-
Peritz, B.C.: On the informativeness of titles (1984)
0.16
0.1625918 = product of:
0.2438877 = sum of:
0.23217005 = weight(_text_:sociology in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23217005 = score(doc=2636,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.7613253 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
0.01171765 = product of:
0.0234353 = sum of:
0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0234353 = score(doc=2636,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The frequency of non-informative titles of journal articles was assessed for two fields: library and information science and sociology. The percentage of non informative titles was 21% in the formaer and 15% in the latter. In both fields, the non-informative titles, were concentratein only a few journals. The non-informative titles in library science were derived mainly from non-research journals. IN sociology the reasons for non-informative titles may be more complex; some of these journals are highly cited. For the improvement of retrievaleffiency the adoption of a policy encouraging informative titles (as in journals of chemistry) is recommended.
-
Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990)
0.04
0.03551214 = product of:
0.10653641 = sum of:
0.10653641 = sum of:
0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0234353 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08310111 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:43:54
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.4, S.272-281
-
Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000)
0.03
0.033224124 = product of:
0.09967237 = sum of:
0.09967237 = sum of:
0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01657126 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08310111 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 11. 8.2001 16:22:19
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.03
0.026619852 = product of:
0.079859555 = sum of:
0.079859555 = sum of:
0.020501617 = weight(_text_:of in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501617 = score(doc=2417,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.059357934 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059357934 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Pages
- S.22-25
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol. 20
- Source
- Productivity in the information age : proceedings of the 46th ASIS annual meeting, 1983. Ed.: Raymond F Vondra
-
Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997)
0.03
0.02536581 = product of:
0.07609743 = sum of:
0.07609743 = sum of:
0.016739499 = weight(_text_:of in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016739499 = score(doc=3107,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.059357934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059357934 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:59:22
- Imprint
- Gaithersburgh, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology
-
Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997)
0.02
0.023731515 = product of:
0.071194544 = sum of:
0.071194544 = sum of:
0.0118366135 = weight(_text_:of in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0118366135 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
0.059357934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059357934 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 27. 2.1999 20:55:22
- Imprint
- Gaithersburgh, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology
-
Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996)
0.02
0.023560425 = product of:
0.070681274 = sum of:
0.070681274 = sum of:
0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023194931 = score(doc=6971,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the Reuters test collection, which at 22.173 references is significantly larger than most traditional test collections. In addition, Reuters has none of the recall calculation problems normally associated with some of the larger test collections available. Explains the method derived by D.D. Lewis to perform retrieval experiments on the Reuters collection and illustrates the use of the Reuters collection using some simple retrieval experiments that compare the performance of stemming algorithms
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966)
0.02
0.023010295 = product of:
0.06903088 = sum of:
0.06903088 = sum of:
0.027480325 = weight(_text_:of in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027480325 = score(doc=2718,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A study of the number of irrelevant documents retrieved in a co-ordinate indexing system that does not employ eitherr roles or links. These tests were based on one hundred actual inquiries received in the library and therefore an evaluation of recall efficiency is not included. Over half the enquiries produced no noise, but the mean average percentage niose figure was approximately 33 per cent based on a total average retireval figure of eighteen documents per search. Details of the size of the indexed collection, methods of indexing, and an analysis of the reasons for the retrieval of irrelevant documents are discussed, thereby providing information officers who are thinking of installing such a system with some evidence on which to base a decision as to whether or not to utilize these devices
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
-
Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973)
0.02
0.022886775 = product of:
0.06866033 = sum of:
0.06866033 = sum of:
0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021173978 = score(doc=5002,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Many retrievalexperiments are intended to discover ways of improving performance, taking the results obtained with some particular technique as a baseline. The fact that substantial alterations to a system often have little or no effect on particular collections is puzzling. This may be due to the initially poor seperation of relevant and non-relevant documents. The paper presents a procedure for characterizing this seperation for a collection, which can be used to show whether proposed modifications of the base system are likely to be useful.
- Date
- 19. 3.1996 11:22:12
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 29(1973) no.3, S.251-257
-
¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997)
0.02
0.022141643 = product of:
0.06642493 = sum of:
0.06642493 = sum of:
0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018938582 = score(doc=3087,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
- Imprint
- Gaithersburgh, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology
-
Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997)
0.02
0.02129588 = product of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=744,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- TREC ia an annual conference held in the USA devoted to electronic systems for large full text information searching. The conference deals with evaluation and comparison techniques developed since 1992 by participants from the research and industrial fields. The work of the conference is destined for designers (rather than users) of systems which access full text information. Describes the context, objectives, organization, evaluation methods and limits of TREC
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
-
¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003)
0.02
0.02129588 = product of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=4049,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
- Imprint
- Gaithersburg, MD : National Institute of Standards / Information Technology Laboratory
-
Blair, D.C.: STAIRS Redux : thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after (1996)
0.02
0.021157425 = product of:
0.06347227 = sum of:
0.06347227 = sum of:
0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021921717 = score(doc=3002,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=3002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The test of retrieval effectiveness performed on IBM's STAIRS and reported in 'Communications of the ACM' 10 years ago, continues to be cited frequently in the information retrieval literature. The reasons for the study's continuing pertinence to today's research are discussed, and the political, legal, and commercial aspects of the study are presented. In addition, the method of calculating recall that was used in the STAIRS study is discussed in some detail, especially how it reduces the 5 major types of uncertainty in recall estimations. It is also suggested that this method of recall estimation may serve as the basis for recall estimations that might be truly comparable between systems
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.4-22
-
Sievert, M.E.; McKinin, E.J.: Why full-text misses some relevant documents : an analysis of documents not retrieved by CCML or MEDIS (1989)
0.02
0.020407092 = product of:
0.06122127 = sum of:
0.06122127 = sum of:
0.025606511 = weight(_text_:of in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025606511 = score(doc=3564,freq=26.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 3564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=3564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3564)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Searches conducted as part of the MEDLINE/Full-Text Research Project revealed that the full-text data bases of clinical medical journal articles (CCML (Comprehensive Core Medical Library) from BRS Information Technologies, and MEDIS from Mead Data Central) did not retrieve all the relevant citations. An analysis of the data indicated that 204 relevant citations were retrieved only by MEDLINE. A comparison of the strategies used on the full-text data bases with the text of the articles of these 204 citations revealed that 2 reasons contributed to these failure. The searcher often constructed a restrictive strategy which resulted in the loss of relevant documents; and as in other kinds of retrieval, the problems of natural language caused the loss of relevant documents.
- Date
- 9. 1.1996 10:22:31
- Source
- ASIS'89. Managing information and technology. Proceedings of the 52nd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington D.C., 30.10.-2.11.1989. Vol.26. Ed.by J. Katzer and G.B. Newby
-
Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998)
0.02
0.020292649 = product of:
0.060877945 = sum of:
0.060877945 = sum of:
0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0133916 = score(doc=3572,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes of 3 searches on the topic of virtual communities done on the WWW using HotBot and traditional databases using LEXIS-NEXIS and ABI/Inform. Concludes that the WWW is a good starting place for a broad concept search but the traditional services are better for more precise topics
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
-
Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994)
0.02
0.02002593 = product of:
0.060077786 = sum of:
0.060077786 = sum of:
0.018527232 = weight(_text_:of in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018527232 = score(doc=7302,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
-
Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983)
0.02
0.02002593 = product of:
0.060077786 = sum of:
0.060077786 = sum of:
0.018527232 = weight(_text_:of in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018527232 = score(doc=5001,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
- Date
- 14. 3.1996 13:22:21
-
Brown, M.E.: By any other name : accounting for failure in the naming of subject categories (1995)
0.02
0.02002593 = product of:
0.060077786 = sum of:
0.060077786 = sum of:
0.018527232 = weight(_text_:of in 5598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018527232 = score(doc=5598,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 5598, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5598)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 5598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=5598,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5598, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5598)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Research shows that 65-80% of subject search terms fail to match the appropriate subject heading and one third to one half of subject searches result in no references being retrieved. Examines the subject search terms geberated by 82 school and college students in Princeton, NJ, evaluated the match between the named terms and the expected subject headings, proposes an explanation for match failures in relation to 3 invariant properties common to all search terms: concreteness, complexity, and syndeticity. Suggests that match failure is a consequence of developmental naming patterns and that these patterns can be overcome through the use of metacognitive naming skills
- Date
- 2.11.1996 13:08:22
-
Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995)
0.02
0.019723108 = product of:
0.059169322 = sum of:
0.059169322 = sum of:
0.023554565 = weight(_text_:of in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023554565 = score(doc=1757,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
-
Wood, F.; Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Sobczyk, G.; Duffin, R.: Information skills, searching behaviour and cognitive styles for student-centred learning : a computer-assisted learning approach (1996)
0.02
0.019723108 = product of:
0.059169322 = sum of:
0.059169322 = sum of:
0.023554565 = weight(_text_:of in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023554565 = score(doc=4341,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Undergraduates were tested to establish how they searched databases, the effectiveness of their searches and their satisfaction with them. The students' cognitive and learning styles were determined by the Lancaster Approaches to Studying Inventory and Riding's Cognitive Styles Analysis tests. There were significant differences in the searching behaviour and the effectiveness of the searches carried out by students with different learning and cognitive styles. Computer-assisted learning (CAL) packages were developed for three departments. The effectiveness of the packages were evaluated. Significant differences were found in the ways students with different learning styles used the packages. Based on the experience gained, guidelines for the teaching of information skills and the production and use of packages were prepared. About 2/3 of the searches had serious weaknesses, indicating a need for effective training. It appears that choice of searching strategies, search effectiveness and use of CAL packages are all affected by the cognitive and learning styles of the searcher. Therefore, students should be made aware of their own styles and, if appropriate, how to adopt more effective strategies
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.79-92
