-
Veinot, T.C.; Williams, K.: Following the "community" thread from sociology to information behavior and informatics : uncovering theoretical continuities and research opportunities (2012)
0.14
0.13846734 = product of:
0.207701 = sum of:
0.19900289 = weight(_text_:sociology in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19900289 = score(doc=234,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.6525645 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
0.008698098 = product of:
0.017396197 = sum of:
0.017396197 = weight(_text_:of in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017396197 = score(doc=234,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The authors review five paradigms from the discipline of community sociology (functionalism, evolution, conflict, interactionism, and exchange) to assess their potential utility for understanding everyday life information behavior and technology use. Their analysis considers the ways in which each paradigm defines the concepts of community, information, and technology. It also explores the insights offered by each paradigm regarding relationships between community and both information and technology. Accordingly, the authors highlight the ways in which existing information behavior and informatics scholarship draws from similar conceptual roots. Key insights drawn from this research, as well as remaining gaps and research questions, are examined. Additionally, they consider the limitations of each approach. The authors conclude by arguing for the value of a vigorous research program regarding information behavior and technology use in communities, particularly that which takes the community as the central unit of analysis. They consider key questions that could drive such a research program, as well as potentially fruitful conceptual and methodological approaches for this endeavor.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.847-864
-
Berger, P.L.; Luckmann, Th.: ¬Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit : eine Theorie der Wissenssoziologie (1992)
0.14
0.13740325 = product of:
0.20610486 = sum of:
0.19900289 = weight(_text_:sociology in 573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19900289 = score(doc=573,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.6525645 = fieldWeight in 573, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=573)
0.0071019684 = product of:
0.014203937 = sum of:
0.014203937 = weight(_text_:of in 573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014203937 = score(doc=573,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 573, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=573)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: Siebert, H.: Sozialkonstruktivismus: Gesellschaft als Konstruktion. In: Journal of social science education. 3(2004) no.2, S.95-103.
- Footnote
- Originaltitel: The social construction of reality (1966).
- LCSH
- Knowledge, Sociology of
- Subject
- Knowledge, Sociology of
-
Degele, N.: Informiertes Wissen : Eine Wissenssoziologie der computerisierten Gesellschaft (2000)
0.14
0.1360165 = product of:
0.20402475 = sum of:
0.19900289 = weight(_text_:sociology in 3986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19900289 = score(doc=3986,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.6525645 = fieldWeight in 3986, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3986)
0.0050218496 = product of:
0.010043699 = sum of:
0.010043699 = weight(_text_:of in 3986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010043699 = score(doc=3986,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.14660224 = fieldWeight in 3986, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3986)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- LCSH
- Knowledge, Sociology of
- Subject
- Knowledge, Sociology of
-
Kuronen, T.: Ranganathanin lait ja virtuaalikirjasto (1996)
0.13
0.13343228 = product of:
0.20014842 = sum of:
0.18762173 = weight(_text_:sociology in 6704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18762173 = score(doc=6704,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 6704, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6704)
0.012526695 = product of:
0.02505339 = sum of:
0.02505339 = weight(_text_:of in 6704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02505339 = score(doc=6704,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 6704, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6704)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Evaluates the potential of the electronic library (virtual library) to provide information for the public in light of Ranganathan's five laws of library science. Rephrases certain laws in the context of electronic information resources and points to opportunities to make additions to the laws in light of news services and the Internet
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: The five laws of Ranganathan and the virtual library
- Imprint
- Tampere : Oulu University, Department of Information Studies and Sociology
-
Sonnenwald, D.H.: Evolving perspectives of human information behaviour : contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons (1999)
0.13
0.13325709 = product of:
0.19988562 = sum of:
0.1407163 = weight(_text_:sociology in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1407163 = score(doc=293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.4614328 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
0.059169322 = sum of:
0.023554565 = weight(_text_:of in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023554565 = score(doc=293,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
0.03561476 = weight(_text_:22 in 293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03561476 = score(doc=293,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 293, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=293)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an evolving framework for human information behaviour, including information exploration, seeking, filtering, use and dissemination. It is based on empirical studies of human information behaviour in a variety of settings (Iivonen & Sonnenwald, 1998; Sonnenwald, 1993, 1995, 1996) and theories from a variety of research traditions, including information science, communication, sociology and psychology that inform our understanding of human information behaviour. I begin formulating the framework by discussing fundamental concepts, such as context, situation and social networks. Building on these concepts, I propose a series of propositions that strive to elucidate the framework. Key ideas in the framework include the introduction of the role of social networks in information exploration, and the concept of an `information horizon' in which we can act to explore information.
- Date
- 22. 3.2002 9:46:09
- Source
- Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Research in Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts, 13-15 August 1998, Sheffield, UK. Ed. by D.K. Wilson u. D.K. Allen
-
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.; Warner, J.: ¬The role of monographs in scholarly communications : an empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics (1996)
0.13
0.1328128 = product of:
0.1992192 = sum of:
0.18762173 = weight(_text_:sociology in 6875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18762173 = score(doc=6875,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 6875, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6875)
0.011597466 = product of:
0.023194931 = sum of:
0.023194931 = weight(_text_:of in 6875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023194931 = score(doc=6875,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 6875, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6875)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines the transmission of ideas across time in disciplines selected from the humanities and social sciences. Citation aanalysis is used to trace the diffusion of ideas as they are embodied in monographic publications. The study is part of a developing research programme and is intended to establish a framework to inform future developments
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 52(1996) no.4, S.389-404
-
Marco, J.G.: Hacia un modelo de intervencion en los procesos de transmision del conocimiento (1995)
0.13
0.13213915 = product of:
0.19820872 = sum of:
0.18762173 = weight(_text_:sociology in 6679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18762173 = score(doc=6679,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 6679, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6679)
0.010586989 = product of:
0.021173978 = sum of:
0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 6679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021173978 = score(doc=6679,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 6679, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6679)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Knowledge organisation is an interdisciplinary subject drawing from the fields of psychology, linguistics, economy, sociology, information science and computing. Examines the need for controlling the transfer of knowledge, discussing knowledge acquisition and representation, the role of the information scientist and the practical work of information professionals
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Towards a model of intervention in knowledge transfer processes
-
Smith, B.A.; Hesse-Biber, S.: Users' experiences with qualitative data analysis software : neither Frankenstein's monster nor muse (1996)
0.13
0.13213915 = product of:
0.19820872 = sum of:
0.18762173 = weight(_text_:sociology in 7482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18762173 = score(doc=7482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 7482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7482)
0.010586989 = product of:
0.021173978 = sum of:
0.021173978 = weight(_text_:of in 7482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021173978 = score(doc=7482,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 7482, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7482)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Increasing use of qualitative data analysis software might interfere with both the art and science of qualitative research. Analysis of interviews with 12 qualitative researcherchers in sociology and in organizational behaviour show ehat these fears are exaggerated. Users of qualitative data analysis software in most cases use the computer as an organizational, time saving tool and take special care to maintain close relationships with both the data and the respondents. It is unclear whether or not the amount of time and affort saved by the computer enhance research activity
-
¬The study of information : interdisciplinary messages (1984)
0.13
0.13139401 = product of:
0.19709101 = sum of:
0.18762173 = weight(_text_:sociology in 8953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18762173 = score(doc=8953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 8953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8953)
0.009469291 = product of:
0.018938582 = sum of:
0.018938582 = weight(_text_:of in 8953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018938582 = score(doc=8953,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 8953, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8953)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Content
- Information science; its roots and relations as viewed from the perspective of cognitive science; informatics (computer and information science), its ideology, methodology, and sociology; intellectual issues in the history of artificial intelligence; linguistcs and its relations to other disciplines; library and information sciences; disciplinary differentiation, competition, and convergence; cybernetics; thirty years of information theory; on system theory and its relevance to problems in information science; system theory, knowledge and the social sciences
-
Rees-Potter, L.K.: Dynamic thesaural systems : a bibliometric study of terminological and conceptual change in sociology and economics with application to the design of dynamic thesaural systems (1989)
0.13
0.13054825 = product of:
0.19582237 = sum of:
0.18762173 = weight(_text_:sociology in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18762173 = score(doc=5059,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
0.008200646 = product of:
0.016401293 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 5059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=5059,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 5059, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5059)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Thesauri have been used in the library and information science field to provide a standard descriptor language for indexers or searchers to use in an informations storage and retrieval system. One difficulty has been the maintenance and updating of thesauri since terms used to describe concepts change over time and vary between users. This study investigates a mechanism by which thesauri can be updated and maintained using citation, co-citation analysis and citation context analysis.
-
Cheng, W.-N.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Information and argument structures in Sociology research abstracts (2018)
0.13
0.13054825 = product of:
0.19582237 = sum of:
0.18762173 = weight(_text_:sociology in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18762173 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.61524373 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.008200646 = product of:
0.016401293 = sum of:
0.016401293 = weight(_text_:of in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016401293 = score(doc=4750,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Mulkay, M.J.; Gilbert, G.N.; Woolgar, S.: Problem areas and research networks in science (1975)
0.13
0.12508115 = product of:
0.37524346 = sum of:
0.37524346 = weight(_text_:sociology in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.37524346 = score(doc=5771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
1.2304875 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Sociology. 9(1975), S.187-203
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Ahrweiler, P.: In search of a network theory of innovations : relations, positions, and perspectives (2014)
0.12
0.119810276 = product of:
0.17971541 = sum of:
0.16583575 = weight(_text_:sociology in 1531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16583575 = score(doc=1531,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5438038 = fieldWeight in 1531, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1531)
0.013879661 = product of:
0.027759323 = sum of:
0.027759323 = weight(_text_:of in 1531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027759323 = score(doc=1531,freq=44.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.40518725 = fieldWeight in 1531, product of:
6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
44.0 = termFreq=44.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1531)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- As a complement to Nelson and Winter's (1977) article titled "In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation," a sociological perspective on innovation networks can be elaborated using Luhmann's social systems theory, on the one hand, and Latour's "sociology of translations," on the other. Because of a common focus on communication, these perspectives can be combined as a set of methodologies. Latour's sociology of translations specifies a mechanism for generating variation in relations ("associations"), whereas Luhmann's systems perspective enables the specification of (functionally different) selection environments such as markets, professional organizations, and political control. Selection environments can be considered as mechanisms of social coordination that can self-organize-beyond the control of human agency-into regimes in terms of interacting codes of communication. Unlike relatively globalized regimes, technological trajectories are organized locally in "landscapes." A resulting "duality of structure" (Giddens, 1979) between the historical organization of trajectories and evolutionary self-organization at the regime level can be expected to drive innovation cycles. Reflexive translations add a third layer of perspectives to (a) the relational analysis of observable links that shape trajectories and (b) the positional analysis of networks in terms of latent dimensions. These three operations can be studied in a single framework, but using different methodologies. Latour's first-order associations can then be analytically distinguished from second-order translations in terms of requiring other communicative competencies. The resulting operations remain infrareflexively nested, and can therefore be used for innovative reconstructions of previously constructed boundaries.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.11, S.2359-2374
-
Alvarado, R.U.: ¬Una revision critica de la ley de Bradford (1996)
0.12
0.117731646 = product of:
0.17659746 = sum of:
0.16416901 = weight(_text_:sociology in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16416901 = score(doc=835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.53833824 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
0.012428444 = product of:
0.024856888 = sum of:
0.024856888 = weight(_text_:of in 835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024856888 = score(doc=835,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 835, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Bradford's law is widely used in collection development to identify the most productive periodicals, but does nott take into account the variables of frequency of publication and number of years of publication during a particular time span. Hence not all periodicals necessarily have the same opportunity to publish relevant articles. To test this hypothesis, the productivity of American sociology periodicals during 1987-91 was analysed and shown to correlate with frequency of publication and number of years of publication, giving a more accurate representation than using Bradford's law as originally formulated
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: A critical revision of Bradford's law
-
Sutton, B.: Understanding scientific knowledge and communication : library and information science in the undergraduate curriculum (1996)
0.12
0.117731646 = product of:
0.17659746 = sum of:
0.16416901 = weight(_text_:sociology in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16416901 = score(doc=2853,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.53833824 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
0.012428444 = product of:
0.024856888 = sum of:
0.024856888 = weight(_text_:of in 2853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024856888 = score(doc=2853,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 2853, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2853)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Describes an experimental undergraduate seminar on the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge which takes a multidisciplinary approach, using case studies to draw together theoretical principles from library and information science, insights from the philosophy and sociology of science, issues in critical thinking and problem solving, and details on the construction and use of information retrieval systems. Offered as an elective course to juniors and seniors, at the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, the course is designed to meet the needs of students who do not expect to become information professionals but who can benefit from a better understanding of the principles of scientific knowledge production and the cultivation of information retrieval skills
- Source
- Journal of education for library and information science. 37(1996) no.1, S.11-29
-
Braman, S.: ¬The autopoietic state : communication and democratic potential in the net (1994)
0.12
0.117257774 = product of:
0.17588666 = sum of:
0.16416901 = weight(_text_:sociology in 8465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16416901 = score(doc=8465,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.53833824 = fieldWeight in 8465, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8465)
0.01171765 = product of:
0.0234353 = sum of:
0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 8465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0234353 = score(doc=8465,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 8465, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8465)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The relationship between the practice of democracy and the use of new information technologies is dependent upon the technologies of communication and information, rules regarding their use and the nature of the entity making those rules. Since today developments in all three of these areas are turbulent, looks to social theory that deals with turbulence and chaos as a way of understanding the democratic potential in the qualitatively different network society. The literature drawn upon includes second-order cybernetics and chaos theory, organizational sociology, and the literature on the state. The concept of the autopoietic state is developed as a basis for determining appropriate communication policy principles for maximizing the democratic potential in the network environment
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.6, S.358-368
-
Wepsiec, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings pertaining to society (1982)
0.12
0.117257774 = product of:
0.17588666 = sum of:
0.16416901 = weight(_text_:sociology in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16416901 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.53833824 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
0.01171765 = product of:
0.0234353 = sum of:
0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0234353 = score(doc=281,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Seven clusters of headings on three levels of generalization, listed in Library of Congress Subject Headings, 9th edition, representing types of concepts pertaining to the study of society, society itself, and its various types of social units, are analyzed for their hierarchical relationships. Eighty-three headings in the clusters Sociology and Family are found to be overrelated, while 112 headings are underrelated in Social structure. Community, Social institutions. Age groups and social classes. Suggestions are offered for restructuring some hierarchical relationships, and the need for the development of a comprehensive code for establishing headings is emphasized.
-
Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.; Rowland, F.: ¬The citation advantage of open-access articles (2008)
0.12
0.117100105 = product of:
0.17565015 = sum of:
0.16583575 = weight(_text_:sociology in 2374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16583575 = score(doc=2374,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5438038 = fieldWeight in 2374, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2374)
0.009814401 = product of:
0.019628802 = sum of:
0.019628802 = weight(_text_:of in 2374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019628802 = score(doc=2374,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 2374, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2374)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Four subjects - ecology, applied mathematics, sociology, and economics - were selected to assess whether there is a citation advantage between journal articles that have an open-access (OA) version on the Internet compared to those articles that are exclusively toll access (TA). Citations were counted using the Web of Science, and the OA status of articles was determined by searching OAIster, OpenDOAR, Google, and Google Scholar. Of a sample of 4,633 articles examined, 2,280 (49%) were OA and had a mean citation count of 9.04 whereas the mean for TA articles was 5.76. There appears to be a clear citation advantage for those articles that are OA as opposed to those that are TA. This advantage, however, varies between disciplines, with sociology having the highest citation advantage, but the lowest number of OA articles, from the sample taken, and ecology having the highest individual citation count for OA articles, but the smallest citation advantage. Tests of correlation or association between OA status and a number of variables were generally found to weak or inconsistent. The cause of this citation advantage has not been determined.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.12, S.1963-1972
-
Hellqvist, B.: Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis (2010)
0.12
0.11675325 = product of:
0.17512988 = sum of:
0.16416901 = weight(_text_:sociology in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16416901 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.53833824 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
0.010960858 = product of:
0.021921717 = sum of:
0.021921717 = weight(_text_:of in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021921717 = score(doc=3329,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This article studies citation practices in the arts and humanities from a theoretical and conceptual viewpoint, drawing on studies from fields like linguistics, history, library & information science, and the sociology of science. The use of references in the humanities is discussed in connection with the growing interest in the possibilities of applying citation analysis to humanistic disciplines. The study shows how the use of references within the humanities is connected to concepts of originality, to intellectual organization, and to searching and writing. Finally, it is acknowledged that the use of references is connected to stylistic, epistemological, and organizational differences, and these differences must be taken into account when applying citation analysis to humanistic disciplines.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.310-318
-
Cheng, W.-N.; Khoo, C.S.G.: Information structures in sociology research papers : modeling cause-effect and comparison relations in research objective and result statements (2021)
0.12
0.11577663 = product of:
0.17366494 = sum of:
0.16583575 = weight(_text_:sociology in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16583575 = score(doc=387,freq=4.0), product of:
0.30495512 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.5438038 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9606886 = idf(docFreq=113, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
0.007829184 = product of:
0.015658367 = sum of:
0.015658367 = weight(_text_:of in 387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015658367 = score(doc=387,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 387, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=387)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- When writing a research paper, the author has to select information to include in the paper to support various arguments. The information has to be organized and synthesized into a coherent whole through relationships and information structures. There is hardly any research on the information structure of research papers, and how information structure supports rhetorical and argument structures. Thus, this study is focused on information organization in the Abstract and Introduction sections of sociology research papers, analyzing the information structure of research objective, question, hypothesis, and result statements. The study is limited to research papers reporting research that investigated cause-effect relations between two concepts. Two semantic frames were developed to specify the types of information associated with cause-effect and comparison relations, and used as coding schemes to annotate the text for different information types. Six link patterns between the two frames were identified-showing how comparisons are used to support the claim that the cause-effect relation is valid. This study demonstrated how semantic frames can be incorporated in discourse analysis to identify deep structures underlying the argument structure. The results carry implications for the knowledge representation of academic research in knowledge graphs, for semantic relation extraction, and teaching of academic writing.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.11, S.1367-1385
