Search (45 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.1038222 = sum of:
      0.08266668 = product of:
        0.24800003 = sum of:
          0.24800003 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24800003 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.441267 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05204841 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.021155523 = product of:
        0.042311046 = sum of:
          0.042311046 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042311046 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05204841 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Liu, R.-L.: Context recognition for hierarchical text classification (2009) 0.04
    0.04075531 = product of:
      0.08151062 = sum of:
        0.08151062 = sum of:
          0.039199576 = weight(_text_:management in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039199576 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05204841 = queryNorm
              0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
          0.042311046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042311046 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05204841 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information is often organized as a text hierarchy. A hierarchical text-classification system is thus essential for the management, sharing, and dissemination of information. It aims to automatically classify each incoming document into zero, one, or several categories in the text hierarchy. In this paper, we present a technique called CRHTC (context recognition for hierarchical text classification) that performs hierarchical text classification by recognizing the context of discussion (COD) of each category. A category's COD is governed by its ancestor categories, whose contents indicate contextual backgrounds of the category. A document may be classified into a category only if its content matches the category's COD. CRHTC does not require any trials to manually set parameters, and hence is more portable and easier to implement than other methods. It is empirically evaluated under various conditions. The results show that CRHTC achieves both better and more stable performance than several hierarchical and nonhierarchical text-classification methodologies.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:11:54
  3. Kwok, K.L.: ¬The use of titles and cited titles as document representations for automatic classification (1975) 0.02
    0.022866419 = product of:
      0.045732837 = sum of:
        0.045732837 = product of:
          0.091465674 = sum of:
            0.091465674 = weight(_text_:management in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091465674 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 11(1975), S.201-206
  4. Wu, M.; Fuller, M.; Wilkinson, R.: Using clustering and classification approaches in interactive retrieval (2001) 0.02
    0.022866419 = product of:
      0.045732837 = sum of:
        0.045732837 = product of:
          0.091465674 = sum of:
            0.091465674 = weight(_text_:management in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.091465674 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.459-484
  5. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001) 0.02
    0.021155523 = product of:
      0.042311046 = sum of:
        0.042311046 = product of:
          0.08462209 = sum of:
            0.08462209 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08462209 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 14:17:22
  6. Major, R.L.; Ragsdale, C.T.: ¬An aggregation approach to the classification problem using multiple prediction experts (2000) 0.02
    0.019599788 = product of:
      0.039199576 = sum of:
        0.039199576 = product of:
          0.07839915 = sum of:
            0.07839915 = weight(_text_:management in 3789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07839915 = score(doc=3789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 3789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.4, S.683-696
  7. Krellenstein, M.: Document classification at Northern Light (1999) 0.02
    0.019599788 = product of:
      0.039199576 = sum of:
        0.039199576 = product of:
          0.07839915 = sum of:
            0.07839915 = weight(_text_:management in 4435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07839915 = score(doc=4435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag bei: Search engines and beyond: developing efficient knowledge management systems; 1999 Search engine Meeting, Boston, MA, April 19-20 1999
  8. Savic, D.: Designing an expert system for classifying office documents (1994) 0.02
    0.018478857 = product of:
      0.036957715 = sum of:
        0.036957715 = product of:
          0.07391543 = sum of:
            0.07391543 = weight(_text_:management in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07391543 = score(doc=2655,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.42132655 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Can records management benefit from artificial intelligence technology, in particular from expert systems? Gives an answer to this question by showing an example of a small scale prototype project in automatic classification of office documents. Project methodology and basic elements of an expert system's approach are elaborated to give guidelines to potential users of this promising technology
    Source
    Records management quarterly. 28(1994) no.3, S.20-29
  9. HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016) 0.02
    0.017629603 = product of:
      0.035259206 = sum of:
        0.035259206 = product of:
          0.07051841 = sum of:
            0.07051841 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07051841 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  10. Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Herrero Solana, V.: Document organization using Kohonen's algorithm (2002) 0.01
    0.013066526 = product of:
      0.026133051 = sum of:
        0.026133051 = product of:
          0.052266102 = sum of:
            0.052266102 = weight(_text_:management in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052266102 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.1, S.79-89
  11. Bock, H.-H.: Datenanalyse zur Strukturierung und Ordnung von Information (1989) 0.01
    0.012340722 = product of:
      0.024681443 = sum of:
        0.024681443 = product of:
          0.049362887 = sum of:
            0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049362887 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  12. Dubin, D.: Dimensions and discriminability (1998) 0.01
    0.012340722 = product of:
      0.024681443 = sum of:
        0.024681443 = product of:
          0.049362887 = sum of:
            0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 2338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049362887 = score(doc=2338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2338)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  13. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01
    0.012340722 = product of:
      0.024681443 = sum of:
        0.024681443 = product of:
          0.049362887 = sum of:
            0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049362887 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  14. Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006) 0.01
    0.012340722 = product of:
      0.024681443 = sum of:
        0.024681443 = product of:
          0.049362887 = sum of:
            0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049362887 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:24:52
  15. Yi, K.: Automatic text classification using library classification schemes : trends, issues and challenges (2007) 0.01
    0.012340722 = product of:
      0.024681443 = sum of:
        0.024681443 = product of:
          0.049362887 = sum of:
            0.049362887 = weight(_text_:22 in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049362887 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 18:31:54
  16. Savic, D.: Automatic classification of office documents : review of available methods and techniques (1995) 0.01
    0.011433209 = product of:
      0.022866419 = sum of:
        0.022866419 = product of:
          0.045732837 = sum of:
            0.045732837 = weight(_text_:management in 2219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045732837 = score(doc=2219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.3-18
  17. Losee, R.M.: Text windows and phrases differing by discipline, location in document, and syntactic structure (1996) 0.01
    0.011433209 = product of:
      0.022866419 = sum of:
        0.022866419 = product of:
          0.045732837 = sum of:
            0.045732837 = weight(_text_:management in 6962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045732837 = score(doc=6962,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 6962, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 32(1996) no.6, S.747-767
  18. Miyamoto, S.: Information clustering based an fuzzy multisets (2003) 0.01
    0.011433209 = product of:
      0.022866419 = sum of:
        0.022866419 = product of:
          0.045732837 = sum of:
            0.045732837 = weight(_text_:management in 1071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045732837 = score(doc=1071,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1071, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 39(2003) no.2, S.195-213
  19. Hu, G.; Zhou, S.; Guan, J.; Hu, X.: Towards effective document clustering : a constrained K-means based approach (2008) 0.01
    0.011433209 = product of:
      0.022866419 = sum of:
        0.022866419 = product of:
          0.045732837 = sum of:
            0.045732837 = weight(_text_:management in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045732837 = score(doc=2113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17543502 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.4, S.1397-1409
  20. Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2009) 0.01
    0.010577762 = product of:
      0.021155523 = sum of:
        0.021155523 = product of:
          0.042311046 = sum of:
            0.042311046 = weight(_text_:22 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042311046 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18226467 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05204841 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 19:51:28

Years

Languages

  • e 40
  • d 4