-
Lemert, C.C.: Language, structure, and measurement : structuralist semiotics and sociology (1979)
0.36
0.3600958 = product of:
0.54014367 = sum of:
0.5306744 = weight(_text_:sociology in 6141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.5306744 = score(doc=6141,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
1.7401721 = fieldWeight in 6141, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6141)
0.009469291 = product of:
0.018938582 = sum of:
0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 6141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018938582 = score(doc=6141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 6141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6141)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- American journal of sociology. 84(1979), S.929-957
-
Pathak, L.P.: Sociology schedule in the UDC : filiatory structure, terminology, categorization and concept representation (1995)
0.27
0.26993322 = product of:
0.4048998 = sum of:
0.3446831 = weight(_text_:sociology in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3446831 = score(doc=2885,freq=12.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
1.1302749 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.0602167 = sum of:
0.02460194 = weight(_text_:of in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02460194 = score(doc=2885,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Attention is drawn to the inadequacies of the existing classification schemes as pointed out by individuals and groups concerned with classification research. The article is based on an earlier study by the author, which identified and arranged in a filiatory way the main concepts of sociology and determined their relative significance as headings in a classification scheme. The sociology schedule in the DDC was examined on the basis of 9 evaluation criteria, as e.g. arrangement of major categories, provision for main concepts, use of phrased headings instead of individual key terms, and scattering of related concepts in the schedule. It was found that a large number of the main concepts of sociology are either not represented in the schedule or mentioned in the scope note only along with the main headings. A table shows 100 main concepts of sociology arranged and classified within 10 major categories or sections, and their provision in the DDC. The study suggests that the DDC needs serious reconsideration with regard to the main headings/categories provided as class headings, terminology used for the concepts, the filiatory structure adopted, and the representation of the main concepts of sociology
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.148-158
-
Mulkay, M.J.: Sociology of the scientific research community (1977)
0.22
0.22441578 = product of:
0.33662367 = sum of:
0.32833803 = weight(_text_:sociology in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32833803 = score(doc=284,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
1.0766765 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
0.00828563 = product of:
0.01657126 = sum of:
0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01657126 = score(doc=284,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 284, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=284)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.21
0.20959115 = product of:
0.31438673 = sum of:
0.23452716 = weight(_text_:sociology in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23452716 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.76905465 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.079859555 = sum of:
0.020501617 = weight(_text_:of in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501617 = score(doc=613,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.059357934 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059357934 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Abschnitte zu: The origins of citation indexing in science - Citation analysis in sociology, history and philosophy of science - From ASIS to ASIST
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Stover, M.: Familiy studies electronic resources (1993)
0.19
0.1923564 = product of:
0.28853458 = sum of:
0.2814326 = weight(_text_:sociology in 6517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2814326 = score(doc=6517,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.9228656 = fieldWeight in 6517, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6517)
0.0071019684 = product of:
0.014203937 = sum of:
0.014203937 = weight(_text_:of in 6517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014203937 = score(doc=6517,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 6517, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6517)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes electronic sources of information on family studies which includes perspectives from psychology, sociology, and social work and other disciplines where emphasis is placed on the family system. Describes online databases, CD-ROM databases and Internet resources
-
Schneider, A.: ¬The Internet as an extended classroom (1998)
0.18
0.18394946 = product of:
0.27592418 = sum of:
0.2653372 = weight(_text_:sociology in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2653372 = score(doc=329,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.8700861 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.010586989 = product of:
0.021173978 = sum of:
0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021173978 = score(doc=329,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes the implementation and acceptance of an electronic syllabus on the WWW for teaching sociology. The greatest potential of a teaching home page on the Internet lies in a synergy effect of 3 domains: WWW pages serve as administrative tools, as powerful research instruments, and as a tool skill to prepare students for their careers in public or private institutions. Uses the empirical example of an electronic syllabus to illuminate potentials, problems and the acceptance of the Internet as an extended sociology classroom by students
-
Pathak, L.P.; Binwal, J.C.: Identification of main concepts used in sociology and their categorization (1994)
0.18
0.18191916 = product of:
0.27287874 = sum of:
0.26220936 = weight(_text_:sociology in 7548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26220936 = score(doc=7548,freq=10.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.8598293 = fieldWeight in 7548, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7548)
0.0106693795 = product of:
0.021338759 = sum of:
0.021338759 = weight(_text_:of in 7548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021338759 = score(doc=7548,freq=26.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.31146988 = fieldWeight in 7548, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7548)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports on the findings of a study conducted to identify the main concepts used in sociology according to their relative significance. A sample of 87 introductory textbooks of sociology was considered, chapter headings used in them were classified and 100 main concepts were identified. A scheme for their arrangement was suggested using 10 major categories. In order to compare the relative significance of each concept for use in the retrieval tools as headings, a proportion of a book used for a concept by all the authors in these books was added. This cumulative proportion has been termed the 'relative weight of a concept', which made it possible to arrange all the 100 concepts into three 'levels of significance categories'. Thus, 44 concepts have been identified as most significant concepts, 26 in the second level of significance, and 30 in the last category of relative significance, only for use as headings in the bibliographic information retrieval tools pertaining to sociology. The study concludes in that no bibliographic information storage and retrieval tool in the field of sociology can justify noninclusion as main headings, the most significant concepts identified, that appear in the first category of relative significance, as these seem to represent the core of the discipline
-
Hider, P.: Towards a sociology of KOS and more basic KO research (2020)
0.17
0.17033672 = product of:
0.25550508 = sum of:
0.2437278 = weight(_text_:sociology in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2437278 = score(doc=18,freq=6.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.79922515 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
0.011777283 = product of:
0.023554565 = sum of:
0.023554565 = weight(_text_:of in 18) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023554565 = score(doc=18,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 18, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=18)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- It is suggested that the knowledge organization (KO) field places greater emphasis on basic research that examines the sociology of KO systems (KOS) and the broader, environmental reasons for the development of both formal and informal KOS. This approach is contrasted with applied KO, which focuses on the practical construction or improvement of specific KOS. The preponderance of applied research in the field of KO is confirmed, at least within the document-centric strand more closely aligned with library and information science, through a survey of articles in the Knowledge Organization journal published between 2009 and 2018. The survey utilized the Frascati Manual definitions for basic and applied research, and referenced Tennis's classification of KO research (2008). There is considerable potential for building on the critical tradition of KO, with various areas ripe for further sociological investigation. A sociology of KOS could also be accommodated in the popular KO approach of domain analysis.
-
Alexander, F.: Assessing information taxonomies using epistemology and the sociology of science (2012)
0.17
0.16517393 = product of:
0.24776089 = sum of:
0.23452716 = weight(_text_:sociology in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23452716 = score(doc=397,freq=8.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.76905465 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
0.013233736 = product of:
0.026467472 = sum of:
0.026467472 = weight(_text_:of in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026467472 = score(doc=397,freq=40.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38633084 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
40.0 = termFreq=40.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper aims to summarise a literature review undertaken to determine whether or not information taxonomy work, as a specific activity within the broader field of knowledge organisation system construction, can usefully be compared to a process of scientific enquiry. The theories of objectivity and subjectivity proposed by Helen Longino are considered, to determine their relevance to taxonomists and classification theorists. Design/methodology/approach - The review assesses and synthesises relevant best practice and theoretical literature from information science, sociology of science, and related disciplines, including linguistics, epistemology, and psychology. Findings - Although requirements of objectivity in science and in taxonomy work differ significantly, the achievement of consensus within communities is similar. This warrants development of Longino's theories for application to taxonomy work. Research limitations/implications - The potentially relevant literature represents too vast and diverse a body of scholarship for comprehensive review of every area, so a synthetic interdisciplinary approach has been taken, highlighting aspects worthy of further investigation. Practical implications - Subjectivity and objectivity are deemed significant for information taxonomists, especially regarding usability and accessibility of systems, while the sociology of science provides frameworks that could be adapted to offer methods of assessing the subjectivity and objectivity of taxonomies. This suggests much potential for developing Longino's theories into a framework or set of heuristics for taxonomy practitioners. Originality/value - Current literature on taxonomy work, as distinct from classification, categorisation, and similar topics within the broader knowledge organisation field, is scant, and academic and interdisciplinary approaches scarce. Relating the sociology of science to information taxonomy work is a novel approach. By exposing this relationship, a starting point is provided for researchers who wish to develop understanding of these fields and theoretical understanding of taxonomies and professional best practice is enhanced.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 68(2012) no.5, S.725-743
