-
Fujita, M.; Lopes, L.; Moreira, W.; Piovezan dos Santos, L.B.; Andrade e Cruz, M.C.; Rodrigues de Barros Ribas, R.: Construction and evaluation of hierarchical structures of indexing languages for online catalogs of libraries : an experience of the São Paulo State University (UNESP) (2018)
0.01
0.0051254043 = product of:
0.015376212 = sum of:
0.015376212 = product of:
0.030752424 = sum of:
0.030752424 = weight(_text_:of in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030752424 = score(doc=4307,freq=54.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.44887587 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
54.0 = termFreq=54.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The construction and updating of indexing languages depend on the organization of their hierarchical structures in order to determine the classification of related terms and, above all, to allow a constant updating of vocabulary, a condition for knowledge evolution. The elaboration of an indexing language for online catalogs of libraries' networks is important considering the diversity and specificity of knowledge areas. From this perspective, the present paper reports on the work of a team of catalogers and researchers engaged in the construction of a hierarchical structure of an indexing language for an online catalog of a university library's network. The work on hierarchical structures began by defining the categories and subcategories that form the indexing language macrostructure by using the parameters of the Library of Congress Subject Headings , the National Library Terminology and the Vocabulary of the University of São Paulo Library's system. Throughout the stages of the elaboration process of the macrostructure, difficulties and improvements were observed and discussed. The results enabled the assessment of the hierarchical structures of the languages used in the organization of the superordinate and subordinate terms, which has contributed to the systematization of operational procedures contained in an indexing language manual for online catalogs of libraries.
-
Anderson, J.D.: Indexing and classification : file organization and display for information retrieval (1989)
0.00
0.0044112457 = product of:
0.013233736 = sum of:
0.013233736 = product of:
0.026467472 = sum of:
0.026467472 = weight(_text_:of in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026467472 = score(doc=873,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Indexing: the state of our knowledge and the state of our ignorance. Proc. of the 20th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, New York, 13.5.1988. Ed.: B.H. Weinberg
-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988)
0.00
0.0035289964 = product of:
0.010586989 = sum of:
0.010586989 = product of:
0.021173978 = sum of:
0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021173978 = score(doc=762,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Delineates on the changing role of vocabulary control devices such as classification, subject headings, and thesaurus. Identifies the basic issue in the design and development of these devices and their role in the changing information technology. The paper identifies the differentiations needed in the new roles of these devices in data base technology
-
Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001)
0.00
0.0027618767 = product of:
0.00828563 = sum of:
0.00828563 = product of:
0.01657126 = sum of:
0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01657126 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 35(2001), S.249-298
-
Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002)
0.00
0.0027618767 = product of:
0.00828563 = sum of:
0.00828563 = product of:
0.01657126 = sum of:
0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01657126 = score(doc=97,freq=32.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
32.0 = termFreq=32.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the World Wide Web. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing system of Ranganathan. A prototype Software System has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and to input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the Standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and the URL of the web document, the record is stored in the System. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The System stores the Surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. The search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using the chain indexing technique. If a single term is Input, the System searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved Keadings is too large (running into more than a page) the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The System searches subject headings already retrieved and looks for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL, the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed in a Windows NT environment using ASP and a web server is under rigorous testing. The database and Index management routines need further development.
An interesting but somewhat confusing article telling how the writers described web pages with Dublin Core metadata, including a faceted classification, and built a system that lets users browse the collection through the facets. They seem to want to cover too much in a short article, and unnecessary space is given over to screen shots showing how Dublin Core metadata was entered. The screen shots of the resulting browsable system are, unfortunately, not as enlightening as one would hope, and there is no discussion of how the system was actually written or the technology behind it. Still, it could be worth reading as an example of such a system and how it is treated in journals.
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Devadason, F.J.: Facet analysis and Semantic Web: musings of a student of Ranganathan. Unter: http://www.geocities.com/devadason.geo/FASEMWEB.html#FacetedIndex.
-
Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing application for organizing and accessing internet resources (2003)
0.00
0.0027335489 = product of:
0.008200646 = sum of:
0.008200646 = product of:
0.016401293 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=3966,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the WWW. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing System of Ranganathan. A prototype software system has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and URL of the Web document, the record is stored in the system. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The system stores the surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. Search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using chain indexing technique. If a single term is input, the system searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved headings is too large (running into more than a page) then the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The system searches subject headings already retrieved and look for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed under Windows NT environment using ASP and web server is under rigorous testing. The database and indexes management routines need further development.
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.; Blocks, D.; Cuncliffe, D.: Representation and retrieval in faceted systems (2003)
0.00
0.002609728 = product of:
0.007829184 = sum of:
0.007829184 = product of:
0.015658367 = sum of:
0.015658367 = weight(_text_:of in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015658367 = score(doc=2703,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses two inter-related themes: the retrieval potential of faceted thesauri and XML representations of fundamental facets. Initial findings are discussed from the ongoing 'FACET' project, in collaboration with the National Museum of Science and Industry. The work discussed seeks to take advantage of the structure afforded by faceted systems for multi-term queries and flexible matching, focusing in this paper an the Art and Architecture Thesaurus. A multi-term matching function yields ranked results with partial matches via semantic term expansion, based an a measure of distance over the semantic index space formed by thesaurus relationships. Our intention is to drive the system from general representations and a common query structure and interface. To this end, we are developing an XML representation based an work by the Classification Research Group an fundamental facets or categories. The XML representation maps categories to particular thesauri and hierarchies. The system interface, which is configured by the mapping, incorporates a thesaurus browser with navigation history together with a term search facility and drag and drop query builder.
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996)
0.00
0.0023673228 = product of:
0.0071019684 = sum of:
0.0071019684 = product of:
0.014203937 = sum of:
0.014203937 = weight(_text_:of in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014203937 = score(doc=5698,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the shortcomings of search engines for the WWW comparing their current capabilities to those of the first generation CD-ROM products. Some allow phrase searching and most are improving their Boolean searching. Few allow truncation, wild cards or nested logic. They are stateless, losing previous search criteria. Unlike the indexing and classification systems for today's CD-ROMs, those for Web pages are random, unstructured and of variable quality. Considers that at best Web search engines can only offer free text searching. Discusses whether automatic data classification systems such as Infoseek Ultra can overcome the haphazard nature of the Web with neural network technology, and whether Boolean search techniques may be redundant when replaced by technology such as the Euroferret search engine. However, artificial intelligence is rarely successful on huge, varied databases. Relevance ranking and automatic query expansion still use the same simple inverted indexes. Most Web search engines do nothing more than word counting. Further complications arise with foreign languages
-
Losee, R.M.: Improving collection browsing : small world networking and Gray code ordering (2017)
0.00
0.001972769 = product of:
0.0059183068 = sum of:
0.0059183068 = product of:
0.0118366135 = sum of:
0.0118366135 = weight(_text_:of in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0118366135 = score(doc=5148,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Documents in digital and paper libraries may be arranged, based on their topics, in order to facilitate browsing. It may seem intuitively obvious that ordering documents by their subject should improve browsing performance; the results presented in this article suggest that ordering library materials by their Gray code values and through using links consistent with the small world model of document relationships is consistent with improving browsing performance. Below, library circulation data, including ordering with Library of Congress Classification numbers and Library of Congress Subject Headings, are used to provide information useful in generating user-centered document arrangements, as well as user-independent arrangements. Documents may be linearly arranged so they can be placed in a line by topic, such as on a library shelf, or in a list on a computer display. Crossover links, jumps between a document and another document to which it is not adjacent, can be used in library databases to allow additional paths that one might take when browsing. The improvement that is obtained with different combinations of document orderings and different crossovers is examined and applications suggested.
-
Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (2001)
0.00
0.0019529418 = product of:
0.005858825 = sum of:
0.005858825 = product of:
0.01171765 = sum of:
0.01171765 = weight(_text_:of in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01171765 = score(doc=6113,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.17103596 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.4, S.206-208 (C. Arsenault):"Overall, this is an excellent work, on an ever increasingly pertinent topic. This long-awaited second edition provides a thorough and comprehensive update of an already important text. I very highly recommend it to professionals and academics alike ; both neophytes and veterans will find it valuable. It is a fundamental work that cannot be ignored in the field of subject analysis and retrieval for all bibliographic systems, including online catalogs."
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Facets and controlled vocabularies : an annotated bibliography (2003)
0.00
0.0015782153 = product of:
0.0047346456 = sum of:
0.0047346456 = product of:
0.009469291 = sum of:
0.009469291 = weight(_text_:of in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009469291 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: All about facets and controlled vocabularies (2002)
0.00
0.0015782153 = product of:
0.0047346456 = sum of:
0.0047346456 = product of:
0.009469291 = sum of:
0.009469291 = weight(_text_:of in 5141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009469291 = score(doc=5141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 5141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5141)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: What is a controlled vocabulary? (2002)
0.00
0.0015782153 = product of:
0.0047346456 = sum of:
0.0047346456 = product of:
0.009469291 = sum of:
0.009469291 = weight(_text_:of in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009469291 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Creating a controlled vocabulary (2003)
0.00
0.0015782153 = product of:
0.0047346456 = sum of:
0.0047346456 = product of:
0.009469291 = sum of:
0.009469291 = weight(_text_:of in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009469291 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Synonym rings and authority files (2003)
0.00
0.0015782153 = product of:
0.0047346456 = sum of:
0.0047346456 = product of:
0.009469291 = sum of:
0.009469291 = weight(_text_:of in 2468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009469291 = score(doc=2468,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 2468, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2468)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
-
Fast, K.; Leise, F.; Steckel, M.: Controlled vocabularies : a glosso-thesaurus (2003)
0.00
0.0015782153 = product of:
0.0047346456 = sum of:
0.0047346456 = product of:
0.009469291 = sum of:
0.009469291 = weight(_text_:of in 2469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009469291 = score(doc=2469,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.13821793 = fieldWeight in 2469, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2469)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- An online series of articles explaining controlled vocabularies and, in particular, faceted classification. It is not yet finished, but what they have covered is very well done, practical and informative, with useful advice and a full treatment. It is worth reading now, and when they actually get to performing facet analysis and making a faceted system, it will make a very useful reference.
