Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Sacherschließung"
  1. Hall, J.L.; Bawden, D.: Online retrieval history : how it all began (2011) 0.01
    0.014577395 = product of:
      0.08746437 = sum of:
        0.08746437 = weight(_text_:searching in 4539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08746437 = score(doc=4539,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.61930627 = fieldWeight in 4539, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4539)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to discuss the history of online searching through the views of one of its pioneers. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents, and comments on, the recollections of Jim Hall, one of the earliest UK-based operators of, and writers on, online retrieval systems. Findings - The paper gives an account of the development of online searching in the UK during the 1960s and 1970s. Originality/value - The paper presents the perspective of one of the pioneers of online searching.
  2. Kilgour, F.G.: Origins of coordinate searching (1997) 0.01
    0.012755221 = product of:
      0.07653132 = sum of:
        0.07653132 = weight(_text_:searching in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07653132 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.541893 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Provides a history of the development of coordinate indexing and searching. In the 1930s scientists began to use edge notched punched cards for searching. The Batten system was invented in 1944. Following the World War 2 these systems underwent major enhancements: Calvin Mooers built up the punched card system with his Zatocoding, and Mortimer Taube enlarged the peek-a-boo system with his Uniterm development. 2 computerizations' of Taube's Uniterm system led to the present day world of information retrieval
  3. Silva, C.M.A. da; Ortega, C.D.: Proposals that preceded the call number : shelf arrangement in the Francofone manuals of librarianship from the mid-nineteenth century to 1930 (2017) 0.01
    0.01251464 = product of:
      0.07508784 = sum of:
        0.07508784 = product of:
          0.15017568 = sum of:
            0.15017568 = weight(_text_:manuals in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15017568 = score(doc=4138,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25905544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.57970476 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Shelf arrangement, from a bibliographic perspective, constitutes a reading proposal of the collection to the users as well as a resource for management and access to the documents. However, the centrality of the call number testifies the near forgetfulness of the different proposals that came before it and the role of the collection of documents and the target audience in the elaboration of the organization, in addition to the overlapping of the bibliographic classification to shelf arrangement. This work is justified by the need to restore shelf arrangement, seeking to understand its fundamental aspects from the literature in which the activity was systematized. Thus, this paper aims at contributing to reorient the shelf arrangement as an activity of information organization, exploring its conformation in the Francophone literature, from the midnineteenth century up to the 1930s. As for the methodology, this is an exploratory research made possible through the historical-conceptual investigation of shelf arrangement found in the Francophone manuals of librarianship of that period. This study concludes that the activity was placed by that line since the nineteenth century, when its own terminology was developed under the consideration of the intervention of the contexts, using methods and guided by the diversity of proposals.
  4. Maniez, J.: ¬L'¬évolution des languages documentaires (1993) 0.01
    0.011902392 = product of:
      0.07141435 = sum of:
        0.07141435 = weight(_text_:searching in 7076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07141435 = score(doc=7076,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.5056614 = fieldWeight in 7076, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7076)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In the frame of an issue of the Documentaliste devoted to the history of information science in France, the author of this article looks at the development of the two main families of information languages, hierarchical and analytical ones and attempts to discern how and how much this evolution has been influenced by the elements of information searching systems, literature, indexers, designers, users, searching techniques and indexing techniques
  5. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.01
    0.006161073 = product of:
      0.03696644 = sum of:
        0.03696644 = product of:
          0.110899314 = sum of:
            0.110899314 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.110899314 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2959851 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  6. From classification to 'knowledge organization' : Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997) (1997) 0.01
    0.005260164 = product of:
      0.031560984 = sum of:
        0.031560984 = weight(_text_:searching in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031560984 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. den Wiederabdruck der folgenden Beiträge: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (Memorandum of the Classification Research Group, 1955); COATES, E.J.: Classification in information retrieval: the twenty years following Dorking (1978); VICKERY, B.C.: Structure and function in retrieval languages (1971); VICKERY, B.C.: Knowledge representation: a brief review (1986); LEWSI, D.D. u. K. SPARCK JONES: Natural language processing for information retrieval (1996); CLEVERDON, C.W. u. J. MILLS: The testing of indexing language devices (1963); SOERGEL, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance: the logical evidence (1994); SPARCK JONES, K.: Reflections on TREC (1995); KEREN, C.: On information science (1984); SALTON, G.: A note about information science research (1985); SVENONIUS, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1986); MILSTEAD, J.L.: Needs for research in indexing (1994); WEINER, M.L. u. E.D. LIDDY: Intelligent text processing, and intelligence tradecraft (1995); ZORN, P. et al.: Advanced searching: tricks of the trade (1996); CROFT, W.B.: What do people want from information retrieval? (1995)
  7. Steierwald, U.: Wissen und System : zu Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz' Theorie einer Universalbibliothek (1995) 0.00
    0.0047301063 = product of:
      0.028380638 = sum of:
        0.028380638 = product of:
          0.056761276 = sum of:
            0.056761276 = weight(_text_:22 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056761276 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Series
    Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.22
  8. Taube, M.: Functional approach to bibliographic organization : a critique and a proposal (1985) 0.00
    0.0036821149 = product of:
      0.022092689 = sum of:
        0.022092689 = weight(_text_:searching in 3635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022092689 = score(doc=3635,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.15643102 = fieldWeight in 3635, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3635)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The idea of computing with concepts as mathematicians manipulate variables in equations goes back at least as far as G. W. Leibniz (1663). Leibniz dreamed of a universal calculus, an ambiguity-free language, with which scholars could communicate ideas with mathematical precision. George Boole, in his investigation of the laws of thought, contributed to the realization of this idea by developing a calculus of classes (1847). A modern visionary who saw a practical application of Boole's work and further contributed to the idea of communicating by "computing" was Mortimer Taube (1910-1965), a member of the Library of Congress staff from 1944 to 1949 who later founded Documentation, Inc. He proposed communicating with a mechanized information store by combining concepts using the Boolean operators, AND, OR and NOT. The following selection contains one of the first presentations of a technique Taube called "coordinate indexing" and what later has come to be called "post coordinate indexing" or Boolean searching. This selection is interesting an three counts. It is interesting first of all because of its early date-1950. Though the idea of coordinate indexing had been anticipated in manual systems of the punched card sort, these systems were limited, relying for the most part an repeated application of the AND operator. To conceptualize the full power that could be achieved by Boolean search strategy in mechanized systems was an imaginative step forward. Second, the selection is interesting insofar as the idea of coordinate indexing is couched, indeed nearly hidden, in a somewhat ponderous essay an the compatibility of universal and special classifications and the merits of different methods of information organization. Ponderous though it is, the essay is worth a careful reading. The perspective it gives is enlightening, a reminder that the roots of information science reach far back into the bibliographic past. The third and perhaps most interesting aspect of this selection is that in it Taube looks beyond the technique of coordinate indexing to envisage its implications an bibliographic organization. (Now more than thirty years later we are still attempting to understand these implications.) What Taube saw was a new method of bibliographic organization, which, not ingenuously, he observed might seem almost bumptious in the face of a two thousand year history of organizing information. This "new" method was, however, being proposed elsewhere, albeit in different guise, by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.) and his school. It was the method of organizing information using abstract categories called fields or facets. These categories, unlike those used in the great traditional classifications, were not locked in procrustean hierarchical structures, but could be freely synthesized or combined in indexing or retrieval. In short, Taube's voice was among those at midcentury supporting the move from enumerative to synthetic subject approaches. The fact that it was an American voice and one especially weIl informed about bibliography and computers is perhaps what led Jesse Shera to refer to Taube as "the Melvil Dewey ... of midtwentieth century American Librarianship," one who was able "to weld successfully conventional librarianship and the then-emerging information science."
  9. Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947) 0.00
    0.0031534042 = product of:
      0.018920425 = sum of:
        0.018920425 = product of:
          0.03784085 = sum of:
            0.03784085 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03784085 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
  10. Riplinger, T.: ¬Die Bedeutung der Methode Eppelsheimer für Theorie und Praxis der bibliothekarischen und der dokumentarischen Sacherschließung (2004) 0.00
    0.0031534042 = product of:
      0.018920425 = sum of:
        0.018920425 = product of:
          0.03784085 = sum of:
            0.03784085 = weight(_text_:22 in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03784085 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:33:51
  11. Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015) 0.00
    0.0031534042 = product of:
      0.018920425 = sum of:
        0.018920425 = product of:
          0.03784085 = sum of:
            0.03784085 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03784085 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2016 15:58:46
  12. Moneda Corrochano, M. de la; López-Huertas, M.J.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.: Spanish research in knowledge organization (2002-2010) (2013) 0.00
    0.002759229 = product of:
      0.016555373 = sum of:
        0.016555373 = product of:
          0.033110745 = sum of:
            0.033110745 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033110745 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:10:07
  13. Vom Buch zur Datenbank : Paul Otlets Utopie der Wissensvisualisierung (2012) 0.00
    0.0019708779 = product of:
      0.011825266 = sum of:
        0.011825266 = product of:
          0.023650533 = sum of:
            0.023650533 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023650533 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2016 16:06:54
  14. Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.00
    0.0015767021 = product of:
      0.009460213 = sum of:
        0.009460213 = product of:
          0.018920425 = sum of:
            0.018920425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018920425 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.