Search (72 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Carvalho, J.R. de; Cordeiro, M.I.; Lopes, A.; Vieira, M.: Meta-information about MARC : an XML framework for validation, explanation and help systems (2004) 0.03 
    0.030296182 = product of:
  0.090888545 = sum of:
    0.07433317 = product of:
      0.14866634 = sum of:
        0.14866634 = weight(_text_:manuals in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14866634 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25905544 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.57387847 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.016555373 = product of:
      0.033110745 = sum of:
        0.033110745 = weight(_text_:22 in 2848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033110745 = score(doc=2848,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2848, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2848)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This article proposes a schema for meta-information about MARC that can express at a fairly comprehensive level the syntactic and semantic aspects of MARC formats in XML, including not only rules but also all texts and examples that are conveyed by MARC documentation. It can be thought of as an XML version of the MARC or UNIMARC manuals, for both machine and human usage. The article explains how such a schema can be the central piece of a more complete framework, to be used in conjunction with "slim" record formats, providing a rich environment for the automated processing of bibliographic data.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.131-137
  2. UNIMARC manual : IFLA UBCIM Programme (1987) 0.03 
    0.02502928 = product of:
  0.15017568 = sum of:
    0.15017568 = product of:
      0.30035135 = sum of:
        0.30035135 = weight(_text_:manuals in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30035135 = score(doc=62,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25905544 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            1.1594095 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    PRECIS
    Documents / Cataloguing / Machine / readable files / International exchange / Formats: UNIMARC / Manuals
    Subject
    Documents / Cataloguing / Machine / readable files / International exchange / Formats: UNIMARC / Manuals
  3. Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2000) 0.02 
    0.0173545 = product of:
  0.0520635 = sum of:
    0.03787318 = weight(_text_:searching in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03787318 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
    0.014190319 = product of:
      0.028380638 = sum of:
        0.028380638 = weight(_text_:22 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028380638 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  4. Hollis, R.; Brunelle, B.S.: Developing a common user interface for information searching (1995) 0.01 
    0.014877992 = product of:
  0.08926795 = sum of:
    0.08926795 = weight(_text_:searching in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08926795 = score(doc=3364,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.6320768 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews the debate over a Common User Interface for databases, across various hardware platforms and operating systems, for both CD-ROM and online searching of bibliographic and full text databases. Discusses the implementation and further development of Z39.50 as an international standard for structured bibliographic data
  5. ISO 25964 Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies (2008) 0.01 
    0.011970511 = product of:
  0.03591153 = sum of:
    0.01893659 = weight(_text_:searching in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01893659 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.13408373 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
    0.01697494 = product of:
      0.03394988 = sum of:
        0.03394988 = weight(_text_:etc in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03394988 = score(doc=1169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.17953302 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    T.1: Today's thesauri are mostly electronic tools, having moved on from the paper-based era when thesaurus standards were first developed. They are built and maintained with the support of software and need to integrate with other software, such as search engines and content management systems. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals trained in indexing and searching, today there is a demand for vocabularies that untrained users will find to be intuitive. ISO 25964 makes the transition needed for the world of electronic information management. However, part 1 retains the assumption that human intellect is usually involved in the selection of indexing terms and in the selection of search terms. If both the indexer and the searcher are guided to choose the same term for the same concept, then relevant documents will be retrieved. This is the main principle underlying thesaurus design, even though a thesaurus built for human users may also be applied in situations where computers make the choices. Efficient exchange of data is a vital component of thesaurus management and exploitation. Hence the inclusion in this standard of recommendations for exchange formats and protocols. Adoption of these will facilitate interoperability between thesaurus management systems and the other computer applications, such as indexing and retrieval systems, that will utilize the data. Thesauri are typically used in post-coordinate retrieval systems, but may also be applied to hierarchical directories, pre-coordinate indexes and classification systems. Increasingly, thesaurus applications need to mesh with others, such as automatic categorization schemes, free-text search systems, etc. Part 2 of ISO 25964 describes additional types of structured vocabulary and gives recommendations to enable interoperation of the vocabularies at all stages of the information storage and retrieval process.
  6. Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's Thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2016) 0.01 
    0.011902392 = product of:
  0.07141435 = sum of:
    0.07141435 = weight(_text_:searching in 2698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07141435 = score(doc=2698,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.5056614 = fieldWeight in 2698, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2698)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vgl.: Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters. In: Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science 2000. S.46-58. Vgl.: DOI: 10.1080/01639374.2015.1116359.
  7. Reinke, U.: ¬Der Austausch terminologischer Daten (1993) 0.01 
    0.0075444183 = product of:
  0.04526651 = sum of:
    0.04526651 = product of:
      0.09053302 = sum of:
        0.09053302 = weight(_text_:etc in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09053302 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Diplomarbeit at the University of Saarbrücken which contains the following topics: data exchange format; terminology management systems; terminological databases; terminological record; data elements; data categories; data fields, etc.: hard- and software-related difficulties for the structure of records; description of approaches for the development of an exchange format for terminological data (MATER, MicroMATER, NTRF, SGML); considerations concerning an SGML-like exchange format; perspectives
  8. Recommandation 995 (1995) 0.01 
    0.0075444183 = product of:
  0.04526651 = sum of:
    0.04526651 = product of:
      0.09053302 = sum of:
        0.09053302 = weight(_text_:etc in 4689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09053302 = score(doc=4689,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 4689, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4689)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Text of a document produced by the French Librarians Association, Federation of Library Software Users and the Association of Directors of Departmental Lending Libraries, setting out standards for local data included in bibliographic notices in UNIMARC format. These are specifically intended for loan copies sent from central to branch libraries, for integration into the local catalogue. The subfields (MARC field 995) are: origin of document; bar code; classification code and loan details; details of contents, support etc; and notes on physical features
  9. Shieh, J.: PCC's work on URIs in MARC (2020) 0.01 
    0.0075444183 = product of:
  0.04526651 = sum of:
    0.04526651 = product of:
      0.09053302 = sum of:
        0.09053302 = weight(_text_:etc in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09053302 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In 2015, the PCC Task Group on URIs in MARC was tasked to identify and address linked data identifiers deployment in the current MARC format. By way of a pilot test, a survey, MARC Discussion papers, Proposals, etc., the Task Group initiated and introduced changes to MARC encoding. The Task Group succeeded in laying the ground work for preparing library data transition from MARC data to a linked data, RDF environment.
  10. Wall, C.E.; Cole, T.W.; Kazmer, M.M.: HyperText MARCup : a conceptualization for encoding, de-constructing, searching, retrieving, and using traditional knowledge tools (1995) 0.01 
    0.0073642298 = product of:
  0.044185378 = sum of:
    0.044185378 = weight(_text_:searching in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044185378 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  11. Kernernman, V.Y.; Koenig, M.E.D.: USMARC as a standardized format for the Internet hypermedia document control/retrieval/delivery system design (1996) 0.01 
    0.0073642298 = product of:
  0.044185378 = sum of:
    0.044185378 = weight(_text_:searching in 5565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044185378 = score(doc=5565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 5565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5565)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Surveys how the USMARC integrated bibliographic format (UBIF) could be mapped onto an hypermedia document USMARC format (HDUF) to meet the requirements of a hypermedia document control/retrieval/delivery (HDRD) system for the Internet. Explores the characteristics of such a system using an example of the WWW's directory and searching engine Yahoo!. Discusses additional standard specifications for the UBIF's structure, content designation, and data content to map this format into the HDUF that can serve as a proxy for the Net HDRD system
  12. Chowdhury, G.G.: Record formats for integrated databases : a review and comparison (1996) 0.01 
    0.0073642298 = product of:
  0.044185378 = sum of:
    0.044185378 = weight(_text_:searching in 7679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044185378 = score(doc=7679,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 7679, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7679)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Discusses the issues involved in the development of data formats for computerized information retrieval systems. Integrated databases capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information, in a single database structure, are more convenient for searching and retrieval by end users. Several bibliographic formats have been developed and are used for these bibliographic control puposes. Reviews features of 6 major bibliographic formats: USMARC, UKMARC, UNIMARC, CCF, MIBIS and ABNCD are reviewed. Only 2 formats: CCF and ABNCD are capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information and supporting the design of integrated databases. The comparison suggests that, while CCF makes more detailed provision for bibliographic information, ABNCD makes better provision for factual information such as profiles of institutions, information systems, projects and human experts
  13. Provansal, A.: Neuf mois après (1997) 0.01 
    0.0073642298 = product of:
  0.044185378 = sum of:
    0.044185378 = weight(_text_:searching in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044185378 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Electronic documents are creating new services and generating new demands, with consequent impacts on the means of transmitting knowledge, international standards and democratisation of access. Universal bibliographic control depends on common rules for bibliographic description and format to ensure compatibility and exchange. In addition to ISBN and UNIMARC for cataloguing, Z39.50 allows searching of heterogeneous databases and SGML makes cataloguing in publication a reality. Such developments must be based on knowledge of what users want and their real search and consultation practices, not what the system devisers have the technology to create
  14. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01 
    0.006689381 = product of:
  0.040136285 = sum of:
    0.040136285 = product of:
      0.08027257 = sum of:
        0.08027257 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08027257 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  15. Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997) 0.01 
    0.0063121966 = product of:
  0.03787318 = sum of:
    0.03787318 = weight(_text_:searching in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03787318 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
  16. Taylor, M.; Dickmeiss, A.: Delivering MARC/XML records from the Library of Congress catalogue using the open protocols SRW/U and Z39.50 (2005) 0.01 
    0.0063121966 = product of:
  0.03787318 = sum of:
    0.03787318 = weight(_text_:searching in 4350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03787318 = score(doc=4350,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 4350, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4350)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The MARC standard for representing catalogue records and the Z39.50 standard for locating and retrieving them have facilitated interoperability in the library domain for more than a decade. With the increasing ubiquity of XML, these standards are being superseded by MARCXML and MarcXchange for record representation and SRW/U for searching and retrieval. Service providers moving from the older standards to the newer generally need to support both old and new forms during the transition period. YAZ Proxy uses a novel approach to provide SRW/MARCXML access to the Library of Congress catalogue, by translating requests into Z39.50 and querying the older system directly. As a fringe benefit, it also greatly accelerates Z39.50 access.
  17. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.0063068084 = product of:
  0.03784085 = sum of:
    0.03784085 = product of:
      0.0756817 = sum of:
        0.0756817 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0756817 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  18. Wiesenmüller, H.: Von Fröschen und Strategen : Ein kleiner Leitfaden zur AACR2-Debatte (2002) 0.01 
    0.0056583136 = product of:
  0.03394988 = sum of:
    0.03394988 = product of:
      0.06789976 = sum of:
        0.06789976 = weight(_text_:etc in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06789976 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.35906604 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Zu den bestbesuchten Veranstaltungen des diesjährigen Bibliothekartages in Augsburg gehörte die Diskussion um die Reform der Formalerschließung. Ganz offensichtlich spielt die Katalogisierung - trotz Internet, Digitalisierung, Dublin Core etc. - im täglichen Geschäft nach wie vor eine bedeutende Rolle. Die Debatte um Regelwerke und Datenformate wird jedenfalls mit großem Ernst und Engagement geführt. Doch die Diskussion droht mittlerweile unübersichtlich zu werden, fachliche Argumente, technische Erfordernisse und bibliothekspolitische Positionen gehen munter durcheinander.
  19. MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004) 0.01 
    0.005518458 = product of:
  0.033110745 = sum of:
    0.033110745 = product of:
      0.06622149 = sum of:
        0.06622149 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06622149 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
  20. Geißelmann, F.: Arbeitsergebnisse der Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01 
    0.005518458 = product of:
  0.033110745 = sum of:
    0.033110745 = product of:
      0.06622149 = sum of:
        0.06622149 = weight(_text_:22 in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06622149 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    26. 8.2000 19:22:35

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 52
  • d 16
  • f 2
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 63
  • s 4
  • m 3
  • b 2
  • x 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications