        0.05366306 = product of:
          0.16098918 = sum of:
            0.16098918 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16098918 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16098918 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16098918 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.16098918 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16098918 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Heflin, J.; Hendler, J.: Semantic interoperability on the Web (2000) 0.04
    0.03562918 = product of:
      0.12470212 = sum of:
        0.105475776 = weight(_text_:industry in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105475776 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
        0.019226344 = product of:
          0.03845269 = sum of:
            0.03845269 = weight(_text_:22 in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03845269 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    XML will have a profound impact on the way data is exchanged on the Internet. An important feature of this language is the separation of content from presentation, which makes it easier to select and/or reformat the data. However, due to the likelihood of numerous industry and domain specific DTDs, those who wish to integrate information will still be faced with the problem of semantic interoperability. In this paper we discuss why this problem is not solved by XML, and then discuss why the Resource Description Framework is only a partial solution. We then present the SHOE language, which we feel has many of the features necessary to enable a semantic web, and describe an existing set of tools that make it easy to use the language.
    Date
    11. 5.2013 19:22:18
  4. Kollia, I.; Tzouvaras, V.; Drosopoulos, N.; Stamou, G.: ¬A systemic approach for effective semantic access to cultural content (2012) 0.03
    0.029843397 = product of:
      0.10445189 = sum of:
        0.07049395 = weight(_text_:united in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07049395 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
        0.033957936 = product of:
          0.06791587 = sum of:
            0.06791587 = weight(_text_:states in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06791587 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.304198 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    A large on-going activity for digitization, dissemination and preservation of cultural heritage is taking place in Europe, United States and the world, which involves all types of cultural institutions, i.e., galleries, libraries, museums, archives and all types of cultural content. The development of Europeana, as a single point of access to European Cultural Heritage, has probably been the most important result of the activities in the field till now. Semantic interoperability, linked open data, user involvement and user generated content are key issues in these developments. This paper presents a system that provides content providers and users the ability to map, in an effective way, their own metadata schemas to common domain standards and the Europeana (ESE, EDM) data models. The system is currently largely used by many European research projects and the Europeana. Based on these mappings, semantic query answering techniques are proposed as a means for effective access to digital cultural heritage, providing users with content enrichment, linking of data based on their involvement and facilitating content search and retrieval. An experimental study is presented, involving content from national content aggregators, as well as thematic content aggregators and the Europeana, which illustrates the proposed system
  5. Veltman, K.H.: Syntactic and semantic interoperability : new approaches to knowledge and the Semantic Web (2001) 0.02
    0.023874719 = product of:
      0.08356151 = sum of:
        0.056395162 = weight(_text_:united in 3883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056395162 = score(doc=3883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2479343 = fieldWeight in 3883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3883)
        0.02716635 = product of:
          0.0543327 = sum of:
            0.0543327 = weight(_text_:states in 3883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0543327 = score(doc=3883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.24335839 = fieldWeight in 3883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    At VVWW-7 (Brisbane, 1997), Tim Berners-Lee outlined his vision of a global reasoning web. At VVWW- 8 (Toronto, May 1998), he developed this into a vision of a semantic web, where one Gould search not just for isolated words, but for meaning in the form of logically provable claims. In the past four years this vision has spread with amazing speed. The semantic web has been adopted by the European Commission as one of the important goals of the Sixth Framework Programme. In the United States it has become linked with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). While this quest to achieve a semantic web is new, the quest for meaning in language has a history that is almost as old as language itself. Accordingly this paper opens with a survey of the historical background. The contributions of the Dublin Core are reviewed briefly. To achieve a semantic web requires both syntactic and semantic interoperability. These challenges are outlined. A basic contention of this paper is that semantic interoperability requires much more than a simple agreement concerning the static meaning of a term. Different levels of agreement (local, regional, national and international) are involved and these levels have their own history. Hence, one of the larger challenges is to create new systems of knowledge organization, which identify and connect these different levels. With respect to meaning or semantics, early twentieth century pioneers such as Wüster were hopeful that it might be sufficient to limit oneself to isolated terms and words without reference to the larger grammatical context: to concept systems rather than to propositional logic. While a fascination with concept systems implicitly dominates many contemporary discussions, this paper suggests why this approach is not sufficient. The final section of this paper explores how an approach using propositional logic could lead to a new approach to universals and particulars. This points to a re-organization of knowledge, and opens the way for a vision of a semantic web with all the historical and cultural richness and complexity of language itself.
  6. Landry, P.: MACS: multilingual access to subject and link management : Extending the Multilingual Capacity of TEL in the EDL Project (2007) 0.02
    0.022388287 = product of:
      0.078359 = sum of:
        0.050892793 = weight(_text_:management in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050892793 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
        0.027466208 = product of:
          0.054932415 = sum of:
            0.054932415 = weight(_text_:22 in 1287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054932415 = score(doc=1287,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1287, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1287)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  7. Hubain, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hooland, S. van: Automated SKOS vocabulary design for the biopharmaceutical industry (2016) 0.02
    0.021309327 = product of:
      0.14916529 = sum of:
        0.14916529 = weight(_text_:industry in 5132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14916529 = score(doc=5132,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 5132, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5132)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Ensuring quick and consistent access to large collections of unstructured documents is one of the biggest challenges facing knowledge-intensive organizations. Designing specific vocabularies to index and retrieve documents is often deemed too expensive, full-text search being preferred despite its known limitations. However, the process of creating controlled vocabularies can be partly automated thanks to natural language processing and machine learning techniques. With a case study from the biopharmaceutical industry, we demonstrate how small organizations can use an automated workflow in order to create a controlled vocabulary to index unstructured documents in a semantically meaningful way.
  8. Petras, V.: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen : eine Fallstudie (2010) 0.02
    0.0156718 = product of:
      0.0548513 = sum of:
        0.035624955 = weight(_text_:management in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035624955 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
        0.019226344 = product of:
          0.03845269 = sum of:
            0.03845269 = weight(_text_:22 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03845269 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Das BMBF hat bis Ende 2007 ein Projekt gefördert, dessen Aufgabe es war, die Erstellung und das Management von Crosskonkordanzen zwischen kontrollierten Vokabularen (Thesauri, Klassifikationen, Deskriptorenlisten) zu organisieren. In drei Jahren wurden 64 Crosskonkordanzen mit mehr als 500.000 Relationen zwischen kontrollierten Vokabularen aus den Sozialwissenschaften und anderen Fachgebieten umgesetzt. In der Schlussphase des Projekts wurde eine umfangreiche Evaluation durchgeführt, die die Effektivität der Crosskonkordanzen in unterschiedlichen Informationssystemen testen sollte. Der Artikel berichtet über die Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der Heterogenitätsbehandlung durch Crosskonkordanzen und die Ergebnisse der umfangreichen Analysen.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  9. Kutz, O.; Mossakowski, T.; Galinski, C.; Lange, C.: Towards a standard for heterogeneous ontology integration and interoperability (2011) 0.01
    0.0140987905 = product of:
      0.09869153 = sum of:
        0.09869153 = weight(_text_:united in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09869153 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.433885 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Even though ontologies are widely being used to enable interoperability in information-rich endeavours, there is currently no united framework for ontology interoperability itself. Surprisingly little of the state of the art in modularity and structuring, e.g. in software engineering, has been applied to ontology engineering so far. However, application areas like Ambient Assisted Living (AAL), which require synchronization and orchestration of interoperable services, are in dire need of safe and secure ontology interoperability. OntoIOp (Ontology Integration and Interoperability), a new international standard proposed in ISO/TC 37/SC 3, aims at filling this gap.
  10. Huckstorf, A.; Petras, V.: Mind the lexical gap : EuroVoc Building Block of the Semantic Web (2011) 0.01
    0.012084679 = product of:
      0.084592745 = sum of:
        0.084592745 = weight(_text_:united in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084592745 = score(doc=2782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Ein Konferenzereignis der besonderen Art fand am 18. und 19. November 2010 in Luxemburg statt. Initiiert durch das Amt für Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Union (http://publications.europa.eu) waren Bibliothekare und Information Professionals eingeladen, um über die Zukunft mehrsprachiger kontrollierter Vokabulare in Informationssystemen und insbesondere deren Beitrag zum Semantic Web zu diskutieren. Organisiert wurde die Konferenz durch das EuroVoc-Team, das den Thesaurus der Europäischen Union bearbeitet. Die letzte EuroVoc-Konferenz fand im Jahr 2006 statt. In der Zwischenzeit ist EuroVoc zu einem ontologie-basierten Thesaurusmanagementsystem übergegangen und hat systematisch begonnen, Semantic-Web-Technologien für die Bearbeitung und Repräsentation einzusetzen und sich mit anderen Vokabularen zu vernetzen. Ein produktiver Austausch fand mit den Produzenten anderer europäischer und internationaler Vokabulare (z.B. United Nations oder FAO) sowie Vertretern aus Projekten, die an Themen über automatische Indexierung (hier insbesondere parlamentarische und rechtliche Dokumente) sowie Interoperabilitiät zwischen Vokabularen arbeiten, statt.
  11. Wang, S.; Isaac, A.; Schopman, B.; Schlobach, S.; Meij, L. van der: Matching multilingual subject vocabularies (2009) 0.01
    0.012084679 = product of:
      0.084592745 = sum of:
        0.084592745 = weight(_text_:united in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084592745 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Most libraries and other cultural heritage institutions use controlled knowledge organisation systems, such as thesauri, to describe their collections. Unfortunately, as most of these institutions use different such systems, united access to heterogeneous collections is difficult. Things are even worse in an international context when concepts have labels in different languages. In order to overcome the multilingual interoperability problem between European Libraries, extensive work has been done to manually map concepts from different knowledge organisation systems, which is a tedious and expensive process. Within the TELplus project, we developed and evaluated methods to automatically discover these mappings, using different ontology matching techniques. In experiments on major French, English and German subject heading lists Rameau, LCSH and SWD, we show that we can automatically produce mappings of surprisingly good quality, even when using relatively naive translation and matching methods.
  12. Garcia Marco, F.J.: Compatibility & heterogeneity in knowledge organization : some reflections around a case study in the field of consumer information (2008) 0.01
    0.011194143 = product of:
      0.0391795 = sum of:
        0.025446396 = weight(_text_:management in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025446396 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
        0.013733104 = product of:
          0.027466208 = sum of:
            0.027466208 = weight(_text_:22 in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027466208 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    A case study in compatibility and heterogeneity of knowledge organization (KO) systems and processes is presented. It is based in the experience of the author in the field of information for consumer protection, a good example of the emerging transdisciplinary applied social sciences. The activities and knowledge organization problems and solutions of the Aragonian Consumers' Information and Documentation Centre are described and analyzed. Six assertions can be concluded: a) heterogeneity and compatibility are certainly an inherent problem in knowledge organization and also in practical domains; b) knowledge organization is also a social task, not only a lögical one; c) knowledge organization is affected by economical and efficiency considerations; d) knowledge organization is at the heart of Knowledge Management; e) identifying and maintaining the focus in interdisciplinary fields is a must; f the different knowledge organization tools of a institution must be considered as an integrated system, pursuing a unifying model.
    Date
    16. 3.2008 18:22:50
  13. Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008) 0.01
    0.011194143 = product of:
      0.0391795 = sum of:
        0.025446396 = weight(_text_:management in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025446396 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
        0.013733104 = product of:
          0.027466208 = sum of:
            0.027466208 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027466208 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  14. Si, L.E.; O'Brien, A.; Probets, S.: Integration of distributed terminology resources to facilitate subject cross-browsing for library portal systems (2010) 0.01
    0.010070565 = product of:
      0.07049395 = sum of:
        0.07049395 = weight(_text_:united in 3944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07049395 = score(doc=3944,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 3944, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3944)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Content architecture: exploiting and managing diverse resources: proceedings of the first national conference of the United Kingdom chapter of the International Society for Knowedge Organization (ISKO)
  15. Kempf, A.O.; Ritze, D.; Eckert, K.; Zapilko, B.: New ways of mapping knowledge organization systems : using a semi-automatic matching procedure for building up vocabulary crosswalks (2014) 0.01
    0.010070565 = product of:
      0.07049395 = sum of:
        0.07049395 = weight(_text_:united in 1371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07049395 = score(doc=1371,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 1371, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1371)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Content
    Papers from the ISKO-UK Biennial Conference, "Knowledge Organization: Pushing the Boundaries," United Kingdom, 8-9 July, 2013, London.
  16. Shah, C.: Collaborative information seeking : the art and science of making the whole greater than the sum of all (2012) 0.01
    0.008610267 = product of:
      0.06027187 = sum of:
        0.06027187 = weight(_text_:industry in 360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06027187 = score(doc=360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2563144 = fieldWeight in 360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=360)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Today's complex, information-intensive problems often require people to work together. Mostly these tasks go far beyond simply searching together; they include information lookup, sharing, synthesis, and decision-making. In addition, they all have an end-goal that is mutually beneficial to all parties involved. Such "collaborative information seeking" (CIS) projects typically last several sessions and the participants all share an intention to contribute and benefit. Not surprisingly, these processes are highly interactive. Shah focuses on two individually well-understood notions: collaboration and information seeking, with the goal of bringing them together to show how it is a natural tendency for humans to work together on complex tasks. The first part of his book introduces the general notions of collaboration and information seeking, as well as related concepts, terminology, and frameworks; and thus provides the reader with a comprehensive treatment of the concepts underlying CIS. The second part of the book details CIS as a standalone domain. A series of frameworks, theories, and models are introduced to provide a conceptual basis for CIS. The final part describes several systems and applications of CIS, along with their broader implications on other fields such as computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) and human-computer interaction (HCI). With this first comprehensive overview of an exciting new research field, Shah delivers to graduate students and researchers in academia and industry an encompassing description of the technologies involved, state-of-the-art results, and open challenges as well as research opportunities.
  17. Boteram, F.: "Content architecture" : semantic interoperability in an international comprehensive knowledge organisation system (2010) 0.01
    0.0080564525 = product of:
      0.056395162 = sum of:
        0.056395162 = weight(_text_:united in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056395162 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2479343 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Content architecture: exploiting and managing diverse resources: proceedings of the first national conference of the United Kingdom chapter of the International Society for Knowedge Organization (ISKO).
  18. Reasoning Web : Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures (2017) 0.01
    0.00629635 = product of:
      0.04407445 = sum of:
        0.04407445 = weight(_text_:management in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04407445 = score(doc=3934,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.32251096 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This volume contains the lecture notes of the 13th Reasoning Web Summer School, RW 2017, held in London, UK, in July 2017. In 2017, the theme of the school was "Semantic Interoperability on the Web", which encompasses subjects such as data integration, open data management, reasoning over linked data, database to ontology mapping, query answering over ontologies, hybrid reasoning with rules and ontologies, and ontology-based dynamic systems. The papers of this volume focus on these topics and also address foundational reasoning techniques used in answer set programming and ontologies.
    LCSH
    Database management
    Subject
    Database management
  19. Metadata and semantics research : 9th Research Conference, MTSR 2015, Manchester, UK, September 9-11, 2015, Proceedings (2015) 0.01
    0.0061691385 = product of:
      0.043183967 = sum of:
        0.043183967 = weight(_text_:management in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043183967 = score(doc=3274,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    LCSH
    Database management
    Subject
    Database management
  20. Landry, P.; Zumer, M.; Clavel-Merrin, G.: Report on cross-language subject access options (2006) 0.01
    0.0058213607 = product of:
      0.040749524 = sum of:
        0.040749524 = product of:
          0.08149905 = sum of:
            0.08149905 = weight(_text_:states in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08149905 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04054466 = queryNorm
                0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This report presents the results of desk-top based study of projects and initiatives in the area of linking and mapping subject tools. While its goal is to provide areas of further study for cross-language subject access in the European Library, and specifically the national libraries of the Ten New Member States, it is not restricted to cross-language mappings since some of the tools used to create links across thesauri or subject headings in the same language may also be appropriate for cross-language mapping. Tools reviewed have been selected to represent a variety of approaches (e.g. subject heading to subject heading, thesaurus to thesaurus, classification to subject heading) reflecting the variety of subject access tools in use in the European Library. The results show that there is no single solution that would be appropriate for all libraries but that parts of several initiatives may be applicable on a technical, organisational or content level.

Languages

  • e 63
  • d 14

Types

  • a 50
  • el 22
  • m 9
  • s 5
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…