-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.03
0.02801812 = product of:
0.05603624 = sum of:
0.05603624 = product of:
0.11207248 = sum of:
0.11207248 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11207248 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.02801812 = product of:
0.05603624 = sum of:
0.05603624 = product of:
0.11207248 = sum of:
0.11207248 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11207248 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993)
0.03
0.026438305 = product of:
0.05287661 = sum of:
0.05287661 = product of:
0.10575322 = sum of:
0.10575322 = weight(_text_:searching in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10575322 = score(doc=3741,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.5056614 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Investigates the relative efficacy of searching by terms and by citations in searches collected in health science libraries. In pilot and field studies the odds that overlap items retrieved would be relevant or partially relevant were greatly improved. In the field setting citation searching was able to add average of 24% recall to traditional subject retrieval. Attempts to identify distinguishing characteristics in queries which might benefit most from additional citation searches proved inclusive. Online access of citation databases has been hampered by their high cost
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024764754 = product of:
0.049529508 = sum of:
0.049529508 = product of:
0.099059016 = sum of:
0.099059016 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099059016 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Lin, X.; White, H.D.; Buzydlowski, J.: Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching (2003)
0.02
0.024285134 = product of:
0.048570268 = sum of:
0.048570268 = product of:
0.097140536 = sum of:
0.097140536 = weight(_text_:searching in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097140536 = score(doc=1080,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.46447968 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Author searching is traditionally based on the matching of name strings. Special characteristics of authors as personal names and subject indicators are not considered. This makes it difficult to identify a set of related authors or to group authors by subjects in retrieval systems. In this paper, we describe the design and implementation of a prototype visualization system to enhance author searching. The system, called AuthorLink, is based on author co-citation analysis and visualization mapping algorithms such as Kohonen's feature maps and Pathfinder networks. AuthorLink produces interactive author maps in real time from a database of 1.26 million records supplied by the Institute for Scientific Information. The maps show subject groupings and more fine-grained intellectual connections among authors. Through the interactive interface the user can take advantage of such information to refine queries and retrieve documents through point-and-click manipulation of the authors' names.
-
Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996)
0.02
0.023133516 = product of:
0.046267033 = sum of:
0.046267033 = product of:
0.092534065 = sum of:
0.092534065 = weight(_text_:searching in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092534065 = score(doc=3044,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.44245374 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports recent experiences with the publishing, via the Internet and WWW of ISI's biweekly newspaper, The Scientist; which was originally mounted on the NSFnet. Compares the use of the Internet for SDI by comparing Web searches via AltaVista with similar searches on CD-ROM. Predicts that future current awareness services and SDI services will be linked to electronic periodicals in electronic libraries. Concludes with a note on cited reference searching, a variation on the theme of hypertext searching, with particular reference to SCI and Web crawlers
-
Whitley, K.M.: Analysis of SciFinder Scholar and Web of Science citation searches (2002)
0.02
0.023133516 = product of:
0.046267033 = sum of:
0.046267033 = product of:
0.092534065 = sum of:
0.092534065 = weight(_text_:searching in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092534065 = score(doc=1255,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.44245374 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Chemical Abstracts Service recently unveiled citation searching in Chemical Abstracts. With Chemical Abstracts and Science Citation Index both now available for citation searching, this study compares the duplication and uniqueness of citing references for works of chemistry researchers for the years 1999-2001. The two indexes cover very similar source material, so one would expect the citation results to be very similar. This analysis of SciFinder Scholar and Web of Science shows some important differences as the databases are currently offered. Authors and institutions using citation counts as measures of scientific productivity should take note.
-
Hammond, C.C.; Brown, S.W.: Citation searching : search smarter & find more (2008)
0.02
0.020237612 = product of:
0.040475223 = sum of:
0.040475223 = product of:
0.08095045 = sum of:
0.08095045 = weight(_text_:searching in 2206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08095045 = score(doc=2206,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.38706642 = fieldWeight in 2206, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2206)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- At the University of Connecticut, we have been enticing graduate students to join graduate student trainers to learn how to answer the following questions and improve the breadth of their research: Do you need to find articles published outside your primary discipline? What are some seminal articles in your field? Have you ever wanted to know who cited an article you wrote? We are participating in Elsevier's Student Ambassador Program (SAmP) in which graduate students train their peers on "citation searching" research using Scopus and Web of Science, two tremendous citation databases. We are in the fourth semester of these training programs, and they are wildly successful: We have offered more than 30 classes and taught more than 350 students from March 2007 through March 2008. Chelsea is a Ph.D. candidate in the department of communication science at the University of Connecticut (UConn) and was trained as a librarian; she was one of the first peer trainers in the citation searching program. Stephanie is an electronic resource librarian at the University of Connecticut and is the librarian coordinating the program. Together, we would like to explain what we teach in the classes in the hopes of helping even more researchers perform better searches.
