-
Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988)
0.02
0.02129588 = product of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=2832,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reference librarians, who are thoroughly familiar with the purpose, scope and arrangement of abstract periodicals, are uniquely qualified for the task of writing abstracts. The procedures described here offer a relatively simple way for them to write acceptable abstracts from the outset. Although research is being conducted in the area of machine generated abstracts, there wll continue to be a role for human abstractors.
- Source
- Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
-
Hutchins, J.: Summarization: some problems and methods (1987)
0.00
0.004463867 = product of:
0.0133916 = sum of:
0.0133916 = product of:
0.0267832 = sum of:
0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0267832 = score(doc=2738,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Informatics 9: Meaning: the frontier of informatics: proceedings of a conference. Ed.: K.P. Jones
-
Fidel, R.: Writing abstracts for free-text searching (1986)
0.00
0.004175565 = product of:
0.012526695 = sum of:
0.012526695 = product of:
0.02505339 = sum of:
0.02505339 = weight(_text_:of in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02505339 = score(doc=684,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A survey of abstracting policies by producers of bibliographical databases examined abstracting guidelines which aim to enhance free- text retrieval. Of the 123 database policies examined, fifty-seven (46 per cent) included such instructions. Editors consider contents of abstracts and their language as a primary factor in retrieval enhancement. Most recommend that once abstractors decide which concepts to include in abstracts and in which form to represent them, these terms should be co-ordinated with index terms assigned from a controlled vocabulary. Guidelines about the type of abstracts, i.e., informative or indicative, and about their length are not affected by the capability of free-text retrieval
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 42(1986), S.11-21
-
Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Content analysis : a special case of text compression (1989)
0.00
0.003945538 = product of:
0.0118366135 = sum of:
0.0118366135 = product of:
0.023673227 = sum of:
0.023673227 = weight(_text_:of in 3549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023673227 = score(doc=3549,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34554482 = fieldWeight in 3549, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3549)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Presents a theoretical model, based on the Flower/Hayes model of expository writing, of the process involved in content analysis for abstracting and indexing.
- Source
- Information, knowledge, evolution. Proceedings of the 44th FID Congress, Helsinki, 28.8.-1.9.1988. Ed. by S. Koshiala and R. Launo
-
Abstracting and indexing services in perspective : Miles Conrad memorial lectures 1969-1983. Commemorating the twenty-fifth anniversary of the National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services (1983)
0.00
0.0027335489 = product of:
0.008200646 = sum of:
0.008200646 = product of:
0.016401293 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=689,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 689, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: BAKER, D.B.: Abstracting and indexing services: past, present, and future; KENNEDY, H.E.: A perspective on fifteen years in the abstracting and indexing field; WEIL, B.H.: Will abstracts survive technological developments? and will "cheaper is better" win out?; KILGOUR, F.G.: Comparative development of abstracting and indexing, and monograph cataloging; ROWLETT, R.J.: Abstracts, who needs them?