Search (1310 results, page 1 of 66)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.39 
    0.386374 = product of:
  0.9015393 = sum of:
    0.12879133 = product of:
      0.386374 = sum of:
        0.386374 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.386374 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.386374 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.386374 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
    0.386374 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.386374 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.32 
    0.32197836 = product of:
  0.7512828 = sum of:
    0.10732612 = product of:
      0.32197836 = sum of:
        0.32197836 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32197836 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.32197836 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32197836 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
    0.32197836 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32197836 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Burke, C.B.: America's information wars : the untold story of information systems in America's conflicts and politics from World War II to the internet age (2018) 0.31 
    0.30566916 = product of:
  0.534921 = sum of:
    0.105475776 = weight(_text_:industry in 5953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105475776 = score(doc=5953,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 5953, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5953)
    0.07124991 = weight(_text_:management in 5953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07124991 = score(doc=5953,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5953, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5953)
    0.24174388 = weight(_text_:united in 5953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24174388 = score(doc=5953,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        1.0627968 = fieldWeight in 5953, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5953)
    0.116451465 = product of:
      0.23290293 = sum of:
        0.23290293 = weight(_text_:states in 5953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23290293 = score(doc=5953,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            1.0431818 = fieldWeight in 5953, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5953)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    Abstract
    This book narrates the development of science and intelligence information systems and technologies in the U.S. from World War II through today. The story ranges from a description of the information systems and machines of the 1940s to the rise of a huge international science information industry, and to the 1990's Open Access-Open Culture.
    LCSH
    Information technology / United States / Management
    Management information systems / United States
    Internet Access control / United States
    Subject
    Information technology / United States / Management
    Management information systems / United States
    Internet Access control / United States
  4. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.26 
    0.26177615 = product of:
  0.610811 = sum of:
    0.064395666 = product of:
      0.193187 = sum of:
        0.193187 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.193187 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.27320766 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27320766 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
    0.27320766 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27320766 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  5. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.23 
    0.22538485 = product of:
  0.525898 = sum of:
    0.07512829 = product of:
      0.22538485 = sum of:
        0.22538485 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22538485 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22538485 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22538485 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
    0.22538485 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22538485 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  6. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.19 
    0.193187 = product of:
  0.45076966 = sum of:
    0.064395666 = product of:
      0.193187 = sum of:
        0.193187 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.193187 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.193187 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.193187 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.193187 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.193187 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  7. Schmidt, E.; Rosenberg, J.: Wie Google tickt (2015) 0.19 
    0.18642126 = product of:
  0.3262372 = sum of:
    0.106546625 = weight(_text_:industry in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.106546625 = score(doc=2406,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
    0.07197328 = weight(_text_:management in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07197328 = score(doc=2406,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
    0.0996935 = weight(_text_:united in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0996935 = score(doc=2406,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.43829006 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
    0.048023775 = product of:
      0.09604755 = sum of:
        0.09604755 = weight(_text_:states in 2406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09604755 = score(doc=2406,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.43020093 = fieldWeight in 2406, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    LCSH
    Google (Firm) / Management
    Internet industry / Management / United States
    RSWK
    Google Inc. / Management
    Google Inc. / Strategisches Management
    Subject
    Google Inc. / Management
    Google Inc. / Strategisches Management
    Google (Firm) / Management
    Internet industry / Management / United States
  8. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.17 
    0.17451745 = product of:
  0.40720737 = sum of:
    0.042930447 = product of:
      0.12879133 = sum of:
        0.12879133 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12879133 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.18213846 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18213846 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.18213846 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18213846 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  9. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.17 
    0.1726516 = product of:
  0.40285373 = sum of:
    0.193187 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.193187 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.193187 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.193187 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.016479723 = product of:
      0.032959446 = sum of:
        0.032959446 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032959446 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  10. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.16 
    0.16098918 = product of:
  0.3756414 = sum of:
    0.05366306 = product of:
      0.16098918 = sum of:
        0.16098918 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16098918 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16098918 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16098918 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
    0.16098918 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16098918 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  11. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.16 
    0.16098918 = product of:
  0.3756414 = sum of:
    0.05366306 = product of:
      0.16098918 = sum of:
        0.16098918 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16098918 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16098918 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16098918 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
    0.16098918 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16098918 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  12. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.16 
    0.16098918 = product of:
  0.3756414 = sum of:
    0.05366306 = product of:
      0.16098918 = sum of:
        0.16098918 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16098918 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16098918 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16098918 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
    0.16098918 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16098918 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  13. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.15 
    0.1471901 = product of:
  0.5151653 = sum of:
    0.25758266 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25758266 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.25758266 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25758266 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  14. Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.; Olson, H.A.: ¬The use of BISAC in libraries as new cases of Reader-Interest Classifications (2014) 0.13 
    0.12659912 = product of:
  0.29539794 = sum of:
    0.14916529 = weight(_text_:industry in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14916529 = score(doc=1973,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.6343458 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
    0.09869153 = weight(_text_:united in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09869153 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.433885 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
    0.04754111 = product of:
      0.09508222 = sum of:
        0.09508222 = weight(_text_:states in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09508222 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    In the recent years, several libraries in the United States have been experimenting with Book Industry Standards and Communications (BISAC), the classification system of the book industry, as an alternative to the Dewey Decimal Classification. Although rarely discussed, these cases of implementation of BISAC arguably resemble other past cases of replacement of traditional classifications that received the name of reader-interest classifications. In this article, a comparison of the BISAC cases to the previous cases of reader-interest classifications is taken in order to determine if the current application of BISAC to libraries is susceptible to the same problems, dangers, and ends as occurred in the past.
