Search (284 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.12 
    0.12322147 = product of:
  0.3696644 = sum of:
    0.0924161 = product of:
      0.2772483 = sum of:
        0.2772483 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2772483 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2959851 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2772483 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2772483 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2959851 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.10 
    0.09857717 = product of:
  0.2957315 = sum of:
    0.07393288 = product of:
      0.22179863 = sum of:
        0.22179863 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22179863 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2959851 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.22179863 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22179863 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2959851 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.06 
    0.061610736 = product of:
  0.1848322 = sum of:
    0.04620805 = product of:
      0.13862415 = sum of:
        0.13862415 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13862415 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2959851 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13862415 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13862415 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2959851 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  4. Strobel, S.: ¬The complete Linux kit : fully configured LINUX system kernel (1997) 0.06 
    0.059900206 = product of:
  0.17970061 = sum of:
    0.15131998 = product of:
      0.30263996 = sum of:
        0.30263996 = weight(_text_:handbooks in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30263996 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2822981 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            1.0720581 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.085969 = idf(docFreq=36, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.028380638 = product of:
      0.056761276 = sum of:
        0.056761276 = weight(_text_:22 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056761276 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    16. 7.2002 20:22:55
    Pages
    3 CD-ROMs + 2 handbooks
  5. Smith, A.G.: Search features of digital libraries (2000) 0.04 
    0.04125291 = product of:
  0.12375873 = sum of:
    0.07574636 = weight(_text_:searching in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07574636 = score(doc=940,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.53633493 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
    0.04801238 = product of:
      0.09602476 = sum of:
        0.09602476 = weight(_text_:etc in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09602476 = score(doc=940,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.50779605 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Traditional on-line search services such as Dialog, DataStar and Lexis provide a wide range of search features (boolean and proximity operators, truncation, etc). This paper discusses the use of these features for effective searching, and argues that these features are required, regardless of advances in search engine technology. The literature on on-line searching is reviewed, identifying features that searchers find desirable for effective searching. A selective survey of current digital libraries available on the Web was undertaken, identifying which search features are present. The survey indicates that current digital libraries do not implement a wide range of search features. For instance: under half of the examples included controlled vocabulary, under half had proximity searching, only one enabled browsing of term indexes, and none of the digital libraries enable searchers to refine an initial search. Suggestions are made for enhancing the search effectiveness of digital libraries; for instance, by providing a full range of search operators, enabling browsing of search terms, enhancement of records with controlled vocabulary, enabling the refining of initial searches, etc.
  6. Rozman, D.; Rifl, B.: Universal Decimal Classification in Slovenia (2007) 0.03 
    0.027652267 = product of:
  0.0829568 = sum of:
    0.05466523 = weight(_text_:searching in 2528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05466523 = score(doc=2528,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.38706642 = fieldWeight in 2528, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2528)
    0.028291566 = product of:
      0.056583133 = sum of:
        0.056583133 = weight(_text_:etc in 2528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056583133 = score(doc=2528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 2528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2528)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    In Slovenia , most libraries use UDC system for cataloguing purposes. Open-access shelving with UDC has also a long tradition in Slovenian public libraries and in some academic libraries. The last printed Slovenian UDC edition dates from 1991. This outdated edition included a very short guide to the use of UDC and about 11000 notations. In the National and University Library, Ljubljana , Slovenia , a team of a coordinator, editors, translators and a computer programmer has been formed to prepare Slovenian translation of UDC version UDC MRF 2001. The on line edition in the format ISO 2709 has kept the original data structure. Searching by UDC numbers, precise searching and full text searching of UDC explanations, notes, examples, etc. have been provided. There are many links in the application which guide the users to UDC numbers. Thus, the appropriate UDC number can be recognized and chosen. Those parts of the application superstructure are especially user friendly and reviewable. Access to the UDC database is controlled.The basics of UDC are explained in the new Slovenian manual »Univerzalna decimalna klasifikacija« published by the National and University Library in Ljubljana in 2006. The authors have created a short, clear and useful manual for beginners as well as for experienced librarians who want to classify and arrange their library holdings in new and innovative ways. In the paper, a description of the characteristics of Slovenian UDC manual is presented and also some proposals for future developments in UDC are expressed.
