Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bourne, R."
  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Bourne, R.: MARC harmonization : progress and problems (1997) 0.01
    0.007914391 = product of:
      0.023743173 = sum of:
        0.023743173 = product of:
          0.047486346 = sum of:
            0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047486346 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    LASER link. 1997, Spring/Summer, S.22-24
  2. Bourne, R.: Common MARC, or 'vivent les differences'? (1996) 0.00
    0.003945538 = product of:
      0.0118366135 = sum of:
        0.0118366135 = product of:
          0.023673227 = sum of:
            0.023673227 = weight(_text_:of in 6727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023673227 = score(doc=6727,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 6727, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6727)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates the history of the machine readable catalogue and the role of the MARC format. Compares US and UK attitiudes to MARC and raises the issue of the incompatibility of the US and British standards. Suggests that they should be able to integrate, giving reasons for this
  3. Bourne, R.: Common MARC, or vivent les differences? (1996) 0.00
    0.001972769 = product of:
      0.0059183068 = sum of:
        0.0059183068 = product of:
          0.0118366135 = sum of:
            0.0118366135 = weight(_text_:of in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0118366135 = score(doc=4690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates the history of the machine readable catalogue (MARC). Compares US and UK attitudes to MARC and raises the fact that US and UK standards are incompatible. Suggests that the 2 should be able to integrate and gives reasons for this