Bainbridge, D.; Dewsnip, M.; Witten, l.H.: Searching digital music libraries (2005)
0.00
0.0030878722 = product of:
0.009263616 = sum of:
0.009263616 = product of:
0.018527232 = sum of:
0.018527232 = weight(_text_:of in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018527232 = score(doc=997,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- There has been a recent explosion of interest in digital music libraries. In particular, interactive melody retrieval is a striking example of a search paradigm that differs radically from the standard full-text search. Many different techniques have been proposed for melody matching, but the area lacks standard databases that allow them to be compared on common grounds--and copyright issues have stymied attempts to develop such a corpus. This paper focuses on methods for evaluating different symbolic music matching strategies, and describes a series of experiments that compare and contrast results obtained using three dominant paradigms. Combining two of these paradigms yields a hybrid approach which is shown to have the best overall combination of efficiency and effectiveness.