-
Keshet, Y.: Classification systems in the light of sociology of knowledge (2011)
0.16
0.16495055 = product of:
0.24742581 = sum of:
0.23452716 = weight(_text_:sociology in 4493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23452716 = score(doc=4493,freq=8.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.76905465 = fieldWeight in 4493, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4493)
0.012898651 = product of:
0.025797302 = sum of:
0.025797302 = weight(_text_:of in 4493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025797302 = score(doc=4493,freq=38.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.37654874 = fieldWeight in 4493, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4493)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Classification is an important process in making sense of the world, and has a pronounced social dimension. This paper aims to compare folksonomy, a new social classification system currently being developed on the web, with conventional taxonomy in the light of theoretical sociological and anthropological approaches. The co-existence of these two types of classification system raises the questions: Will and should taxonomies be hybridized with folksonomies? What can each of these systems contribute to information-searching processes, and how can the sociology of knowledge provide an answer to these questions? This paper aims also to address these issues. Design/methodology/approach - This paper is situated at the meeting point of the sociology of knowledge, epistemology and information science and aims at examining systems of classification in the light of both classical theory and current late-modern sociological and anthropological approaches. Findings - Using theoretical approaches current in the sociology of science and knowledge, the paper envisages two divergent possible outcomes. Originality/value - While concentrating on classifications systems, this paper addresses the more general social issue of what we know and how it is known. The concept of hybrid knowledge is suggested in order to illuminate the epistemological basis of late-modern knowledge being constructed by hybridizing contradictory modern knowledge categories, such as the subjective with the objective and the social with the natural. Integrating tree-like taxonomies with folksonomies or, in other words, generating a naturalized structural order of objective relations with social, subjective classification systems, can create a vast range of hybrid knowledge.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 67(2011) no.1, S.144-158
-
Riviera, E.: Testing the strength of the normative approach in citation theory through relational bibliometrics : the case of Italian sociology (2015)
0.16
0.16399194 = product of:
0.2459879 = sum of:
0.23452716 = weight(_text_:sociology in 1854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23452716 = score(doc=1854,freq=8.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.76905465 = fieldWeight in 1854, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1854)
0.011460752 = product of:
0.022921504 = sum of:
0.022921504 = weight(_text_:of in 1854) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022921504 = score(doc=1854,freq=30.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 1854, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1854)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In scientometrics, citer behavior is traditionally investigated using one of two main approaches. According to the normative point of view, the behavior of scientists is regulated by norms that make the detection of citation patterns useful for the interpretation of bibliometric measures. According to the constructivist perspective, citer behavior is influenced by other factors linked to the social and/or psychological sphere that do not allow any statistical inferences that are useful for the purposes of interpretation. An intermediate position supports normative theories in describing citer behavior with respect to high citation frequencies and constructivist theories with respect to low citation counts. In this paper, this idea was tested in a case study of the Italian sociology community. Italian sociology is characterized by an unusual organization into three "political" or "ideological" camps, and belonging to one camp can be considered a potentially strong constructivist reason to cite. An all-author co-citation analysis was performed to map the structure of the Italian sociology community and look for evidence of three camps. We did not expect to find evidence of this configuration in the co-citation map. The map, in fact, included authors who obtained high citation counts that are supposedly produced by a normative-oriented behavior. The results confirmed this hypothesis and showed that the clusters seemed to be divided according to topic and not by camp. Relevant scientific works were cited by the members of the entire community regardless of their membership in any particular camp.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.6, S.1178-1188
-
Cronin, B.; Snyder, H.; Atkins, H.: Comparative citation rankings of authors in mongraphic and journal literature : a study of sociology (1997)
0.16
0.16351385 = product of:
0.24527077 = sum of:
0.23217005 = weight(_text_:sociology in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23217005 = score(doc=4709,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.7613253 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
0.01310073 = product of:
0.02620146 = sum of:
0.02620146 = weight(_text_:of in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02620146 = score(doc=4709,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes a study which examined the scholarly literature of sociology. Tens of thousands of references from monographs and leading academic journals were analyzed. The relative rankings of authors who were highly cited in the monographic literature did not change in the journal literature of the same period. However, there was only a small overlap between the most highly cited authors based on the journal sample and those based on the monograph sample. The lack of correlation suggests that there may be 2 distinct populations of highly cited authors
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 53(1997) no.3, S.263-273
-
Gantman, E.R.; Dabós, M.P.: Research output and impact of the fields of management, economics, and sociology in Spain and France : an analysis using Google Scholar and Scopus (2018)
0.16
0.16318531 = product of:
0.24477796 = sum of:
0.23452716 = weight(_text_:sociology in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23452716 = score(doc=4454,freq=8.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.76905465 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
0.010250809 = product of:
0.020501617 = sum of:
0.020501617 = weight(_text_:of in 4454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020501617 = score(doc=4454,freq=24.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 4454, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4454)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Because of a greater coverage of documentary sources in many languages that is greater than that of traditional bibliographic databases, Google Scholar is an ideal tool for examining the social sciences in non-Anglophone countries. We have therefore used it to study the scholarly output and impact of three scientific disciplines, management, economics, and sociology, in Spain and France, comparing some of the results with those retrieved with Scopus. Our findings show that scientific articles are the predominant form of scholarly communication in Google Scholar for our selected fields and countries. In addition, our results indicate that in Google Scholar the vernacular languages of each country are more used than English in all cases, but economics in France. The opposite occurs in Scopus, except for the case of sociology articles in France We also show that books receive on average more citations than other published documents in Google Scholar. Finally, we demonstrate that publishing in English is associated with greater scholarly impact, except for the case of France in Google Scholar for articles in sociology and books in the three fields.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.8, S.1054-1066
-
Peritz, B.C.: On the informativeness of titles (1984)
0.16
0.1625918 = product of:
0.2438877 = sum of:
0.23217005 = weight(_text_:sociology in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23217005 = score(doc=2636,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.7613253 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
0.01171765 = product of:
0.0234353 = sum of:
0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0234353 = score(doc=2636,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The frequency of non-informative titles of journal articles was assessed for two fields: library and information science and sociology. The percentage of non informative titles was 21% in the formaer and 15% in the latter. In both fields, the non-informative titles, were concentratein only a few journals. The non-informative titles in library science were derived mainly from non-research journals. IN sociology the reasons for non-informative titles may be more complex; some of these journals are highly cited. For the improvement of retrievaleffiency the adoption of a policy encouraging informative titles (as in journals of chemistry) is recommended.
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.15
0.15452126 = product of:
0.23178187 = sum of:
0.22290441 = product of:
0.44580883 = sum of:
0.17395894 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17395894 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37143064 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.27184987 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27184987 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.46432164 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.008877459 = product of:
0.017754918 = sum of:
0.017754918 = weight(_text_:of in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017754918 = score(doc=692,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Rha, E.Y.; Belkin, N.: Exploring social aspects of task perception using cognitive sociology : a social cognitive perspective (2020)
0.14
0.14342903 = product of:
0.21514353 = sum of:
0.16583575 = weight(_text_:sociology in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16583575 = score(doc=5973,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5438038 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.04930777 = sum of:
0.019628802 = weight(_text_:of in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019628802 = score(doc=5973,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.029678967 = weight(_text_:22 in 5973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029678967 = score(doc=5973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5973)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore effects of individuals' social context on their perception of a task, for better understanding of social aspects of task-based information seeking behavior. Design/methodology/approach This study took a qualitative case approach and conducted semi-structured one-on-one interviews with 12 participants. A cross-context comparative approach was chosen to identify effects of the social contexts on individuals. For comparative analysis, the research population was tenured faculty members in two different disciplines, natural sciences and humanities. The interview data were analyzed and coded using NVivo12 through an open coding process. Findings The results demonstrate that the same task type is differently perceived by individuals in different social contexts. Reasons for the different perceptions in the different contexts are associated with social factors of the disciplines, specifically social norms and practices. Originality/value This study uses a novel theoretical framework, cognitive sociology, to examine social aspects of human perception in relation to task-based information seeking behavior, which has been little understood theoretically and empirically in the field of information science.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.4, S.525-543
-
Sauperl, A.; Klasinc, J.; Luzar, S.: Components of abstracts : logical structure of scholarly abstracts in pharmacology, sociology, and linguistics and literature (2008)
0.14
0.14304484 = product of:
0.21456726 = sum of:
0.20310651 = weight(_text_:sociology in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20310651 = score(doc=1961,freq=6.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.666021 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.011460752 = product of:
0.022921504 = sum of:
0.022921504 = weight(_text_:of in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022921504 = score(doc=1961,freq=30.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The international standard ISO 214:1976 defines an abstract as "an abbreviated, accurate representation of the contents of a document" (p. 1) that should "enable readers to identify the basic content of a document quickly and accurately to determine relevance" (p. 1). It also should be useful in computerized searching. The ISO standard suggests including the following elements: purpose, methods, results, and conclusions. Researchers have often challenged this structure and found that different disciplines and cultures prefer different information content. These claims are partially supported by the findings of our research into the structure of pharmacology, sociology, and Slovenian language and literature abstracts of papers published in international and Slovenian scientific periodicals. The three disciplines have different information content. Slovenian pharmacology abstracts differ in content from those in international periodicals while the differences between international and Slovenian abstracts are small in sociology. In the field of Slovenian language and literature, only domestic abstracts were studied. The identified differences can in part be attributed to the disciplines, but also to the different role of journals and papers in the professional society and to differences in perception of the role of abstracts. The findings raise questions about the structure of abstracts required by some publishers of international journals.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1420-1432
-
Veinot, T.C.; Williams, K.: Following the "community" thread from sociology to information behavior and informatics : uncovering theoretical continuities and research opportunities (2012)
0.14
0.13846734 = product of:
0.207701 = sum of:
0.19900289 = weight(_text_:sociology in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19900289 = score(doc=234,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.6525645 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
0.008698098 = product of:
0.017396197 = sum of:
0.017396197 = weight(_text_:of in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017396197 = score(doc=234,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The authors review five paradigms from the discipline of community sociology (functionalism, evolution, conflict, interactionism, and exchange) to assess their potential utility for understanding everyday life information behavior and technology use. Their analysis considers the ways in which each paradigm defines the concepts of community, information, and technology. It also explores the insights offered by each paradigm regarding relationships between community and both information and technology. Accordingly, the authors highlight the ways in which existing information behavior and informatics scholarship draws from similar conceptual roots. Key insights drawn from this research, as well as remaining gaps and research questions, are examined. Additionally, they consider the limitations of each approach. The authors conclude by arguing for the value of a vigorous research program regarding information behavior and technology use in communities, particularly that which takes the community as the central unit of analysis. They consider key questions that could drive such a research program, as well as potentially fruitful conceptual and methodological approaches for this endeavor.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.847-864
-
Sonnenwald, D.H.: Evolving perspectives of human information behaviour : contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons (1999)
0.13
0.13325709 = product of:
0.19988562 = sum of:
0.1407163 = weight(_text_:sociology in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1407163 = score(doc=293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.4614328 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
0.059169322 = sum of:
0.023554565 = weight(_text_:of in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023554565 = score(doc=293,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an evolving framework for human information behaviour, including information exploration, seeking, filtering, use and dissemination. It is based on empirical studies of human information behaviour in a variety of settings (Iivonen & Sonnenwald, 1998; Sonnenwald, 1993, 1995, 1996) and theories from a variety of research traditions, including information science, communication, sociology and psychology that inform our understanding of human information behaviour. I begin formulating the framework by discussing fundamental concepts, such as context, situation and social networks. Building on these concepts, I propose a series of propositions that strive to elucidate the framework. Key ideas in the framework include the introduction of the role of social networks in information exploration, and the concept of an `information horizon' in which we can act to explore information.
- Date
- 22. 3.2002 9:46:09
- Source
- Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
-
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.; Warner, J.: ¬The role of monographs in scholarly communications : an empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics (1996)
0.13
0.1328128 = product of:
0.1992192 = sum of:
0.18762173 = weight(_text_:sociology in 6875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18762173 = score(doc=6875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 6875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6875)
0.011597466 = product of:
0.023194931 = sum of:
0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 6875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023194931 = score(doc=6875,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6875, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6875)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the transmission of ideas across time in disciplines selected from the humanities and social sciences. Citation aanalysis is used to trace the diffusion of ideas as they are embodied in monographic publications. The study is part of a developing research programme and is intended to establish a framework to inform future developments
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 52(1996) no.4, S.389-404
