-
Hjoerland, B.: Domain analysis in information science : eleven approaches - traditional as well as innovative (2002)
0.10
0.10007422 = product of:
0.15011132 = sum of:
0.1407163 = weight(_text_:sociology in 4464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1407163 = score(doc=4464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.4614328 = fieldWeight in 4464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4464)
0.009395021 = product of:
0.018790042 = sum of:
0.018790042 = weight(_text_:of in 4464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018790042 = score(doc=4464,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 4464, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- What kind of knowledge is needed by information specialists working in a specific subject field like medicine, sociology or music? What approaches have been used in information science to produce kinds of domain-specific knowledge? This article presents 11 approaches to domain analysis. Together these approaches make a unique competence for information specialists. The approaches are: producing literature guides and subject gateways, producing special classifications and thesauri; research an indexing and retrieving specialities, empirical user studies; bibliometrical studies; historical studies; document and genre studies; epistemological and critical studies; terminological studies, LSP (languages for special purposes), discourse studies; studies of structures and institutions in scientific communication; and domain analysis in professional cognition and artificial intelligence. Specific examples and selective reviews of literature are provided, and the strengths and drawbacks of each of these approaches are discussed
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.4, S.422-462
-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.04
0.041487586 = product of:
0.062231377 = sum of:
0.052187677 = product of:
0.20875071 = sum of:
0.20875071 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20875071 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37143064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.010043699 = product of:
0.020087399 = sum of:
0.020087399 = weight(_text_:of in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020087399 = score(doc=2514,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
- Source
- WWW '02: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 7-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
-
Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008)
0.04
0.03551214 = product of:
0.10653641 = sum of:
0.10653641 = sum of:
0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0234353 = score(doc=844,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08310111 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 7. 6.2008 16:22:20
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.3, S.xxx
-
MacLeod, R.: Promoting a subject gateway : a case study from EEVL (Edinburgh Engineering Virtual Library) (2000)
0.03
0.03356143 = product of:
0.100684285 = sum of:
0.100684285 = sum of:
0.016739499 = weight(_text_:of in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016739499 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
0.08394479 = weight(_text_:22 in 4872) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08394479 = score(doc=4872,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4872, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4872)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the development of EEVL and outlines the services offered. The potential market for EEVL is discussed, and a case study of promotional activities is presented
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:40:22
-
Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999)
0.03
0.033224124 = product of:
0.09967237 = sum of:
0.09967237 = sum of:
0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01657126 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08310111 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.03
0.033224124 = product of:
0.09967237 = sum of:
0.09967237 = sum of:
0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01657126 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08310111 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996)
0.03
0.028477818 = product of:
0.08543345 = sum of:
0.08543345 = sum of:
0.014203937 = weight(_text_:of in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014203937 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.07122952 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07122952 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Basically a good listing in table format of features from the major search engines
- Date
- 10.11.1996 16:36:22
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.02
0.024179911 = product of:
0.07253973 = sum of:
0.07253973 = sum of:
0.02505339 = weight(_text_:of in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02505339 = score(doc=1149,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a test of the validity of using Google Scholar to evaluate the publications of researchers by comparing the premises on which its search engine, PageRank, is based, to those of Garfield's theory of citation indexing. It finds that the premises are identical and that PageRank and Garfield's theory of citation indexing validate each other.
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Notess, G.R.: Toward more comprehensive Web searching : single searching versus megasearching (1998)
0.02
0.022886775 = product of:
0.06866033 = sum of:
0.06866033 = sum of:
0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021173978 = score(doc=3278,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In spite of their size, the major Web indexes are not comprehensive. Considers approaches carrying out comprehensive searches, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. In the single search tool approach, users search the largest of the databses one by one, using the command language uniqe to each to increase the precision of the esearch. In the megasearch approach, search engines use 1 form that simultaneously seands a single query to a number of search engines and then presents the results. Inference Find, Dogpile and MetaFind are examples of good metasearch engines
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.2, S.73-76
-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.02
0.022886775 = product of:
0.06866033 = sum of:
0.06866033 = sum of:
0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021173978 = score(doc=4869,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
-
Campbell, D.: Australian subject gateways : political and strategic issues (2000)
0.02
0.022141643 = product of:
0.06642493 = sum of:
0.06642493 = sum of:
0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018938582 = score(doc=4875,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=4875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4875)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The key political and strategic issues which needs to be addressed for the future development of the Australian subject gateways are: continued quality of content creation, integration of access to print and electronic resources, archiving and persistent identification, sustainability of services and service integration. These issues will be more effectively tackled internationally, and the Australian subject gateways are keen to work with international collaborators to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:41:16
-
Huvila, I.: Affective capitalism of knowing and the society of search engine (2016)
0.02
0.021915287 = product of:
0.06574586 = sum of:
0.06574586 = sum of:
0.030131098 = weight(_text_:of in 3246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030131098 = score(doc=3246,freq=36.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.43980673 = fieldWeight in 3246, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3246)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 3246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=3246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3246)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the affective premises and economics of the influence of search engines on knowing and informing in the contemporary society. Design/methodology/approach A conceptual discussion of the affective premises and framings of the capitalist economics of knowing is presented. Findings The main proposition of this text is that the exploitation of affects is entwined in the competing market and emancipatory discourses and counter-discourses both as intentional interventions, and perhaps even more significantly, as unintentional influences that shape the ways of knowing in the peripheries of the regime that shape cultural constellations of their own. Affective capitalism bounds and frames our ways of knowing in ways that are difficult to anticipate and read even from the context of the regime itself. Originality/value In the relatively extensive discussion on the role of affects in the contemporary capitalism, influence of affects on knowing and their relation to search engine use has received little explicit attention so far.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 68(2016) no.5, S.566-588
-
Rose, D.E.: Reconciling information-seeking behavior with search user interfaces for the Web (2006)
0.02
0.021661952 = product of:
0.06498586 = sum of:
0.06498586 = sum of:
0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0234353 = score(doc=5296,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- User interfaces of Web search engines reflect attributes of the underlying tools used to create them, rather than what we know about how people look for information. In this article, the author examines several characteristics of user search behavior: the variety of information-seeking goals, the cultural and situational context of search, and the iterative nature of the search task. An analysis of these characteristics suggests ways that interfaces can be redesigned to make searching more effective for users.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:58:06
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.797-799
-
Conhaim, W.W.: Search tools (1996)
0.02
0.02129588 = product of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=4738,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the 3 most popular searching tools for the WWW: InfoSeek, Yahoo and Lycos. Searching Internet directories can also be a useful search technique. Lists other searching engines. Points out a number of evaluations of these search engines published on the WWW. A number of search tools are available for specialized areas. Sites are available that enable parallel searching using several tools at once. Describes WWW pages with information about search engines
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:39:31
-
Fong, W.W.: Searching the World Wide Web (1996)
0.02
0.02129588 = product of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=6597,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 6597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=6597,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6597, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6597)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews the availability on the WWW, of search engines designed to organize various web information sources. Discusses the differences and similarities of each search engine and their advantages and disadvantages. Search engines included in the study were: AltaVista, CUI W3 Catalog, InfoSeek, Lycos, Magellan, Yahoo
- Source
- Journal of library and information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.15-36
-
Sieverts, E.: Slimmerds onder de zoekmachines (1998)
0.02
0.02129588 = product of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=2414,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 2414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=2414,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2414, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2414)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Web search engines generally use best match search techniques, rather than traditional Boolean operators. Precision in searching will depend on the numbers of selected terms appearing in a document and the inclusion of less-common words in the search string. Users are, therefore, recommended to enter as many words as possible. ExCite and WebCrawler lead users from a relevant document to other documents containing similar word patterns, while MusCat and EuroFerret suggest additional keywords for searching
- Date
- 29.12.1998 11:22:34
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Top of the class among the search engines
-
Berinstein, P.: Turning visual : image search engines on the Web (1998)
0.02
0.02129588 = product of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=3595,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Gives an overview of image search engines on the Web. They work by: looking for graphics files; looking for a caption; looking for Web sites whose titles indicate the presence of picturres on a certain subject; or employing human intervention. Describes the image search capabilities of: AltaVista; Amazing Picture Machine (Http://www.ncrtec.org/picture.htm); HotBot; ImageSurfer (http://ipix.yahoo.com); Lycos; Web Clip Art Search Engine and WebSEEK. The search engines employing human intervention provide the best results
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.37-38,40-42
-
Dempsey, L.: ¬The subject gateway : experiences and issues based on the emergence of the Resource Discovery Network (2000)
0.02
0.02129588 = product of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=628,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=628)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Charts the history and development of the UK's Resource Discovery Network, which brings together under a common business, technical and service framework a range of subject gateways and other services for the academic and research community. Considers its future relationship to other services, and position within the information ecology
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:36:13
-
Sandler, M.: Disruptive beneficence : the Google Print program and the future of libraries (2005)
0.02
0.02129588 = product of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.06388764 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=208,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047486346 = score(doc=208,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Libraries must learn to accommodate themselves to Google, and complement its mass digitization efforts with niche digitization of our own. We need to plan for what our activities and services will look like when our primary activity is no longer the storage and circulation of widely-available print materials, and once the printed book is no longer the only major vehicle for scholarly communication.
- Pages
- S.5-22
-
Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000)
0.02
0.021157425 = product of:
0.06347227 = sum of:
0.06347227 = sum of:
0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021921717 = score(doc=631,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041550554 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- 'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:37:55
