Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- lcsh's%3a%20knowledge%2c sociology of%22 2
- lcsh's%3a%20knowledge%2c soziologe of%22 2
- lcshs%3a%20knowledge%2c sociology of%22 2
- lcsh's%3a%20knowledge%2c semiology of%22 2
- lcshs%3a%20knowledge%2c soziologe of%22 2
-
Talja, S.; Tuominen, K.; Savolainen, R.: "Isms" in information science : constructivism, collectivism and constructionism (2005)
0.00
0.004142815 = product of: 0.012428444 = sum of: 0.012428444 = product of: 0.024856888 = sum of: 0.024856888 = weight(_text_:of in 4412) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.024856888 = score(doc=4412,freq=18.0), product of: 0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of: 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.043811057 = queryNorm 0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 4412, product of: 4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of: 18.0 = termFreq=18.0 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4412) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Describes the basic premises of three metatheories that represent important or emerging perspectives on information seeking, retrieval and knowledge formation in information science: constructivism, collectivism, and constructionism. Design/methodology/approach - Presents a literature-based conceptual analysis. Pinpoints the differences between the positions in their conceptions of language and the nature and origin of knowledge. Findings - Each of the three metatheories addresses and solves specific types of research questions and design problems. The metatheories thus complement one another. Each of the three metatheories encourages and constitutes a distinctive type of research and learning. Originality/value - Outlines each metatheory's specific fields of application.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 61(2005) no.1, S.79-101
-
Tuominen, K.; Savolainen, R.: ¬A social constructionist approach to the study of information use as discursive action (1997)
0.00
0.003865822 = product of: 0.011597466 = sum of: 0.011597466 = product of: 0.023194931 = sum of: 0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.023194931 = score(doc=304,freq=12.0), product of: 0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of: 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.043811057 = queryNorm 0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 304, product of: 3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of: 12.0 = termFreq=12.0 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=304) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Presents a study of information seeking behaviour and information use viewed from the social constructionist viewpoint. Introduces social constructionism and presents a social constructionist critique of previous research into information use. Reviews generally the nature of discursive action and its analysis and focuses on the principle issue of information use as a discursive action
- Source
- Information seeking in context: Proceedings of an International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 14-16 August 1996, Tampere, Finland. Ed.: P. Vakkari u.a