-
Ellis, D.; Vasconcelos, A.: Ranganathan and the Net : using facet analysis to search and organise the World Wide Web (1999)
0.03
0.028042056 = product of:
0.05608411 = sum of:
0.05608411 = product of:
0.11216822 = sum of:
0.11216822 = weight(_text_:searching in 726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11216822 = score(doc=726,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.53633493 = fieldWeight in 726, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper documents the continuing relevance of facet analysis as a technique for searching and organising WWW based materials. The 2 approaches underlying WWW searching and indexing - word and concept based indexing - are outlined. It is argued that facet analysis as an a posteriori approach to classification using words from the subject field as the concept terms in the classification derived represents an excellent approach to searching and organising the results of WWW searches using either search engines or search directories. Finally it is argued that the underlying philosophy of facet analysis is better suited to the disparate nature of WWW resources and searchers than the assumptions of contemporaray IR research.
This article gives a cheerfully brief and undetailed account of how to make a faceted classification system, then describes information retrieval and searching on the web. It concludes by saying that facets would be excellent in helping users search and browse the web, but offers no real clues as to how this can be done.
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999)
0.02
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = product of:
0.08405436 = sum of:
0.08405436 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08405436 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999)
0.02
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = product of:
0.08405436 = sum of:
0.08405436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08405436 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.02
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = product of:
0.08405436 = sum of:
0.08405436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08405436 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
-
Tennis, J.T.: ¬The strange case of eugenics : a subject's ontogeny in a long-lived classification scheme and the question of collocative integrity (2012)
0.02
0.018694704 = product of:
0.03738941 = sum of:
0.03738941 = product of:
0.07477882 = sum of:
0.07477882 = weight(_text_:searching in 275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07477882 = score(doc=275,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 275, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=275)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article introduces the problem of collocative integrity present in long-lived classification schemes that undergo several changes. A case study of the subject "eugenics" in the Dewey Decimal Classification is presented to illustrate this phenomenon. Eugenics is strange because of the kinds of changes it undergoes. The article closes with a discussion of subject ontogeny as the name for this phenomenon and describes implications for information searching and browsing.
-
Gnoli, C.; Mei, H.: Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval (2006)
0.01
0.014021028 = product of:
0.028042056 = sum of:
0.028042056 = product of:
0.05608411 = sum of:
0.05608411 = weight(_text_:searching in 534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05608411 = score(doc=534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=534)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In free classification, each concept is expressed by a constant notation, and classmarks are formed by free combinations of them, allowing the retrieval of records from a database by searching any of the component concepts. A refinement of free classification is freely faceted classification, where notation can include facets, expressing the kind of relations held between the concepts. The Integrative Level Classification project aims at testing free and freely faceted classification by applying them to small bibliographical samples in various domains. A sample, called the Dandelion Bibliography of Facet Analysis, is described here. Experience was gained using this system to classify 300 specialized papers dealing with facet analysis itself recorded on a MySQL database and building a Web interface exploiting freely faceted notation. The interface is written in PHP and uses string functions to process the queries and to yield relevant results selected and ordered according to the principles of integrative levels.
-
Connaway, L.S.; Sievert, M.C.: Comparison of three classification systems for information on health insurance (1996)
0.01
0.01400906 = product of:
0.02801812 = sum of:
0.02801812 = product of:
0.05603624 = sum of:
0.05603624 = weight(_text_:22 in 7242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05603624 = score(doc=7242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 4.1997 21:10:19
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.01400906 = product of:
0.02801812 = sum of:
0.02801812 = product of:
0.05603624 = sum of:
0.05603624 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05603624 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.01400906 = product of:
0.02801812 = sum of:
0.02801812 = product of:
0.05603624 = sum of:
0.05603624 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05603624 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.01
0.01400906 = product of:
0.02801812 = sum of:
0.02801812 = product of:
0.05603624 = sum of:
0.05603624 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05603624 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.1-22
-
Putkey, T.: Using SKOS to express faceted classification on the Semantic Web (2011)
0.01
0.013219153 = product of:
0.026438305 = sum of:
0.026438305 = product of:
0.05287661 = sum of:
0.05287661 = weight(_text_:searching in 311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05287661 = score(doc=311,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.2528307 = fieldWeight in 311, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=311)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) to investigate how a faceted classification can be expressed in RDF and shared on the Semantic Web. Statement of the Problem Faceted classification outlines facets as well as subfacets and facet values. Hierarchical relationships and associative relationships are established in a faceted classification. RDF is used to describe how a specific URI has a relationship to a facet value. Not only does RDF decompose "information into pieces," but by incorporating facet values RDF also given the URI the hierarchical and associative relationships expressed in the faceted classification. Combining faceted classification and RDF creates more knowledge than if the two stood alone. An application understands the subjectpredicate-object relationship in RDF and can display hierarchical and associative relationships based on the object (facet) value. This paper continues to investigate if the above idea is indeed useful, used, and applicable. If so, how can a faceted classification be expressed in RDF? What would this expression look like? Literature Review This paper used the same articles as the paper A Survey of Faceted Classification: History, Uses, Drawbacks and the Semantic Web (Putkey, 2010). In that paper, appropriate resources were discovered by searching in various databases for "faceted classification" and "faceted search," either in the descriptor or title fields. Citations were also followed to find more articles as well as searching the Internet for the same terms. To retrieve the documents about RDF, searches combined "faceted classification" and "RDF, " looking for these words in either the descriptor or title.
-
Winske, E.: ¬The development and structure of an urban, regional, and local documents classification scheme (1996)
0.01
0.012257928 = product of:
0.024515856 = sum of:
0.024515856 = product of:
0.049031712 = sum of:
0.049031712 = weight(_text_:22 in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049031712 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Paper presented at conference on 'Local documents, a new classification scheme' at the Research Caucus of the Florida Library Association Annual Conference, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 22 Apr 95
-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.01
0.012257928 = product of:
0.024515856 = sum of:
0.024515856 = product of:
0.049031712 = sum of:
0.049031712 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049031712 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.01
0.012257928 = product of:
0.024515856 = sum of:
0.024515856 = product of:
0.049031712 = sum of:
0.049031712 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049031712 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-36
-
Keshet, Y.: Classification systems in the light of sociology of knowledge (2011)
0.01
0.01168419 = product of:
0.02336838 = sum of:
0.02336838 = product of:
0.04673676 = sum of:
0.04673676 = weight(_text_:searching in 4493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04673676 = score(doc=4493,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 4493, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Classification is an important process in making sense of the world, and has a pronounced social dimension. This paper aims to compare folksonomy, a new social classification system currently being developed on the web, with conventional taxonomy in the light of theoretical sociological and anthropological approaches. The co-existence of these two types of classification system raises the questions: Will and should taxonomies be hybridized with folksonomies? What can each of these systems contribute to information-searching processes, and how can the sociology of knowledge provide an answer to these questions? This paper aims also to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - This paper is situated at the meeting point of the sociology of knowledge, epistemology and information science and aims at examining systems of classification in the light of both classical theory and current late-modern sociological and anthropological approaches. Findings - Using theoretical approaches current in the sociology of science and knowledge, the paper envisages two divergent possible outcomes. Originality/value - While concentrating on classifications systems, this paper addresses the more general social issue of what we know and how it is known. The concept of hybrid knowledge is suggested in order to illuminate the epistemological basis of late-modern knowledge being constructed by hybridizing contradictory modern knowledge categories, such as the subjective with the objective and the social with the natural. Integrating tree-like taxonomies with folksonomies or, in other words, generating a naturalized structural order of objective relations with social, subjective classification systems, can create a vast range of hybrid knowledge.
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.010506795 = product of:
0.02101359 = sum of:
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04202718 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.01
0.010506795 = product of:
0.02101359 = sum of:
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04202718 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010)
0.01
0.010506795 = product of:
0.02101359 = sum of:
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04202718 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
-
Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014)
0.01
0.010506795 = product of:
0.02101359 = sum of:
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04202718 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014)
0.01
0.010506795 = product of:
0.02101359 = sum of:
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04202718 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
