Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (1998) 0.04
    0.03525765 = product of:
      0.10577294 = sum of:
        0.03787318 = weight(_text_:searching in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03787318 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
        0.06789976 = product of:
          0.13579953 = sum of:
            0.13579953 = weight(_text_:etc in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13579953 = score(doc=4141,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.7181321 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: Indexing principles, Indexing practice, Precoordinate indexes, Consistency of indexing, Quality of indexing, Abstracts: types and functions, Writing the Abstract, Evaluation aspects, Approaches used in indexing and abstracting services, Enhancing the indexing, On the indexing and abstracting of imaginative works, Indexing multimedia sources, Texte searching, Automatic indexing, automatic abstracting, and related procedures, Indexing and the Internet, The future of indexing and abstracting, exercises in indexing and abstracting
    LCSH
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Abstracting / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Subject
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Abstracting / Problems, exercises, etc.
  2. Bowman, J.H.: Annotation: a lost art in cataloguing (2007) 0.01
    0.012388862 = product of:
      0.07433317 = sum of:
        0.07433317 = product of:
          0.14866634 = sum of:
            0.14866634 = weight(_text_:manuals in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14866634 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25905544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.57387847 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Public library catalogues in early twentieth-century Britain frequently included annotations, either to clarify obscure titles or to provide further information about the subject-matter of the books they described. Two manuals giving instruction on how to do this were published at that time. Following World War I, with the decline of the printed catalogue, this kind of annotation became rarer, and was almost confined to bulletins of new books. The early issues of the British National Bibliography included some annotations in exceptional cases. Parallels are drawn with the provision of table-of-contents information in present-day OPAC's.
  3. Lancaster, F.W.: Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2003) 0.01
    0.011316627 = product of:
      0.06789976 = sum of:
        0.06789976 = product of:
          0.13579953 = sum of:
            0.13579953 = weight(_text_:etc in 4913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13579953 = score(doc=4913,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.7181321 = fieldWeight in 4913, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    LCSH
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Abstracting / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Subject
    Indexing / Problems, exercises, etc.
    Abstracting / Problems, exercises, etc.
  4. Fidel, R.: Writing abstracts for free-text searching (1986) 0.01
    0.008416262 = product of:
      0.050497573 = sum of:
        0.050497573 = weight(_text_:searching in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050497573 = score(doc=684,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  5. Parekh, R.L.: Advanced indexing and abstracting practices (2000) 0.01
    0.0063121966 = product of:
      0.03787318 = sum of:
        0.03787318 = weight(_text_:searching in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03787318 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: 1. Indexing and Abstracting 2. Automatic Indexing and Automatic Abstracting 3. Principles of Indexing 4.Periodicals Listing and Accessioning 5. Online Computer Service 6. Dialog, Searching and Bibliographic Display 7. Books 8. Bibliographic Control 9. Abstracting Functions 10. Acquisition System 11. Future of Indexing and Abstracting Services
  6. Sauperl, A.; Klasinc, J.; Luzar, S.: Components of abstracts : logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature (2008) 0.01
    0.005260164 = product of:
      0.031560984 = sum of:
        0.031560984 = weight(_text_:searching in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031560984 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The international standard ISO 214:1976 defines an abstract as "an abbreviated, accurate representation of the contents of a document" (p. 1) that should "enable readers to identify the basic content of a document quickly and accurately to determine relevance" (p. 1). It also should be useful in computerized searching. The ISO standard suggests including the following elements: purpose, methods, results, and conclusions. Researchers have often challenged this structure and found that different disciplines and cultures prefer different information content. These claims are partially supported by the findings of our research into the structure of pharmacology, sociology, and Slovenian language and literature abstracts of papers published in international and Slovenian scientific periodicals. The three disciplines have different information content. Slovenian pharmacology abstracts differ in content from those in international periodicals while the differences between international and Slovenian abstracts are small in sociology. In the field of Slovenian language and literature, only domestic abstracts were studied. The identified differences can in part be attributed to the disciplines, but also to the different role of journals and papers in the professional society and to differences in perception of the role of abstracts. The findings raise questions about the structure of abstracts required by some publishers of international journals.
  7. Alonso, M.I.; Fernández, L.M.M.: Perspectives of studies on document abstracting : towards an integrated view of models and theoretical approaches (2010) 0.00
    0.004715261 = product of:
      0.028291566 = sum of:
        0.028291566 = product of:
          0.056583133 = sum of:
            0.056583133 = weight(_text_:etc in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056583133 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this paper is to systemize and improve the scientific status of studies on document abstracting. This is a diachronic, systematic study of document abstracting studies carried out from different perspectives and models (textual, psycholinguistic, social and communicative). Design/methodology/approach - A review of the perspectives and analysis proposals which are of interest to the various theoreticians of abstracting is carried out using a variety of techniques and approaches (cognitive, linguistic, communicative-social, didactic, etc.), each with different levels of theoretical and methodological abstraction and degrees of application. The most significant contributions of each are reviewed and highlighted, along with their limitations. Findings - It is found that the great challenge in abstracting is the systemization of models and conceptual apparatus, which open up this type of research to semiotic and socio-interactional perspectives. It is necessary to carry out suitable empirical research with operative designs and ad hoc measuring instruments which can measure the efficiency of the abstracting and the efficiency of a good abstract, while at the same time feeding back into the theoretical baggage of this type of study. Such research will have to explain and provide answers to all the elements and variables, which affect the realization and the reception of a quality abstract. Originality/value - The paper provides a small map of the studies on document abstracting. This shows how the conceptual and methodological framework has extended at the same time as the Science of Documentation has been evolving. All the models analysed - the communicative and interactional approach - are integrated in a new systematic framework.
  8. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.00
    0.0039417557 = product of:
      0.023650533 = sum of:
        0.023650533 = product of:
          0.047301065 = sum of:
            0.047301065 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047301065 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  9. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.00
    0.0031534042 = product of:
      0.018920425 = sum of:
        0.018920425 = product of:
          0.03784085 = sum of:
            0.03784085 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03784085 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  10. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.0023650532 = product of:
      0.014190319 = sum of:
        0.014190319 = product of:
          0.028380638 = sum of:
            0.028380638 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028380638 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  11. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00
    0.0023650532 = product of:
      0.014190319 = sum of:
        0.014190319 = product of:
          0.028380638 = sum of:
            0.028380638 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028380638 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  12. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.00
    0.0023650532 = product of:
      0.014190319 = sum of:
        0.014190319 = product of:
          0.028380638 = sum of:
            0.028380638 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028380638 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  13. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    0.0019708779 = product of:
      0.011825266 = sum of:
        0.011825266 = product of:
          0.023650533 = sum of:
            0.023650533 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023650533 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03491209 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356