Search (26 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × author_ss:"Lancaster, F.W."
  1. Lancaster, F.W.; Li, J.: ¬The law of constant accessibility of information (1988/89) 0.00
    0.0047837105 = product of:
      0.014351131 = sum of:
        0.014351131 = product of:
          0.028702263 = sum of:
            0.028702263 = weight(_text_:of in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028702263 = score(doc=1565,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 15(1988/89), S.24-25
  2. Lancaster, F.W.: From custodian to knowledge engineer : the evolution of librarianship as a profession (1995) 0.00
    0.0045800544 = product of:
      0.013740162 = sum of:
        0.013740162 = product of:
          0.027480325 = sum of:
            0.027480325 = weight(_text_:of in 3058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027480325 = score(doc=3058,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 3058, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3058)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the monastic library of the Middle Ages, the librarian was essentially a curator, a preserver of collections. For most of history libarians were little more than custodians. The idea of a librarian as a provider of services rather than a collector or preserver of materials, did not emerge until late in the 19th century. Computer and telecommunications technologies have revolutionized the library and greatly expanded the horizons of the librarian. Discusses the ways in which technology has affected the library profession and discusses the role of the librarian in the future. The librarian will increasingly become an information intermediary or information consultant and some will be knowledge engineers involved in the design and construction of information systems and in electronic publishing
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 1(1995) no.4, S.3-8
  3. Lancaster, F.W.; Gillespie, C.J.: Design and evaluation of information systems (1970) 0.00
    0.004463867 = product of:
      0.0133916 = sum of:
        0.0133916 = product of:
          0.0267832 = sum of:
            0.0267832 = weight(_text_:of in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0267832 = score(doc=243,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 5(1970), S.33-70
  4. Lancaster, F.W.: Libraries in the year 2001 (1993) 0.00
    0.00436691 = product of:
      0.01310073 = sum of:
        0.01310073 = product of:
          0.02620146 = sum of:
            0.02620146 = weight(_text_:of in 7599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02620146 = score(doc=7599,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 7599, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the trend away from a paper based society and towards an electronic society: with the advent of computers, electronic mail, computer conferencing, electronic invisible colleges, and the application of computers to libraries and information networks, and to publishing, with the production of electronic media. Forecasts the advent of the electronic library and the electronic librarian, the decline in the use of present day libraries, technical and library services, and the enhanced and extended role of librarians in the new situation. Predicts the eventual demise of the traditional library with the exception of non research libraries but the enhanced value of the librarians as an information specialist
    Source
    Herald of library science. 32(1993) nos.3/4, S.163-170
  5. Lancaster, F.W.: Networked electronic publishing of the results of scholarly research (1995) 0.00
    0.00436691 = product of:
      0.01310073 = sum of:
        0.01310073 = product of:
          0.02620146 = sum of:
            0.02620146 = weight(_text_:of in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02620146 = score(doc=1675,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A review of developments in electronic publishing over the last 25 years is followed by a report on a survey conducted, with directors of university libraries and other academic administrators, to determine attitudes toward a networked electronic approach to the publishing of research articles. A major conclusion is that academic administrators do not now consider the academic community well equipped to undertake an enterprise of this kind and would not give it high priority in the allocation of university resources
    Series
    Publications of Essen University Library; 18
    Source
    Information superhighway: the role of librarians, information scientists, and intermediaries. Festschrift in honor of Frederick Wilfred Lancaster. 17th International Essen Symposium, 24.-27.10.1994. Ed. A.H. Helal et al
  6. Lancaster, F.W.; Ulvila, J.W.; Humphrey, S.M.; Smith, L.C.; Allen, B.; Herner, S.: Evaluation of interactive knowledge-based systems : overview and design for empirical testing (1996) 0.00
    0.00436691 = product of:
      0.01310073 = sum of:
        0.01310073 = product of:
          0.02620146 = sum of:
            0.02620146 = weight(_text_:of in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02620146 = score(doc=3000,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    An overview of levels and approaches in the evalution of knowledge-based systems is presented. There is a need for empirical studies using objective criteria in advance of completing the technical evaluation of such systems. A methodology for this type of evaluation developed for a particular knowledge-based indexing system is presented. It is suggested that the proposed study may serve as a model for the design of any evaluation in which the results of existing intellectual procedures are compared with results achieved when these procedures are aided by use of an appropriate expert system
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.57-69
  7. Qin, J.; Lancaster, F.W.; Allen, B.: Types and levels of collaboration in interdisciplinary research in the sciences (1997) 0.00
    0.00436691 = product of:
      0.01310073 = sum of:
        0.01310073 = product of:
          0.02620146 = sum of:
            0.02620146 = weight(_text_:of in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02620146 = score(doc=1593,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a study which collected a sample of 846 scientific research papers published in 1992 and tests 3 hypotheses on the relationship between research collaboration and interdisciplinarity. Results showed significant differences in degrees of interdisciplinarity among different levels of collaboration and among different disciplines. Collaboration contributed significantly to the degree of interdisciplinarity in some disciplines and not in others. Uses a survey that asked authors about their form of collaboration, channels of communication and use of information. The survey provides some qualitative explanation for the bibliometrics findings. Discusses the perspective of scientist-scientist interaction, scientist-information interaction and information-information interaction
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.10, S.893-916
  8. Lancaster, F.W.: Evaluation of expert systems in information service applications (1994) 0.00
    0.0039058835 = product of:
      0.01171765 = sum of:
        0.01171765 = product of:
          0.0234353 = sum of:
            0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 8905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0234353 = score(doc=8905,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 8905, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    The economics of information. ASIS'94. Proc. 57th ASIS Annual Meeting, Alexandria, VA, Oct. 17-20, 1994. Ed.: B. Maxian
  9. Krooks, D.A.; Lancaster, F.W.: ¬The evolution of guidelines for thesaurus construction (1993) 0.00
    0.003865822 = product of:
      0.011597466 = sum of:
        0.011597466 = product of:
          0.023194931 = sum of:
            0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 7128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023194931 = score(doc=7128,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 7128, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This piece of research traces the evolution of guidelines and principles for the construction of information retrieval thesauri from 1959 to 1993. We conclude that the majority of the basic problems of thesaurus construction has already been identified and solved by 1967 and that Eugene Wall, more than any other individual, has profoundly influenced the entire development in this area
  10. Lancaster, F.W.; Connell, T.H.; Bishop, N.; McCowan, S.: Identifying barriers to effective subject access in library catalogs (1991) 0.00
    0.0036536194 = product of:
      0.010960858 = sum of:
        0.010960858 = product of:
          0.021921717 = sum of:
            0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 2259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021921717 = score(doc=2259,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2259, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2259)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    51 subject searches were performed in an online catalog containing about 4,5 million records. Their success was judges in terms of lists of items, known to be relevant to the various topics, compiled by subject specialists (faculty members or authors of articles in specialized encyclopedias). Many of the items known to be relevant were not retrieved, even in very broad searches that sometimes retrieved several hundred records, and very little could be done to make them retrievable within the constraints of present cataloging practice. Librarians should recognize that library catalogs, as now implemented, offer only the most primitive of subject access and should seek to develop different types of subject access tools. - Vgl auch Letter (B.H. Weinberg) in: LTRS 36(1992) S.123-124.
  11. Lancaster, F.W.: On the need for role indicators in postcoordinate retrieval systems (1968) 0.00
    0.0035289964 = product of:
      0.010586989 = sum of:
        0.010586989 = product of:
          0.021173978 = sum of:
            0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 8948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021173978 = score(doc=8948,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 8948, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8948)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of the findings of various evaluations of role indicators is given. In general, the results have been negative in that little real evidence for the value of the devices has been presented. The need for roles in various subject fields and in very large systems, is discussed. They can only by justified on purely ecomic grounds - if the added cost involved in their use is offset by substantial reduction in the amount of output screening that must be done by the end user
  12. Lancaster, F.W.: Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system (1985) 0.00
    0.0034396404 = product of:
      0.010318921 = sum of:
        0.010318921 = product of:
          0.020637842 = sum of:
            0.020637842 = weight(_text_:of in 3649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020637842 = score(doc=3649,freq=38.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.30123898 = fieldWeight in 3649, product of:
                  6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                    38.0 = termFreq=38.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    F. W. Lancaster is known for his writing an the state of the art in librarylinformation science. His skill in identifying significant contributions and synthesizing literature in fields as diverse as online systems, vocabulary control, measurement and evaluation, and the paperless society have earned him esteem as a chronicler of information science. Equally deserving of repute is his own contribution to research in the discipline-his evaluation of the MEDLARS operating system. The MEDLARS study is notable for several reasons. It was the first large-scale application of retrieval experiment methodology to the evaluation of an actual operating system. As such, problems had to be faced that do not arise in laboratory-like conditions. One example is the problem of recall: how to determine, for a very large and dynamic database, the number of documents relevant to a given search request. By solving this problem and others attendant upon transferring an experimental methodology to the real world, Lancaster created a constructive procedure that could be used to improve the design and functioning of retrieval systems. The MEDLARS study is notable also for its contribution to our understanding of what constitutes a good index language and good indexing. The ideal retrieval system would be one that retrieves all and only relevant documents. The failures that occur in real operating systems, when a relevant document is not retrieved (a recall failure) or an irrelevant document is retrieved (a precision failure), can be analysed to assess the impact of various factors an the performance of the system. This is exactly what Lancaster did. He found both the MEDLARS indexing and the McSH index language to be significant factors affecting retrieval performance. The indexing, primarily because it was insufficiently exhaustive, explained a large number of recall failures. The index language, largely because of its insufficient specificity, accounted for a large number of precision failures. The purpose of identifying factors responsible for a system's failures is ultimately to improve the system. Unlike many user studies, the MEDLARS evaluation yielded recommendations that were eventually implemented.* Indexing exhaustivity was increased and the McSH index language was enriched with more specific terms and a larger entry vocabulary.
    Footnote
    Original in: Journal of the American Medical Association 207(1969) S.114-120.
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
  13. Lancaster, F.W.: Electronic publishing (1989) 0.00
    0.0034169364 = product of:
      0.010250809 = sum of:
        0.010250809 = product of:
          0.020501617 = sum of:
            0.020501617 = weight(_text_:of in 2881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020501617 = score(doc=2881,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 2881, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2881)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Contribution to an issue on the impact of technological change on libraries and ways in which librarians are applying technology to their collections, services to users and the management of their libraries. Traces the evolution of electronic publishing from the early 60s to the present. Pays particular attention to computer conferencing, and hypermedia.
  14. Lancaster, F.W.: ¬The evolution of electronic publishing (1995) 0.00
    0.0033478998 = product of:
      0.010043699 = sum of:
        0.010043699 = product of:
          0.020087399 = sum of:
            0.020087399 = weight(_text_:of in 2446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020087399 = score(doc=2446,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2446, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2446)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Summarizes the development of electronic publishing since the early 60s, when computers were used merely to produce conventional printed products, to the present move toward networked scholarly publishing
  15. Lancaster, F.W.: Evaluation in the context of the digital library (1996) 0.00
    0.0031564306 = product of:
      0.009469291 = sum of:
        0.009469291 = product of:
          0.018938582 = sum of:
            0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 7886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018938582 = score(doc=7886,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 7886, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7886)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Digital libraries are sufficiently differnt from more traditional print on paper libraries to present a new set of parameters relating to the evaluation of its use. Discusses evaluation criteria, problems and methods relevant to the digital library environment
    Source
    Towards a worldwide library: a ten year forecast. Proceedings of the 19th International Essen Symposium, 23-26 Sept 1996. Ed.: A.H. Helal u. J.W. Weiss
  16. Lancaster, F.W.; Elliker, C.; Connell, T.H.: Subject analysis (1989) 0.00
    0.0031564306 = product of:
      0.009469291 = sum of:
        0.009469291 = product of:
          0.018938582 = sum of:
            0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018938582 = score(doc=338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 24(1989), S.35-84
  17. Lancaster, F.W.: Artificial intelligence, expert systems and the digital library (1996) 0.00
    0.0031564306 = product of:
      0.009469291 = sum of:
        0.009469291 = product of:
          0.018938582 = sum of:
            0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018938582 = score(doc=839,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 839, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=839)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Based partly on chapters in a forthcoming book 'Technology and Management in Library and Information Sciences' by F.W. Lancaster and B. Sandore. Some inportant functions of a research library operating largely in a networked digital environment are illustrated. The ability of artificial intelligence and expert system technologies to contribute to these functions is discussed, in the light of a report from the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, as well as experiences with these technologies in the library world and elsewhere
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 3(1996) no.2, S.3-14
  18. Lancaster, F.W.: Searching databases on CD-ROM : comparison of the results of end-user searching with results from two modes of searching by skilled intermediaries (1994) 0.00
    0.0031316737 = product of:
      0.009395021 = sum of:
        0.009395021 = product of:
          0.018790042 = sum of:
            0.018790042 = weight(_text_:of in 8372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018790042 = score(doc=8372,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 8372, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8372)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The results of 35 searches performed by users (end users) of an academic library (Illinois Stae University, Milner Library) in the ERIC databases on CD-ROM were compared with the results for the same topics achieved by an experienced education librarian and by a team of librarians. Recall ratios, precision ratios, and novelty ratios were calculated. Results show that the users, all faculty members or graduate students, found only about a third of the really important items. Suggests that library users are frequently misled into thinking that CD-ROM databases are easy to use and that the 'technology' guarantees satisfactory results.
  19. Elzy, C.; Nourie, A.; Lancaster, F.W.; Joseph, K.M.: Evaluating reference service in a large academic library (1991) 0.00
    0.0030878722 = product of:
      0.009263616 = sum of:
        0.009263616 = product of:
          0.018527232 = sum of:
            0.018527232 = weight(_text_:of in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018527232 = score(doc=4015,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an unobtrusive study of the ability of professional librarians to deal with factual questions conducted at the Milner Library, Illinois State University. Standards were recruited to pose questions for which answers were known, to 19 librarians in 5 departments. In all, 190 test incidents (10 questions for each of the 19 librarians) were used. Librarians were evaluated on the accuracy of the responses given and on their responsiveness and helpfulness, as judged by the student proxies. Describes the methods used in the study, including the accuracy and attitude scales developed, presents the major results, and makes suggestions on the follow-up action that seems appropriate after a study of this kind has been performed
  20. Lancaster, F.W.: Trends in subject indexing from 1957 to 2000 (1980) 0.00
    0.0030878722 = product of:
      0.009263616 = sum of:
        0.009263616 = product of:
          0.018527232 = sum of:
            0.018527232 = weight(_text_:of in 208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018527232 = score(doc=208,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 208, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=208)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Computer have been used in 2 areas of printed index production: to sort entries and fromat printed indexes, and to derive a series of index entries from a minimum intellectual input. Computer indexing enables more indexing terms to be used as well as weighted terms, links and roles. Interest in automatic indexing peaked in the mid-1960s and has since declined. Interest in machine-aided indexing concentrates on using the computer for on-line display or for indexing by extraction. Computers have also made possible the implementation of retrieval systems without indexing-free text systems. Considers future prospects and needs
    Source
    New trends in documentation and information: proceedings of the 39th FID Congress, University of Edinburgh, 25-28 Sept 1978. Ed.: P.J. Taylor