-
Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980)
0.03
0.029450534 = product of:
0.0883516 = sum of:
0.0883516 = sum of:
0.028993664 = weight(_text_:of in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028993664 = score(doc=5835,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.42320424 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.059357934 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059357934 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:44
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u, L. Kajberg
-
Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992)
0.02
0.022141643 = product of:
0.06642493 = sum of:
0.06642493 = sum of:
0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018938582 = score(doc=5830,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper examnines various isues that arise in establishing a theoretical basis for an experimental fiction analysis system. It analyzes the warrants of fiction and of works about fiction. From this analysis, it derives classificatory requirements for a fiction system. Classificatory techniques that may contribute to the specification of data elements in fiction are suggested
- Date
- 5. 8.2006 13:22:08
-
Raieli, R.: ¬The semantic hole : enthusiasm and caution around multimedia information retrieval (2012)
0.02
0.0216313 = product of:
0.0648939 = sum of:
0.0648939 = sum of:
0.022921504 = weight(_text_:of in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022921504 = score(doc=4888,freq=30.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.041972395 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041972395 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:02:10
- Footnote
- Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22
-
Chen, S.-J.; Lee, H.-L.: Art images and mental associations : a preliminary exploration (2014)
0.02
0.019357719 = product of:
0.058073156 = sum of:
0.058073156 = sum of:
0.022458395 = weight(_text_:of in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022458395 = score(doc=1416,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 1416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=1416,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1416, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1416)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the preliminary findings of a study that explores mental associations made by novices viewing art images. In a controlled environment, 20 Taiwanese college students responded to the question "What does the painting remind you of?" after viewing each digitized image of 15 oil paintings by a famous Taiwanese artist. Rather than focusing on the representation or interpretation of art, the study attempted to solicit information about how non-experts are stimulated by art. This paper reports on the analysis of participant responses to three of the images, and describes a12-type taxonomy of association emerged from the analysis. While 9 of the types are derived and adapted from facets in the Art & Architecture Thesaurus, three new types - Artistic Influence Association, Reactive Association, and Prototype Association - are discovered. The conclusion briefly discusses both the significance of the findings and the implications for future research.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Weimer, K.H.: ¬The nexus of subject analysis and bibliographic description : the case of multipart videos (1996)
0.02
0.018567387 = product of:
0.055702157 = sum of:
0.055702157 = sum of:
0.020087399 = weight(_text_:of in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020087399 = score(doc=6525,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 6525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=6525,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6525, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6525)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the goals of bibliographic control, subject analysis and their relationship for audiovisual materials in general and multipart videotape recordings in particular. Concludes that intellectual access to multipart works is not adequately provided for when these materials are catalogues in collective set records. An alternative is to catalogue the parts separately. This method increases intellectual access by providing more detailed descriptive notes and subject analysis. As evidenced by the large number of records in the national database for parts of multipart videos, cataloguers have made the intellectual content of multipart videos more accessible by cataloguing the parts separately rather than collectively. This reverses the traditional cataloguing process to begin with subject analysis, resulting in the intellectual content of these materials driving the bibliographic description. Suggests ways of determining when multipart videos are best catalogued as sets or separately
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.5-18
-
White, M.D.; Marsh, E.E.: Content analysis : a flexible methodology (2006)
0.02
0.017165082 = product of:
0.051495243 = sum of:
0.051495243 = sum of:
0.015880484 = weight(_text_:of in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015880484 = score(doc=5589,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 5589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=5589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5589)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Content analysis is a highly flexible research method that has been widely used in library and information science (LIS) studies with varying research goals and objectives. The research method is applied in qualitative, quantitative, and sometimes mixed modes of research frameworks and employs a wide range of analytical techniques to generate findings and put them into context. This article characterizes content analysis as a systematic, rigorous approach to analyzing documents obtained or generated in the course of research. It briefly describes the steps involved in content analysis, differentiates between quantitative and qualitative content analysis, and shows that content analysis serves the purposes of both quantitative research and qualitative research. The authors draw on selected LIS studies that have used content analysis to illustrate the concepts addressed in the article. The article also serves as a gateway to methodological books and articles that provide more detail about aspects of content analysis discussed only briefly in the article.
- Source
- Library trends. 55(2006) no.1, S.22-45
-
Hauff-Hartig, S.: Automatische Transkription von Videos : Fernsehen 3.0: Automatisierte Sentimentanalyse und Zusammenstellung von Kurzvideos mit hohem Aufregungslevel KI-generierte Metadaten: Von der Technologiebeobachtung bis zum produktiven Einsatz (2021)
0.01
0.007914391 = product of:
0.023743173 = sum of:
0.023743173 = product of:
0.047486346 = sum of:
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 5.2021 12:43:05
-
Hays, D.G.: Linguistic foundations of the theory of content analysis (1969)
0.00
0.0047837105 = product of:
0.014351131 = sum of:
0.014351131 = product of:
0.028702263 = sum of:
0.028702263 = weight(_text_:of in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028702263 = score(doc=118,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- The analysis of communication content. Ed.: G. Gerbner et al
-
Wyllie, J.: Concept indexing : the world beyond the windows (1990)
0.00
0.0047346456 = product of:
0.014203937 = sum of:
0.014203937 = product of:
0.028407874 = sum of:
0.028407874 = weight(_text_:of in 2977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028407874 = score(doc=2977,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 2977, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2977)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper argues that the realisation of the electronic hypermedia of the future depends on integrating the technology of free text retrieval with the classification-based discipline of content analysis
-
Schlapfer, K.: ¬The information content of images (1995)
0.00
0.0047346456 = product of:
0.014203937 = sum of:
0.014203937 = product of:
0.028407874 = sum of:
0.028407874 = weight(_text_:of in 521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028407874 = score(doc=521,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 521, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews the methods of calculating the information content of images, with particular reference to the information content of printed and photographic images; and printed and television images
-
Moraes, J.B.E. de: Aboutness in fiction : methodological perspectives for knowledge organization (2012)
0.00
0.0047346456 = product of:
0.014203936 = sum of:
0.014203936 = product of:
0.028407872 = sum of:
0.028407872 = weight(_text_:of in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028407872 = score(doc=856,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.41465375 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The subject analysis of narrative texts of fiction is complex; the methodological model of identification of concepts as elaborated for scientific texts is not applicable to fiction. It is proposed here that theoretical and methodological use of the Generative Trajectory of Meaning postulated by Greimas may contribute to the identification of aboutness in narrative texts of fiction.
- Source
- Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
-
Hutchins, W.J.: ¬The concept of 'aboutness' in subject indexing (1978)
0.00
0.0045800544 = product of:
0.013740162 = sum of:
0.013740162 = product of:
0.027480325 = sum of:
0.027480325 = weight(_text_:of in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027480325 = score(doc=1961,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The common view of the 'aboutness' of documents is that the index entries (or classifications) assigned to documents represent or indicate in some way the total contents of documents; indexing and classifying are seen as processes involving the 'summerization' of the texts of documents. In this paper an alternative concept of 'aboutness' is proposed based on an analysis of the linguistic organization of texts, which is felt to be more appropriate in many indexing environments (particularly in non-specialized libraries and information services) and which has implications for the evaluation of the effectiveness of indexing systems
-
Beghtol, C.: Bibliographic classification theory and text linguistics : aboutness, analysis, intertextuality and the cognitive act of classifying documents (1986)
0.00
0.004463867 = product of:
0.0133916 = sum of:
0.0133916 = product of:
0.0267832 = sum of:
0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 1346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0267832 = score(doc=1346,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1346, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 42(1986), S.84-113
-
Hutchins, J.: Summarization: some problems and methods (1987)
0.00
0.004463867 = product of:
0.0133916 = sum of:
0.0133916 = product of:
0.0267832 = sum of:
0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0267832 = score(doc=2738,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Informatics 9: Meaning: the frontier of informatics: proceedings of a conference. Ed.: K.P. Jones
-
Chubin, D.E.; Moitra, S.D.: Content analysis of references : adjunct or alternative to citation counting? (1975)
0.00
0.004463867 = product of:
0.0133916 = sum of:
0.0133916 = product of:
0.0267832 = sum of:
0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 5647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0267832 = score(doc=5647,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 5647, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Social studies of science. 5(1975), S.423-441
-
Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995)
0.00
0.004463867 = product of:
0.0133916 = sum of:
0.0133916 = product of:
0.0267832 = sum of:
0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0267832 = score(doc=2926,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
-
Wilson, P.: Subjects and the sense of position (1968)
0.00
0.004463867 = product of:
0.0133916 = sum of:
0.0133916 = product of:
0.0267832 = sum of:
0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 1353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0267832 = score(doc=1353,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1353, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1353)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Wilson argues that the subject of a writing is indetermined, by which he means either it is impossible to say which of two descriptions is 'the' description of the subject of a writing or it is impossible to say if a writing has two subjects rather than one.
- Footnote
- Nachdruck in: Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Eds.: L.M. Chan et al., S.308-325.
- Imprint
- Berkeley : Univ. of California Press
- Source
- Two kinds of power: an essay on bibliographic control
-
Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of 'subject' in information science (1992)
0.00
0.004428855 = product of:
0.013286565 = sum of:
0.013286565 = product of:
0.02657313 = sum of:
0.02657313 = weight(_text_:of in 2247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02657313 = score(doc=2247,freq=28.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38787308 = fieldWeight in 2247, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2247)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article presents a theoretical investigation of the concept of 'subject' or 'subject matter' in library and information science. Most conceptions of 'subject' in the literature are not explicit but implicit. Various indexing and classification theories, including automatic indexing and citation indexing, have their own more or less implicit concepts of subject. This fact puts the emphasis on making the implicit theorie of 'subject matter' explicit as the first step. ... The different conceptions of 'subject' can therefore be classified into epistemological positions, e.g. 'subjective idealism' (or the empiric/positivistic viewpoint), 'objective idealism' (the rationalistic viewpoint), 'pragmatism' and 'materialism/realism'. The third and final step is to propose a new theory of subject matter based on an explicit theory of knowledge. In this article this is done from the point of view of a realistic/materialistic epistemology. From this standpoint the subject of a document is defined as the epistemological potentials of that document
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 48(1992), S.172-200
-
Roberts, C.W.; Popping, R.: Computer-supported content analysis : some recent developments (1993)
0.00
0.0044112457 = product of:
0.013233736 = sum of:
0.013233736 = product of:
0.026467472 = sum of:
0.026467472 = weight(_text_:of in 4236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026467472 = score(doc=4236,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 4236, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4236)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Presents an overview of some recent developments in the clause-based content analysis of linguistic data. Introduces network analysis of evaluative texts, for the analysis of cognitive maps, and linguistic content analysis. Focuses on the types of substantive inferences afforded by the three approaches
-
Rorissa, A.: User-generated descriptions of individual images versus labels of groups of images : a comparison using basic level theory (2008)
0.00
0.0044112457 = product of:
0.013233736 = sum of:
0.013233736 = product of:
0.026467472 = sum of:
0.026467472 = weight(_text_:of in 2122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026467472 = score(doc=2122,freq=40.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 2122, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Although images are visual information sources with little or no text associated with them, users still tend to use text to describe images and formulate queries. This is because digital libraries and search engines provide mostly text query options and rely on text annotations for representation and retrieval of the semantic content of images. While the main focus of image research is on indexing and retrieval of individual images, the general topic of image browsing and indexing, and retrieval of groups of images has not been adequately investigated. Comparisons of descriptions of individual images as well as labels of groups of images supplied by users using cognitive models are scarce. This work fills this gap. Using the basic level theory as a framework, a comparison of the descriptions of individual images and labels assigned to groups of images by 180 participants in three studies found a marked difference in their level of abstraction. Results confirm assertions by previous researchers in LIS and other fields that groups of images are labeled using more superordinate level terms while individual image descriptions are mainly at the basic level. Implications for design of image browsing interfaces, taxonomies, thesauri, and similar tools are discussed.