Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Strader, C.R."
  1. Strader, C.R.: Citation analysis (2012) 0.03
    0.026301075 = product of:
      0.065752685 = sum of:
        0.041615978 = weight(_text_:study in 2601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041615978 = score(doc=2601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044537213 = queryNorm
            0.2873863 = fieldWeight in 2601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2601)
        0.02413671 = product of:
          0.04827342 = sum of:
            0.04827342 = weight(_text_:22 in 2601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04827342 = score(doc=2601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15596174 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044537213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study is a citation analysis of a set of theses and dissertations in the Ohio State University's online catalog, for which the author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) are known. Correlations are sought between the types and ages of resources cited and the number of unique keywords and unique LCSH that were found. The author presents results found in three general discipline areas: arts and humanities, the social sciences, and science, technology, engineering, and medicine.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.02
    0.019725805 = product of:
      0.049314514 = sum of:
        0.031211983 = weight(_text_:study in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031211983 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044537213 = queryNorm
            0.21553972 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
        0.018102532 = product of:
          0.036205065 = sum of:
            0.036205065 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036205065 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15596174 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044537213 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Types