Search (24 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Savoy, J."
  1. Dolamic, L.; Savoy, J.: When stopword lists make the difference (2009) 0.00
    0.0019529418 = product of:
      0.005858825 = sum of:
        0.005858825 = product of:
          0.01171765 = sum of:
            0.01171765 = weight(_text_:of in 3319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01171765 = score(doc=3319,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 3319, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this brief communication, we evaluate the use of two stopword lists for the English language (one comprising 571 words and another with 9) and compare them with a search approach accounting for all word forms. We show that through implementing the original Okapi form or certain ones derived from the Divergence from Randomness (DFR) paradigm, significantly lower performance levels may result when using short or no stopword lists. For other DFR models and a revised Okapi implementation, performance differences between approaches using short or long stopword lists or no list at all are usually not statistically significant. Similar conclusions can be drawn when using other natural languages such as French, Hindi, or Persian.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.200-203
  2. Savoy, J.: ¬A learning scheme for information retrieval in hypertext (1994) 0.00
    0.0015782153 = product of:
      0.0047346456 = sum of:
        0.0047346456 = product of:
          0.009469291 = sum of:
            0.009469291 = weight(_text_:of in 7292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009469291 = score(doc=7292,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 7292, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In proposing a searching strategy well suited to the hypertext environment, we have considered four criteria: (1) the retrieval scheme should be integrated into a large hypertext environment; (2) the retrieval process should be operable with an unrestricted text collection; (3) the processing time should be reasonable; and (4) the system should be capable of learning in order to improve its retrieval effectiveness
  3. Fautsch, C.; Savoy, J.: Algorithmic stemmers or morphological analysis? : an evaluation (2009) 0.00
    0.0011836614 = product of:
      0.0035509842 = sum of:
        0.0035509842 = product of:
          0.0071019684 = sum of:
            0.0071019684 = weight(_text_:of in 2950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0071019684 = score(doc=2950,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.103663445 = fieldWeight in 2950, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2950)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.8, S.1616-1624
  4. Dolamic, L.; Savoy, J.: Indexing and searching strategies for the Russian language (2009) 0.00
    9.863845E-4 = product of:
      0.0029591534 = sum of:
        0.0029591534 = product of:
          0.0059183068 = sum of:
            0.0059183068 = weight(_text_:of in 3301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0059183068 = score(doc=3301,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.086386204 = fieldWeight in 3301, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3301)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.12, S.2540-2547