Search (312 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchoberflächen"
  1. Rogers, Y.: New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction (2003) 0.06
    0.062286716 = product of:
      0.09343007 = sum of:
        0.08208451 = weight(_text_:sociology in 4270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08208451 = score(doc=4270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043811057 = queryNorm
            0.26916912 = fieldWeight in 4270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4270)
        0.011345566 = product of:
          0.022691133 = sum of:
            0.022691133 = weight(_text_:of in 4270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022691133 = score(doc=4270,freq=60.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.33120972 = fieldWeight in 4270, product of:
                  7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
                    60.0 = termFreq=60.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    "Theory weary, theory leery, why can't I be theory cheery?" (Erickson, 2002, p. 269). The field of human-computer interaction (HCI) is rapidly expanding. Alongside the extensive technological developments that are taking place, a profusion of new theories, methods, and concerns has been imported into the field from a range of disciplines and contexts. An extensive critique of recent theoretical developments is presented here together with an overview of HCI practice. A consequence of bringing new theories into the field has been much insightful explication of HCI phenomena and also a broadening of the field's discourse. However, these theoretically based approaches have had limited impact an the practice of interaction design. This chapter discusses why this is so and suggests that different kinds of mechanisms are needed that will enable both designers and researchers to better articulate and theoretically ground the challenges facing them today. Human-computer interaction is bursting at the seams. Its mission, goals, and methods, well established in the '80s, have all greatly expanded to the point that "HCI is now effectively a boundless domain" (Barnard, May, Duke, & Duce, 2000, p. 221). Everything is in a state of flux: The theory driving research is changing, a flurry of new concepts is emerging, the domains and type of users being studied are diversifying, many of the ways of doing design are new, and much of what is being designed is significantly different. Although potentially much is to be gained from such rapid growth, the downside is an increasing lack of direction, structure, and coherence in the field. What was originally a bounded problem space with a clear focus and a small set of methods for designing computer systems that were easier and more efficient to use by a single user is now turning into a diffuse problem space with less clarity in terms of its objects of study, design foci, and investigative methods. Instead, aspirations of overcoming the Digital Divide, by providing universal accessibility, have become major concerns (e.g., Shneiderman, 2002a). The move toward greater openness in the field means that many more topics, areas, and approaches are now considered acceptable in the worlds of research and practice.
    A problem with allowing a field to expand eclectically is that it can easily lose coherence. No one really knows what its purpose is anymore or what criteria to use in assessing its contribution and value to both knowledge and practice. For example, among the many new approaches, ideas, methods, and goals now being proposed, how do we know which are acceptable, reliable, useful, and generalizable? Moreover, how do researchers and designers know which of the many tools and techniques to use when doing design and research? To be able to address these concerns, a young field in a state of flux (as is HCI) needs to take stock and begin to reflect an the changes that are happening. The purpose of this chapter is to assess and reflect an the role of theory in contemporary HCI and the extent to which it is used in design practice. Over the last ten years, a range of new theories has been imported into the field. A key question is whether such attempts have been productive in terms of "knowledge transfer." Here knowledge transfer means the translation of research findings (e.g., theory, empirical results, descriptive accounts, cognitive models) from one discipline (e.g., cognitive psychology, sociology) into another (e.g., human-computer interaction, computer supported cooperative work).
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 38(2004), S.87-144
  2. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.03
    0.033224124 = product of:
      0.09967237 = sum of:
        0.09967237 = sum of:
          0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01657126 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
          0.08310111 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08310111 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.367-430
  3. Poynder, R.: WinSPIRS from SilverPlatter (1994) 0.03
    0.030438973 = product of:
      0.091316916 = sum of:
        0.091316916 = sum of:
          0.020087399 = weight(_text_:of in 8113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020087399 = score(doc=8113,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 8113, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8113)
          0.07122952 = weight(_text_:22 in 8113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07122952 = score(doc=8113,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8113, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8113)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the new Windows search interface to SilverPlatter's CD-ROM database products. Introduces the functions of the software. Reports on the experiences of those involved in beta testing the product
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:32:22
  4. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.02
    0.02437083 = product of:
      0.07311249 = sum of:
        0.07311249 = sum of:
          0.014351131 = weight(_text_:of in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.014351131 = score(doc=5295,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.05876136 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05876136 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.792-796
  5. Vaughan, M.W.; Resnick, M.L.: Search user interfaces : best practices and future visions (2006) 0.02
    0.023731515 = product of:
      0.071194544 = sum of:
        0.071194544 = sum of:
          0.0118366135 = weight(_text_:of in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0118366135 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
          0.059357934 = weight(_text_:22 in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059357934 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:37:31
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.777-780
  6. Davis, L.: Designing a search user interface for a digital library (2006) 0.02
    0.022886775 = product of:
      0.06866033 = sum of:
        0.06866033 = sum of:
          0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021173978 = score(doc=5294,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=5294,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The author describes some of the challenges, decisions, and processes that affected the design and development of the search user interface for Version 2 of the Digital Library for Earth System Education (DLESE; www.dlese.org), released July 29, 2003. The DLESE is a community-led effort funded by the National Science Foundation and is part of the National Science Digital Library (NSDL).
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:48:54
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.788-791
  7. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.02
    0.022141643 = product of:
      0.06642493 = sum of:
        0.06642493 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  8. Lee, D.; Srivastava, S.; Vista, D.: Generating advanced query interfaces (1998) 0.02
    0.022141643 = product of:
      0.06642493 = sum of:
        0.06642493 = sum of:
          0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 3607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018938582 = score(doc=3607,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 3607, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3607)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=3607,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3607, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3607)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the design and implementation of an interface generator for constructing advanced visual query WWW interfaces that allow the specification of complex queries. The generated inerfaces share a consistent look and feel. The tool accepts as input a high-level specification of the interface and produces as output its implementation
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
  9. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.02
    0.021661952 = product of:
      0.06498586 = sum of:
        0.06498586 = sum of:
          0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0234353 = score(doc=6958,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  10. Rose, D.E.: Reconciling information-seeking behavior with search user interfaces for the Web (2006) 0.02
    0.021661952 = product of:
      0.06498586 = sum of:
        0.06498586 = sum of:
          0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0234353 = score(doc=5296,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    User interfaces of Web search engines reflect attributes of the underlying tools used to create them, rather than what we know about how people look for information. In this article, the author examines several characteristics of user search behavior: the variety of information-seeking goals, the cultural and situational context of search, and the iterative nature of the search task. An analysis of these characteristics suggests ways that interfaces can be redesigned to make searching more effective for users.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:58:06
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.797-799
  11. Dillon, A.; Vaughan, M.: "It's the journey and the destination" : shape and the emergent property of genre in evaluating digital documents (1997) 0.02
    0.021157425 = product of:
      0.06347227 = sum of:
        0.06347227 = sum of:
          0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021921717 = score(doc=2889,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Navigation is a limited metaphor for hypermedia and website use that potentially constraints our understanding of human-computer interaction. Traces the emergence of the navigation metaphor and the emprical analysis of navigation measures in usability evaluation before suggesting an alternative concept to consider: shape. The shape concept affords a richer analytic tool for considering humans' use of digital documents and invokes social level analysis of meaning that are shared among discourse communities who both produce and consume the information resources
    Date
    6. 2.1999 20:10:22
    Source
    New review of hypermedia and multimedia. 1997, no.3, S.91-106
  12. Mochel, K.: Search in the Web shopping environment (2006) 0.02
    0.020615373 = product of:
      0.06184612 = sum of:
        0.06184612 = sum of:
          0.020295564 = weight(_text_:of in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020295564 = score(doc=5301,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 5301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=5301,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5301, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5301)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The author presents a design case study of a search user interface for Web catalogs in the context of online shopping for consumer products such as clothing, furniture, and sporting goods. The case study provides a review of the user data for the user interface (UI), and the resulting redesign recommendations. Based on the case study and its user data, a set of common user requirements for searching in the context of online shopping is provided.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:23:19
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.819-824
  13. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.02
    0.020562192 = product of:
      0.061686575 = sum of:
        0.061686575 = product of:
          0.12337315 = sum of:
            0.12337315 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12337315 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22
  14. Barker, A.L.: DataStar Web : a comparison with 'classic' DataStar command language searching (1998) 0.02
    0.020292649 = product of:
      0.060877945 = sum of:
        0.060877945 = sum of:
          0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0133916 = score(doc=7691,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=7691,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Compares and contrasts online searching on DataStar using the 'classic' command language, with access via the more recent Web interface (DataStar Web). The search functionality of the 2 interfaces is not identical, although both use the same retrieval software and access the same databases. Many of the differences affect retrieval effectiveness and may trip up novice and experienced searchers alike
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.155-167
  15. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Searching behaviour and the evaluation of online catalogues (1991) 0.02
    0.020292649 = product of:
      0.060877945 = sum of:
        0.060877945 = sum of:
          0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0133916 = score(doc=2765,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Pages
    S.20-22
    Source
    OPACs and the user: Proc. of the 3rd Anglo-Nordic seminar, Apr. 90
  16. Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006) 0.02
    0.020292649 = product of:
      0.060877945 = sum of:
        0.060877945 = sum of:
          0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0133916 = score(doc=5299,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Usability evaluations and observations of users shopping at Amazon.com (http://www.amazon.com) revealed some interesting user behaviors. The mixed behavior patterns were leveraged to create an interface for an e-commerce product. The author describes some design practices for providing a scoped search interface for an e-commerce site.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:17:44
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.808-812
  17. Roto, V.: Search on mobile phones. (2006) 0.02
    0.020292649 = product of:
      0.060877945 = sum of:
        0.060877945 = sum of:
          0.0133916 = weight(_text_:of in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0133916 = score(doc=5304,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
          0.047486346 = weight(_text_:22 in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047486346 = score(doc=5304,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The search tools familiar from the personal computer are propagating to mobile devices. Are users willing to type keywords with the limited keypad of an ordinary mobile phone? How does mobile search differ from stationary search? The author found that users are surprisingly willing to use search also with the traditional phone keypad, and foresees a search revolution as mobile devices enable location-based search.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:35:39
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.834-837
  18. Allen, B.L.: Designing information systems for user abilities and tasks : an experimental study (1998) 0.02
    0.020072233 = product of:
      0.0602167 = sum of:
        0.0602167 = sum of:
          0.02460194 = weight(_text_:of in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02460194 = score(doc=2664,freq=24.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
                4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                  24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
          0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03561476 = score(doc=2664,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2664, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2664)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    With the many choices that can be built into information systems, it is possible to customize such systems for users, based on the tasks that users are accomplishing, on the personal characteristics of users, or a combination of these factors. Reports results of an experiment which detailed logging of use of experimental information systems and was used to determine the optimal configuration of these systems for each user. 4 experimental systems were specially designed and all used a single database of 668 bibliographic records. Tasks were varied, and the cognitive abilities of users were tested to assess one important personal characteristic. Results showed that it was possible to create an optimal configuration to match the cognitive abilities of users, but that it was more difficult to assess which configuration was the best match for specific tasks. The person in task interaction proved to be the least powerful indicator of design configurations. These results suggest that usable information systems can be created for users by careful analysis of the interaction of design features with personal characteristics such as cognitive abilities
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.139-153
  19. Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006) 0.02
    0.02002593 = product of:
      0.060077786 = sum of:
        0.060077786 = sum of:
          0.018527232 = weight(_text_:of in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018527232 = score(doc=5302,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:30:09
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.825-828
  20. Dorner, D.G.; Curtis, A.M.: ¬A comparative review of common user interface products (2004) 0.02
    0.019373938 = product of:
      0.058121815 = sum of:
        0.058121815 = sum of:
          0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01657126 = score(doc=2851,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
          0.041550554 = weight(_text_:22 in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041550554 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A common user interface replaces the multiple interfaces found among individual electronic library resources, reducing the time and effort spent by the user in both searching and learning to use a range of databases. Although the primary function of a common user interface is to simplify the search process, such products can be holistic solutions designed to address requirements other than searching, such as user authentication and site branding. This review provides a detailed summary of software currently on the market. The products reviewed were EnCompass, MetaLib, Find-It-All OneSearch, ZPORTAL, CPORTAL, InfoTrac Total Access, MetaFind, MuseSearch, SiteSearch, Single Search, Chameleon Gateway, and WebFeat.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.182-197

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 283
  • m 17
  • s 6
  • r 4
  • el 3
  • p 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications