Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Who dunnit? : Metatags and hyperauthorship (2001)
0.00
0.003382594 = product of:
0.010147782 = sum of:
0.010147782 = product of:
0.020295564 = sum of:
0.020295564 = weight(_text_:of in 6031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020295564 = score(doc=6031,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 6031, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6031)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Multiple authorship is a topic of growing concern in a number of scientific domains. When, as is increasingly common, scholarly articles and clinical reports have scores or even hundreds of authors-what Cronin (in press) has termed "hyperauthorship" -the precise nature of each individual's contribution is often masked. A notation that describes collaborators' contributions and allows those contributions to be tracked in, and across, texts (and over time) offers a solution. Such a notation should be useful, easy to use, and acceptable to communities of scientists. Drawing on earlier work, we present a proposal for an XML-like "contribution" mark-up, and discuss the potential benefits and possible drawbacks
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.9, S.770-773