-
Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000)
0.02
0.019828727 = product of:
0.039657455 = sum of:
0.039657455 = product of:
0.07931491 = sum of:
0.07931491 = weight(_text_:searching in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07931491 = score(doc=4593,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.37924606 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A citation analysis examined the 28 best articles published in JASIS from 1969-1996. Best articles tend to single-authored works twice as long as the avergae article published in JASIS. They are cited and self-cited much more often than the average article. The greatest source of references made to the best articles is from JASIS itself. The top 5 best papers focus largely on information retrieval and online searching
- Content
- Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.017511327 = product of:
0.035022654 = sum of:
0.035022654 = product of:
0.07004531 = sum of:
0.07004531 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07004531 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Garfield, E.: From citation indexes to informetrics : is the tail now wagging the dog? (1998)
0.02
0.016357865 = product of:
0.03271573 = sum of:
0.03271573 = product of:
0.06543146 = sum of:
0.06543146 = weight(_text_:searching in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06543146 = score(doc=2809,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Provides a synoptic review and history of citation indexes and their evolution into research evaluation tools including a discussion of the use of bibliometric data for evaluating US institutions (academic departments) by the National Research Council (NRC). Covers the origin and uses of periodical impact factors, validation studies of citation analysis, information retrieval and dissemination (current awareness), citation consciousness, historiography and science mapping, Citation Classics, and the history of contemporary science. Illustrates the retrieval of information by cited reference searching, especially as it applies to avoiding duplicated research. Discusses the 15 year cumulative impacts of periodicals and the percentage of uncitedness, the emergence of scientometrics, old boy networks, and citation frequency distributions. Concludes with observations about the future of citation indexing
-
Hellqvist, B.: Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis (2010)
0.02
0.016357865 = product of:
0.03271573 = sum of:
0.03271573 = product of:
0.06543146 = sum of:
0.06543146 = weight(_text_:searching in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06543146 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article studies citation practices in the arts and humanities from a theoretical and conceptual viewpoint, drawing on studies from fields like linguistics, history, library & information science, and the sociology of science. The use of references in the humanities is discussed in connection with the growing interest in the possibilities of applying citation analysis to humanistic disciplines. The study shows how the use of references within the humanities is connected to concepts of originality, to intellectual organization, and to searching and writing. Finally, it is acknowledged that the use of references is connected to stylistic, epistemological, and organizational differences, and these differences must be taken into account when applying citation analysis to humanistic disciplines.
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.014858853 = product of:
0.029717706 = sum of:
0.029717706 = product of:
0.059435412 = sum of:
0.059435412 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059435412 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Pao, M.L.; Worthen, D.B.: Retrieval effectiveness by semantic and citation searching (1989)
0.01
0.014021028 = product of:
0.028042056 = sum of:
0.028042056 = product of:
0.05608411 = sum of:
0.05608411 = weight(_text_:searching in 2288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05608411 = score(doc=2288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 2288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004)
0.01
0.014021028 = product of:
0.028042056 = sum of:
0.028042056 = product of:
0.05608411 = sum of:
0.05608411 = weight(_text_:searching in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05608411 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The Web is a huge source of information, and one of the main problems facing users is finding documents which correspond to their requirements. Apart from the problem of thematic relevance, the documents retrieved by search engines do not always meet the users' expectations. The document may be too general, or conversely too specialized, or of a different type from what the user is looking for, and so forth. We think that adding metadata to pages can considerably improve the process of searching for information an the Web. This article presents a possible typology for Web sites and pages, as weIl as a method for propagating metadata values, based an the study of the Web graph and more specifically the method of cocitation in this graph.
-
He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: PubSearch : a Web citation-based retrieval system (2001)
0.01
0.014021028 = product of:
0.028042056 = sum of:
0.028042056 = product of:
0.05608411 = sum of:
0.05608411 = weight(_text_:searching in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05608411 = score(doc=4806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Many scientific publications are now available on the World Wide Web for researchers to share research findings. However, they tend to be poorly organised, making the search of relevant publications difficult and time-consuming. Most existing search engines are ineffective in searching these publications, as they do not index Web publications that normally appear in PDF (portable document format) or PostScript formats. Proposes a Web citation-based retrieval system, known as PubSearch, for the retrieval of Web publications. PubSearch indexes Web publications based on citation indices and stores them into a Web Citation Database. The Web Citation Database is then mined to support publication retrieval. Apart from supporting the traditional cited reference search, PubSearch also provides document clustering search and author clustering search. Document clustering groups related publications into clusters, while author clustering categorizes authors into different research areas based on author co-citation analysis.
-
Belter, C.W.: Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews (2016)
0.01
0.014021028 = product of:
0.028042056 = sum of:
0.028042056 = product of:
0.05608411 = sum of:
0.05608411 = weight(_text_:searching in 3158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05608411 = score(doc=3158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 3158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3158)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Systematic reviews are essential for evaluating biomedical treatment options, but the growing size and complexity of the available biomedical literature combined with the rigor of the systematic review method mean that systematic reviews are extremely difficult and labor-intensive to perform. In this article, I propose a method of searching the literature by systematically mining the various types of citation relationships between articles. I then test the method by comparing its precision and recall to that of 14 published systematic reviews. The method successfully retrieved 74% of the studies included in these reviews and 90% of the studies it could reasonably be expected to retrieve. The method also retrieved fewer than half of the total number of publications retrieved by these reviews and can be performed in substantially less time. This suggests that the proposed method offers a promising complement to traditional text-based methods of literature identification and retrieval for systematic reviews.
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.01400906 = product of:
0.02801812 = sum of:
0.02801812 = product of:
0.05603624 = sum of:
0.05603624 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05603624 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.012257928 = product of:
0.024515856 = sum of:
0.024515856 = product of:
0.049031712 = sum of:
0.049031712 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049031712 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.012257928 = product of:
0.024515856 = sum of:
0.024515856 = product of:
0.049031712 = sum of:
0.049031712 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049031712 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
