Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"f"
  1. Koch, E.: Recherche et indexation : resultats-limites (1998) 0.04
    0.040937115 = product of:
      0.102342784 = sum of:
        0.051497146 = weight(_text_:study in 2238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051497146 = score(doc=2238,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044537213 = queryNorm
            0.3556224 = fieldWeight in 2238, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2238)
        0.050845634 = product of:
          0.10169127 = sum of:
            0.10169127 = weight(_text_:teaching in 2238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10169127 = score(doc=2238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.24199244 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044537213 = queryNorm
                0.42022496 = fieldWeight in 2238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2238)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Report of the French Libraries Association study and research section study day, held in Grenoble in Oct 1997. Topics covered included precision / recall and linguistic compatibility between indexing and search languages; the history and develoment of the RAMEAU authorities list; using RAMEAU in special libraries; international cooperation; and applying RAMEAU in specific disciplines. Points emphasised were the need to train teaching staff in new technology since students are usually more expert; and the danger of indexers, through ignorance of user needs, creating over complex systems
  2. Regimbeau, G.: Acces thématiques aux oeuvres d'art contemporaines dans les banques de données (1998) 0.03
    0.026301075 = product of:
      0.065752685 = sum of:
        0.041615978 = weight(_text_:study in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041615978 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044537213 = queryNorm
            0.2873863 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
        0.02413671 = product of:
          0.04827342 = sum of:
            0.04827342 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04827342 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15596174 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044537213 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the possibilities and difficulties encountered when using a thematic index to search contemporary art databanks. Jaconde and Videomuseum, 2 French databanks, are used as examples. the core problems found in the study are the methods and limits of indexing in both systems. A thematic index should be developed that is better adapted to 20th century art, based on the complementary and reciprocal relationship between text and image, and which fully exploits hypertext
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  3. Tomitch, M.-M.: ¬Le role de l'IFLA en matière de normalisation (1998) 0.02
    0.02301344 = product of:
      0.0575336 = sum of:
        0.03641398 = weight(_text_:study in 2243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03641398 = score(doc=2243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044537213 = queryNorm
            0.251463 = fieldWeight in 2243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2243)
        0.021119623 = product of:
          0.042239245 = sum of:
            0.042239245 = weight(_text_:22 in 2243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042239245 = score(doc=2243,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15596174 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044537213 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2243, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Presentation given at the French Libraries Association study and research section day on 'research and indexing: limited results', held in Grenoble in Oct 1997
    Date
    17.11.1998 16:22:09