Chan, H.C.: Naturalness of graphical queries based on the entity relationship model (1995)
0.04
0.03989011 = product of:
0.099725276 = sum of:
0.041615978 = weight(_text_:study in 3207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041615978 = score(doc=3207,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.044537213 = queryNorm
0.2873863 = fieldWeight in 3207, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3207)
0.058109295 = product of:
0.11621859 = sum of:
0.11621859 = weight(_text_:teaching in 3207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11621859 = score(doc=3207,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24199244 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.044537213 = queryNorm
0.4802571 = fieldWeight in 3207, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3207)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Graphical queries involving 14 different query concepts were used in a study with 27 subjects. The results show that well designed graphical queries can be comprehended without teaching. Not so well designed queries are difficult to comprehend. The natural ability to specify graphical queries is not as good. The results identify clearly those concepts that are naturally easy to specify, and those that are difficult. The findings can be used for designing graphical interfaces, as well as for designing training packages
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.03
0.028865311 = product of:
0.07216328 = sum of:
0.054060746 = weight(_text_:study in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054060746 = score(doc=201,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.044537213 = queryNorm
0.37332577 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.018102532 = product of:
0.036205065 = sum of:
0.036205065 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036205065 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044537213 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