  15. Walters, W.H.; Wilder, E.I.: Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007-2012 (2016) 0.13 
    0.12546398 = product of:
  0.2927493 = sum of:
    0.025446396 = weight(_text_:management in 2940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025446396 = score(doc=2940,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2940, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2940)
    0.199387 = weight(_text_:united in 2940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.199387 = score(doc=2940,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.8765801 = fieldWeight in 2940, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2940)
    0.06791587 = product of:
      0.13583174 = sum of:
        0.13583174 = weight(_text_:states in 2940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13583174 = score(doc=2940,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.608396 = fieldWeight in 2940, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    We investigate the contributions of particular disciplines, countries, and academic departments to the literature of library and information science (LIS) using data for the articles published in 31 journals from 2007 to 2012. In particular, we examine the contributions of authors outside the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada; faculty in departments other than LIS; and practicing librarians. Worldwide, faculty in LIS departments account for 31% of the journal literature; librarians, 23%; computer science faculty, 10%; and management faculty, 10%. The top contributing nations are the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, China, Canada, and Taiwan. Within the United States and the United Kingdom, the current productivity of LIS departments is correlated with past productivity and with other measures of reputation and performance. More generally, the distribution of contributions is highly skewed. In the United States, five departments account for 27% of the articles contributed by LIS faculty; in the United Kingdom, four departments account for nearly two-thirds of the articles. This skewed distribution reinforces the possibility that high-status departments may gain a permanent advantage in the competition for students, faculty, journal space, and research funding. At the same time, concentrations of research-active faculty in particular departments may generate beneficial spillover effects.
  16. Levy, S.: In the plex : how Google thinks, works, and shapes our lives (2011) 0.11 
    0.111884125 = product of:
  0.1957972 = sum of:
    0.074582644 = weight(_text_:industry in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074582644 = score(doc=9,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.3171729 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
    0.017812477 = weight(_text_:management in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017812477 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.13034125 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
    0.06978545 = weight(_text_:united in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06978545 = score(doc=9,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.30680305 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
    0.03361664 = product of:
      0.06723328 = sum of:
        0.06723328 = weight(_text_:states in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06723328 = score(doc=9,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.30114064 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    Abstract
    Few companies in history have ever been as successful and as admired as Google, the company that has transformed the Internet and become an indispensable part of our lives. How has Google done it? Veteran technology reporter Steven Levy was granted unprecedented access to the company, and in this revelatory book he takes readers inside Google headquarters-the Googleplex-to show how Google works. While they were still students at Stanford, Google cofounders Larry Page and Sergey Brin revolutionized Internet search. They followed this brilliant innovation with another, as two of Google's earliest employees found a way to do what no one else had: make billions of dollars from Internet advertising. With this cash cow (until Google's IPO nobody other than Google management had any idea how lucrative the company's ad business was), Google was able to expand dramatically and take on other transformative projects: more efficient data centers, open-source cell phones, free Internet video (YouTube), cloud computing, digitizing books, and much more. The key to Google's success in all these businesses, Levy reveals, is its engineering mind-set and adoption of such Internet values as speed, openness, experimentation, and risk taking. After its unapologetically elitist approach to hiring, Google pampers its engineers-free food and dry cleaning, on-site doctors and masseuses-and gives them all the resources they need to succeed. Even today, with a workforce of more than 23,000, Larry Page signs off on every hire. But has Google lost its innovative edge? It stumbled badly in China-Levy discloses what went wrong and how Brin disagreed with his peers on the China strategy-and now with its newest initiative, social networking, Google is chasing a successful competitor for the first time. Some employees are leaving the company for smaller, nimbler start-ups. Can the company that famously decided not to be evil still compete? No other book has ever turned Google inside out as Levy does with In the Plex.
    LCSH
    Internet industry / United States
    Subject
    Internet industry / United States
  17. Ye, F.Y.; Yu, S.S.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations at the country level and its dynamic evolution under the pressures of globalization (2013) 0.11 
    0.108513534 = product of:
  0.25319824 = sum of:
    0.12785596 = weight(_text_:industry in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12785596 = score(doc=1110,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.543725 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
    0.084592745 = weight(_text_:united in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084592745 = score(doc=1110,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
    0.040749524 = product of:
      0.08149905 = sum of:
        0.08149905 = weight(_text_:states in 1110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08149905 = score(doc=1110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 1110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1110)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Using data from the Web of Science (WoS), we analyze the mutual information among university, industry, and government addresses (U-I-G) at the country level for a number of countries. The dynamic evolution of the Triple Helix can thus be compared among developed and developing nations in terms of cross-sectional coauthorship relations. The results show that the Triple Helix interactions among the three subsystems U-I-G become less intensive over time, but unequally for different countries. We suggest that globalization erodes local Triple Helix relations and thus can be expected to have increased differentiation in national systems since the mid-1990s. This effect of globalization is more pronounced in developed countries than in developing ones. In the dynamic analysis, we focus on a more detailed comparison between China and the United States. Specifically, the Chinese Academy of the (Social) Sciences is changing increasingly from a public research institute to an academic one, and this has a measurable effect on China's position in the globalization.
  18. Choi, S.; Yang, J.S.W.; Park, H.W.: ¬The triple helix and international collaboration in science (2015) 0.10 
    0.10069043 = product of:
  0.23494434 = sum of:
    0.13049245 = weight(_text_:industry in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13049245 = score(doc=1616,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.554937 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
    0.07049395 = weight(_text_:united in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07049395 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.30991787 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
    0.033957936 = product of:
      0.06791587 = sum of:
        0.06791587 = weight(_text_:states in 1616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06791587 = score(doc=1616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.304198 = fieldWeight in 1616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1616)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Previous studies of international scientific collaboration have rarely gone beyond revealing the structural relationships between countries. Considering how scientific collaboration is actually initiated, this study focuses on the organization and sector levels of international coauthorship networks, going beyond a country-level description. Based on a network analysis of coauthorship networks between members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), this study attempts to gain a better understanding of international scientific collaboration by exploring the structure of the coauthorship network in terms of university-industry-government (UIG) relationships, the mode of knowledge production, and the underlying dynamic of collaboration in terms of geographic, linguistic, and economic factors. The results suggest that the United States showed overwhelming dominance in all bilateral UIG combinations with the exception of the government-government (GG) network. Scientific collaboration within the industry sector was concentrated in a few players, whereas that between the university and industry sectors was relatively less concentrated. Despite the growing participation from other sectors, universities were still the main locus of knowledge production, with the exception of 5 countries. The university sector in English-speaking wealthy countries and the government sector of non-English-speaking, less-wealthy countries played a key role in international collaborations between OECD countries. The findings did not provide evidence supporting the institutional proximity argument.
  19. Hale, K.: How information matters : networks and public policy innovation (2011) 0.09 
    0.09182158 = product of:
  0.21425036 = sum of:
    0.040714234 = weight(_text_:management in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040714234 = score(doc=692,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
    0.112790324 = weight(_text_:united in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.112790324 = score(doc=692,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
    0.060745806 = product of:
      0.12149161 = sum of:
        0.12149161 = weight(_text_:states in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12149161 = score(doc=692,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.5441659 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    How Information Matters examines the ways a network of state and local governments and nonprofit organizations can enhance the capacity for successful policy change by public administrators. Hale examines drug courts, programs that typify the highly networked, collaborative environment of public administrators today. These "special dockets" implement justice but also drug treatment, case management, drug testing, and incentive programs for non-violent offenders in lieu of jail time. In a study that spans more than two decades, Hale shows ways organizations within the network act to champion, challenge, and support policy innovations over time. Her description of interactions between courts, administrative agencies, and national organizations highlight the evolution of collaborative governance in the state and local arena, with vignettes that share specific experiences across six states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Missouri, and Tennessee) and ways that they acquired knowledge from the network to make decisions. How Information Matters offers valuable insight into successful ways for collaboration and capacity building. It will be of special interest to public administrators or policymakers who wish to identify ways to improve their own programs' performance.
    BK
    88.20 (Organisation staatlicher Einrichtungen / Management staatlicher Einrichtungen)
    Classification
    88.20 (Organisation staatlicher Einrichtungen / Management staatlicher Einrichtungen)
    LCSH
    Policy networks / United States
    Information networks / United States
    Series
    Public management and change series
    Subject
    Policy networks / United States
    Information networks / United States
  20. Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011) 0.08 
    0.07988844 = product of:
  0.18640636 = sum of:
    0.105475776 = weight(_text_:industry in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.105475776 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.061704237 = weight(_text_:management in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061704237 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04054466 = queryNorm
        0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.019226344 = product of:
      0.03845269 = sum of:
        0.03845269 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03845269 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04054466 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:23:07
    Theme
    Content Management System

Authors

Languages

  • e 1055
  • d 244
  • a 1
  • es 1
  • hu 1
  • i 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1128
  • m 114
  • el 107
  • s 42
  • x 21
  • r 9
  • b 6
  • i 2
  • n 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications