-
Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007)
0.05
0.045743637 = product of:
0.2744618 = sum of:
0.2744618 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2744618 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2959851 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Footnote
- DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
-
Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002)
0.01
0.013372278 = product of:
0.08023366 = sum of:
0.08023366 = sum of:
0.056583133 = weight(_text_:etc in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056583133 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.023650533 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023650533 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- A main goal of recent studies in semantics is to integrate into conceptual structures the models of representation used in linguistics, logic, and/or artificial intelligence. A fundamental problem resides in the need to structure knowledge and then to check the validity of constructed representations. We propose associating logical properties with relationships by introducing the relationships into a typed and functional system of specifcations. This makes it possible to compare conceptual representations against the relationships established between the concepts. The mandatory condition to validate such a conceptual representation is consistency. The semantic system proposed is based an a structured set of semantic primitives-types, relations, and properties-based an a global model of language processing, Applicative and Cognitive Grammar (ACG) (Desc16s, 1990), and an extension of this model to terminology (Jouis & Mustafa 1995, 1996, 1997). The ACG postulates three levels of representation of languages, including a cognitive level. At this level, the meanings of lexical predicates are represented by semantic cognitive schemes. From this perspective, we propose a set of semantic concepts, which defines an organized system of meanings. Relations are part of a specification network based an a general terminological scheure (i.e., a coherent system of meanings of relations). In such a system, a specific relation may be characterized as to its: (1) functional type (the semantic type of arguments of the relation); (2) algebraic properties (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, etc.); and (3) combinatorial relations with other entities in the same context (for instance, the part of the text where a concept is defined).
- Date
- 1.12.2002 11:12:22
-
Kolmayer, E.; Lavandier, J.; Roger, D.: Conceptual maps : users navigation through paradigmatic and syntagmatic links (1998)
0.01
0.0073642298 = product of:
0.044185378 = sum of:
0.044185378 = weight(_text_:searching in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044185378 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- This experiment, focused on the users behaviour, aims to study the search topic representation they build and to highlight the role of a graphical thesaurus on their mental models and searching behaviour. The users expertise in the field is considered. The results show how difficult it is to structure a field; they also point out how much a graphical thesaurus could contribute to such a task, but also its restricted role in the query task. They urge us to think over which shape is proper to the conceptual interface and the variety of links that have to be taken into account
-
Dahlberg, I.: Zur Theorie des Begriffs (1974)
0.01
0.0056583136 = product of:
0.03394988 = sum of:
0.03394988 = product of:
0.06789976 = sum of:
0.06789976 = weight(_text_:etc in 1617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06789976 = score(doc=1617,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.35906604 = fieldWeight in 1617, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1617)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- A concept is regarded as the common element of both classification systems and thesauri. Reality and knowledge are not represented by words or terms but by the meanings "behind" these tokens. A concept of, say, an object, a property of an object, a process, etc. is derived from verbal statements on these as subjects and may therefore be defined as the whole of true and possible predicates that can be collected on a given subject. It is from these predicates that the characteristics of the corresponding concepts can be derived. Common characteristics in different concepts lead to relationsbetween concepts, which relations in turn are factors for the formation of concept systems. Different kinds of relationships as well as different kinds of concepts are distinguished. It is pointed out that an orderly supply of the elements for propositions (informative statements) on new knowledge requires the construction and availability of such concept systems
-
Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987)
0.01
0.005518458 = product of:
0.033110745 = sum of:
0.033110745 = product of:
0.06622149 = sum of:
0.06622149 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06622149 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Pages
- S.9-22
-
Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971)
0.00
0.0047301063 = product of:
0.028380638 = sum of:
0.028380638 = product of:
0.056761276 = sum of:
0.056761276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056761276 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
-
Thellefsen, M.M.; Thellefsen, T.; Sørensen, B.: Information as signs : a semiotic analysis of the information concept, determining its ontological and epistemological foundations (2018)
0.00
0.004715261 = product of:
0.028291566 = sum of:
0.028291566 = product of:
0.056583133 = sum of:
0.056583133 = weight(_text_:etc in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056583133 = score(doc=4241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this paper is to formulate an analytical framework for the information concept based on the semiotic theory. Design/methodology/approach The paper is motivated by the apparent controversy that still surrounds the information concept. Information, being a key concept within LIS, suffers from being anchored in various incompatible theories. The paper suggests that information is signs, and it demonstrates how the concept of information can be understood within C.S. Peirce's phenomenologically rooted semiotic. Hence, from there, certain ontological conditions as well epistemological consequences of the information concept can be deduced. Findings The paper argues that an understanding of information, as either objective or subjective/discursive, leads to either objective reductionism and signal processing, that fails to explain how information becomes meaningful at all, or conversely, information is understood only relative to subjective/discursive intentions, agendas, etc. To overcome the limitations of defining information as either objective or subjective/discursive, a semiotic analysis shows that information understood as signs is consistently sensitive to both objective and subjective/discursive features of information. It is consequently argued that information as concept should be defined in relation to ontological conditions having certain epistemological consequences. Originality/value The paper presents an analytical framework, derived from semiotics, that adds to the developments of the philosophical dimensions of information within LIS.
-
Conceptual structures : logical, linguistic, and computational issues. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 14-18, 2000 (2000)
0.00
0.0040010316 = product of:
0.02400619 = sum of:
0.02400619 = product of:
0.04801238 = sum of:
0.04801238 = weight(_text_:etc in 691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04801238 = score(doc=691,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.25389802 = fieldWeight in 691, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=691)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Computer scientists create models of a perceived reality. Through AI techniques, these models aim at providing the basic support for emulating cognitive behavior such as reasoning and learning, which is one of the main goals of the Al research effort. Such computer models are formed through the interaction of various acquisition and inference mechanisms: perception, concept learning, conceptual clustering, hypothesis testing, probabilistic inference, etc., and are represented using different paradigms tightly linked to the processes that use them. Among these paradigms let us cite: biological models (neural nets, genetic programming), logic-based models (first-order logic, modal logic, rule-based systems), virtual reality models (object systems, agent systems), probabilistic models (Bayesian nets, fuzzy logic), linguistic models (conceptual dependency graphs, language-based rep resentations), etc. One of the strengths of the Conceptual Graph (CG) theory is its versatility in terms of the representation paradigms under which it falls. It can be viewed and therefore used, under different representation paradigms, which makes it a popular choice for a wealth of applications. Its full coupling with different cognitive processes lead to the opening of the field toward related research communities such as the Description Logic, Formal Concept Analysis, and Computational Linguistic communities. We now see more and more research results from one community enrich the other, laying the foundations of common philosophical grounds from which a successful synergy can emerge. ICCS 2000 embodies this spirit of research collaboration. It presents a set of papers that we believe, by their exposure, will benefit the whole community. For instance, the technical program proposes tracks on Conceptual Ontologies, Language, Formal Concept Analysis, Computational Aspects of Conceptual Structures, and Formal Semantics, with some papers on pragmatism and human related aspects of computing. Never before was the program of ICCS formed by so heterogeneously rooted theories of knowledge representation and use. We hope that this swirl of ideas will benefit you as much as it already has benefited us while putting together this program
-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.00
0.0031534042 = product of:
0.018920425 = sum of:
0.018920425 = product of:
0.03784085 = sum of:
0.03784085 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03784085 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994)
0.00
0.002759229 = product of:
0.016555373 = sum of:
0.016555373 = product of:
0.033110745 = sum of:
0.033110745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033110745 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 7.2000 19:17:40
-
Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006)
0.00
0.002759229 = product of:
0.016555373 = sum of:
0.016555373 = product of:
0.033110745 = sum of:
0.033110745 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033110745 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Pages
- S.22-33
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.00
0.0023650532 = product of:
0.014190319 = sum of:
0.014190319 = product of:
0.028380638 = sum of:
0.028380638 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028380638 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012)
0.00
0.0019708779 = product of:
0.011825266 = sum of:
0.011825266 = product of:
0.023650533 = sum of:
0.023650533 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023650533 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:11:25
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.00
0.0019708779 = product of:
0.011825266 = sum of:
0.011825266 = product of:
0.023650533 = sum of:
0.023650533 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023650533 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.00
0.0019708779 = product of:
0.011825266 = sum of:
0.011825266 = product of:
0.023650533 = sum of:
0.023650533 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023650533 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03491209 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
