Search (301 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Docotor, R.D.: Social equity and information technologies : moving toward information democracy (1992) 0.10
    0.0996096 = product of:
      0.14941439 = sum of:
        0.1407163 = weight(_text_:sociology in 346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1407163 = score(doc=346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.4614328 = fieldWeight in 346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=346)
        0.008698098 = product of:
          0.017396197 = sum of:
            0.017396197 = weight(_text_:of in 346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017396197 = score(doc=346,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 346, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=346)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the concept of information democracy, noting that is has roots in several fields: political science; sociology; social work; communication science; and library and information science; butthat it is explicitly recognized only in library and information science. Focuses on the interplay between information technologies and society and on the theme of social equity and the distribution and use of information resources. When dealing with information democracy there is a focus on the information poor: a population that goes beyond the economically poor to include the aged, disabled, those in rural areas, and those in schools. Traces the historical origins leading to the concerns for social equity and information technologies. Notes that there is power associated with the control of information resources as well as with the control of economic and political resources. Looks at social equity and information technology in several broad areas
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 27(1992), S.43-96
  2. Singh, S. (Sewa); Singh, S. (Sukhbir): Colon Classification : a select bibliography (1992) 0.07
    0.06800768 = product of:
      0.10201151 = sum of:
        0.093810864 = weight(_text_:sociology in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093810864 = score(doc=1479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.30762187 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
        0.008200646 = product of:
          0.016401293 = sum of:
            0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 1479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016401293 = score(doc=1479,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 1479, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This being the Birth Centenary.Year of Dr. S. R. Ranganathan, it was deemed as a befitting tribute to the author of Colon Classifiction to bring together all that has been published thus far on it and complile it in the form of a bibliographies are an important source of information on a particular field of study and research. A research worker has to carry out the literature survey on the area of interest which sometimes consumes many precious man hours in order to collect some relevent citations. Thus bibliographies are a useful source in saving the precious time and energy of the reseach workers, and lead them to the primary sources for carryying out the research further to the destination.
    Content
    Inhalt: General Classification, Colon Classification, Edition7, Philosophy, Conference, Literature Survey, Features, History. Countries and Areas , Theoru, Design of Classification, Classification Problems , Research in Classification, Trends in Classification, Depth Classification, Automatic Classification, Uses of Classification, Practical Classification, Application of Classification, Standards, Glossary.Teminology, classification and Reference Service, Classificationand Documentation, Classification and Communication, Classification and Retrieval, Comparison to Other Schemes, Canons, Isolates, Common Isolates , Space Isolates, Time Isolates, Special Isolates, Postulates, Fundamental Categories, Facet Formula, Optionl Facets, Rounds and Levels, Basic Subjects, Notation and Symbols, Array and Chanin, Devices, Mnemonics, Phase Relation, Systems and Specials, Book Number, Cooperative Calssification, Teaching of Classification, Classification of Specific Subjects, Book Science, Bibliography, Library and Information Science, Classification, Cataloguing, Mathematics, Cybernetics, Engineering, Computer, Chemistry, Crystallography, Technology. Food Technology, Corrosion, Parasitism, Geology , Agriculture, Zoology, Animal Husbandry, Medicine, Useful Arts, Military Science, Creative Arts, Aiterature, Sanskrit, Marathi, Tamil, Calssics, Linguistics, Philosophy, Ssocial Science, Geography, Maps, History , Political Science, Economics, Sociology, Law,
  3. MacFarlane, A.; Missaoui, S.; Makri, S.; Gutierrez Lopez, M.: Sender vs. recipient-orientated information systems revisited (2022) 0.07
    0.06777492 = product of:
      0.10166238 = sum of:
        0.093810864 = weight(_text_:sociology in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093810864 = score(doc=607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.30762187 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
        0.0078515215 = product of:
          0.015703043 = sum of:
            0.015703043 = weight(_text_:of in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015703043 = score(doc=607,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.2292085 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Belkin and Robertson (1976a) reflected on the ethical implications of theoretical research in information science and warned that there was potential for abuse of knowledge gained by undertaking such research and applying it to information systems. In particular, they identified the domains of advertising and political propaganda that posed particular problems. The purpose of this literature review is to revisit these ideas in the light of recent events in global information systems that demonstrate that their fears were justified. Design/methodology/approach The authors revisit the theory in information science that Belkin and Robertson used to build their argument, together with the discussion on ethics that resulted from this work in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The authors then review recent literature in the field of information systems, specifically information retrieval, social media and recommendation systems that highlight the problems identified by Belkin and Robertson. Findings Information science theories have been used in conjunction with empirical evidence gathered from user interactions that have been detrimental to both individuals and society. It is argued in the paper that the information science and systems communities should find ways to return control to the user wherever possible, and the ways to achieve this are considered. Research limitations/implications The ethical issues identified require a multidisciplinary approach with research in information science, computer science, information systems, business, sociology, psychology, journalism, government and politics, etc. required. This is too large a scope to deal with in a literature review, and we focus only on the design and implementation of information systems (Zimmer, 2008a) through an information science and information systems perspective. Practical implications The authors argue that information systems such as search technologies, social media applications and recommendation systems should be designed with the recipient of the information in mind (Paisley and Parker, 1965), not the sender of that information. Social implications Information systems designed ethically and with users in mind will go some way to addressing the ill effects typified by the problems for individuals and society evident in global information systems. Originality/value The authors synthesize the evidence from the literature to provide potential technological solutions to the ethical issues identified, with a set of recommendations to information systems designers and implementers.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 78(2022) no.2, S.485-509
  4. Rogers, Y.: New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction (2003) 0.06
    0.062286716 = product of:
      0.09343007 = sum of:
        0.08208451 = weight(_text_:sociology in 4270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08208451 = score(doc=4270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.26916912 = fieldWeight in 4270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4270)
        0.011345566 = product of:
          0.022691133 = sum of:
            0.022691133 = weight(_text_:of in 4270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022691133 = score(doc=4270,freq=60.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.33120972 = fieldWeight in 4270, product of:
                  7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
                    60.0 = termFreq=60.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    "Theory weary, theory leery, why can't I be theory cheery?" (Erickson, 2002, p. 269). The field of human-computer interaction (HCI) is rapidly expanding. Alongside the extensive technological developments that are taking place, a profusion of new theories, methods, and concerns has been imported into the field from a range of disciplines and contexts. An extensive critique of recent theoretical developments is presented here together with an overview of HCI practice. A consequence of bringing new theories into the field has been much insightful explication of HCI phenomena and also a broadening of the field's discourse. However, these theoretically based approaches have had limited impact an the practice of interaction design. This chapter discusses why this is so and suggests that different kinds of mechanisms are needed that will enable both designers and researchers to better articulate and theoretically ground the challenges facing them today. Human-computer interaction is bursting at the seams. Its mission, goals, and methods, well established in the '80s, have all greatly expanded to the point that "HCI is now effectively a boundless domain" (Barnard, May, Duke, & Duce, 2000, p. 221). Everything is in a state of flux: The theory driving research is changing, a flurry of new concepts is emerging, the domains and type of users being studied are diversifying, many of the ways of doing design are new, and much of what is being designed is significantly different. Although potentially much is to be gained from such rapid growth, the downside is an increasing lack of direction, structure, and coherence in the field. What was originally a bounded problem space with a clear focus and a small set of methods for designing computer systems that were easier and more efficient to use by a single user is now turning into a diffuse problem space with less clarity in terms of its objects of study, design foci, and investigative methods. Instead, aspirations of overcoming the Digital Divide, by providing universal accessibility, have become major concerns (e.g., Shneiderman, 2002a). The move toward greater openness in the field means that many more topics, areas, and approaches are now considered acceptable in the worlds of research and practice.
    A problem with allowing a field to expand eclectically is that it can easily lose coherence. No one really knows what its purpose is anymore or what criteria to use in assessing its contribution and value to both knowledge and practice. For example, among the many new approaches, ideas, methods, and goals now being proposed, how do we know which are acceptable, reliable, useful, and generalizable? Moreover, how do researchers and designers know which of the many tools and techniques to use when doing design and research? To be able to address these concerns, a young field in a state of flux (as is HCI) needs to take stock and begin to reflect an the changes that are happening. The purpose of this chapter is to assess and reflect an the role of theory in contemporary HCI and the extent to which it is used in design practice. Over the last ten years, a range of new theories has been imported into the field. A key question is whether such attempts have been productive in terms of "knowledge transfer." Here knowledge transfer means the translation of research findings (e.g., theory, empirical results, descriptive accounts, cognitive models) from one discipline (e.g., cognitive psychology, sociology) into another (e.g., human-computer interaction, computer supported cooperative work).
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 38(2004), S.87-144
  5. Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval (2008) 0.04
    0.037970424 = product of:
      0.11391127 = sum of:
        0.11391127 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.09497269 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09497269 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:01:26
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42
  6. Morris, S.A.: Mapping research specialties (2008) 0.04
    0.037970424 = product of:
      0.11391127 = sum of:
        0.11391127 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
          0.09497269 = weight(_text_:22 in 3962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09497269 = score(doc=3962,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3962, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3962)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 9:30:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.xxx-xxx
  7. Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006) 0.04
    0.037970424 = product of:
      0.11391127 = sum of:
        0.11391127 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
          0.09497269 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09497269 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:22:28
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
  8. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.04
    0.037970424 = product of:
      0.11391127 = sum of:
        0.11391127 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.09497269 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09497269 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 41(2007), S.xxx-xxx
  9. Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996) 0.04
    0.037970424 = product of:
      0.11391127 = sum of:
        0.11391127 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
          0.09497269 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09497269 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.10.1996 14:22:33
    Source
    Bulletin of bibliography. 53(1996) no.1, S.49-66
  10. Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987) 0.04
    0.037970424 = product of:
      0.11391127 = sum of:
        0.11391127 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
          0.09497269 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09497269 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
  11. Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987) 0.04
    0.037970424 = product of:
      0.11391127 = sum of:
        0.11391127 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
          0.09497269 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09497269 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
  12. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.04
    0.037970424 = product of:
      0.11391127 = sum of:
        0.11391127 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.09497269 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09497269 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  13. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.03
    0.033224124 = product of:
      0.09967237 = sum of:
        0.09967237 = sum of:
          0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01657126 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08310111 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.367-430
  14. Buckland, M.K.; Liu, Z.: History of information science (1995) 0.02
    0.024756517 = product of:
      0.07426955 = sum of:
        0.07426955 = sum of:
          0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0267832 = score(doc=4226,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=4226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4226)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the historical development of information science as deemed to be covered by the particular interests of memebers of the American Society for Information Science, as defined as the representation, storage, transmission, selection, retrieval, filtering, and use of documents and messages. Arranges the references cited roughly according to the classification scheme used by Information Science Abstracts, and so uses the headings: background; information science; techniques and technology; information related behaviour; application areas; social aspects; education for information science; institutions; individuals; geographical areas; and conclusions
    Date
    13. 6.1996 19:22:20
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 30(1995), S.385-416
  15. Rader, H.B.: Library orientation and instruction - 1993 (1994) 0.02
    0.023731515 = product of:
      0.071194544 = sum of:
        0.071194544 = sum of:
          0.0118366135 = weight(_text_:of in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0118366135 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
          0.059357934 = weight(_text_:22 in 209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059357934 = score(doc=209,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 209, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=209)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This annotated bibliography lists materials dealing with information literacy - including instruction in the use of information resources, research, and computer skills related to retrieving, using, and evaluating information. This review, the 20th to be published in RSR, includes items in English published in 1993
    Source
    Reference services review. 22(1994) no.4, S.81-
  16. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.02
    0.023560425 = product of:
      0.070681274 = sum of:
        0.070681274 = sum of:
          0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.023194931 = score(doc=266,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  17. Haas, S.W.: Natural language processing : toward large-scale, robust systems (1996) 0.02
    0.022886775 = product of:
      0.06866033 = sum of:
        0.06866033 = sum of:
          0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021173978 = score(doc=7415,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 31(1996), S.83-119
  18. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.02
    0.02129588 = product of:
      0.06388764 = sum of:
        0.06388764 = sum of:
          0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.016401293 = score(doc=249,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015) 0.02
    0.021157425 = product of:
      0.06347227 = sum of:
        0.06347227 = sum of:
          0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021921717 = score(doc=2092,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The object of this literature review is to provide a historical perspective of R and D work in the area of Knowledge Organization (KO). This overview/summarization will provide information on major areas of KO. Journal articles published in core areas of KO: (Classification, Indexing, Thesauri and Taxonomies, Internet and Subject approach to information in the electronic era and Ontologies will be predominantly covered in this literature review. Coverage in this overview may not be completely exhaustive, but it succinctly showcases major developments in the area of KO. This review is a good source of additional reading material on KO apart from prescribed reading material on KO
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:13:38
  20. Weiss, A.K.; Carstens, T.V.: ¬The year's work in cataloging, 1999 (2001) 0.02
    0.020615373 = product of:
      0.06184612 = sum of:
        0.06184612 = sum of:
          0.020295564 = weight(_text_:of in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020295564 = score(doc=6084,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 6084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=6084,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6084, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6084)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The challenge of cataloging Web sites and electronic resources was the most important issue facing the cataloging world in the last year. This article reviews attempts to analyze and revise the cataloging code in view of the new electronic environment. The difficulties of applying traditional library cataloging standards to Web resources has led some to favor metadata as the best means of providing access to these materials. The appropriate education and training for library cataloging personnel remains crucial during this transitional period. Articles on user understanding of Library of Congress subject headings and on cataloging practice are also reviewed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Languages

  • e 294
  • d 3
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • ru 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 265
  • b 45
  • m 17
  • s 8
  • el 7
  • r 5
  • ? 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…