Search (50 results, page 2 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Cronin, B."
  1. Cronin, B.; Overfeldt, K.; Fouchereaux, K.; Manzvanzvike, T.; Cha, M.; Sona, E.: ¬The Internet and competitive intelligence : a survey of current practice (1994) 0.00
    0.003865822 = product of:
      0.011597466 = sum of:
        0.011597466 = product of:
          0.023194931 = sum of:
            0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023194931 = score(doc=529,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet has the potential to become a major strategic information tool for commercial enterprises. many companies, large and small, are already using the Internet to gain an edge in an increasingly competitive business environment, both domestically and internationally. It may well be that the Internet is the next major phase in the evolution of the competitive intelligence function in advanced organizations, especially as commercialization of the network intensifies. Describes an exploratory study of business use of the Internet for competitive intelligence purposes
    Source
    International journal of information management. 14(1994) no.3, S.204-222
  2. Cronin, B.; Snyder, H.W.; Rosembaum, H.; Martinson, A.; Callahan, E.: Invoked on the Web (1998) 0.00
    0.003865822 = product of:
      0.011597466 = sum of:
        0.011597466 = product of:
          0.023194931 = sum of:
            0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023194931 = score(doc=2327,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Where, how, and why are scholars invoked on the WWW? An inductively derived typology was used to captue genres of invocation. Comparative data were gathered using five commercial search engines. It is argued that the Web fosters mow modalities of scholarly communication. Different categories of invocation are identified and analyzed in terms of their potential to inform sociometric and bibliometric analyses of academic interaction
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1319-1328
  3. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002) 0.00
    0.003865822 = product of:
      0.011597466 = sum of:
        0.011597466 = product of:
          0.023194931 = sum of:
            0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023194931 = score(doc=1263,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The accrual of symbolic capital is an important aspect of academic life. Successful capital formation is commonly signified by the trappings of scholarly distinction or acknowledged status as a public intellectual. We consider and compare three potential indices of symbolic capital: citation counts, Web hits, and media mentions. Our Eindings, which are domain specific, suggest that public intellectuals are notable by their absence within the information studies community.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.14, S.1267-1270
  4. Cronin, B.: Bowling alone together : academic writing as distributed cognition (2004) 0.00
    0.003865822 = product of:
      0.011597466 = sum of:
        0.011597466 = product of:
          0.023194931 = sum of:
            0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023194931 = score(doc=2265,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The twentieth century saw the progressive collectivization of science-dramatic growth in teamwork in general and large-scale collaboration in particular. Cognitive partnering in the conduct of research and scholarship has become commonplace, and this trend is reflected in rates of co-authorship and sub-authorship collaboration. The effects of these developments an academic writing are discussed and theorized in terms of distributed cognition.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.6, S.557-560
  5. Cronin, B.: Acknowledgement trends in the research literature of information science (2001) 0.00
    0.003865822 = product of:
      0.011597466 = sum of:
        0.011597466 = product of:
          0.023194931 = sum of:
            0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 4488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023194931 = score(doc=4488,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 4488, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Data were gathered on acknowledgements in five leading information science journals for the years 1991-1999. The results were compared with data from two earlier studies of the same journals. Analysis of the aggregate data (1971-1999) confirms the general impression that acknowledgement has become an institutionalised element of the scholarly communication process, reflecting the growing cognitive and structural complexity of contemporary research.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 57(2001) no.3, S.427-433
  6. Cronin, B.; Franks, S.: Trading cultures : Resource mobilization and service rendering in the life sciences as revealed in the journal article's paratext (2006) 0.00
    0.003865822 = product of:
      0.011597466 = sum of:
        0.011597466 = product of:
          0.023194931 = sum of:
            0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023194931 = score(doc=5105,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Formal and informal modes of collaboration in life sciences research were explored paratextually. The bylines and acknowledgments of more than 1,000 research articles in the journal Cell were analyzed to reveal the strength of collegiate ties and the importance of material and ideational trading between both individuals and labs. Intense coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration were shown to be defining features of contemporary research in the life sciences.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.14, S.1909-1918
  7. Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993) 0.00
    0.0036536194 = product of:
      0.010960858 = sum of:
        0.010960858 = product of:
          0.021921717 = sum of:
            0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021921717 = score(doc=7827,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products
    Source
    Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting 1993, New York, 4-6 May 1993. Ed.: M.E. Williams
  8. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Timelines of creativity : A study of intellectual innovators in information science (2007) 0.00
    0.0036536194 = product of:
      0.010960858 = sum of:
        0.010960858 = product of:
          0.021921717 = sum of:
            0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021921717 = score(doc=480,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 480, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=480)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    We explore the relationship between creativity and both chronological and professional age in information science using a novel bibliometric approach that allows us to capture the shape of a scholar's career. Our approach draws on D.W. Galenson's (2006) analyses of artistic creativity, notably his distinction between conceptual and experimental innovation, and also H.C. Lehman's (1953) seminal study of the relationship between stage of career and outstanding performance. The data presented here suggest that creativity is expressed in different ways, at different times, and with different intensities in academic information science.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.1948-1959
  9. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: ¬The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies (2008) 0.00
    0.0036536194 = product of:
      0.010960858 = sum of:
        0.010960858 = product of:
          0.021921717 = sum of:
            0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 1377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021921717 = score(doc=1377,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 1377, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1377)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe a large-scale, longitudinal citation analysis of intellectual trading between information studies and cognate disciplines. The results of their investigation reveal the extent to which information studies draws on and, in turn, contributes to the ideational substrates of other academic domains. Their data show that the field has become a more successful exporter of ideas as well as less introverted than was previously the case. In the last decade, information studies has begun to contribute significantly to the literatures of such disciplines as computer science and engineering on the one hand and business and management on the other, while also drawing more heavily on those same literatures.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.551-564
  10. Sugimoto, C.R.; Cronin, B.: Biobibliometric profiling : an examination of multifaceted approaches to scholarship (2012) 0.00
    0.0036536194 = product of:
      0.010960858 = sum of:
        0.010960858 = product of:
          0.021921717 = sum of:
            0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 4991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021921717 = score(doc=4991,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 4991, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4991)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    We conducted a fine-grained prosopography of six distinguished information scientists to explore commonalities and differences in their approaches to scholarly production at different stages of their careers. Specifically, we gathered data on authors' genre preferences, rates and modes of scholarly production, and coauthorship patterns. We also explored the role played by gender and place in determining mentoring and collaboration practices across time. Our biobibliometric profiles of the sextet reveal the different shapes a scholar's career can take. We consider the implications of our findings for new entrants into the academic marketplace.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.3, S.450-468
  11. Cronin, B.: Metatheorizing citation (1998) 0.00
    0.0035289964 = product of:
      0.010586989 = sum of:
        0.010586989 = product of:
          0.021173978 = sum of:
            0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 5127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021173978 = score(doc=5127,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 5127, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews a variety of perspectives on citation. Argues that citations have multiple articulations in that they inform our understanding of the sociocultural, cognitive, and textual aspects of scientific communication. Proposes 2 metatheoretical frameworks as a means of negotiating the interpretative differences which characterize the various discourse communities concerned with citation theory and practice
    Footnote
    Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
  12. Cronin, B.: ¬The sociological turn in information science (2009) 0.00
    0.0035289964 = product of:
      0.010586989 = sum of:
        0.010586989 = product of:
          0.021173978 = sum of:
            0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 3655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021173978 = score(doc=3655,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3655, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores the history of 'the social' in information science. It traces the influence of social scientific thinking on the development of the field's intellectual base. The continuing appropriation of both theoretical and methodological insights from domains such as social studies of science, science and technology studies, and socio-technical systems is discussed.
  13. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Who dunnit? : Metatags and hyperauthorship (2001) 0.00
    0.003382594 = product of:
      0.010147782 = sum of:
        0.010147782 = product of:
          0.020295564 = sum of:
            0.020295564 = weight(_text_:of in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020295564 = score(doc=6031,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Multiple authorship is a topic of growing concern in a number of scientific domains. When, as is increasingly common, scholarly articles and clinical reports have scores or even hundreds of authors-what Cronin (in press) has termed "hyperauthorship" -the precise nature of each individual's contribution is often masked. A notation that describes collaborators' contributions and allows those contributions to be tracked in, and across, texts (and over time) offers a solution. Such a notation should be useful, easy to use, and acceptable to communities of scientists. Drawing on earlier work, we present a proposal for an XML-like "contribution" mark-up, and discuss the potential benefits and possible drawbacks
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.9, S.770-773
  14. Davenport, L.; Cronin, B.: What does hypertext offer the information scientist? (1989) 0.00
    0.0031564306 = product of:
      0.009469291 = sum of:
        0.009469291 = product of:
          0.018938582 = sum of:
            0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018938582 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 15(1989) no.6, S.369-372
  15. Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: Social intelligence (1993) 0.00
    0.0031564306 = product of:
      0.009469291 = sum of:
        0.009469291 = product of:
          0.018938582 = sum of:
            0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018938582 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 28(1993), S.1-44
  16. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists (2006) 0.00
    0.0031564306 = product of:
      0.009469291 = sum of:
        0.009469291 = product of:
          0.018938582 = sum of:
            0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018938582 = score(doc=196,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The authors apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information science. Faculty rankings based on raw citation counts are compared with those based on h-counts. There is a strong positive correlation between the two sets of rankings. It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar's research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1275-1278
  17. Cronin, B.: Standing on ceremony (2013) 0.00
    0.0027618767 = product of:
      0.00828563 = sum of:
        0.00828563 = product of:
          0.01657126 = sum of:
            0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01657126 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1309-1310
  18. Cronin, B.: Peer review (2011) 0.00
    0.0027618767 = product of:
      0.00828563 = sum of:
        0.00828563 = product of:
          0.01657126 = sum of:
            0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01657126 = score(doc=1922,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1215
  19. Cronin, B.: Meta-life (2014) 0.00
    0.0027618767 = product of:
      0.00828563 = sum of:
        0.00828563 = product of:
          0.01657126 = sum of:
            0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01657126 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.3, S.431-432
  20. Cronin, B.: ¬The evolving indicator space (iSpace) (2013) 0.00
    0.0027618767 = product of:
      0.00828563 = sum of:
        0.00828563 = product of:
          0.01657126 = sum of:
            0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01657126 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1523-1525