  7. Open Knowledge Foundation: Prinzipien zu offenen bibliographischen Daten (2011) 0.02 
    0.02190863 = product of:
  0.13145177 = sum of:
    0.13145177 = sum of:
      0.09800487 = weight(_text_:etc in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09800487 = score(doc=4399,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03491209 = queryNorm
          0.5182672 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
      0.033446904 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033446904 = score(doc=4399,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03491209 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    "Bibliographische Daten Um den Geltungsbereich der Prinzipien festzulegen, wird in diesem ersten Teil der zugrundeliegende Begriff bibliographischer Daten erläutert. Kerndaten Bibliographische Daten bestehen aus bibliographischen Beschreibungen. Eine bibliographische Beschreibung beschreibt eine bibliographische Ressource (Artikel, Monographie etc. - ob gedruckt oder elektronisch) zum Zwecke 1. der Identifikation der beschriebenen Ressource, d.h. des Zeigens auf eine bestimmte Ressource in der Gesamtheit aller bibliographischer Ressourcen und 2. der Lokalisierung der beschriebenen Ressource, d.h. eines Hinweises, wo die beschriebene Ressource aufzufinden ist. Traditionellerweise erfüllte eine Beschreibung beide Zwecke gleichzeitig, indem sie Information lieferte über: Autor(en) und Herausgeber, Titel, Verlag, Veröffentlichungsdatum und -ort, Identifizierung des übergeordneten Werks (z.B. einer Zeitschrift), Seitenangaben. Im Web findet Identifikation statt mittels Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) wie z.B. URNs oder DOIs. Lokalisierung wird ermöglicht durch HTTP-URIs, die auch als Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) bezeichnet werden. Alle URIs für bibliographische Ressourcen fallen folglich unter den engen Begriff bibliographischer Daten. Sekundäre Daten Eine bibliographische Beschreibung kann andere Informationen enthalten, die unter den Begriff bibliographischer Daten fallen, beispielsweise Nicht-Web-Identifikatoren (ISBN, LCCN, OCLC etc.), Angaben zum Urheberrechtsstatus, administrative Daten und mehr; diese Daten können von Bibliotheken, Verlagen, Wissenschaftlern, Online-Communities für Buchliebhaber, sozialen Literaturverwaltungssystemen und Anderen produziert sein. Darüber hinaus produzieren Bibliotheken und verwandte Institutionen kontrollierte Vokabulare zum Zwecke der bibliographischen Beschreibung wie z. B. Personen- und Schlagwortnormdateien, Klassifikationen etc., die ebenfalls unter den Begriff bibliographischer Daten fallen."
    Date
    22. 3.2011 18:22:29
  8. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.02 
    0.021395644 = product of:
  0.12837386 = sum of:
    0.12837386 = sum of:
      0.09053302 = weight(_text_:etc in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09053302 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03491209 = queryNorm
          0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
      0.03784085 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03784085 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03491209 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
  9. Schaat, S.: Von der automatisierten Manipulation zur Manipulation der Automatisierung (2019) 0.02 
    0.021395644 = product of:
  0.12837386 = sum of:
    0.12837386 = sum of:
      0.09053302 = weight(_text_:etc in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09053302 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03491209 = queryNorm
          0.47875473 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
      0.03784085 = weight(_text_:22 in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03784085 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03491209 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    "Wir kennen das bereits von Google, Facebook und Amazon: Unser Internet-Verhalten wird automatisch erfasst, damit uns angepasste Inhalte präsentiert werden können. Ob uns diese Inhalte gefallen oder nicht, melden wir direkt oder indirekt zurück (Kauf, Klick etc.). Durch diese Feedbackschleife lernen solche Systeme immer besser, was sie uns präsentieren müssen, um unsere Bedürfnisse anzusprechen, und wissen implizit dadurch auch immer besser, wie sie unsere Bedürfniserfüllung - zur Konsumtion - manipulieren können."
    Date
    19. 2.2019 17:22:00
  10. Miles, A.; Matthews, B.; Beckett, D.; Brickley, D.; Wilson, M.; Rogers, N.: SKOS: A language to describe simple knowledge structures for the web (2005) 0.02 
    0.019750334 = product of:
  0.059251003 = sum of:
    0.031243779 = weight(_text_:searching in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031243779 = score(doc=517,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.22122687 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
    0.028007222 = product of:
      0.056014445 = sum of:
        0.056014445 = weight(_text_:etc in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056014445 = score(doc=517,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.29621437 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    "Textual content-based search engines for the web have a number of limitations. Firstly, many web resources have little or no textual content (images, audio or video streams etc.) Secondly, precision is low where natural language terms have overloaded meaning (e.g. 'bank', 'watch', 'chip' etc.) Thirdly, recall is incomplete where the search does not take account of synonyms or quasi-synonyms. Fourthly, there is no basis for assisting a user in modifying (expanding, refining, translating) a search based on the meaning of the original search. Fifthly, there is no basis for searching across natural languages, or framing search queries in terms of symbolic languages. The Semantic Web is a framework for creating, managing, publishing and searching semantically rich metadata for web resources. Annotating web resources with precise and meaningful statements about conceptual aspects of their content provides a basis for overcoming all of the limitations of textual content-based search engines listed above. Creating this type of metadata requires that metadata generators are able to refer to shared repositories of meaning: 'vocabularies' of concepts that are common to a community, and describe the domain of interest for that community.
