Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993)
0.03
0.026301075 = product of:
0.065752685 = sum of:
0.041615978 = weight(_text_:study in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041615978 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.044537213 = queryNorm
0.2873863 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
0.02413671 = product of:
0.04827342 = sum of:
0.04827342 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04827342 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15596174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044537213 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Presents a summary of a more detailed study made of evaluation versions of these 2 US software packages, due to appear in 'C and L applications'. The packages are aimed at individual researchers, students and lecturers rather than libraries. Concludes that the cheaper package, EndNote, appears better suited to the students with occasional need for bibliographies, whereas the more complex (and expensive) Pro-Cite would suit a researcher or writer with a high output of professional papers. Pro-Cite could probably also be used by a small library as a means of creating a database
- Source
- Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
