Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Oppenheim, C."
  1. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The legal problems associated with electronic copyright management systems (1996) 0.06
    0.059271935 = product of:
      0.20745176 = sum of:
        0.07189624 = weight(_text_:management in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07189624 = score(doc=5056,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.51601756 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
        0.13555552 = weight(_text_:europe in 5056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13555552 = score(doc=5056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 5056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5056)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines existing treaties and legislation relating to copyright such as the Berne Convention, the Unfair Contract Terms Act and the concept of fair dealing. Assesses the role of Electronic Copyright Management Systems (ECMS) in protecting holders of rights; their relationship to the law in the UK, USA, and Europe; and their value in providing an agreed framework between libraries, users and publishers, so that the concept of the 'electronic' library can become a reality
    Source
    Information management report. 1996, May, S.11-16
  2. Oppenheim, C.: Intellectual property : legal and other issues (1997) 0.03
    0.030961724 = product of:
      0.10836603 = sum of:
        0.031131983 = weight(_text_:management in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031131983 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
        0.077234045 = sum of:
          0.043630954 = weight(_text_:studies in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043630954 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
          0.033603087 = weight(_text_:22 in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033603087 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The rapidly increasing volume and variety of electronic or digitized information sources and their accessibility worldwide, have brought to the surface new issues concerning intellectual property, the complexity of the related legal questions and application of legislative measures in real world situations. Attemps to define 'intellectual property' from different points of view; considers the different types with different 'strengths' of protection, and the underlying objectives of such protection. Discusses copyright and international treaties on intellectual property, what is protected and for how long, the concept of fair use and the role of organizations concerned with reproduction rights. Presents a brief overview of the intellectual property questions relating to electronic media: machine readable databases, the information resources on the Internet, and images; electrocopying and downloading of texts and images from networks; and the special nature and copyright problems of multimedia. Also considers moral rights and the need for and feasibility of establishing Electronic Copyright Management System (ECMS)
    Source
    Information studies. 3(1997) no.1, S.5-22
  3. Grainger-Smith, N.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The role of information systems and technology (IS/IT) in investment banks (1994) 0.03
    0.030539105 = product of:
      0.10688686 = sum of:
        0.05392218 = weight(_text_:management in 957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05392218 = score(doc=957,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 957, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=957)
        0.052964687 = weight(_text_:case in 957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052964687 = score(doc=957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29144385 = fieldWeight in 957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=957)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the role of information systems and information technology (IT) within investment banks, based upon a survey of the literature and a small scale case study. Considers whether investment banks receive value for money from their investment in IT, and ways in which IT can be evaluated for its contribution to profitability. Concludes that failure to implement techniques for systematically identifying and qualifying IT costs and benefits has mede it difficult for them to determine the level of added value resulting from such investment and the contribution of IT towards the bottom line. Considers also what role technology plays in the strategic management process and concludes that it is essential to incorporate both information and IT strategy into the strategic management process, to ensue that IT is cooncentrated in those areas in which it cann add most value. Finally, considers the potential for deriving competitive advantage from IT
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  4. Oppenheim, C.: National information policies and the need for a coalition for public information (1996) 0.03
    0.028032223 = product of:
      0.09811278 = sum of:
        0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036320645 = score(doc=4859,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
        0.061792135 = weight(_text_:case in 4859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061792135 = score(doc=4859,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 4859, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4859)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Defines a national information policy, identifying 6 component areas. Describes some specific aspects of government action that can be used as a test of commitment to an national information policy. Suggests support for electronic information industries is one of the key methods by which a government can influence information policy, citing the case of the USA as an example. More specifically, considers freedom of information, and policy towards public and national libraries. Argues for the creation of a Coalition for Public Information in each major country, to provide a forum where members of the information community can participate in public policy discussions about technical, economic and social questions arising from the use of information derived from the new electronic communication and information delivery technologies
    Source
    Information management report. 1996, Mar., S.7-13
  5. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic copyright and the law librarian (1994) 0.02
    0.019365076 = product of:
      0.13555552 = sum of:
        0.13555552 = weight(_text_:europe in 759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13555552 = score(doc=759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.25178367 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.5383809 = fieldWeight in 759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=759)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Covers issues concerned with copyright in machine readable records such as electronic databases and their usage. computer software and electrocopying. Considers the position regarding copyright in abstracts, and whether online databases can be considered literary works. Highlights some key court cases concerning database and compilation copyright in both the US and Europe. Notes the complex copyright implications of multimedia information delivery, and particular concerns over the copying and piracy of computer software. A European directive on database copyright is in preparation
  6. Zuccala, A.; Thelwall, M.; Oppenheim, C.; Dhiensa, R.: Web intelligence analyses of digital libraries : a case study of the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH) (2007) 0.02
    0.018422639 = product of:
      0.06447923 = sum of:
        0.049935583 = weight(_text_:case in 838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049935583 = score(doc=838,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.2747759 = fieldWeight in 838, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=838)
        0.014543652 = product of:
          0.029087303 = sum of:
            0.029087303 = weight(_text_:studies in 838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029087303 = score(doc=838,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.17634688 = fieldWeight in 838, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=838)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the use of LexiURL as a Web intelligence tool for collecting and analysing links to digital libraries, focusing specifically on the National electronic Library for Health (NeLH). Design/methodology/approach - The Web intelligence techniques in this study are a combination of link analysis (web structure mining), web server log file analysis (web usage mining), and text analysis (web content mining), utilizing the power of commercial search engines and drawing upon the information science fields of bibliometrics and webometrics. LexiURL is a computer program designed to calculate summary statistics for lists of links or URLs. Its output is a series of standard reports, for example listing and counting all of the different domain names in the data. Findings - Link data, when analysed together with user transaction log files (i.e. Web referring domains) can provide insights into who is using a digital library and when, and who could be using the digital library if they are "surfing" a particular part of the Web; in this case any site that is linked to or colinked with the NeLH. This study found that the NeLH was embedded in a multifaceted Web context, including many governmental, educational, commercial and organisational sites, with the most interesting being sites from the.edu domain, representing American Universities. Not many links directed to the NeLH were followed on September 25, 2005 (the date of the log file analysis and link extraction analysis), which means that users who access the digital library have been arriving at the site via only a few select links, bookmarks and search engine searches, or non-electronic sources. Originality/value - A number of studies concerning digital library users have been carried out using log file analysis as a research tool. Log files focus on real-time user transactions; while LexiURL can be used to extract links and colinks associated with a digital library's growing Web network. This Web network is not recognized often enough, and can be a useful indication of where potential users are surfing, even if they have not yet specifically visited the NeLH site.
  7. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The implications of copyright legislation for electronic access to journal collections (1994) 0.02
    0.018260393 = product of:
      0.06391137 = sum of:
        0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04150931 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
        0.02240206 = product of:
          0.04480412 = sum of:
            0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 7245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480412 = score(doc=7245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Journal of document and text management. 2(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  8. Oppenheim, C.: Recent EC initiatives on copyright (1993) 0.01
    0.010377328 = product of:
      0.07264129 = sum of:
        0.07264129 = weight(_text_:management in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07264129 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1993, Feb., S.9-13
  9. Norris, M.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬The h-index : a broad review of a new bibliometric indicator (2010) 0.01
    0.00919453 = product of:
      0.06436171 = sum of:
        0.06436171 = sum of:
          0.03635913 = weight(_text_:studies in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03635913 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.22043361 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
          0.028002575 = weight(_text_:22 in 4147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028002575 = score(doc=4147,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.041336425 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4147, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4147)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This review aims to show, broadly, how the h-index has become a subject of widespread debate, how it has spawned many variants and diverse applications since first introduced in 2005 and some of the issues in its use. Design/methodology/approach - The review drew on a range of material published in 1990 or so sources published since 2005. From these sources, a number of themes were identified and discussed ranging from the h-index's advantages to which citation database might be selected for its calculation. Findings - The analysis shows how the h-index has quickly established itself as a major subject of interest in the field of bibliometrics. Study of the index ranges from its mathematical underpinning to a range of variants perceived to address the indexes' shortcomings. The review illustrates how widely the index has been applied but also how care must be taken in its application. Originality/value - The use of bibliometric indicators to measure research performance continues, with the h-index as its latest addition. The use of the h-index, its variants and many applications to which it has been put are still at the exploratory stage. The review shows the breadth and diversity of this research and the need to verify the veracity of the h-index by more studies.
    Date
    8. 1.2011 19:22:13
  10. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic copyright (1993) 0.01
    0.007412377 = product of:
      0.051886637 = sum of:
        0.051886637 = weight(_text_:management in 6087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051886637 = score(doc=6087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 6087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6087)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1993, Jan., S.9-14
  11. Oppenheim, C.: ¬The applications of virtual reality : pt.1.2 (1993) 0.01
    0.007412377 = product of:
      0.051886637 = sum of:
        0.051886637 = weight(_text_:management in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051886637 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1993, Nov., S. - , Dec., S.10-14
  12. Oppenheim, C.: Managers' use and handling of information (1997) 0.01
    0.006289611 = product of:
      0.044027276 = sum of:
        0.044027276 = weight(_text_:management in 357) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044027276 = score(doc=357,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 357, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=357)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    International journal of information management. 17(1997) no.4, S.239-248
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  13. Oppenheim, C.: Document delivery and electronic copyright : what is copyright? (1995) 0.01
    0.0059299017 = product of:
      0.04150931 = sum of:
        0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 1703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04150931 = score(doc=1703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.041336425 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1703)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1995, March, S.1-6
  14. Oppenheim, C.; Morris, A.; McKnight, C.: ¬The evaluation of WWW search engines (2000) 0.00
    0.0044073923 = product of:
      0.030851744 = sum of:
        0.030851744 = product of:
          0.06170349 = sum of:
            0.06170349 = weight(_text_:studies in 4546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06170349 = score(doc=4546,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 4546, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4546)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The literature of the evaluation of Internet search engines is reviewed. Although there have been many studies, there has been little consistency in the way such studies have been carried out. This problem is exacerbated by the fact that recall is virtually impossible to calculate in the fast changing Internet environment, and therefore the traditional Cranfield type of evaluation is not usually possible. A variety of alternative evaluation methods has been suggested to overcome this difficulty. The authors recommend that a standardised set of tools is developed for the evaluation of web search engines so that, in future, comparisons can be made between search engines more effectively, and that variations in performance of any given search engine over time can be tracked. The paper itself does not provide such a standard set of tools, but it investigates the issues and makes preliminary recommendations of the types of tools needed
  15. Oppenheim, C.: Using the h-Index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship (2007) 0.00
    0.0044073923 = product of:
      0.030851744 = sum of:
        0.030851744 = product of:
          0.06170349 = sum of:
            0.06170349 = weight(_text_:studies in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06170349 = score(doc=780,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.37408823 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The recently developed h-index has been applied to the literature produced by senior British-based academics in librarianship and information science. The majority of those evaluated currently hold senior positions in UK information science and librarianship departments; however, a small number of staff in other departments and retired "founding fathers" were analyzed as well. The analysis was carried out using the Web of Science (Thomson Scientific, Philadelphia, PA) for the years from 1992 to October 2005, and included both secondauthored papers and self-citations. The top-ranking British information scientist, Peter Willett, has an h-index of 31. However, it was found that Eugene Garfield, the founder of modern citation studies, has an even higher h-index of 36. These results support other studies suggesting that the h-index is a useful tool in the armory of bibliometrics.
  16. Oppenheim, C.: Do citations count? : Citation indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) (1996) 0.00
    0.0041553294 = product of:
      0.029087303 = sum of:
        0.029087303 = product of:
          0.058174606 = sum of:
            0.058174606 = weight(_text_:studies in 6673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058174606 = score(doc=6673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 6673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Citations are used to illustrate or elaborate on a point, or to criticize. Citation studies, based on ISI's citation indexes, can help evaluate scientific research, while impact factors aid libraries in deciding which journals to cancel or purchase. Suggests that citiation counts can replace the costly RAE in assessing the research output of university departments
  17. Eager, C.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬An observational method for undertaking user needs studies (1996) 0.00
    0.003672827 = product of:
      0.025709787 = sum of:
        0.025709787 = product of:
          0.051419575 = sum of:
            0.051419575 = weight(_text_:studies in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051419575 = score(doc=3671,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.3117402 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The study of information needs has long be acknowlegded as one of the most important factors in the design of information services but has been hampered by the severe problem of designing user studies that will reliably measure them. Reviews the literature of previous research in this field, concluding that time and money are the chief constraints on information seeking behaviour. Describes a new observational technique for identifying the information needs of users and reports results of a small scale experiment to test the methodology. The observational technique involves the researcher being with the subject continuously throughout the day and observing their actions. The behaviour recorded was any action taken in order to answer a question. A small scale study was undertaken of 3 academics from the Psychology Department, University of Strathclyde, using the observational technique. The preferred technique of all the academics was to carry out their own research, followed by consultation with other individuals. One lecturer was a significantly heavier user of electronic media than the other two. The preferred physical locations of the information sources were personal collections and the University Library. One lecturer consistently used a wide range of sources while the other two strongly preferred to use personal contacts. Informal sources were found to be twice as popular as formal sources. A follow up questionnaire survey examined the possibility that previous training in the use of the library could explain the differences in the use of electronic information sources but results were found to be negative. Concludes that the new research tool developed for this type of study is both robust and likely to yield reliable information about user information needs
  18. Oppenheim, C.: ¬An agenda for action to achieve the information society in the UK (1996) 0.00
    0.0032002942 = product of:
      0.02240206 = sum of:
        0.02240206 = product of:
          0.04480412 = sum of:
            0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 7670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04480412 = score(doc=7670,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7670, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7670)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.6, S.407-421
  19. Baird, L.M.; Oppenheim, C.: Do citations matter? (1994) 0.00
    0.0031164968 = product of:
      0.021815477 = sum of:
        0.021815477 = product of:
          0.043630954 = sum of:
            0.043630954 = weight(_text_:studies in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043630954 = score(doc=6896,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.26452032 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Citation indexes are based on the principle of authors citing previous articles of relevance. The paper demonstrates the long history of citing for precedent and notes how ISI's citation indexes differ from 'Shephards Citations'. The paper analyses some of the criticisms of citations counting, and some of the uses for which citation analysis has been employed. The paper also examines the idea of the development of an Acknowledgement Index, and concludes such an index is unlikely to be commercially viable. The paper describes a citation study of Eugene Garfield, and concludes that he may be the most heavily cited information scientist, that he is a heavy self-citer, and that the reasons why other authors cite Garfield are different from the reasons why he cites himself. The paper concludes that citation studies remain a valid methgod of analysis of individuals', institutions', or journals' impact, but need to be used with caution and in conjunction with other measures
  20. Oppenheim, C.: Electronic scholarly publishing and open access (2009) 0.00
    0.0024002206 = product of:
      0.016801544 = sum of:
        0.016801544 = product of:
          0.033603087 = sum of:
            0.033603087 = weight(_text_:22 in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033603087 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041336425 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    8. 7.2010 19:22:45