  11. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.02 
    0.01872119 = product of:
  0.112327136 = sum of:
    0.112327136 = sum of:
      0.07921639 = weight(_text_:etc in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07921639 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03491209 = queryNorm
          0.41891038 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
      0.033110745 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033110745 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03491209 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Ontologien werden eingesetzt, um durch semantische Fundierung insbesondere für das Dokumentenretrieval eine grundlegend bessere Basis zu haben, als dies gegenwärtiger Stand der Technik ist. Vorgestellt wird eine an der FH Darmstadt entwickelte und eingesetzte Ontologie, die den Gegenstandsbereich Hochschule sowohl breit abdecken und gleichzeitig differenziert semantisch beschreiben soll. Das Problem der semantischen Suche besteht nun darin, dass sie für Informationssuchende so einfach wie bei gängigen Suchmaschinen zu nutzen sein soll, und gleichzeitig auf der Grundlage des aufwendigen Informationsmodells hochwertige Ergebnisse liefern muss. Es wird beschrieben, welche Möglichkeiten die verwendete Software K-Infinity bereitstellt und mit welchem Konzept diese Möglichkeiten für eine semantische Suche nach Dokumenten und anderen Informationseinheiten (Personen, Veranstaltungen, Projekte etc.) eingesetzt werden.
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
  12. EndNote Plus 2.3 : Enhanced reference database and bibliography maker. With EndLink 2.1, link to on-line and CD-ROM databases (1997) 0.02 
    0.017698374 = product of:
  0.106190234 = sum of:
    0.106190234 = product of:
      0.21238047 = sum of:
        0.21238047 = weight(_text_:manuals in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21238047 = score(doc=1717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25905544 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.81982636 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4202213 = idf(docFreq=71, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Pages
    356 + 90 S. 3 disc, 2 manuals
  13. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.02 
    0.0173545 = product of:
  0.0520635 = sum of:
    0.03787318 = weight(_text_:searching in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03787318 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.26816747 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
    0.014190319 = product of:
      0.028380638 = sum of:
        0.028380638 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028380638 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1222562 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    More and more cultural heritage institutions publish their collections, vocabularies and metadata on the Web. The resulting Web of linked cultural data opens up exciting new possibilities for searching and browsing through these cultural heritage collections. We report on ongoing work in which we investigate the estimation of relevance in this Web of Culture. We study existing measures of semantic distance and how they apply to two use cases. The use cases relate to the structured, multilingual and multimodal nature of the Culture Web. We distinguish between measures using the Web, such as Google distance and PMI, and measures using the Linked Data Web, i.e. the semantic structure of metadata vocabularies. We perform a small study in which we compare these semantic distance measures to human judgements of relevance. Although it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, the study provides new insights into the applicability of semantic distance measures to the Web of Culture, and clear starting points for further research.
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
  14. Fayfich, P.R.: Searching for information on the WWW (???) 0.02 
    0.016832525 = product of:
  0.100995146 = sum of:
    0.100995146 = weight(_text_:searching in 3167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.100995146 = score(doc=3167,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.7151132 = fieldWeight in 3167, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3167)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  15. Angjeli, A.; Isaac, A.: Semantic web and vocabularies interoperability : an experiment with illuminations collections (2008) 0.02 
    0.015960682 = product of:
  0.047882043 = sum of:
    0.025248786 = weight(_text_:searching in 2324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025248786 = score(doc=2324,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.1787783 = fieldWeight in 2324, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2324)
    0.022633255 = product of:
      0.04526651 = sum of:
        0.04526651 = weight(_text_:etc in 2324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04526651 = score(doc=2324,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.23937736 = fieldWeight in 2324, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2324)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    During the years 2006 and 2007, the BnF has collaborated with the National Library of the Netherlands within the framework of the Dutch project STITCH. This project, through concrete experiments, investigates semantic interoperability, especially in relation to searching. How can we conduct semantic searches across several digital heritage collections? The metadata related to content analysis are often heterogeneous. Beyond using manual mapping of semantically similar entities, STITCH explores the techniques of the semantic web, particularly ontology mapping. This paper is about an experiment made on two digital iconographic collections: Mandragore, iconographic database of the Manuscript Department of the BnF, and the Medieval Illuminated manuscripts collection of the KB. While the content of these two collections is similar, they have been processed differently and the vocabularies used to index their content is very different. Vocabularies in Mandragore and Iconclass are both controlled and hierarchical but they do not have the same semantic and structure. This difference is of particular interest to the STITCH project, as it aims to study automatic alignment of two vocabularies. The collaborative experiment started with a precise analysis of each of the vocabularies; that included concepts and their representation, lexical properties of the terms used, semantic relationships, etc. The team of Dutch researchers then studied and implemented mechanisms of alignment of the two vocabularies. The initial models being different, there had to be a common standard in order to enable procedures of alignment. RDF and SKOS were selected for that. The experiment lead to building a prototype that allows for querying in both databases at the same time through a single interface. The descriptors of each vocabulary are used as search terms for all images regardless of the collection they belong to. This experiment is only one step in the search for solutions that aim at making navigation easier between heritage collections that have heterogeneous metadata.
  16. Babeu, A.: Building a "FRBR-inspired" catalog : the Perseus digital library experience (2008) 0.02 
    0.015960682 = product of:
  0.047882043 = sum of:
    0.025248786 = weight(_text_:searching in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025248786 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.1787783 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
    0.022633255 = product of:
      0.04526651 = sum of:
        0.04526651 = weight(_text_:etc in 2429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04526651 = score(doc=2429,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18910104 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03491209 = queryNorm
            0.23937736 = fieldWeight in 2429, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2429)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Our catalog should not be called a FRBR catalog perhaps, but instead a "FRBR Inspired catalog." As such our main goal has been "practical findability," we are seeking to support the four identified user tasks of the FRBR model, or to "Search, Identify, Select, and Obtain," rather than to create a FRBR catalog, per se. By encoding as much information as possible in the MODS and MADS records we have created, we believe that useful searching will be supported, that by using unique identifiers for works and authors users will be able to identify that the entity they have located is the desired one, that by encoding expression level information (such as the language of the work, the translator, etc) users will be able to select which expression of a work they are interested in, and that by supplying links to different online manifestations that users will be able to obtain access to a digital copy of a work. This white paper will discuss previous and current efforts by the Perseus Project in creating a FRBRized catalog, including the cataloging workflow, lessons learned during the process and will also seek to place this work in the larger context of research regarding FRBR, cataloging, Library 2.0 and the Semantic Web, and the growing importance of the FRBR model in the face of growing million book digital libraries.
  17. Koch, T.: Browsing and searching Internet resources (1996) 0.01 
    0.0147284595 = product of:
  0.088370755 = sum of:
    0.088370755 = weight(_text_:searching in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.088370755 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.6257241 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  18. Bradley, P.: ¬The relevance of underpants to searching the Web (2000) 0.01 
    0.0147284595 = product of:
  0.088370755 = sum of:
    0.088370755 = weight(_text_:searching in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.088370755 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.6257241 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  19. Nicholson, D.: High-Level Thesaurus (HILT) project : interoperability and cross-searching distributed services (200?) 0.01 
    0.014577395 = product of:
  0.08746437 = sum of:
    0.08746437 = weight(_text_:searching in 5966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08746437 = score(doc=5966,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.61930627 = fieldWeight in 5966, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5966)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    My presentation is about the HILT, High Level Thesaurus Project, which is looking, very roughly speaking, at how we might deal with interoperability problems relating to cross-searching distributed services by subject. The aims of HILT are to study and report on the problem of cross-searching and browsing by subject across a range of communities, services, and service or resource types in the UK given the wide range of subject schemes and associated practices in place
  20. Koch, T.: Searching the Web : systematic overview over indexes (1995) 0.01 
    0.012624393 = product of:
  0.07574636 = sum of:
    0.07574636 = weight(_text_:searching in 3169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07574636 = score(doc=3169,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14122958 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03491209 = queryNorm
        0.53633493 = fieldWeight in 3169, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3169)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 178
  • d 95
  • a 2
  • el 2
  • i 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 132
  • i 14
  • m 6
  • r 5
  • s 5
  • x 4
  • b 2
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications