Search (9942 results, page 1 of 498)

  1. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.11
    0.109851226 = product of:
      0.21970245 = sum of:
        0.21970245 = sum of:
          0.10637741 = weight(_text_:research in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10637741 = score(doc=3069,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.71324587 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.11332505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11332505 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
    Source
    Library research. 1(1979), S.199-222
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.10427822 = sum of:
      0.08302978 = product of:
        0.24908933 = sum of:
          0.24908933 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24908933 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44320524 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.021248447 = product of:
        0.042496894 = sum of:
          0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042496894 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.10
    0.09713356 = sum of:
      0.08302978 = product of:
        0.24908933 = sum of:
          0.24908933 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24908933 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44320524 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.014103786 = product of:
        0.028207572 = sum of:
          0.028207572 = weight(_text_:research in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028207572 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  4. Lynch, C.A.; Preston, C.M.: Describing and classifying networked information resources (1992) 0.09
    0.09427262 = product of:
      0.18854524 = sum of:
        0.18854524 = sum of:
          0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 2974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07522019 = score(doc=2974,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.504341 = fieldWeight in 2974, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2974)
          0.11332505 = weight(_text_:22 in 2974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11332505 = score(doc=2974,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2974, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2974)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Electronic networking: research, applications, and policy. 2(1992) no.1, S.10-22
  5. Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008) 0.09
    0.09427262 = product of:
      0.18854524 = sum of:
        0.18854524 = sum of:
          0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07522019 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.504341 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.11332505 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11332505 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 9:30:22
  6. Trauth, E.M.: Qualitative research in IS : issues and trends (2001) 0.09
    0.09427262 = product of:
      0.18854524 = sum of:
        0.18854524 = sum of:
          0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07522019 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.504341 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
          0.11332505 = weight(_text_:22 in 5848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11332505 = score(doc=5848,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5848, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 3.2003 15:35:22
  7. Sillince, J.A.A.: Intelligent argumentation systems : requirements, models, research agenda, and applications (1997) 0.09
    0.09427262 = product of:
      0.18854524 = sum of:
        0.18854524 = sum of:
          0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 7774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07522019 = score(doc=7774,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.504341 = fieldWeight in 7774, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7774)
          0.11332505 = weight(_text_:22 in 7774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11332505 = score(doc=7774,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7774, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7774)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  8. Elliott, P.: Reporting LIS research : a review article (1990) 0.09
    0.09135385 = product of:
      0.1827077 = sum of:
        0.1827077 = sum of:
          0.0977139 = weight(_text_:research in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0977139 = score(doc=5882,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.6551582 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
          0.08499379 = weight(_text_:22 in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08499379 = score(doc=5882,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the problem of library and information science research publishing and reviews the monographs, abstracting services and periodicals that disseminate information about research.
    Source
    Librarianship. 22(1990), no.4, S.257-264
  9. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09
    0.08689853 = sum of:
      0.069191486 = product of:
        0.20757446 = sum of:
          0.20757446 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20757446 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44320524 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.01770704 = product of:
        0.03541408 = sum of:
          0.03541408 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03541408 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  10. Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018) 0.09
    0.085812956 = sum of:
      0.069191486 = product of:
        0.20757446 = sum of:
          0.20757446 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20757446 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44320524 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.01662147 = product of:
        0.03324294 = sum of:
          0.03324294 = weight(_text_:research in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03324294 = score(doc=855,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.
    Content
    Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
  11. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08
    0.08302978 = product of:
      0.16605955 = sum of:
        0.16605955 = product of:
          0.49817866 = sum of:
            0.49817866 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.49817866 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.44320524 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  12. Scientific discovery (1997) 0.08
    0.08248854 = product of:
      0.16497707 = sum of:
        0.16497707 = sum of:
          0.06581766 = weight(_text_:research in 465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06581766 = score(doc=465,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 465, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=465)
          0.09915942 = weight(_text_:22 in 465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09915942 = score(doc=465,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 465, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=465)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Footnote
    A special issue devoted to recent research on computer systems that can doscover scientific laws or concepts
  13. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.08
    0.08248854 = product of:
      0.16497707 = sum of:
        0.16497707 = sum of:
          0.06581766 = weight(_text_:research in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06581766 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.09915942 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09915942 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
    Source
    Library and information research news. 24(2000) no.77, S.30-34
  14. Forsman, R.B.: Managing the electronic resources transforming research libraries : challenges in the dynamic digital environment (1998) 0.08
    0.08248854 = product of:
      0.16497707 = sum of:
        0.16497707 = sum of:
          0.06581766 = weight(_text_:research in 4699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06581766 = score(doc=4699,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 4699, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4699)
          0.09915942 = weight(_text_:22 in 4699) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09915942 = score(doc=4699,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4699, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4699)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.1-20
  15. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.08
    0.08248854 = product of:
      0.16497707 = sum of:
        0.16497707 = sum of:
          0.06581766 = weight(_text_:research in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06581766 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.09915942 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09915942 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  16. Coates, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification (1969) 0.08
    0.08238842 = product of:
      0.16477685 = sum of:
        0.16477685 = sum of:
          0.07978306 = weight(_text_:research in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07978306 = score(doc=1283,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.5349344 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
          0.08499379 = weight(_text_:22 in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08499379 = score(doc=1283,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22
    Series
    Library Association Research Publications; no.1
    Source
    Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
  17. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.08
    0.08238842 = product of:
      0.16477685 = sum of:
        0.16477685 = sum of:
          0.07978306 = weight(_text_:research in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07978306 = score(doc=6158,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.5349344 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.08499379 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08499379 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  18. Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005) 0.08
    0.08238842 = product of:
      0.16477685 = sum of:
        0.16477685 = sum of:
          0.07978306 = weight(_text_:research in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07978306 = score(doc=4890,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.5349344 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
          0.08499379 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08499379 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2007 17:02:22
    Footnote
    Einleitung zu einem Themenheft "Bibliometrics Research"
  19. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.07
    0.073589385 = product of:
      0.14717877 = sum of:
        0.14717877 = sum of:
          0.047012623 = weight(_text_:research in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047012623 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.10016614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10016614 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Derives a 'literature variable exponential growth model' from Price's literature growth model. The research shows that the new model is more convincing than the former ones. Gives detailed calculation procedure, examples, parameter values and mean square errors
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  20. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.07
    0.073589385 = product of:
      0.14717877 = sum of:
        0.14717877 = sum of:
          0.047012623 = weight(_text_:research in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047012623 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.31521314 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.10016614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10016614 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
    Source
    Information Research. 6(2001), no.2

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 8537
  • m 721
  • el 442
  • s 419
  • r 141
  • x 56
  • b 54
  • i 38
  • ? 11
  • p 7
  • d 6
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications