Search (202 results, page 2 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01
    0.013850185 = product of:
      0.041550554 = sum of:
        0.041550554 = product of:
          0.08310111 = sum of:
            0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08310111 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  2. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.01
    0.013850185 = product of:
      0.041550554 = sum of:
        0.041550554 = product of:
          0.08310111 = sum of:
            0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08310111 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  3. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.01
    0.013850185 = product of:
      0.041550554 = sum of:
        0.041550554 = product of:
          0.08310111 = sum of:
            0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08310111 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  4. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.01
    0.013850185 = product of:
      0.041550554 = sum of:
        0.041550554 = product of:
          0.08310111 = sum of:
            0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08310111 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  5. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.01
    0.013850185 = product of:
      0.041550554 = sum of:
        0.041550554 = product of:
          0.08310111 = sum of:
            0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08310111 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22
  6. Dienelt, O.: ¬Ein Workshop über Indexing (2003) 0.01
    0.008878035 = product of:
      0.026634103 = sum of:
        0.026634103 = sum of:
          0.005858825 = weight(_text_:of in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.005858825 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.08551798 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
          0.020775277 = weight(_text_:22 in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020775277 = score(doc=1502,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    "Unter der Leitung von Frank Merrett von der Socieryy of Indexers (www.indexers.org.uk), die in Sheffield ihren Hauptsitz hat, fand am 22. Januar in London ein Workshop statt, in dem Einblicke in das Indexing (Registererstellung) ermöglicht wurden. SechsTeilnehmerinnen und drei Teilnehmer (Bibliothekare, Katalogisierer, angehende Indexer, Benutzer von Indices) bekamen durch Merrett neben den grundlegenden Dingen auch ein wenig Einblick in die Berufswirklichkeit eines Indexers vermittelt. Zunächst wurden einige Definitionen dessen, was ein Index ist, angesprochen: Ein Index (Register) ist eine systematische Anordnung von Eintragungen, die es dem Benutzer ermöglichen, Informationen in einem Dokument zu finden (nach Norm BS ISO 999,1996). Auch andere Definitionen besagen, dass die im Hauptteil eines Dokuments enthaltenen Informationen so herausgefiltert werden sollen, dass durch die Benutzung des Registers ein möglichst benutzerfreundlicher Zugang zum Hauptteil erfolgen kann. Ein Index soll den einen Benutzer entscheiden lassen, ob ein Dokument etwas für ihn Interessantes enthält. Dem anderen soll es dazu dienen, das Gelesene wieder aufzufrischen. Ein Index muss beiden gerecht werden. Nach Eintreffen des Materials vom Verlag (sehr oft als Papierausdruck) beginnt der erste Schritt, der vom persönlichen Arbeitsstil des Indexers abhängt. Manche beginnen sofort beim Lesen mit dem Niederschreiben von Begriffen, oft unter Verwendung von Software (Macrex, Cindex), andere markieren oder unterstreichen zunächst die relevanten Begriffe. Hier beginnt die eigentliche Arbeit, die darin besteht, wichtige Informationen aus dem Text herauszufiltern und so aufzubereiten, dass ein Buchleser zu Wichtigem hingeführt wird. Dazu gehören Entscheidungen wie zum Beispiel »was ist wichtig«, »was kann/ muss weggelassen werden«, »wo müssen Siehe- beziehungsweise Siehe-auch-Verweise eingebrachtwerden«. Bibliothekarisch gesehen, ist dies Sacherschließung und zugleich formale Erfassung, letztlich das Aufbauen eines Kreuzkatalogs. So wie ein Sacherschließer muss auch ein Indexer ständig überlegen, mit welchen Begriffen er dem Benutzer des Registers einen guten Zugang zur Information verschaffen kann. Ein gutes Verständnis des Faches, das in der Vorlage behandelt wird, ist deshalb unbedingt notwendig. Das wurde anhand einiger Seiten geübt, genauso wie das Aufbe-reiten des Index. Äußerste Genauigkeit ist hier nötig. Anhand eines fertigen Index mit eingebauten Ungenauigkeiten wurde geübt, sehr genau hinzuschauen und kleinste Ungenauigkeiten zu erkennen. Merrett sagte, dass ein gut geschriebenes Buch besser zu bearbeiten sei als eines, das einen weniger guten Hauptteil hat. Oft hat ein Indexer nur zwei Wochen Zeit für die Erstellung eines Registers. Die wenigsten dürften allerdings ständig von morgens bis abends an einem Index arbeiten, und nur sehr wenige verdienen ausschließlich mit dem Erstellen von Registern ihren Lebensunterhalt. Meistens ist dies ein Nebenjob. Nach Frank Merrett sind die Verhandlungen mit einem Verlag über einen zu erstellenden Index recht vorsichtig zu führen. Insbesondere über die Termine (Eintreffen des Manuskripts, Abliefern des Produkts) sowie die Form der Vorlage (welches Format, welcher Umfang) muss sich ein Indexer absichern, um keine Überraschungen zu erleben. So kann es sein, dass die Vorlage nicht als Buch, sondern als ein Stapel von Druckbogen, ungefalzt und unsortiert, ankommt. Auch das Honorar muß vom Indexer in Anbetracht des zu erwartenden Aufwandes verhandelt werden. Indexer ist keine geschützte Bezeichnung, deshalb kann sich jeder so nennen. Die Prüfungen, die man bei der Sociery of Indexers ablegen kann, sind aber ein Qualitätsnachweis. Die Society kann durch das Aufführen der Namen und Spezialgebiete auf der Homepage beziehungsweise in einem Verzeichnis einiges für die Mitglieder tun. Die Sociery legt auf das Kontakthalten mit Verlegern großen Wert, um dort auf die Dienste der Indexer hinzuweisen. Um Aufträge muß sich aber jeder selbst kümmern.
  7. Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007) 0.01
    0.007914391 = product of:
      0.023743173 = sum of:
        0.023743173 = product of:
          0.047486346 = sum of:
            0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047486346 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    8.12.2007 18:41:22
  8. Lipetz, B.-A.: ¬The usefulness of indexes (1989) 0.01
    0.0057987324 = product of:
      0.017396197 = sum of:
        0.017396197 = product of:
          0.034792393 = sum of:
            0.034792393 = weight(_text_:of in 875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034792393 = score(doc=875,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.50784504 = fieldWeight in 875, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=875)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexing: the state of our knowledge and the state of our ignorance. Proc. of the 20th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, New York, 13.5.1988. Ed.: B.H. Weinberg
  9. Bishop, A.P.; Liddy, E.D.; Settel, B.: Index quality study : pt.1: quantitative description of back-of-the-book indexes (1991) 0.01
    0.0057987324 = product of:
      0.017396197 = sum of:
        0.017396197 = product of:
          0.034792393 = sum of:
            0.034792393 = weight(_text_:of in 7764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034792393 = score(doc=7764,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.50784504 = fieldWeight in 7764, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7764)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Port Aransas, TX : American Society of Indexers
    Source
    Indexing tradition and innovation: proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the American Society of Indexers
  10. ISO 999.4: Guidelines for the content, organization and presentation of indexes : Committee draft (1991) 0.01
    0.0054670977 = product of:
      0.016401293 = sum of:
        0.016401293 = product of:
          0.032802586 = sum of:
            0.032802586 = weight(_text_:of in 8088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032802586 = score(doc=8088,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.47880095 = fieldWeight in 8088, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Ottawa : Office of Library Standards, National Library of Canada
  11. Thomas, D.: Book indexing principles and standards (1989) 0.01
    0.005293495 = product of:
      0.015880484 = sum of:
        0.015880484 = product of:
          0.03176097 = sum of:
            0.03176097 = weight(_text_:of in 865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03176097 = score(doc=865,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.46359703 = fieldWeight in 865, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexing: the state of our knowledge and the state of our inorance. Proc. of the 20th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, New York, 13.5.1988. Ed.: B.H. Weinberg
  12. Fetters, L.K.: Indexing software (1989) 0.01
    0.005293495 = product of:
      0.015880484 = sum of:
        0.015880484 = product of:
          0.03176097 = sum of:
            0.03176097 = weight(_text_:of in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03176097 = score(doc=866,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.46359703 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexing: the state of our knowledge and the state of our ignorance. Proc. of the 20th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, New York, 13.5.1988. Ed.: B.H. Weinberg
  13. Preschel, B.M.: Indexing for print, online, and CD-ROM (1989) 0.01
    0.005293495 = product of:
      0.015880484 = sum of:
        0.015880484 = product of:
          0.03176097 = sum of:
            0.03176097 = weight(_text_:of in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03176097 = score(doc=871,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.46359703 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Indexing: the state of our knowledge and the state of our ignorance. Proc. of the 20th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, New York, 13.5.1988. Ed.: B.H. Weinberg
  14. Liddy, E.D.: ¬The art of back-of-the-book indexes (1991-92) 0.01
    0.005219456 = product of:
      0.015658367 = sum of:
        0.015658367 = product of:
          0.031316735 = sum of:
            0.031316735 = weight(_text_:of in 6357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031316735 = score(doc=6357,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.45711282 = fieldWeight in 6357, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6357)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A mail survey of 433 authors produced data on the status of the indexers of their books. The collection of reliable data was to determine whether differences are discernable among indexes according to the status who created them
    Source
    Annual review of OCLC research. 1991-92, S.34-36
  15. Indexing legal materials (1993) 0.01
    0.005219456 = product of:
      0.015658367 = sum of:
        0.015658367 = product of:
          0.031316735 = sum of:
            0.031316735 = weight(_text_:of in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031316735 = score(doc=3633,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.45711282 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält Kapitel zu folgenden Themen: History of law indexing; Types of law books and their users; Structure and design of indexes; Selecting and analyzing subjects; Indexing terms; Form of entries and references; Indexing EC materials; Cases and statutes; Conclusion; Index of works cited; Index
    Imprint
    London : Society of indexers
    Series
    Society of Indexers: occasional papers; 2
  16. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing standards : Are they possible? What good are they? Why bother? (1993) 0.01
    0.0051669977 = product of:
      0.015500993 = sum of:
        0.015500993 = product of:
          0.031001985 = sum of:
            0.031001985 = weight(_text_:of in 8087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031001985 = score(doc=8087,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.45251858 = fieldWeight in 8087, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the nature of standards as tools to promote compatibility and improve practice, the role of research versus expert opinion in the creation of standards, the changing scope of standards for indexes in the face of the changing indexing environment, with the increasing use of automatic indexing, electronic displays, and electronic searching of non-displayed indexes. Describes the current draft of the NISO American Standard Guidelines for indexes in information retrieval (Z39.4) in terms of 3 fundamental requirements: syntax, vocabulary management and comprehensive planning and design. Concludes with comments about the nebulous concept of good and accurate indexing and whether and how standards can be used advantageously
    Imprint
    Port Aransas, TX : American Society of Indexers
    Source
    Indexing, providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany
  17. Diodato, V.; Gandt, G.: Back of book indexes and the characteristics of author and nonauthor indexing : report of an exploratory study (1991) 0.00
    0.0047837105 = product of:
      0.014351131 = sum of:
        0.014351131 = product of:
          0.028702263 = sum of:
            0.028702263 = weight(_text_:of in 1114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028702263 = score(doc=1114,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 1114, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1114)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study examined the content of back of book indexes produced by 37 authors and 27 nonauthors. The purpose was to see if differences between the two groups of indexers could be discerned by counting the occurrence of characteristics in their indexes. The nonauthors, many or all of whom were probably professional indexers, provided significantly more index pages, modified headings, and modifiers than did the author indexers. The two groups were almost identical in their frequency of cross reference use. The simple counting technique is a feasible method. It should be applied to othe populations of back of book indexes to determine how generalizable are the author/nonauthor differences seen here
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.341-350
  18. Wallis, E.: Indexing training and accreditation in UK (1993) 0.00
    0.0047346456 = product of:
      0.014203937 = sum of:
        0.014203937 = product of:
          0.028407874 = sum of:
            0.028407874 = weight(_text_:of in 7650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028407874 = score(doc=7650,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 7650, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Port Aransas, TX : American Society of Indexers
    Source
    Indexing: providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead; proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, Alexandria, VA, May 1993. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany
  19. Cousins, G.: Professional indexing in Australia : first steps towards accreditation (1993) 0.00
    0.0047346456 = product of:
      0.014203937 = sum of:
        0.014203937 = product of:
          0.028407874 = sum of:
            0.028407874 = weight(_text_:of in 7651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028407874 = score(doc=7651,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 7651, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7651)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Port Aransas, TX : American Society of Indexers
    Source
    Indexing: providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead; proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, Alexandria, VA, May 1993. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany
  20. Kleinberg, I.: Making the case for professional indexers : where is the proof? (1993) 0.00
    0.0047346456 = product of:
      0.014203937 = sum of:
        0.014203937 = product of:
          0.028407874 = sum of:
            0.028407874 = weight(_text_:of in 7766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028407874 = score(doc=7766,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.41465378 = fieldWeight in 7766, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Port Aransas, TX : American Society of Indexers
    Source
    Indexing, providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany

Languages

  • e 193
  • d 8
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 171
  • m 21
  • n 6
  • s 5
  • r 2
  • More… Less…