Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"nl"
  1. Zakrzewska, E.D.: GOO of UDC? : twee systemen voor inhoudelijke ontsluiting vergeleken (1997) 0.03 
    0.026301075 = product of:
  0.065752685 = sum of:
    0.041615978 = weight(_text_:study in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041615978 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044537213 = queryNorm
        0.2873863 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
    0.02413671 = product of:
      0.04827342 = sum of:
        0.04827342 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04827342 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044537213 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In the Netherlands the Gemeenschappelijke Onderwerps Ontsluiting (Standard Subject Indexing) schedules were developed for libraries using the national online catalogue. At Leiden University's Institute voor Oost-Europees Recht en Ruslandkunde use of both UDC and GOO schedules enabled a comparison to be made of the systems. A study of approx. 1.400 titles showed that GOO was more effective in retrieving relevant documents, whereas UDC was more suited for compiling subject bibliographies. The best of both schemes should be combined for optimal retrieval
    Source
    Informatie professional. 1(1997) no.3, S.19-22
  2. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.02 
    0.02301344 = product of:
  0.0575336 = sum of:
    0.03641398 = weight(_text_:study in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03641398 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044537213 = queryNorm
        0.251463 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
    0.021119623 = product of:
      0.042239245 = sum of:
        0.042239245 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042239245 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044537213 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Almost as many systems as libraries: a study of alternative shelf arrangement schems
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
  3. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.02 
    0.02301344 = product of:
  0.0575336 = sum of:
    0.03641398 = weight(_text_:study in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03641398 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044537213 = queryNorm
        0.251463 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    0.021119623 = product of:
      0.042239245 = sum of:
        0.042239245 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042239245 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044537213 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Subject arrangement assists browsing?: subject versus alphabetical arrangement: a study in differences in user behavious
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23

Authors

Themes