-
Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.; Schaefer, A.: Evaluating strategic support for information access in the DAFFODIL system (2004)
0.05
0.049055643 = product of:
0.09811129 = sum of:
0.09811129 = sum of:
0.05608411 = weight(_text_:searching in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05608411 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04202718 = score(doc=2419,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The digital library system Daffodil is targeted at strategic support of users during the information search process. For searching, exploring and managing digital library objects it provides user-customisable information seeking patterns over a federation of heterogeneous digital libraries. In this paper evaluation results with respect to retrieval effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction are presented. The analysis focuses on strategic support for the scientific work-flow. Daffodil supports the whole work-flow, from data source selection over information seeking to the representation, organisation and reuse of information. By embedding high level search functionality into the scientific work-flow, the user experiences better strategic system support due to a more systematic work process. These ideas have been implemented in Daffodil followed by a qualitative evaluation. The evaluation has been conducted with 28 participants, ranging from information seeking novices to experts. The results are promising, as they support the chosen model.
- Date
- 16.11.2008 16:22:48
-
Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984)
0.02
0.024515856 = product of:
0.049031712 = sum of:
0.049031712 = product of:
0.098063424 = sum of:
0.098063424 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098063424 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20.10.2000 12:22:23
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = product of:
0.08405436 = sum of:
0.08405436 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08405436 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = product of:
0.08405436 = sum of:
0.08405436 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08405436 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
-
Pfeifer, U.; Poersch, T.; Fuhr, N.: Retrieval effectiveness of proper name search methods (1996)
0.02
0.018694704 = product of:
0.03738941 = sum of:
0.03738941 = product of:
0.07477882 = sum of:
0.07477882 = weight(_text_:searching in 6982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07477882 = score(doc=6982,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 6982, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6982)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reviews similarity measures for searching names. These measures deal with phonetic similarity, typing errors, and plain string similarity. Shows experimentally that all 3 approaches lead to significantly higher retrieval quality than plain identity. Further improvements are possible by combining different methods. Develops a probabilistic interpretation of string similarity that leads to better results than an ad-hoc approach
-
Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988)
0.02
0.017511327 = product of:
0.035022654 = sum of:
0.035022654 = product of:
0.07004531 = sum of:
0.07004531 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07004531 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 8.1998 12:51:22
-
Pfeifer, U.; Fuhr, N.; Huynh, T.: Searching structured documents with the enhanced retrieval functionality of freeWAIS-sf and SFgate (1995)
0.02
0.016357865 = product of:
0.03271573 = sum of:
0.03271573 = product of:
0.06543146 = sum of:
0.06543146 = weight(_text_:searching in 2214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06543146 = score(doc=2214,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 2214, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2214)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Schaefer, A.; Jordan, M.; Klas, C.-P.; Fuhr, N.: Active support for query formulation in virtual digital libraries : a case study with DAFFODIL (2005)
0.01
0.01168419 = product of:
0.02336838 = sum of:
0.02336838 = product of:
0.04673676 = sum of:
0.04673676 = weight(_text_:searching in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04673676 = score(doc=4296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Daffodil is a front-end to federated, heterogeneous digital libraries targeting at strategic support of users during the information seeking process. This is done by offering a variety of functions for searching, exploring and managing digital library objects. However, the distributed search increases response time and the conceptual model of the underlying search processes is inherently weaker. This makes query formulation harder and the resulting waiting times can be frustrating. In this paper, we investigate the concept of proactive support during the user's query formulation. For improving user efficiency and satisfaction, we implemented annotations, proactive support and error markers on the query form itself. These functions decrease the probability for syntactical or semantical errors in queries. Furthermore, the user is able to make better tactical decisions and feels more confident that the system handles the query properly. Evaluations with 30 subjects showed that user satisfaction is improved, whereas no conclusive results were received for efficiency.
